AzTrials
AzTrials

Oropharyngeal DysphagiaNCT04346212

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Patients With COVID-19

An observational study of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and COVID-19, run by Hospital de Mataró at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a common complication in/post ICU patients that have been with intubation/mechanical ventilation or with tracheotomies or NG tubes, in patients with acute respiratory infection/pneumonia/respiratory insufficiency with a severe disease needing high concentration of oxygen or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, COVID-19, Sars-CoV2
What is being tested?
Swallowing evaluation with the EAT-10 and the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST)
How many people
605 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
14 Apr 2020to 30 Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All COVID-19 + patients admitted to the CSdM more than 48h from April to the end of the pandemic (estimation: N=300). There are 3 main phenotypes of patients with OD related to COVID-19: 1. ICU. Patients in/post ICU with OD associated with intubation/mechanical ventilation or OD associated with tracheotomies or NG tubes (critical or semi-critical patients). 2. Wards. Patients with respiratory infection/pneumonia/respiratory insufficiency, some of them with a severe disease needing high concentration of oxygen or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (acute patients with some complexity). 3. Post-acute COVID-19 patients discharged from acute hospitals to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes or medicalized facilities (sub-acute patients, convalescents).

Who may be able to join

  • Infected patients (COVID-19 + by PCR or according to physician's criteria in the medical report of the patient at discharge) admitted to the CSdM more than 48 h.
  • Patients able to be explored regarding OD and nutritional status according to their physician's criteria (fully awake patients in a stable respiratory situation and optimal PaO2/FiO2).

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrolled risk of infection for healthcare professionals (HCP) (according to the safety considerations stated below).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Hospital de Mataró)

    Mataró, Barcelona, 08301

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Malnutrition in Patients Infected by SARS-CoV-2: Prevalence and Needs of Compensatory Treatment and Follow up in Patients Admitted by COVID-19 at the Consorci Sanitari Del Maresme

Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a common complication in/post ICU patients that have been with intubation/mechanical ventilation or with tracheotomies or NG tubes, in patients with acute respiratory infection/pneumonia/respiratory insufficiency with a severe disease needing high concentration of oxygen or noninvasive mechanical ventilation and also in patients discharged from acute hospitals to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes or other facilities. All these situations are common for COVID-19 patients that are currently filling our hospitals due to the pandemic expansion of SARS-CoV-2. OD is associated to prolonged hospitalization, dehydration and severe nutritional and respiratory complications -aspiration pneumonia-, hospital readmissions and mortality. Aim: to assess the prevalence of OD and nutritional risk in these patients and to know their needs of compensatory treatment following the application of an early intervention, and to assess whether OD and malnutrition are indicators of poor prognosis for COVID-19 patients. Methods: prospective study in which we will use the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST) to assess the prevalence of OD, and NRS2002 to assess the nutritional risk in admitted patients with confirmed COVID-19 at the Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Catalonia, Spain. We will register also results of the EAT-10, nutritional status, the needs of compensatory treatments of these patients following an early intervention with fluid and nutritional adaptation and use of nutritional supplements. We will also collect other clinical variables from medical history of the patient related to hospitalization and we will follow the clinical complications and nutritional status at 3 and 6 months follow up.

Read the detailed description

Design: 1) prospective study in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients admitted to the CSdM more than 48h with 2 follow-up points at 3/6 months after discharge.

  1. comparative study between the 3 first waves of the pandemic in the acute phase.

Aims:

1.1)To assess the prevalence of OD, nutritional risk, the needs of compensatory treatment and complications at 3/6 month follow up of patients admitted by COVID-19 in Hospital de Mataró, Hospital St. Jaume and the medicalized Atenea Hotel, Mataró (Barcelona), Spain.

1.2)To validate an early intervention including fluid thickening and nutritional support.

1.3)In addition, we would like to know if those patients with OD and those with OD and MN have worse prognosis than those without these conditions.

2.1) To compare the three first waves of the pandemic in the hospitalization period (clinical, swallowing, nutritional status and mortality).

  • Inclusion criteria: Infected patients (COVID-19 + PCR or according to physician's criteria at discharge medical report) admitted to the CSdM >48h; patients able to be explored regarding OD and nutritional status according to their physician's criteria (fully awake patients in a stable respiratory situation and optimal PaO2/FiO2).
  • Exclusion criteria: uncontrolled risk of infection for healthcare professionals (HCP).

