ARDS, HumanAPPROVE-CARENCT04347941
Awake Prone Positioning to Reduce Invasive VEntilation in COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory failurE
A study testing Prone Positioning in people with ARDS, Human and Mechanical Ventilation Complication, run by University College Hospital Galway at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Prone positioning (PP) is an effective first-line intervention to treat moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, as it improves gas exchanges and lowers mortality.The use of PP in awake self-ventilating patients with (e.g. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ARDS, Human, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, COVID19
- What is being tested?
- Prone Positioning
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 11 Jul 2020to 26 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suspected or confirmed COVID19 infection
- Bilateral Infiltrates on CXR
- SpO2 <94% on FiO2 40% by either venturi facemask or high flow nasal cannula
- RR <40
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age <18
- Uncooperative or likely to be unable to lie on abdomen for 16 hours
- Receiving comfort care only
- Multi-organ failure
- RR>40
- Contraindication to PP (e.g. vomiting, abdominal wound, unstable pelvic/spinal lesions, pregnancy >20/40 gestation, severe brain injury).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Prone positioning (PP) is an effective first-line intervention to treat moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, as it improves gas exchanges and lowers mortality.The use of PP in awake self-ventilating patients with (e.g. COVID-19 induced) ARDS could improve gas exchange and reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, but has not been studied outside of case series.The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled study of patients with COVID-19 induced respiratory failure to determine if prone positioning reduces the need for mechanical ventilation compared to standard management.
Read the detailed description
Prone positioning (PP) is an adjunctive therapy used that has been proven to save lives in sedated patients with confirmed moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). PP involves placing patients in the prone, i.e. face down position for time periods of up to 16 hours per day. PP promotes lung homogeneity, improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics permitting reduction of ventilation intensity, and reducing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
Maintaining self-ventilation is associated with increased aeration of dependent lung regions, less need for sedation, improved cardiac filling and removes the risk of VILI, and so is an important therapeutic goal in hypoxic patients. The use of PP in awake self-ventilating patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) and/or ARDS could improve gas exchange and reduce the need for invasive MV, but has not been studied outside of case series.
However, an increase in oxygenation does not necessarily reduce the risk of invasive MV. PP has significant attached risks such as causing pressure sores in patients, PP is uncomfortable for some patients, it increases nursing workload, and if ineffective could hinder the delivery of other (effective) medical care. Hence there is a need to determine if PP of awake patients is effective in reducing the need for invasive MV. This multi-centre, open label, randomized controlled study of COVID-19 induced AHRF/ARDS will determine if PP reduces the need for mechanical ventilation.
- Conditions
- ARDS, Human, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, COVID19
- Being tested
- Prone Positioning, Standard of care.
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prone PositioningProcedure or surgery
Patient will be asked to remain for at least one hour and to a maximum total of 16 hours in prone position with 45 minutes breaks for meals. Immediately prior to proning, if spO2 <94% on FiO2 0.4, start on 100% O2 to ensure stability during proning. A nurse or assistant will assist patient to turn on side and then face down with the support of pillows as required for comfort, ensure that they are predominantly on their chest rather than on their side. Arms can be at side, in swimmer position and can be moved to patients' comfort, pillows under knees and chest for comfort and call bell to be at patient's arm's length. Vitals and work of breathing score will be measured before and at 1 hour into each proning session and at the end of each session. Total length of time in prone position will be recorded. Intervention to continue daily until oxygen requirement to maintain spO2 >94% is below FiO2 0.4 via venturi facemask or high flow nasal cannula
Standard of care.Procedure or surgery
Standard of care. Prone positioning may be administered as a rescue therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prone Positioning | Experimental | Intervention patients will remain up to 16 hours per day in Prone Positioning with 45 minutes breaks for meals Receives: Procedure: Prone Positioning |
| Standard Care | Active comparator | Control patients will receive full standard care. Prone Positioning as a rescue intervention is permitted and is recorded. Receives: Procedure: Standard of care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Effect of Prone Positioning on Requirement for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Death in Patients With COVID 19 Induced Respiratory Failure.
A measure of effect of awake prone positioning in patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure undergoing supplemental oxygen via high flow nasal cannular oxygen on reducing requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation or death. Outcome measure is calculated as a count of the number of patients who went onto require invasive mechanical ventilation or died up to 28 days post randomization.
