Infant DevelopmentGlucolightNCT04347590
Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants
A study testing Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) and Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) in people with Infant Development and Hypoglycemia Neonatal, run by University Hospital Padova at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Neonatal hypoglicaemia is associated with impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm infants. Thus, hypoglicemic events should be diagnosed and treated promptly. Unfortunately, hypo- and hyperglicaemia management is still controversial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 hours to 2 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Infant Development, Hypoglycemia Neonatal, Neurodevelopmental Abnormality
- What is being tested?
- Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) and Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 24 Apr 2020to 30 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 hours to 2 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- <= 32 weeks gestation
- birthweight <1500 g
Who cannot join
- birthweight <500g
- congenital pathologies
- lack of parental consent
- perinatal maternal infections
- albinism
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - University Hospital of Padua
Padua, 35128
Alfonso Galderisi, MD, +390498213545, alfonsogalderisi@gmail.com
Alfonso Galderisi, MD
About this study
Official title: Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants (the Babyglucolight Trial)
Neonatal hypoglicaemia is associated with impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm infants. Thus, hypoglicemic events should be diagnosed and treated promptly. Unfortunately, hypo- and hyperglicaemia management is still controversial.
The investigators aim to assess if a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) impacts on both short-term and long-term neurodevelopment. Primary outcome is the effect of CGM coupled with a control algorithm for glucose infusion on the number of hemodynamic significant events (defined as hypoglycemic events associated with DOT-detectable reduction of brain oxygenation).
Read more
It will be enrolled newborns ≤32 weeks gestational age and/or of birthweight ≤1500 g, they will be randomized in two study arms, both of them will wear Medtronic CGM during the first 5 days of life: 1) Blinded group (B): the device monitor will be switched off, glucose infusion rate will be modified according to the daily capillary glucose tests. 2) Unblinded group (UB): the device monitor will be visibile, alarms for hypos/hyper will be active and glucose infusion rate will be modulated according to CGM and PID control algorithm.
Enrolled newborns will also be monitored with near-infrared diffuse optical tomography (DOT) during the first 5 days from enrollment.
Follow-up will be performed at 12, 18, 24 months and 5 years by neurodevleopmental scale (Bailey III until 24 months; Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) at 5 years).
The estimated numerosity is 60 patients (30 for each arm).
Read the detailed description
Background - Hypoglycaemia is a very common event during the first week of life, it affects up to 15% of term newborns and it is more frequent in preterm and IUGR (Intrauterine Growth Restriction with birth weight <10th percentile) infants.
Repeated and prolonged hypoglicemic events are associated with impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm infants and should be diagnosed and treated promptly (Tam EWY et al, J Pediatrics 2012; Duvanel et al, J Ped 1999; Lucas et al BMJ; 1988; Filam PM et al, J Pediatr 2006).
Unfortunately, the management of hypo / hyperglycaemias in these groups is still controversial due to the lack of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System's (CGMS) efficacy assessments in the Neonatal Care Intensive Units.
Nevertheless, recent studies indicate that CGMS is reliable and can identify a significant number of hypoglycaemias (<40mg / dl, duration> 30 minutes) which could not be recognized through traditional glycemic monitoring (Pertierra Cortada et al, J Ped 2014; Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal\&Neonatal Ed 2013).
The reliability of data provided by CGMS were highlighted by Beardsall and colleagues (Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal \& Neonatal Ed 2013) on a population of newborns with an average birth weight of 1007 gr (SD 0.27) and a gestational age of 28.36 SG (SD 2.26), the study showed a high correlation (0.94) between capillary monitoring data (traditional) and data provided by the CGMS.
However, the effects of these CGMS-based approaches on short and long-term neurodevelopment are still unknown, as well as the real impact of these glycemic variations and the maintenance of euglycemia on cerebral hemodynamics.
Indeed, every treatment proposed in this fragile population must have, as its ultimate aim, the improvement of its neuro-cognitive development in order to be considered effective and useful.
Aim - The study the Investigators are going to conduct is aimed to evaluate if CGM, as driver of therapeutic decisions in preterm newborns (birthweight ≤1500g, gestational age ≤32 weeks) during the first week of life, may be able to improve both short-term and long-term neurodevelopment.
