AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3NCT04345367

Study of Abrocitinib Compared With Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy

A Phase 3 study testing Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 151 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
727 participants
Where
151 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
11 Jun 2020to 13 Jul 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Diagnosis of chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 6 months
  • Moderate to severe AD (BSA at least 10%, IGA at least 3, EASI at least 16, and PP-NRS severity score at least 4)
  • Recent history of inadequate response to treatment with medicated topical therapy for AD, or who have required systemic therapies for control of their disease

Who cannot join

  • Acute or chronic medical or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation
  • Have increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism
  • Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
  • Prior treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors or IL-4 or IL-13 antagonists including dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab
  • Other active non-AD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
  • Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or platelet dysfunction, malignancies, current or history of certain infections, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use contraception

Trial locations and contacts

151 sites in 15 countries.

151 sites in 15 countries

United States49 sites
  • Total Skin & Beauty Dermatology Center, PC

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35205

  • Clinical Research Center Of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Skin Care Research, LLC

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • MetroBoston Clinical Partners, LLC

    Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135

  • Avant Research Associates, LLC

    Crowley, Louisiana, 70526

  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • Onyx Clinical Research

    Flint, Michigan, 48507

  • Linden Road Imaging Center

    Flint, Michigan, 48532

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Center for Clinical Studies, LTD. LLP

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Olympian Clinical Research

    Largo, Florida, 33770

  • Vivida Dermatology

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148

  • Ark Clinical Research

    Long Beach, California, 90806

  • Beach Allergy and Asthma Specialty Group, A Medical Corporation

    Long Beach, California, 90808

  • Wallace Medical Group, Inc

    Los Angeles, California, 90056

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Miami Dermatology & Laser Research, LLC

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • International Clinical Research - Tennessee LLC

    Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130

  • One Health Research Clinic

    Norcross, Georgia, 30093

  • Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC

    Normal, Illinois, 61761

  • Skin Specialists, PC

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

    Orlando, Florida, 32801

  • Accel Research Sites - Pure Skin Dermatology & Aesthetics

    Orlando, Florida, 32819

  • Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

  • Paddington Testing Co, Inc.

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • Alliance Dermatology & MOHS Center, PC

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Empire Clinical Research

    Pomona, California, 91767

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • Boice-Willis Clinic, PA

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • Regional Medical Imaging, P.C. ( Local X-Ray)

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48067

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • MedDerm Associates

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • University of California San Diego Dermatology

    San Diego, California, 92122

  • University Clinical Trials Inc.

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Synergy Dermatology

    San Francisco, California, 94132

  • Wolverine Clinical Trials, Llc

    Santa Ana, California, 92705

  • Clinical Science Institute

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Carolina Research Center, Inc.

    Shelby, North Carolina, 28150

  • The South Bend Clinic Center for Research

    South Bend, Indiana, 46617

  • Acclaim Dermatology, PLLC

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77479

  • Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Olympian Clinical Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Revival Research Institute, LLC

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • Jordan Valley Dermatology Center

    West Jordan, Utah, 84088

  • Integrated Clinical Research

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406

Other trials in United States

Canada21 sites
  • Dermatology Research Institute

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J7E1

  • Intermed groupe santé

    Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 7Y8

  • Alberta DermaSurgery Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G1C3

  • Kingsway Clinical Research

    Etobicoke, Ontario, M8X 1Y9

  • Medicor Research Inc

    Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3A 1W8

  • Sudbury Skin Clinique

    Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3C 1X8

  • DermEffects

    London, Ontario, N6H 5L5

  • Lynderm Research Inc.

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2

  • DermEdge Research

    Mississauga, Ontario, L5H 1G9

  • North Bay Dermatology Centre

    North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7

  • The Centre for Clinical Trials

    Oakville, Ontario, L6J 7W5

  • Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre

    Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2

  • SKiN Centre for Dermatology

    Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2

  • Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4x7

  • Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis

    Québec, G1W4R4

  • CARE Clinic Ltd

    Red Deer, Alberta, T4P-1K4

  • The Centre for Dermatology

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5

  • Karma Clinical Trials, Inc.