Study population

All COVID-19 patients admitted to the CSdM more than 48h from April to the end of the pandemic:

  1. ICU. Patients in/post ICU with OD associated with intubation/mechanical ventilation or OD associated with tracheotomies or NG tubes (semi-critical patients).
  2. Wards. Patients with respiratory infection/pneumonia/respiratory insufficiency, some of them with a severe disease needing high concentration of oxygen or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (acute patients with some complexity).
  3. Post-acute COVID-19 patients discharged from acute hospitals to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes or medicalized facilities (sub-acute patients, convalescents).

Sample size calculation: Taking into account the main study variable and that we will do an opportunistic recruitment (admitted patients), a sample size of 315 subjects randomly selected will suffice to estimate with a 95% confidence and a precision +/-5.5 percent units, a population percentage considered to be around 55.0% (estimated OD prevalence). It has been anticipated a replacement rate of 0%.

Study variables

  • Main variable: prevalence of OD and risk of malnutrition among COVID-19 patients.
  • Secondary variables: needs of nutritional supplementation, texture-modified diets, use of thickeners and patient's adherence to compensatory measures, functional capacity, comorbidities, nutritional analytical parameters, weight, clinical severity (including pneumonia severity), neurological symptoms, pharmacological treatment, ICU admission, and hospital readmissions, visits to emergency department, respiratory infections and mortality at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Clinical prognosis in those patients with OD and/or MN compared to those without these conditions.

Study visits/evaluations/management 4 evaluation points*: 1) admission; 2) discharge; and 3-4) follow up at 3 months and 6 months. According to the first evaluation, an interventional plan (management) will be prescribed in order to improve patient's swallowing, feeding and nutritional status during admission. All the evaluations and interventional plans are currently being performed as standard clinical practice and will be obtained from patient's medical history record. Study variables will be grouped in 3 different assessments: a) clinical assessment; b) swallowing assessment; and c) nutritional assessment.

  • There will be no follow-up in the comparative study between the 3 firsts waves of the pandemic.
  1. Admission*: there will be 2 admission evaluation points, the first one 24-48h after admission (pre-admission data) and the second one during admission (admission data). 1.1.Clinical evaluation: patient origin (community, nursing home, socio-health center), functional status before, during admission and at discharge (Barthel index), comorbidities (Charlson index), clinical symptoms before and during admission, neurological symptoms, ICU admission and length of stay, respiratory infection, its symptoms, severity and length from the week before admission, prescribed pharmacological treatment, hospitalization days and mortality during admission. 1.2.Swallowing evaluation: anamnesis, EAT-10 questionnaire (screening), clinical swallowing assessment with volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST) at admission and tolerance and adherence with the recommendations (volume and viscosity) during admission. 1.3.Nutritional evaluation: anthropometrical measurements and nutrition-related questions pre and post-admission, analytical parameters at admission and during admission (albumin, pre-albumin, cholesterol, total proteins, lymphocytes, ferritin and C-reactive protein), NRS2002 at admission and at discharge and nutritional recommendations during admission (ONS, type of diet and intake) and patient's adherence.
  2. Discharge: 2.1.Codification at discharge: SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, OD, respiratory infection, aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition or others. 2.2.Recommendations at discharge: fluid and nutritional recommendations at discharge (volume and viscosity, oral nutritional supplementation and type of diet). *After evaluations, healthcare professionals will give to the patients clinical recommendations on the use of thickeners, texture-modified diets and nutritional supplementation if required.
  3. Follow up (3/6 months): we will collect clinical data, information about swallowing and nutritional status and needs through the electronical medical history of the patients and by telephone call. Patients will receive new recommendations on fluid and nutritional adaptation and nutritional supplementation if required. The follow-up evaluations will include:

3.1.Clinical evaluation: mortality (date), patient residence (community, nursing home, socio-health center), functional status (Barthel index), and hospital resources consumption/clinical outcomes (hospital readmissions, visits to the emergency department, and respiratory infections).

3.2.Swallowing evaluation: anamnesis, EAT-10 (swallowing screening); if positive, virtual clinical swallowing assessment with the V-VST, and fluid adaptation recommendations.

3.3.Nutritional evaluation: anthropometrical measurements (current weight), ONS intake (time taken from discharge), textural diet adaptation if needed and compliance with the previous recommendations, NRS2002, and analytical parameters (albumin, cholesterol, ferritin, C-reactive protein) if the patient had a blood analysis during the previous month.