Study design - Randomized Controlled Trial
- Patients: newborns with GA ≤32weeks and/or BW≤ 1500 g. They will be enrolled within the first 48 hours of life
- Intervention group: Unblinded CGM + Proportional integrative Derivative algorithm (PID) to adequate daily glucose intake
- Control group: Blinded CGM with daily glucose intake adequated according to SMBG (=2 blood glucose/day) using standard of care (ESPGHAN) intakes
- Primary Outcome: to evaluate if the use of CGMS (Continuous glucose monitoring system) combined with an algorithm for glucose infusion reduces the number of hemodynamically significant hypoglycemic events during the first week of life
Matherials and Methods - Continuous glucose sensor (Medtronic guardian) will be applied within 48 hours from birth to the study population on the lateral side of thigh, after parents' consent collection.
All the patients will be randomized to the blinded or unblinded group before the application of CGM. Randomization will be performed using a randomization list electronically generated.
Near-infrared diffuse optical tomography (DOT) will be used for brain monitoring. The instrumentation consists of:
- A cap, similar to the one we already created and used in a pilot study in this population (Galderisi et al., Neurophotonics 2016)
- Optical fibers, connected to the instrumentation and inserted into specific holes for optodes placed in the cap
- An external device containing lasers and detectors, controlled by a portable personal computer
Blinded group: they will wear CGM for 5 days, the alarms and the CGM monitor will be switched off. The daily amount of carbohydrates will be decided according to blood glucose tests (at least 2 per day).
Unblinded group (intervention/open CGM group): they will wear CGM for 5 days, the alarms of CGM will be switched on. The daily intake of carbohydrates will be adapted according to CGM data. In case of reported hypoglicaemia (<47 mg/dl), the data will be confirmed by capillary / catheter blood sampling and it wil be treated with Dextrose 40% gel (200 mg/kg) or 2 mg/kg 10% glucose solution.
Glucose adjustment for values out of the target tight glycemic range (72-144mg/dL) will be decided according to the PID algorithm and performed every 3 hours as suggested by the algorithm.
Numerosity: the estimated numerosity is 60 patients. (30 per arm)
Reasons for study interruption: local and/or systemic complication due to the application of device, transfer of patient to another center of care, withdrawal of consent, death, malfunction of device. Reasons for interruption of monitoring will be specified in the final report.
Risks and benefits analysis - The open CGM is expected to decrease the duration and number of hypoglicemic episodes. Early detection of the hypoglicemic events helps reducing their frequency, while adaptation of carbohydrate intake based on CGM data will prevent further hypoglycemic episodes during the observation period.
In addition, this device permits to reduce the number of blood sampling in the U-CGM group, reducing a painful (heel stick) and potentially dangerous (catheter sampling) procedure.
Even though the risk of local reaction is conceivable, it has never been described in studies conducted in newborns. If a local reaction occurs, the device will be removed and the trial will end for the patient.
Perspective and limits - Although the use of the CGMS in preterm infants has been well described, its efficacy in improving short-term and long-term neurodevelopment has never been established, as well as the connection between glycaemic variations and cerebral activity in this population. Only by achieving this goal the real efficacy and utility of CGMS in this population will be clear.
The study has been designed as a no-profit research project by the Principal Investigators and Collaborators of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of University of Padua.
Interim assessment: after 20 participants enrolled; subsequent interim assessment have been planned every 20 participants enrolled. Study will be interrupted if >10% difference in primary outcome.
