Atopic DermatitisPhase 3NCT04345367
Study of Abrocitinib Compared With Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 151 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 727 participants
- Where
- 151 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2020to 13 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Diagnosis of chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 6 months
- Moderate to severe AD (BSA at least 10%, IGA at least 3, EASI at least 16, and PP-NRS severity score at least 4)
- Recent history of inadequate response to treatment with medicated topical therapy for AD, or who have required systemic therapies for control of their disease
Who cannot join
- Acute or chronic medical or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation
- Have increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism
- Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
- Prior treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors or IL-4 or IL-13 antagonists including dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab
- Other active non-AD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
- Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or platelet dysfunction, malignancies, current or history of certain infections, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use contraception
Trial locations and contacts
151 sites in 15 countries.
151 sites in 15 countries
United States49 sites
Total Skin & Beauty Dermatology Center, PC
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Clinical Research Center Of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Skin Care Research, LLC
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
MetroBoston Clinical Partners, LLC
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Avant Research Associates, LLC
Crowley, Louisiana, 70526
Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey
East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520
Onyx Clinical Research
Flint, Michigan, 48507
Linden Road Imaging Center
Flint, Michigan, 48532
Hamzavi Dermatology
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Center for Clinical Studies, LTD. LLP
Houston, Texas, 77004
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Olympian Clinical Research
Largo, Florida, 33770
Vivida Dermatology
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Ark Clinical Research
Long Beach, California, 90806
Beach Allergy and Asthma Specialty Group, A Medical Corporation
Long Beach, California, 90808
Wallace Medical Group, Inc
Los Angeles, California, 90056
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Miami Dermatology & Laser Research, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33173
International Clinical Research - Tennessee LLC
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130
One Health Research Clinic
Norcross, Georgia, 30093
Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Skin Specialists, PC
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
Orlando, Florida, 32801
Accel Research Sites - Pure Skin Dermatology & Aesthetics
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Paddington Testing Co, Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
Alliance Dermatology & MOHS Center, PC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Empire Clinical Research
Pomona, California, 91767
Oregon Medical Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97223
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Boice-Willis Clinic, PA
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804
Regional Medical Imaging, P.C. ( Local X-Ray)
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48067
Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
MedDerm Associates
San Diego, California, 92103
University of California San Diego Dermatology
San Diego, California, 92122
University Clinical Trials Inc.
San Diego, California, 92123
Synergy Dermatology
San Francisco, California, 94132
Wolverine Clinical Trials, Llc
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Clinical Science Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Carolina Research Center, Inc.
Shelby, North Carolina, 28150
The South Bend Clinic Center for Research
South Bend, Indiana, 46617
Acclaim Dermatology, PLLC
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Olympian Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Revival Research Institute, LLC
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Dundee Dermatology
West Dundee, Illinois, 60118
Jordan Valley Dermatology Center
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Integrated Clinical Research
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406
Canada21 sites
Dermatology Research Institute
Calgary, Alberta, T2J7E1
Intermed groupe santé
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 7Y8
Alberta DermaSurgery Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G1C3
Kingsway Clinical Research
Etobicoke, Ontario, M8X 1Y9
Medicor Research Inc
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3A 1W8
Sudbury Skin Clinique
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3C 1X8
DermEffects
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
Lynderm Research Inc.
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
DermEdge Research
Mississauga, Ontario, L5H 1G9
North Bay Dermatology Centre
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7
The Centre for Clinical Trials
Oakville, Ontario, L6J 7W5
Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2
SKiN Centre for Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2
Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4x7
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, G1W4R4
CARE Clinic Ltd
Red Deer, Alberta, T4P-1K4
The Centre for Dermatology
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5
Karma Clinical Trials, Inc.
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3
Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Toronto Research Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M3H5Y8
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Poland20 sites
NZOZ Specjalistyczny Osrodek Dermatologiczny DERMAL s.c.
Bialystok, 15-453
DERMAPOLIS Medical Dermatology Center
Chorzów, 41-500
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-214
MCBK
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 05-825
Care Clinic Centrum Medyczne
Katowice, 40-568
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.