Measured: Up to 28 days post randomisation
Secondary outcomes (9)
Length of Time Tolerating Prone Positioning
description of duration of prone positioning in hours per day from day 0 to day 14 in trial
Measured: Daily during intervention up to 14 days post randomisation
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Measured Before Prone Positioning
Measure of change in oxygenation before intervention in the patients assigned to awake prone positioning
Measured: Immediately before intervention
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio After 1 Hours of Prone Positioning
Measure of change in oxygenation following patients being placed in the prone position for 1 hour
Measured: During intervention
SpO2/FiO2 Ratio Measured Before Prone Positioning
Measure of oxygenation using pulse oximetry before intervention where ABG not available
Measured: Immediately before intervention
SpO2/FiO2 Ratio After 1 Hour in Prone Positioning
Measure of oxygenation 1 hour after intervention where ABG not available
Measured: During Intervention
Number Requiring Increase in Ventilatory Assistance
Number of patients in each group requiring an increase in the respiratory support from baseline high flow nasal cannula oxygen post randomization up to 28 days later, defined as need for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (biPAP)
Measured: Up to 28 days post randomisation
Work of Breathing Assessment (Respiratory Distress Scale)
Measure of work of breathing in COVID-19 based on Oxygen Delivery Device, Oxygen Saturation and respiratory rate and accessory muscle use with 0-3 Mild, 4-6 Moderate and 7-10 Severe
Measured: Immediately before and during intervention
Changes in Bioimpedance Measures of Lung Edema in Patients in PP
Substudy examining use of bioimpedance as a surrogate measure of lung edema following prone positioning
Measured: During intervention
Use of Awake Prone Positioning as a Rescue Intervention in Control Patients
Number of patients who underwent rescue awake prone positioning in control patients by physicians in response to hypoxia
Measured: Up to 28 days post randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2020
- Study start11 Jul 2020
- Primary completion26 Jan 2021
- Study completion26 Jan 2021
Why it stopped: Enrollment for trial was terminated on January 26, 2021 after a third interim analysis demonstrated that a pre-defined statistical criteria for efficacy were met as part of meta-trial study of awake prone positioning.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ARDS, HumanStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College Hospital Galway
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Laffey, University College Hospital Galway
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04347941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APPROVE-CARE-2020
- Acronym
- APPROVE-CARE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Electronic Case report form following informed consent, all patient identification removed, and individual patient response to intervention will be shared.
Publications
Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
PubMed 34425070Tavernier E, McNicholas B, Pavlov I, Roca O, Perez Y, Laffey J, Mirza S, Cosgrave D, Vines D, Frat JP, Ehrmann S, Li J. Awake prone positioning of hypoxaemic patients with COVID-19: protocol for a randomised controlled open-label superiority meta-trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 11;10(11):e041520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041520.
PubMed 33177145
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Awake Prone Positioning to Reduce Invasive VEntilation in COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory failurE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04347941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APPROVE-CARE / APPROVE-CARE-2020
- Conditions
- ARDS, Human, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, COVID19
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Enrollment for trial was terminated on January 26, 2021 after a third interim analysis demonstrated that a pre-defined statistical criteria for efficacy were met as part of meta-trial study of awake prone positioning.
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College Hospital GalwayUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Dec 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prone positioning (PP) is an effective first-line intervention to treat moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, as it improves gas exchanges and lowers mortality.The use of PP in awake self-ventilating patients with (e.g. COVID-19 induced) ARDS could improve gas exchange and reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, but has not been studied outside of case series.The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled study of patients with COVID-19 induced respiratory failure to determine if prone positioning reduces the need for mechanical ventilation compared to standard management.
Detailed description
Prone positioning (PP) is an adjunctive therapy used that has been proven to save lives in sedated patients with confirmed moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). PP involves placing patients in the prone, i.e. face down position for time periods of up to 16 hours per day. PP promotes lung homogeneity, improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics permitting reduction of ventilation intensity, and reducing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
Maintaining self-ventilation is associated with increased aeration of dependent lung regions, less need for sedation, improved cardiac filling and removes the risk of VILI, and so is an important therapeutic goal in hypoxic patients. The use of PP in awake self-ventilating patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) and/or ARDS could improve gas exchange and reduce the need for invasive MV, but has not been studied outside of case series.