Funding: STARS grant from University of Padova (Italy); Penta Foundation; CARIPARO
- Being tested
- Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian), Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring (cgm), neonatal hypoglycemia, preterm infants, diffuse optical tomography (dot)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)Device
Data from device will be readable and alarms on
Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)Device
Data from device will be blinded and alarms off
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unblinded CGM | Experimental | CGM data will be "unblinded", with Hypo/hyperglycemia alarms on. Data will be recorded from CGM every three hours and intervention to adequate glucose intake will be performed to keep glycemia in normal range (72-144mg/dl) if necessary. Receives: Device: Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) |
| Blinded CGM | Other | Hypo/hyper alarms are off. CGM data will be blinded. Glucose intake will be adequate according to at least 2 capillary glycemic tests per day. Receives: Device: Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (posterior areas)
Number of hypoglycemic events henomdynamically significant. Hypoglycemic events are defined as any value <72mg/dL (mild hypo) or <47mg/dL (severe hypo). They are classified as "significant" in the presence of a reduction from baseline HbT >=15% (posterior areas)
Measured: 5 days
Secondary outcomes (8)
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (overall)
Number of hypoglycemic events henomdynamically significant. Hypoglycemic events are defined as any value <72mg/dL (mild hypo) or <47mg/dL (severe hypo). They are classified as "significant" in the presence of a reduction from baseline HbT >=15% (average of tested areas)
Measured: 5 days
Long-term neurodevelopment
Effect of CGM based intervention on Bayley III performance at 24 months
Measured: 24 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 2
Effect of CGM based intervention on Bayley III performance at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 3
Long-term neurodevelopment on Bayley III performance at 18 months
Measured: 18 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 4
Long-term neurodevelopment on Bayley III performance at 36 months
Measured: 36 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 4
Long-term neurodevelopment on Bayley III performance at 50 months
Measured: 50 months
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (overall-hyperglycemia)
Effect of Hyperglycemia (>144mg/dL and >180mg/dL) on brain hemodynamic
Measured: 5 days
Intervention and brain hemodynamic
effect of intervention on overall brain hemodynamic (baseline vs end of study monitoring DOT)
Measured: 5 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2020
- Study start24 Apr 2020
- Primary completion30 Apr 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infant DevelopmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Padova
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Padova
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alfonso Galderisi, University Hospital Padova
- Investigators
- Alfonso Galderisi, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital of Padua
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04347590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AOP1813
- Acronym
- Glucolight
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Agus MS, Steil GM, Wypij D, Costello JM, Laussen PC, Langer M, Alexander JL, Scoppettuolo LA, Pigula FA, Charpie JR, Ohye RG, Gaies MG; SPECS Study Investigators. Tight glycemic control versus standard care after pediatric cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1208-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206044. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
PubMed 22957521Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, VanWeissenbruch M, Midgley P, Thio M, Cornette L, Ossuetta I, Palmer CR, Iglesias I, de Jong M, Gill B, de Zegher F, Dunger DB. Validation of the continuous glucose monitoring sensor in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Mar;98(2):F136-40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301661. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
PubMed 22791467Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, Palmer CR, van Weissenbruch M, Midgley P, Thompson M, Thio M, Cornette L, Ossuetta I, Iglesias I, Theyskens C, de Jong M, Ahluwalia JS, de Zegher F, Dunger DB. Early insulin therapy in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1873-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803725.
PubMed 18971490Chalia M, Lee CW, Dempsey LA, Edwards AD, Singh H, Michell AW, Everdell NL, Hill RW, Hebden JC, Austin T, Cooper RJ. Hemodynamic response to burst-suppressed and discontinuous electroencephalography activity in infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Neurophotonics. 2016 Jul;3(3):031408. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031408. Epub 2016 May 2.
PubMed 27446969Debillon T, Zupan V, Ravault N, Magny JF, Dehan M. Development and initial validation of the EDIN scale, a new tool for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Jul;85(1):F36-41. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.1.f36.
PubMed 11420320Russell SJ, El-Khatib FH, Sinha M, Magyar KL, McKeon K, Goergen LG, Balliro C, Hillard MA, Nathan DM, Damiano ER. Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):313-325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314474. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
PubMed 24931572Shah VS, Ohlsson A. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD001452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001452.pub4.
PubMed 21975734Sinclair JC, Bottino M, Cowett RM. Interventions for prevention of neonatal hyperglycemia in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD007615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007615.pub3.
PubMed 21975772Singh H, Cooper RJ, Wai Lee C, Dempsey L, Edwards A, Brigadoi S, Airantzis D, Everdell N, Michell A, Holder D, Hebden JC, Austin T. Mapping cortical haemodynamics during neonatal seizures using diffuse optical tomography: a case study. Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jul 6;5:256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.012. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25161892Duvanel CB, Fawer CL, Cotting J, Hohlfeld P, Matthieu JM. Long-term effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on brain growth and psychomotor development in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1999 Apr;134(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70209-x.
PubMed 10190926Filan PM, Inder TE, Cameron FJ, Kean MJ, Hunt RW. Neonatal hypoglycemia and occipital cerebral injury. J Pediatr. 2006 Apr;148(4):552-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.11.015.