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3

  • Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Toronto Research Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M3H5Y8

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

Poland20 sites
  • NZOZ Specjalistyczny Osrodek Dermatologiczny DERMAL s.c.

    Bialystok, 15-453

  • DERMAPOLIS Medical Dermatology Center

    Chorzów, 41-500

  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

    Gdansk, 80-214

  • MCBK

    Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 05-825

  • Care Clinic Centrum Medyczne

    Katowice, 40-568

  • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Centrum Medyczne Promed

    Krakow, 31-513

  • Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J.M. Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna

    Lodz, 90-242

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "DERMED" Centrum Medyczne

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Dermedic Jacek Zdybski

    Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400

  • Gabinety Lekarskie Rivermed

    Poznan, 61-441

  • Spolka Cywilna Andrzej Krolicki, Tomasz Kochanowski, ,,Laser Clinic"

    Szczecin, 70-332

  • Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecinskie Centrum Medyczne

    Szczecin, 71-434

  • Medycyna Kliniczna

    Warsaw, 00-874

  • MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.

    Warsaw, 02-106

  • Carpe Diem Centrum Medycyny Estetycznej

    Warsaw, 02-661

  • EMC Instytut Medyczny S.A. Przychodnia przy ul. Lowieckiej

    Wroclaw, 50-220

  • Cityclinic Przychodnia Lekarsko Psychologiczna Matusiak Spółka Partnerska

    Wroclaw, 50-566

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, 52-416

  • Kliniczny Oddzial Chorob Wewnetrznych, Dermatologii i Alergologii

    Zabrze, 41-800

Other trials in Poland

Germany10 sites
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Klinikum Bielefeld Rosenhöhe

    Bielefeld, 33647

  • Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH

    Dresden, 01069

  • IKF Pneumologie GmbH & Co KG

    Frankfurt am Main, 60596

  • SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH

    Gera, 07548

  • Studienzentrum Dr. med. Beate Schwarz

    Langenau, 89129

  • SIBAmed GmbH

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck

    Lübeck, 23538

  • Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Quist

    Mainz, 55128

  • University of Muenster

    Münster, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Australia8 sites
  • Box Hill Hospital

    Box Hill, Victoria, 3128

  • Emeritus Research

    Camberwell, Victoria, 3124

  • Skin Health Institute Inc.

    Carlton, Victoria, 3053

  • Sinclair Dermatology

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • St George Dermatology and Skin Cancer Centre

    Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217

  • Melbourne Health Radiology

    Pakrville, Victoria, 3050

  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, Victoria, 3050

  • Royal North Shore Hospital

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Chile8 sites
  • Medicien

    Las Condes, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7580150

  • MIRES (M Y F Estudios Clinicos Limitada)

    Nunoa, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7750495

  • Vida lntegra

    Nunoa, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7750495

  • Centro Radiologico Plaza Baquedano

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7500906

  • Centro Medico SkinMed Limitada

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7580206

  • Clínica Dermacross S.A.

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7640881

  • Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8380456

  • Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos - CIEC

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8420383

Other trials in Chile

Slovakia6 sites
  • SUMMIT CLINICAL RESEARCH, s.r.o.

    Bratislava, 831 01

  • SKINKLINIK s.r.o

    Bratislava, 83103

  • BeneDerma s.r.o.

    Bratislava, 841 02

  • Derma therapy spol. s.r.o.

    Bratislava, 851 01

  • Dermatovenerologicka ambulancia

    Nové Zámky, 940 34

  • SANARE spol.s.r.o.