Krakow, 31-501
Centrum Medyczne Promed
Krakow, 31-513
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J.M. Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna
Lodz, 90-242
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "DERMED" Centrum Medyczne
Lodz, 90-265
Dermedic Jacek Zdybski
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400
Gabinety Lekarskie Rivermed
Poznan, 61-441
Spolka Cywilna Andrzej Krolicki, Tomasz Kochanowski, ,,Laser Clinic"
Szczecin, 70-332
Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecinskie Centrum Medyczne
Szczecin, 71-434
Medycyna Kliniczna
Warsaw, 00-874
MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.
Warsaw, 02-106
Carpe Diem Centrum Medycyny Estetycznej
Warsaw, 02-661
EMC Instytut Medyczny S.A. Przychodnia przy ul. Lowieckiej
Wroclaw, 50-220
Cityclinic Przychodnia Lekarsko Psychologiczna Matusiak Spółka Partnerska
Wroclaw, 50-566
Centrum Medyczne Oporow
Wroclaw, 52-416
Kliniczny Oddzial Chorob Wewnetrznych, Dermatologii i Alergologii
Zabrze, 41-800
Germany10 sites
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
Bad Bentheim, 48455
Klinikum Bielefeld Rosenhöhe
Bielefeld, 33647
Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH
Dresden, 01069
IKF Pneumologie GmbH & Co KG
Frankfurt am Main, 60596
SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH
Gera, 07548
Studienzentrum Dr. med. Beate Schwarz
Langenau, 89129
SIBAmed GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538
Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Quist
Mainz, 55128
University of Muenster
Münster, 48149
Australia8 sites
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Emeritus Research
Camberwell, Victoria, 3124
Skin Health Institute Inc.
Carlton, Victoria, 3053
Sinclair Dermatology
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
St George Dermatology and Skin Cancer Centre
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Melbourne Health Radiology
Pakrville, Victoria, 3050
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Chile8 sites
Medicien
Las Condes, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7580150
MIRES (M Y F Estudios Clinicos Limitada)
Nunoa, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7750495
Vida lntegra
Nunoa, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7750495
Centro Radiologico Plaza Baquedano
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7500906
Centro Medico SkinMed Limitada
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7580206
Clínica Dermacross S.A.
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7640881
Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8380456
Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos - CIEC
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8420383
Slovakia6 sites
SUMMIT CLINICAL RESEARCH, s.r.o.
Bratislava, 831 01
SKINKLINIK s.r.o
Bratislava, 83103
BeneDerma s.r.o.
Bratislava, 841 02
Derma therapy spol. s.r.o.
Bratislava, 851 01
Dermatovenerologicka ambulancia
Nové Zámky, 940 34
SANARE spol.s.r.o.
Svidník, 089 01
Bulgaria5 sites
MHAT Dobrich AD
Dobrich, 9300
MC Asklepii OOD
Dupnitsa, 2600
DCC Alexandrovska EOOD
Sofia, 1431
DCC Fokus-5 - Medical Establishment for Outpatient Care EOOD
Sofia, 1463
Military Medical Academy MHAT Sofia
Sofia, 1606
South Korea5 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, 61469
The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital
Incheon, 21431
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, 06973
Spain5 sites
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Centro de Especialidades Mollabao (Area Sanitaria de Pontevedra e O Salnes)
Pontevedra, 36001
Hospital de Montecelo
Pontevedra, 36071
Hungary4 sites
Clinexpert Kft.
Budapest, 1033
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ
Debrecen, 4032
Trial Pharma Kft.