PubMed 16647423Galderisi A, Brigadoi S, Cutini S, Moro SB, Lolli E, Meconi F, Benavides-Varela S, Baraldi E, Amodio P, Cobelli C, Trevisanuto D, Dell'Acqua R. Long-term continuous monitoring of the preterm brain with diffuse optical tomography and electroencephalography: a technical note on cap manufacturing. Neurophotonics. 2016 Oct;3(4):045009. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.4.045009. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
PubMed 28042587Mitanchez D. Glucose regulation in preterm newborn infants. Horm Res. 2007;68(6):265-71. doi: 10.1159/000104174. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
PubMed 17587854Harris DL, Battin MR, Weston PJ, Harding JE. Continuous glucose monitoring in newborn babies at risk of hypoglycemia. J Pediatr. 2010 Aug;157(2):198-202.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
PubMed 20338573Hay WW Jr, Raju TN, Higgins RD, Kalhan SC, Devaskar SU. Knowledge gaps and research needs for understanding and treating neonatal hypoglycemia: workshop report from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;155(5):612-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.044. No abstract available.
PubMed 19840614
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants (the Babyglucolight Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04347590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Glucolight / AOP1813
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring (cgm), neonatal hypoglycemia, preterm infants, diffuse optical tomography (dot)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital PadovaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Padova
- Study start
- 24 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neonatal hypoglicaemia is associated with impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm infants. Thus, hypoglicemic events should be diagnosed and treated promptly. Unfortunately, hypo- and hyperglicaemia management is still controversial.
The investigators aim to assess if a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) impacts on both short-term and long-term neurodevelopment. Primary outcome is the effect of CGM coupled with a control algorithm for glucose infusion on the number of hemodynamic significant events (defined as hypoglycemic events associated with DOT-detectable reduction of brain oxygenation).
It will be enrolled newborns ≤32 weeks gestational age and/or of birthweight ≤1500 g, they will be randomized in two study arms, both of them will wear Medtronic CGM during the first 5 days of life: 1) Blinded group (B): the device monitor will be switched off, glucose infusion rate will be modified according to the daily capillary glucose tests. 2) Unblinded group (UB): the device monitor will be visibile, alarms for hypos/hyper will be active and glucose infusion rate will be modulated according to CGM and PID control algorithm.
Enrolled newborns will also be monitored with near-infrared diffuse optical tomography (DOT) during the first 5 days from enrollment.
Follow-up will be performed at 12, 18, 24 months and 5 years by neurodevleopmental scale (Bailey III until 24 months; Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) at 5 years).
The estimated numerosity is 60 patients (30 for each arm).
Detailed description
Background - Hypoglycaemia is a very common event during the first week of life, it affects up to 15% of term newborns and it is more frequent in preterm and IUGR (Intrauterine Growth Restriction with birth weight <10th percentile) infants.
Repeated and prolonged hypoglicemic events are associated with impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm infants and should be diagnosed and treated promptly (Tam EWY et al, J Pediatrics 2012; Duvanel et al, J Ped 1999; Lucas et al BMJ; 1988; Filam PM et al, J Pediatr 2006).
Unfortunately, the management of hypo / hyperglycaemias in these groups is still controversial due to the lack of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System's (CGMS) efficacy assessments in the Neonatal Care Intensive Units.
Nevertheless, recent studies indicate that CGMS is reliable and can identify a significant number of hypoglycaemias (<40mg / dl, duration> 30 minutes) which could not be recognized through traditional glycemic monitoring (Pertierra Cortada et al, J Ped 2014; Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal\&Neonatal Ed 2013).
The reliability of data provided by CGMS were highlighted by Beardsall and colleagues (Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal \& Neonatal Ed 2013) on a population of newborns with an average birth weight of 1007 gr (SD 0.27) and a gestational age of 28.36 SG (SD 2.26), the study showed a high correlation (0.94) between capillary monitoring data (traditional) and data provided by the CGMS.
However, the effects of these CGMS-based approaches on short and long-term neurodevelopment are still unknown, as well as the real impact of these glycemic variations and the maintenance of euglycemia on cerebral hemodynamics.
Indeed, every treatment proposed in this fragile population must have, as its ultimate aim, the improvement of its neuro-cognitive development in order to be considered effective and useful.
Aim - The study the Investigators are going to conduct is aimed to evaluate if CGM, as driver of therapeutic decisions in preterm newborns (birthweight ≤1500g, gestational age ≤32 weeks) during the first week of life, may be able to improve both short-term and long-term neurodevelopment.