    Svidník, 089 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Bulgaria5 sites
  • MHAT Dobrich AD

    Dobrich, 9300

  • MC Asklepii OOD

    Dupnitsa, 2600

  • DCC Alexandrovska EOOD

    Sofia, 1431

  • DCC Fokus-5 - Medical Establishment for Outpatient Care EOOD

    Sofia, 1463

  • Military Medical Academy MHAT Sofia

    Sofia, 1606

Other trials in Bulgaria

South Korea5 sites
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital

    Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355

  • Chonnam National University Hospital

    Gwangju, 61469

  • The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital

    Incheon, 21431

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

  • Chung-Ang University Hospital

    Seoul, 06973

Other trials in South Korea

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Centro de Especialidades Mollabao (Area Sanitaria de Pontevedra e O Salnes)

    Pontevedra, 36001

  • Hospital de Montecelo

    Pontevedra, 36071

Other trials in Spain

Hungary4 sites
  • Clinexpert Kft.

    Budapest, 1033

  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Trial Pharma Kft.

    Kaposvár, 7400

  • Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ

    Szeged, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Finland3 sites
  • Terveystalo Tampere

    Tampere, 33100

  • Mehiläinen Neo

    Turku, 20520

  • Turun yliopistollinen keskussairaala

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Latvia3 sites
  • Health Centre 4 Ltd. Diagnostics Centre

    Riga, LV-1003

  • LLC J.Kisis

    Riga, LV-1003

  • Outpatient Clinic of Ventspils

    Ventspils, LV-3601

Other trials in Latvia

Taiwan3 sites
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 23561

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, Taiwan (r.o.c), 11217

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 100

Other trials in Taiwan

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3B RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, ACTIVE CONTROLLED MULTI-CENTER STUDY ASSESSING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ABROCITINIB COMPARED WITH DUPILUMAB IN ADULT PARTICIPANTS ON BACKGROUND TOPICAL THERAPY WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS

This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult participants on background topical therapy, with moderate to severe AD. The treatment duration is 26 weeks. A total of approximately 600 participants will be enrolled from approximately 220 sites globally. Approximately 600 participants will be randomly assigned to study intervention. There are primary efficacy assessments at Week 2 and Week 4, and a key secondary efficacy assessment at Week 16. Efficacy and safety endpoints will be assessed throughout the entire study. Exploratory endpoints related to hand eczema efficacy will be assessed throughout the study.

Being tested
Abrocitinib 200 mg, Dupilumab 300 mg
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, eczema, JAK, janus kinase
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Abrocitinib 200 mgDrug

    Abrocitinib 200 mg administered as two 100 mg tablets to be taken orally once daily for 26 weeks. Placebo injections will be administered every other week for 24 weeks.

  • Dupilumab 300 mgCombination product

    Dupilumab 300 mg administered as a single subcutaneous injection every other week for 24 weeks (2 injections on day 1). Placebo tablets will be administered daily.

Study groups in NCT04345367
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Abrocitinib 200 mg plus placebo injectionExperimentalAbrocitinib 200 mg daily through Week 26, plus placebo injections every other week through Week 24
Receives: Drug: Abrocitinib 200 mg
Dupilumab 300 mg plus placebo tabletsActive comparatorDupilumab 300 mg every other week (2 injections on Day 1) through Week 24, plus placebo tablets daily through Week 26
Receives: Combination Product: Dupilumab 300 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) From Baseline at Week 2

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to atopic dermatitis (AD) was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Week 2

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 90% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) Response at Week 4

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 4

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Week 16

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Weeks 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI-75) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and >=2 Points Improvement From Baseline up to Week 26

    IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, except any residual discoloration (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and/or hypopigmentation); 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Days 2 to 15

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  7. Time to Achieve >=4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4)

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 30

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage (%) Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    The extent (%) to which a body region was involved with AD was determined using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Four body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin/genitals) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Total number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual was derived as sum of % BSA across all 4 body regions and ranged from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    SCORAD is a scoring index for AD which combined extent (A), severity (B) and subjective symptoms (C). For A, a rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region was added to determine A (range: 0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema/papulation; oozing/crusting; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3); severity scores were added to give B (range: 0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analog scale (VAS) where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss were added to give 'C' (range: 0-20). SCORAD total score was calculated as: A/5+7*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  10. Change From Baseline in Total Anxiety Score Measured Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 12,16 and 26

    HADS was a validated 14-item questionnaire to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, each of which comprised of 7 items. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicated more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assessed state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-A total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicated greater severity of anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26