Kaposvár, 7400
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ
Szeged, 6720
Finland3 sites
Terveystalo Tampere
Tampere, 33100
Mehiläinen Neo
Turku, 20520
Turun yliopistollinen keskussairaala
Turku, 20520
Latvia3 sites
Health Centre 4 Ltd. Diagnostics Centre
Riga, LV-1003
LLC J.Kisis
Riga, LV-1003
Outpatient Clinic of Ventspils
Ventspils, LV-3601
Taiwan3 sites
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, 23561
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan (r.o.c), 11217
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100
Italy1 site
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Roma, 00168
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3B RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, ACTIVE CONTROLLED MULTI-CENTER STUDY ASSESSING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ABROCITINIB COMPARED WITH DUPILUMAB IN ADULT PARTICIPANTS ON BACKGROUND TOPICAL THERAPY WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult participants on background topical therapy, with moderate to severe AD. The treatment duration is 26 weeks. A total of approximately 600 participants will be enrolled from approximately 220 sites globally. Approximately 600 participants will be randomly assigned to study intervention. There are primary efficacy assessments at Week 2 and Week 4, and a key secondary efficacy assessment at Week 16. Efficacy and safety endpoints will be assessed throughout the entire study. Exploratory endpoints related to hand eczema efficacy will be assessed throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Abrocitinib 200 mg, Dupilumab 300 mg
- Keywords
- atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, eczema, JAK, janus kinase
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Abrocitinib 200 mgDrug
Abrocitinib 200 mg administered as two 100 mg tablets to be taken orally once daily for 26 weeks. Placebo injections will be administered every other week for 24 weeks.
Dupilumab 300 mgCombination product
Dupilumab 300 mg administered as a single subcutaneous injection every other week for 24 weeks (2 injections on day 1). Placebo tablets will be administered daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abrocitinib 200 mg plus placebo injection | Experimental | Abrocitinib 200 mg daily through Week 26, plus placebo injections every other week through Week 24 Receives: Drug: Abrocitinib 200 mg |
| Dupilumab 300 mg plus placebo tablets | Active comparator | Dupilumab 300 mg every other week (2 injections on Day 1) through Week 24, plus placebo tablets daily through Week 26 Receives: Combination Product: Dupilumab 300 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) From Baseline at Week 2
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to atopic dermatitis (AD) was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Measured: Week 2
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 90% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) Response at Week 4
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Measured: Week 4
Secondary outcomes (18)
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Week 16
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Weeks 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Measured: Week 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI-75) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and >=2 Points Improvement From Baseline up to Week 26
IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, except any residual discoloration (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and/or hypopigmentation); 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Days 2 to 15
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Measured: Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time to Achieve >=4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4)
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 30
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage (%) Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
The extent (%) to which a body region was involved with AD was determined using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Four body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin/genitals) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Total number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual was derived as sum of % BSA across all 4 body regions and ranged from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
SCORAD is a scoring index for AD which combined extent (A), severity (B) and subjective symptoms (C). For A, a rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region was added to determine A (range: 0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema/papulation; oozing/crusting; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3); severity scores were added to give B (range: 0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analog scale (VAS) where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss were added to give 'C' (range: 0-20). SCORAD total score was calculated as: A/5+7*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Change From Baseline in Total Anxiety Score Measured Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 12,16 and 26
HADS was a validated 14-item questionnaire to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, each of which comprised of 7 items. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicated more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assessed state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-A total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicated greater severity of anxiety.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Total Depression Score Measured Using the HADS at Week 12,16 and 26
HADS was a validated 14-item questionnaire to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, each of which comprised of 7 items. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicated more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-D assessed the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items with score ranging from 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicated greater severity of depression symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measured the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12, 16 and 26
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consisted of six questions used to calculate a health utility score. There were two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assessed mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a VAS that measured health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state on a vertical VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 12, 16 and 26
POEM was a 7-item participant reported outcome measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item was scored as: no days=0, 1-2 days=1, 3-4 days=2, 5-6 days=3 and every day=4. The item scores were added to provide a total score ranging from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep Scale) at Week 12, 16 and 26
The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item measure that is segregated into subscales addressing seven sleep domains (i.e. sleep disturbance, snoring, short of breath or headache, adequacy of sleep, somnolence, sleep problems index I and sleep problems index II). An additional single item assessed quantity of sleep. Each of the sleep domains were scored on a range of 0 to 100, and higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The quantity of sleep scores ranged from 0 to 24 (number of hours slept). Change from baseline scores for each individual sleep domain and quantity of sleep are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
The skin pain NRS was a participant reported outcome where participants were asked to rate the "worst skin pain" in the past 24 hours on a 11-point scale from 0=no skin pain to 10=worst skin pain imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse pain.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Medicated Topical Background Therapy-free Days
Medicated topical background therapy-free days was defined as number of days where a participant maintained a response of EASI-90 or greater without the use of medicated topical background therapy.