Management of patients with COVID-19, OD and MN:

After admission in our health care centers, COVID-19 patients will be screened by a speech and language pathologist (SLP) for OD with specific questions and the V-VST, and nutritional status with the NRS2002. In addition, clinical data of patients will be recorded during admission. Those patients with a NRS2002 ≥ 3 points, will require ONS, that will be given in two formats (liquid or viscosity-adapted) depending on the swallowing status. Those patients with less than 70 years will receive 2 instead of 1/day. According to patient's masticatory and swallowing hability they will receive texture-modified diets in 3 different formats: 1) normal, 2) easy mastication diet, and 3) puree. Normal diet is composed by 1750Kcal/70g protein; if the patient is at nutritional risk or malnourished (NRS2002≥3) he/she will also receive a high caloric-proteic diet with 2000Kcal/90g protein. Finally there will be a fluid adaptation according to the results of the V-VST with 3 different viscosities: 1)liquid, 2)250mPa•s, and 3)800mPa•s. During admission patients will be managed by the SLPs and the nutritionist team of the healthcare centers. Just before discharge, patients will be re-evaluated and swallowing and nutritional recommendations will be given adapted to the new status of the patient by using the same criteria. On a nutritional level, just before discharge, patients will be re-evaluated by the team of dietitians to detect those patients who have not yet improved their nutritional status and therefore will need to continue taking ONS after discharge. The criteria for maintaining or not maintaining the prescription at discharge will be those corresponding to a normal dietary assessment, such as: anorexia, not having recovered weight or insufficient intake due to vomiting, nausea or other causes not related to hospital food. Other criteria may be included at the discretion of the clinical professional. This group will be dispensed ONS for at least 1 month after discharge.

We will collect also data on patient's destination, functional capacity, weight loss, admission to the ICU and clinical data at discharge. Finally, patients will be followed-up at 3/6 months for clinical complications through their electronic medical history.

Main study procedures and variables

  • EAT-10: is a simple 10-item questionnaire to screen for the risk of dysphagia (score>2, risk of OD) (Belafsky P 2008, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; Rofes L 2014, Neurogastroenterol Motil).
  • V-VST: is a validated clinical test to explore safety and efficacy of swallow and select the optimal bolus volume and viscosity for each patient with/at risk of OD. It uses different volumes (5, 10 and 20mL) and viscosities (250mPa•s, liquid and 800mPa•s) (thickener Nutilis Clear) to evaluate clinical signs of impaired efficacy and safety of swallow. We will apply a simplified V-VST with only 1 volume (10mL) and the 3 usual viscosities in order to reduce the hospital burden and stress for the patient (Clavé P 2008, Clin Nutr). Recommendations on fluid adaptation given to the patient according to the results of the test will be recorded.
  • Nutritional status: a nutritional evaluation is done to COVID-19 patients according to their phenotype. We will use the nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002), a validated nutritional screening tool for hospitalized adult patients and has been recommended by a recent guideline for COVID-19 admitted patients (Ying-Hui Jin, 2020, Mil Med Res). If the patient scores 3 or more points is considered to be in nutritional risk and a more comprehensive nutritional evaluation should be performed and nutritional supplementation applied. Recommendations on nutritional adaptation given to the patient (adaptation of texture/calories/proteins and nutritional supplementation) according to the results of the tests will be recorded.
  • Other study variables collected from patient's medical history: patient origin and destination at discharge, hospitalization days, admission to the ICU, myopathy post-ICU and length of stay in the ICU, symptomatology before and during admission (fever, cough, dyspnea, diarrhea, vomiting, ageusia, anosmia, headache, polymyalgia), neurological symptoms during admission (seizures, encephalitis, delirium, headache, dyskinesia, stroke, parenthesis, ataxia, encephalitis), functionality with the Barthel index (pre-admission, admission and discharge), comorbidities with the Charlson score, respiratory infections during admission and its severity and type, use of oxygen therapy, pronation, prescribed treatment, anthropometric measurements (weight at discharge, weight loss), use and tolerability of oral nutritional supplements, nutritional intake, use of enteral or parenteral nutrition, biochemical parameters at admission and discharge (pre-albumin, albumin, cholesterol, total proteins, lymphocytes, ferritin and C-reactive protein), diagnostics at discharge (SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, OD, respiratory infection, aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition or others), and intra-hospital mortality.
  • Follow-up (3 and 6 months): we will collect data of clinical complications from the medical history of the patient and by telephone call: swallowing, nutritional status and needs (including analytical parameters), hospital readmissions, visits to the emergency department, incidence of respiratory infections (including pneumonia, COPD exacerbations) and mortality.
Being tested
Swallowing evaluation with the EAT-10 and the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST)
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders, COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Swallowing evaluation with the EAT-10 and the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST)Diagnostic test