Study design - Randomized Controlled Trial
- Patients: newborns with GA ≤32weeks and/or BW≤ 1500 g. They will be enrolled within the first 48 hours of life
- Intervention group: Unblinded CGM + Proportional integrative Derivative algorithm (PID) to adequate daily glucose intake
- Control group: Blinded CGM with daily glucose intake adequated according to SMBG (=2 blood glucose/day) using standard of care (ESPGHAN) intakes
- Primary Outcome: to evaluate if the use of CGMS (Continuous glucose monitoring system) combined with an algorithm for glucose infusion reduces the number of hemodynamically significant hypoglycemic events during the first week of life
Matherials and Methods - Continuous glucose sensor (Medtronic guardian) will be applied within 48 hours from birth to the study population on the lateral side of thigh, after parents' consent collection.
All the patients will be randomized to the blinded or unblinded group before the application of CGM. Randomization will be performed using a randomization list electronically generated.
Near-infrared diffuse optical tomography (DOT) will be used for brain monitoring. The instrumentation consists of:
- A cap, similar to the one we already created and used in a pilot study in this population (Galderisi et al., Neurophotonics 2016)
- Optical fibers, connected to the instrumentation and inserted into specific holes for optodes placed in the cap
- An external device containing lasers and detectors, controlled by a portable personal computer
Blinded group: they will wear CGM for 5 days, the alarms and the CGM monitor will be switched off. The daily amount of carbohydrates will be decided according to blood glucose tests (at least 2 per day).
Unblinded group (intervention/open CGM group): they will wear CGM for 5 days, the alarms of CGM will be switched on. The daily intake of carbohydrates will be adapted according to CGM data. In case of reported hypoglicaemia (<47 mg/dl), the data will be confirmed by capillary / catheter blood sampling and it wil be treated with Dextrose 40% gel (200 mg/kg) or 2 mg/kg 10% glucose solution.
Glucose adjustment for values out of the target tight glycemic range (72-144mg/dL) will be decided according to the PID algorithm and performed every 3 hours as suggested by the algorithm.
Numerosity: the estimated numerosity is 60 patients. (30 per arm)
Reasons for study interruption: local and/or systemic complication due to the application of device, transfer of patient to another center of care, withdrawal of consent, death, malfunction of device. Reasons for interruption of monitoring will be specified in the final report.
Risks and benefits analysis - The open CGM is expected to decrease the duration and number of hypoglicemic episodes. Early detection of the hypoglicemic events helps reducing their frequency, while adaptation of carbohydrate intake based on CGM data will prevent further hypoglycemic episodes during the observation period.
In addition, this device permits to reduce the number of blood sampling in the U-CGM group, reducing a painful (heel stick) and potentially dangerous (catheter sampling) procedure.
Even though the risk of local reaction is conceivable, it has never been described in studies conducted in newborns. If a local reaction occurs, the device will be removed and the trial will end for the patient.
Perspective and limits - Although the use of the CGMS in preterm infants has been well described, its efficacy in improving short-term and long-term neurodevelopment has never been established, as well as the connection between glycaemic variations and cerebral activity in this population. Only by achieving this goal the real efficacy and utility of CGMS in this population will be clear.
The study has been designed as a no-profit research project by the Principal Investigators and Collaborators of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of University of Padua.
Interim assessment: after 20 participants enrolled; subsequent interim assessment have been planned every 20 participants enrolled. Study will be interrupted if >10% difference in primary outcome.
Funding: STARS grant from University of Padova (Italy); Penta Foundation; CARIPARO
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unblinded CGM | Experimental | Device: Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)CGM data will be "unblinded", with Hypo/hyperglycemia alarms on. Data will be recorded from CGM every three hours and intervention to adequate glucose intake will be performed to keep glycemia in normal range (72-144mg/dl) if necessary. |
| Blinded CGM | Other | Device: Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)Hypo/hyper alarms are off. CGM data will be blinded. Glucose intake will be adequate according to at least 2 capillary glycemic tests per day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 hours to 2 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- <= 32 weeks gestation
- birthweight <1500 g
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- birthweight <500g
- congenital pathologies
- lack of parental consent
- perinatal maternal infections
- albinism
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)Data from device will be readable and alarms on | Device | Unblinded CGM |
| Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian)Data from device will be blinded and alarms off | Device | Blinded CGM |
Primary outcome
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (posterior areas)
Time frame: 5 days
Number of hypoglycemic events henomdynamically significant. Hypoglycemic events are defined as any value <72mg/dL (mild hypo) or <47mg/dL (severe hypo). They are classified as "significant" in the presence of a reduction from baseline HbT >=15% (posterior areas)
8 secondary outcomes
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (overall)
Time frame: 5 days
Long-term neurodevelopment
Time frame: 24 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 2
Time frame: 12 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 3
Time frame: 18 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 4
Time frame: 36 months
Long-term neurodevelopment 4
Time frame: 50 months
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (overall-hyperglycemia)
Time frame: 5 days
Intervention and brain hemodynamic
Time frame: 5 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 22957521Agus MS, Steil GM, Wypij D, Costello JM, Laussen PC, Langer M, Alexander JL, Scoppettuolo LA, Pigula FA, Charpie JR, Ohye RG, Gaies MG; SPECS Study Investigators. Tight glycemic control versus standard care after pediatric cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1208-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206044. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 22791467Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, VanWeissenbruch M, Midgley P, Thio M, Cornette L, Ossuetta I, Palmer CR, Iglesias I, de Jong M, Gill B, de Zegher F, Dunger DB. Validation of the continuous glucose monitoring sensor in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Mar;98(2):F136-40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301661. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 18971490Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, Palmer CR, van Weissenbruch M, Midgley P, Thompson M, Thio M, Cornette L, Ossuetta I, Iglesias I, Theyskens C, de Jong M, Ahluwalia JS, de Zegher F, Dunger DB. Early insulin therapy in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1873-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803725.