  11. Change From Baseline in Total Depression Score Measured Using the HADS at Week 12,16 and 26

    HADS was a validated 14-item questionnaire to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, each of which comprised of 7 items. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicated more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-D assessed the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicated greater severity of depression symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26

  12. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measured the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  13. Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12, 16 and 26

    The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consisted of six questions used to calculate a health utility score. There were two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a VAS that measured health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state on a vertical VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26

  14. Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 12, 16 and 26

    POEM was a 7-item participant reported outcome measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item was scored as: no days=0, 1-2 days=1, 3-4 days=2, 5-6 days=3 and every day=4. The item scores were added to provide a total score ranging from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26

  15. Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep Scale) at Week 12, 16 and 26

    The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item measure that is segregated into subscales addressing seven sleep domains (i.e. sleep disturbance, snoring, short of breath or headache, adequacy of sleep, somnolence, sleep problems index I and sleep problems index II). An additional single item assessed quantity of sleep. Each of the sleep domains were scored on a range of 0 to 100, and higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The quantity of sleep scores ranged from 0 to 24 (number of hours slept). Change from baseline scores for each individual sleep domain and quantity of sleep are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26

  16. Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    The skin pain NRS was a participant reported outcome where participants were asked to rate the "worst skin pain" in the past 24 hours on a 11-point scale from 0=no skin pain to 10=worst skin pain imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse pain.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

  17. Medicated Topical Background Therapy-free Days

    Medicated topical background therapy-free days was defined as number of days where a participant maintained a response of EASI-90 or greater without the use of medicated topical background therapy.

    Measured: Day 1 up to Week 26

  18. Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Points Improvement From Baseline in DLQI at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

    DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measured the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Measured: Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2020
  2. Study start11 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion13 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion13 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
727 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04345367
Sponsor's protocol ID
B7451050
Other IDs
2019-004013-13, 2019
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
27 Mar 2020
Last updated
8 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Weidinger S, Reich K, Issa N, Hong HC, Bunick CG, Biswas P, Chan G, Guler E, Watkins M, Alderfer J. Abrocitinib Achieves Early and Complete/Near-Complete Skin Clearance Plus Itch-Free State in Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Pooled Post Hoc Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Aug;16(8):4217-4225. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01833-8. Epub 2026 Jun 27.

    PubMed 42365219
  • Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Farooqui SA, Chan G, Biswas P, Guler E. Efficacy and Safety of Variable-Dose Versus Continuous-Dose Abrocitinib Treatment in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pooled Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01778-y. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42162528
  • Yosipovitch G, Gooderham MJ, Elmariah SB, Bonfanti G, Edwards RA, Gregoriou S, Biswas P, Myers DE, Alderfer J, Guler E, Koulias C. Itch Relief and Quality-of-Life Improvement with Abrocitinib and Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of JADE COMPARE and JADE DARE. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026 Jul;27(4):819-830. doi: 10.1007/s40257-026-01030-5. Epub 2026 May 5.

    PubMed 42084697
  • Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Geng B, Carrascosa JM, Bieber T, Brunner PM, Staumont-Salle D, Ji C, Biswas P, Feeney C, Hernandez-Martin I, Rebollo Laserna FJ, Koppensteiner H. Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis? Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3391-3407. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w. Epub 2025 Sep 23.

    PubMed 40987931
  • Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Pink AE, Weidinger S, Chan G, Biswas P, Clibborn C, Guler E. Switching from Dupilumab to Abrocitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy After Treatment With Dupilumab in JADE DARE. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Feb;15(2):367-380. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01320-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

    PubMed 39903335
  • Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Comparing how well abrocitinib and dupilumab treat atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms: a plain language summary. Immunotherapy. 2023 Sep;15(13):975-980. doi: 10.2217/imt-2022-0306. Epub 2023 May 31.

    PubMed 37254941
  • Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 23;400(10348):273-282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01199-0.

    PubMed 35871814

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 151 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 151 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Germany, Australia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) From Baseline at Week 2 (time frame: Week 2). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04345367, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in