Measured: Day 1 up to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Points Improvement From Baseline in DLQI at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measured the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2020
- Study start11 Jun 2020
- Primary completion13 Jul 2021
- Study completion13 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 727 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04345367
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B7451050
- Other IDs
- 2019-004013-13, 2019
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Weidinger S, Reich K, Issa N, Hong HC, Bunick CG, Biswas P, Chan G, Guler E, Watkins M, Alderfer J. Abrocitinib Achieves Early and Complete/Near-Complete Skin Clearance Plus Itch-Free State in Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Pooled Post Hoc Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Aug;16(8):4217-4225. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01833-8. Epub 2026 Jun 27.
PubMed 42365219Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Farooqui SA, Chan G, Biswas P, Guler E. Efficacy and Safety of Variable-Dose Versus Continuous-Dose Abrocitinib Treatment in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pooled Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01778-y. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42162528Yosipovitch G, Gooderham MJ, Elmariah SB, Bonfanti G, Edwards RA, Gregoriou S, Biswas P, Myers DE, Alderfer J, Guler E, Koulias C. Itch Relief and Quality-of-Life Improvement with Abrocitinib and Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of JADE COMPARE and JADE DARE. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026 Jul;27(4):819-830. doi: 10.1007/s40257-026-01030-5. Epub 2026 May 5.
PubMed 42084697Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Geng B, Carrascosa JM, Bieber T, Brunner PM, Staumont-Salle D, Ji C, Biswas P, Feeney C, Hernandez-Martin I, Rebollo Laserna FJ, Koppensteiner H. Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis? Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3391-3407. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w. Epub 2025 Sep 23.
PubMed 40987931Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Pink AE, Weidinger S, Chan G, Biswas P, Clibborn C, Guler E. Switching from Dupilumab to Abrocitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy After Treatment With Dupilumab in JADE DARE. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Feb;15(2):367-380. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01320-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
PubMed 39903335Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Comparing how well abrocitinib and dupilumab treat atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms: a plain language summary. Immunotherapy. 2023 Sep;15(13):975-980. doi: 10.2217/imt-2022-0306. Epub 2023 May 31.
PubMed 37254941Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 23;400(10348):273-282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01199-0.
PubMed 35871814
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3B RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, ACTIVE CONTROLLED MULTI-CENTER STUDY ASSESSING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ABROCITINIB COMPARED WITH DUPILUMAB IN ADULT PARTICIPANTS ON BACKGROUND TOPICAL THERAPY WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04345367
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B7451050
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, eczema, JAK, janus kinase
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 727 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult participants on background topical therapy, with moderate to severe AD. The treatment duration is 26 weeks. A total of approximately 600 participants will be enrolled from approximately 220 sites globally. Approximately 600 participants will be randomly assigned to study intervention. There are primary efficacy assessments at Week 2 and Week 4, and a key secondary efficacy assessment at Week 16. Efficacy and safety endpoints will be assessed throughout the entire study. Exploratory endpoints related to hand eczema efficacy will be assessed throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abrocitinib 200 mg plus placebo injection | Experimental | Drug: Abrocitinib 200 mgAbrocitinib 200 mg daily through Week 26, plus placebo injections every other week through Week 24 |
| Dupilumab 300 mg plus placebo tablets | Active comparator | Combination Product: Dupilumab 300 mgDupilumab 300 mg every other week (2 injections on Day 1) through Week 24, plus placebo tablets daily through Week 26 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Diagnosis of chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 6 months
- Moderate to severe AD (BSA at least 10%, IGA at least 3, EASI at least 16, and PP-NRS severity score at least 4)
- Recent history of inadequate response to treatment with medicated topical therapy for AD, or who have required systemic therapies for control of their disease
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Acute or chronic medical or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation
- Have increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism
- Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
- Prior treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors or IL-4 or IL-13 antagonists including dupilumab, lebrikizumab or tralokinumab
- Other active non-AD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Abrocitinib 200 mgAbrocitinib 200 mg administered as two 100 mg tablets to be taken orally once daily for 26 weeks. Placebo injections will be administered every other week for 24 weeks. | Drug | Abrocitinib 200 mg plus placebo injection |
| Dupilumab 300 mgDupilumab 300 mg administered as a single subcutaneous injection every other week for 24 weeks (2 injections on day 1). Placebo tablets will be administered daily. | Combination product | Dupilumab 300 mg plus placebo tablets |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) From Baseline at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
The severity of itch (pruritus) due to atopic dermatitis (AD) was assessed using the PP-NRS, a validated horizontal NRS. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS with scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 90% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) Response at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.