- Results publication: PubMed 27446969Chalia M, Lee CW, Dempsey LA, Edwards AD, Singh H, Michell AW, Everdell NL, Hill RW, Hebden JC, Austin T, Cooper RJ. Hemodynamic response to burst-suppressed and discontinuous electroencephalography activity in infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Neurophotonics. 2016 Jul;3(3):031408. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031408. Epub 2016 May 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 11420320Debillon T, Zupan V, Ravault N, Magny JF, Dehan M. Development and initial validation of the EDIN scale, a new tool for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Jul;85(1):F36-41. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.1.f36.
- Results publication: PubMed 24931572Russell SJ, El-Khatib FH, Sinha M, Magyar KL, McKeon K, Goergen LG, Balliro C, Hillard MA, Nathan DM, Damiano ER. Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):313-325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314474. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 21975734Shah VS, Ohlsson A. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD001452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001452.pub4.
- Results publication: PubMed 21975772Sinclair JC, Bottino M, Cowett RM. Interventions for prevention of neonatal hyperglycemia in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD007615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007615.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 25161892Singh H, Cooper RJ, Wai Lee C, Dempsey L, Edwards A, Brigadoi S, Airantzis D, Everdell N, Michell A, Holder D, Hebden JC, Austin T. Mapping cortical haemodynamics during neonatal seizures using diffuse optical tomography: a case study. Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jul 6;5:256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.012. eCollection 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 10190926Duvanel CB, Fawer CL, Cotting J, Hohlfeld P, Matthieu JM. Long-term effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on brain growth and psychomotor development in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1999 Apr;134(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70209-x.
- Results publication: PubMed 16647423Filan PM, Inder TE, Cameron FJ, Kean MJ, Hunt RW. Neonatal hypoglycemia and occipital cerebral injury. J Pediatr. 2006 Apr;148(4):552-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.11.015.
- Results publication: PubMed 28042587Galderisi A, Brigadoi S, Cutini S, Moro SB, Lolli E, Meconi F, Benavides-Varela S, Baraldi E, Amodio P, Cobelli C, Trevisanuto D, Dell'Acqua R. Long-term continuous monitoring of the preterm brain with diffuse optical tomography and electroencephalography: a technical note on cap manufacturing. Neurophotonics. 2016 Oct;3(4):045009. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.4.045009. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Related trials for Infant Development
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Vestibular Function on Deaf Infants' Activities of Daily Living
Vestibular Dysfunction, Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Tiny Tummies - A Milk Study
Gut Microbiome, Neurocognitive Correlates of Eating Habits
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Genetic Factors in the Development of Lung Disease
Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Motor Development and Early Predictors of Psychomotor Outcomes in Preterm and Term Infants Assessed by MOS-R and Caregiver Questionnaire at 18 and 36 Months
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Motor Skills Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Improving Nutrition for Babies Born by Caesarean Section
Breastfeeding Mothers of Legal Age, Their Babies Under 6 Months Old Born Vaginally
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alfonso Galderisi, MD principal investigator
University Hospital of Padua
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Unblinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) and Blinded - CGM (Medtronic Guardian) in people with Infant Development and Hypoglycemia Neonatal, run by University Hospital Padova at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alfonso Galderisi, MD (+390498213545, alfonsogalderisi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CGMS and brain hemodynamic (posterior areas) (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04347590, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2020.