Periapical DiseasesNCT04348578
Effect of QMix 2in1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing
A study testing QMix 2in1 in people with Periapical Diseases, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aim: To compare the 12-month radiographic outcome of root canal treatment with and without the additional use of QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) irrigation solution. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Periapical Diseases
- What is being tested?
- QMix 2in1
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2017to 1 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- necrotic, single root teeth with a periapical lesion (2>PAI>5)
Who cannot join
- pregnant
- had used antibiotics within the previous week
- allergy to local anesthetic agents
- history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- had uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hematological disease, or had received or were receiving radiotherapy and periodontal bone loss (visualized radiographically)
- open tooth apex
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Cukurova University, Faculty of Dentistry
Adana, 01130
About this study
Official title: Effect of QMix 2-in-1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing After Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Aim: To compare the 12-month radiographic outcome of root canal treatment with and without the additional use of QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) irrigation solution.
Methodology: The study included 60 single-rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency of 60 patients, randomized into two groups using randomized block design with block sizes of 10 patients in each. Root canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and irrigation was performed with 5 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using side-vented needles during instrumentation. The final irrigation protocol was performed using 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (n= 30) or 5 ml QMix 2-in-1 (n=30). Then the root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona), using the cold lateral compaction technique. The patients were recalled after 12 months and evaluated radiographically according to perapical index (PAI) scores. Pre and post-treatment PAI scores were compared and teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of the treatment groups. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to examine the changes in PAI score from baseline to the follow-up evaluation in each group.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate radiographic periapical repair after endodontic treatment using QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and NaOCl irrigation in single-rooted teeth with apical periodontitis.
- Conditions
- Periapical Diseases
- Being tested
- QMix 2in1
- Keywords
- QMix 2-in-1, Sodium hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Treatment outcome, Radiographic healing
- Medical subject headings
- Periapical Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QMix 2in1Other
In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | No intervention | The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL NaOCl and 5mL sterile saline in the control group.The root canals were dried with sterile paper points and were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with the cold lateral condensation method and the entry cavity was restored with composite. All treatments were performed following a standardized procedure by one operator. After completion of the root canal treatment, periapical radiographs were taken using the paralleling technique. All the patients were called for follow-up examination at 12 months, and were examined radiographically. |
| QMix 2in1 | Experimental | The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL Mix 2in1 and 5mL sterile saline in the experimental group. Receives: Other: QMix 2in1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiographic healing after 12 months follow-up.
After the completion of treatment of both control and QMix 2in1 group, the status of periapical healing was assessed.
Measured: Time frame is 12 months for this study. Each patient will recall for an appointment and the status of the tooth will evaluate radiographically.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2017
- Primary completion1 Feb 2018
- Study completion1 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Periapical DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cukurova UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cukurova University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cemre Sapmaz Uçan, Cukurova University
- Investigators
- Oguz Yoldaş, Professor, Study director, University of Cukurova, Faculty of Dentistry, Vice-Dean
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04348578
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TDH-2017-8165
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
PubMed 24171024Holland R, Gomes JE Filho, Cintra LTA, Queiroz IOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-476. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464.
PubMed 29069143Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PubMed 22892729Pai S, Thomas MS. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):741; author reply 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 21787479Chandrasekhar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri Ch. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix 2 in 1- An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.
PubMed 23349574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of QMix 2-in-1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing After Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04348578
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TDH-2017-8165
- Conditions
- Periapical Diseases
- Keywords
- QMix 2-in-1, Sodium hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Treatment outcome, Radiographic healing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cukurova UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim: To compare the 12-month radiographic outcome of root canal treatment with and without the additional use of QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) irrigation solution.
Methodology: The study included 60 single-rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency of 60 patients, randomized into two groups using randomized block design with block sizes of 10 patients in each. Root canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and irrigation was performed with 5 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using side-vented needles during instrumentation. The final irrigation protocol was performed using 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (n= 30) or 5 ml QMix 2-in-1 (n=30). Then the root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona), using the cold lateral compaction technique. The patients were recalled after 12 months and evaluated radiographically according to perapical index (PAI) scores. Pre and post-treatment PAI scores were compared and teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of the treatment groups. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to examine the changes in PAI score from baseline to the follow-up evaluation in each group.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate radiographic periapical repair after endodontic treatment using QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and NaOCl irrigation in single-rooted teeth with apical periodontitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | No intervention | –The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL NaOCl and 5mL sterile saline in the control group.The root canals were dried with sterile paper points and were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with the cold lateral condensation method and the entry cavity was restored with composite. All treatments were performed following a standardized procedure by one operator. After completion of the root canal treatment, periapical radiographs were taken using the paralleling technique. All the patients were called for follow-up examination at 12 months, and were examined radiographically. |
| QMix 2in1 | Experimental | Other: QMix 2in1The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL Mix 2in1 and 5mL sterile saline in the experimental group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- necrotic, single root teeth with a periapical lesion (2>PAI>5)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pregnant
- had used antibiotics within the previous week
- allergy to local anesthetic agents
- history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- had uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hematological disease, or had received or were receiving radiotherapy and periodontal bone loss (visualized radiographically)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QMix 2in1In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation. | Other | QMix 2in1 |
Primary outcome
Radiographic healing after 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: Time frame is 12 months for this study. Each patient will recall for an appointment and the status of the tooth will evaluate radiographically.
After the completion of treatment of both control and QMix 2in1 group, the status of periapical healing was assessed.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 24171024Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 29069143Holland R, Gomes JE Filho, Cintra LTA, Queiroz IOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-476. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464.
- Results publication: PubMed 22892729Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 21787479Pai S, Thomas MS. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):741; author reply 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 23349574Chandrasekhar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri Ch. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix 2 in 1- An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Periapical Diseases
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruiting
PRP-Assisted Regenerative Endodontics Versus Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Mature Necrotic Teeth
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Inflammatory Outcomes of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Mature Necrotic Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis.
Chronic Apical Periodontitis, Pulp Necrosis
Active, not recruiting
Early Healing of Apical Periodontitis After Root Canal Treatment With Bioceramic and Calcium Hydroxide Medicaments: Evaluation Using PAI and ImageJ
Apical Periodontitis, Root Canal Treatment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Oguz Yoldaş, Professor study director
University of Cukurova, Faculty of Dentistry, Vice-Dean
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing QMix 2in1 in people with Periapical Diseases, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiographic healing after 12 months follow-up. (time frame: Time frame is 12 months for this study. Each patient will recall for an appointment and the status of the tooth will evaluate radiographically.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04348578, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2020.