    Also called Nutritional evaluation (NRS 2002), Fluid and nutritional adaptation registry (needs of compensatory treatment), Clinical complications at 6 months

    We will assess dysphagia, nutritional status and needs of compensatory treatment (fluid and nutritional adaptation) in patients with COVID-19 disease. We will also collect clinical data, information about swallowing and nutritional status and needs through the electronical medical history of the patients and by telephone call at 3 and 6 months follow-up, as well as clinical complications.

Study groups in NCT04346212
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients infected by SARS-CoV-2Patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 at the Hospital de Mataró, Hospital de St. Jaume i Sta. Magdalena and other medicalized facilities in Mataró.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Swallowing evaluation with the EAT-10 and the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia

    Changes in the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia according to a clinical assessment tool, the Volume-Viscosity Swallowing Test (V-VST).

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Changes in the swallowing screening

    Changes in the eating assessment tool (EAT-10 score). A tool that goes from 0 to 40 points and indicates that the patient is at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia if he/she presents 3 or more points

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

  2. Changes in the swallowing status

    Changes in the percentage of patients with impairements in efficacy and/or safety of swallow.

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

  3. Changes in the nutritonal status of study patient's.

    Changes in the nutritional status of study patients (% malnourished, at risk of malnutrition or wellnourished).

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

  4. Changes in the needs of compensatory treatments in those patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (fluid adaptation).

    Changes in the fluid (volume and viscosity) requirements of study patients.

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

  5. Changes in the needs of compensatory treatments in those patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (nutritional adaptation).

    Changes in the nutritional adaptation requirements (type of diet and need of nutritional supplementation).

    Measured: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).

  6. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (incidence of readmissions).

    Changes in the incidence of hospital readmissions: number of hospital readmissions/patient/6 months.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

  7. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (prevalence of readmissions).

    Changes in the prevalence: % of patients with hospital readmissions during the follow-up.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

  8. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (number of visits to emergency department).

    Incidence: number of visits to the emergency department/patient/ 3 or 6 months.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

  9. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (percentage of visits to emergency department).

    Prevalence: % of patients visiting the emergency department during the follow-up.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

  10. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (respiratory complications).

    Incidence of respiratory infections (including pneumonia, and COPD exacerbations).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

  11. Changes in the clinical complications at 3 and 6 months follow up from patient's medical history (mortality).

    3 and 6 months mortality.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months from inclusion.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2020
  2. Study start14 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
605 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04346212
Sponsor's protocol ID
COVID_OD
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
10 Apr 2020
Last updated
14 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Clave P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;12(5):259-70. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

    PubMed 25850008
  • Ortega O, Martin A, Clave P. Diagnosis and Management of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Among Older Persons, State of the Art. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

    PubMed 28412164
  • Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.

    PubMed 19140539
  • Rofes L, Arreola V, Mukherjee R, Clave P. Sensitivity and specificity of the Eating Assessment Tool and the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Sep;26(9):1256-65. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12382. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

    PubMed 24909661
  • Clave P, Arreola V, Romea M, Medina L, Palomera E, Serra-Prat M. Accuracy of the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;27(6):806-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

    PubMed 18789561
  • Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC; MNA-International Group. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Nov;13(9):782-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7.

    PubMed 19812868
  • Todorovic V. Detecting and managing undernutrition of older people in the community. Br J Community Nurs. 2001 Feb;6(2):54-60. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2001.6.2.54.

    PubMed 11927872
  • Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):321-36. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5.

    PubMed 12765673
  • Martin-Martinez A, Ortega O, Vinas P, Arreola V, Nascimento W, Costa A, Riera SA, Alarcon C, Clave P. COVID-19 is associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia and malnutrition in hospitalized patients during the spring 2020 wave of the pandemic. Clin Nutr. 2022 Dec;41(12):2996-3006. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

    PubMed 34187698

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and COVID-19, run by Hospital de Mataró at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (time frame: From April 2020 to September 2021. And at 3 and 6 months follow-up (1st wave).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04346212, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in