18 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 Response at Weeks 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26
Time frame: Week 2, 8, 12, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI-75) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and >=2 Points Improvement From Baseline up to Week 26
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Days 2 to 15
Time frame: Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Percentage of Participants Achieving PP-NRS4 From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time to Achieve >=4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 30
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage (%) Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Percent Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Change From Baseline in Total Anxiety Score Measured Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 12,16 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Total Depression Score Measured Using the HADS at Week 12,16 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12, 16 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 12, 16 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep Scale) at Week 12, 16 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12, 16 and 26
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Medicated Topical Background Therapy-free Days
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Points Improvement From Baseline in DLQI at Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Time frame: Week 2, 12, 16, 20 and 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42365219Weidinger S, Reich K, Issa N, Hong HC, Bunick CG, Biswas P, Chan G, Guler E, Watkins M, Alderfer J. Abrocitinib Achieves Early and Complete/Near-Complete Skin Clearance Plus Itch-Free State in Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Pooled Post Hoc Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Aug;16(8):4217-4225. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01833-8. Epub 2026 Jun 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42162528Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Farooqui SA, Chan G, Biswas P, Guler E. Efficacy and Safety of Variable-Dose Versus Continuous-Dose Abrocitinib Treatment in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pooled Analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01778-y. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42084697Yosipovitch G, Gooderham MJ, Elmariah SB, Bonfanti G, Edwards RA, Gregoriou S, Biswas P, Myers DE, Alderfer J, Guler E, Koulias C. Itch Relief and Quality-of-Life Improvement with Abrocitinib and Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of JADE COMPARE and JADE DARE. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2026 Jul;27(4):819-830. doi: 10.1007/s40257-026-01030-5. Epub 2026 May 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40987931Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Geng B, Carrascosa JM, Bieber T, Brunner PM, Staumont-Salle D, Ji C, Biswas P, Feeney C, Hernandez-Martin I, Rebollo Laserna FJ, Koppensteiner H. Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis? Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3391-3407. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01516-w. Epub 2025 Sep 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39903335Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Pink AE, Weidinger S, Chan G, Biswas P, Clibborn C, Guler E. Switching from Dupilumab to Abrocitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy After Treatment With Dupilumab in JADE DARE. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Feb;15(2):367-380. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01320-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37254941Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Comparing how well abrocitinib and dupilumab treat atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms: a plain language summary. Immunotherapy. 2023 Sep;15(13):975-980. doi: 10.2217/imt-2022-0306. Epub 2023 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35871814Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Soong W, Rice ZP, Hong HC, Katoh N, Valenzuela F, DiBonaventura M, Bratt TA, Zhang F, Clibborn C, Rojo R, Valdez H, Kerkmann U. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 23;400(10348):273-282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01199-0.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
151 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Abrocitinib 200 mg and Dupilumab 300 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 151 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 151 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Germany, Australia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 Points Improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) From Baseline at Week 2 (time frame: Week 2). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04345367, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2022.