However, an increase in oxygenation does not necessarily reduce the risk of invasive MV. PP has significant attached risks such as causing pressure sores in patients, PP is uncomfortable for some patients, it increases nursing workload, and if ineffective could hinder the delivery of other (effective) medical care. Hence there is a need to determine if PP of awake patients is effective in reducing the need for invasive MV. This multi-centre, open label, randomized controlled study of COVID-19 induced AHRF/ARDS will determine if PP reduces the need for mechanical ventilation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prone Positioning | Experimental | Procedure: Prone PositioningIntervention patients will remain up to 16 hours per day in Prone Positioning with 45 minutes breaks for meals |
| Standard Care | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard of care.Control patients will receive full standard care. Prone Positioning as a rescue intervention is permitted and is recorded. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Suspected or confirmed COVID19 infection
- Bilateral Infiltrates on CXR
- SpO2 <94% on FiO2 40% by either venturi facemask or high flow nasal cannula
- RR <40
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age <18
- Uncooperative or likely to be unable to lie on abdomen for 16 hours
- Receiving comfort care only
- Multi-organ failure
- RR>40
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prone PositioningPatient will be asked to remain for at least one hour and to a maximum total of 16 hours in prone position with 45 minutes breaks for meals. Immediately prior to proning, if spO2 <94% on FiO2 0.4, start on 100% O2 to ensure stability during proning. A nurse or assistant will assist patient to turn on side and then face down with the support of pillows as required for comfort, ensure that they are predominantly on their chest rather than on their side. Arms can be at side, in swimmer position and can be moved to patients' comfort, pillows under knees and chest for comfort and call bell to be at patient's arm's length. Vitals and work of breathing score will be measured before and at 1 hour into each proning session and at the end of each session. Total length of time in prone position will be recorded. Intervention to continue daily until oxygen requirement to maintain spO2 >94% is below FiO2 0.4 via venturi facemask or high flow nasal cannula | Procedure or surgery | Prone Positioning |
| Standard of care.Standard of care. Prone positioning may be administered as a rescue therapy | Procedure or surgery | Standard Care |
Primary outcome
The Effect of Prone Positioning on Requirement for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Death in Patients With COVID 19 Induced Respiratory Failure.
Time frame: Up to 28 days post randomisation
A measure of effect of awake prone positioning in patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure undergoing supplemental oxygen via high flow nasal cannular oxygen on reducing requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation or death. Outcome measure is calculated as a count of the number of patients who went onto require invasive mechanical ventilation or died up to 28 days post randomization.
9 secondary outcomes
Length of Time Tolerating Prone Positioning
Time frame: Daily during intervention up to 14 days post randomisation
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Measured Before Prone Positioning
Time frame: Immediately before intervention
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio After 1 Hours of Prone Positioning
Time frame: During intervention
SpO2/FiO2 Ratio Measured Before Prone Positioning
Time frame: Immediately before intervention
SpO2/FiO2 Ratio After 1 Hour in Prone Positioning
Time frame: During Intervention
Number Requiring Increase in Ventilatory Assistance
Time frame: Up to 28 days post randomisation
Work of Breathing Assessment (Respiratory Distress Scale)
Time frame: Immediately before and during intervention
Changes in Bioimpedance Measures of Lung Edema in Patients in PP
Time frame: During intervention
Use of Awake Prone Positioning as a Rescue Intervention in Control Patients
Time frame: Up to 28 days post randomisation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 34425070Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 33177145Tavernier E, McNicholas B, Pavlov I, Roca O, Perez Y, Laffey J, Mirza S, Cosgrave D, Vines D, Frat JP, Ehrmann S, Li J. Awake prone positioning of hypoxaemic patients with COVID-19: protocol for a randomised controlled open-label superiority meta-trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 11;10(11):e041520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041520.
- Result of Meta-trial in which RCT was incorporatedLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Electronic Case report form following informed consent, all patient identification removed, and individual patient response to intervention will be shared.
Related trials for ARDS, Human
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Transpulmonary MP on Prognosis of Patients With Severe ARDS Treated With VV-ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prone Positioning in people with ARDS, Human and Mechanical Ventilation Complication, run by University College Hospital Galway at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Effect of Prone Positioning on Requirement for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Death in Patients With COVID 19 Induced Respiratory Failure. (time frame: Up to 28 days post randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04347941, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2021.