Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromePhase 3ICARNCT04350580
Polyvalent Immunoglobulin in COVID-19 Related ARds
A Phase 3 study testing Human immunoglobulin in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19, run by Centre Hospitalier St Anne at 42 sites in France.
Trial summary
As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35500 people died, essentially due to respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of the with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Human immunoglobulin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 11 Apr 2020to 20 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any patient in intensive care:
- Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours
- ARDS meeting the Berlin criteria
- PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Patient, family or deferred consent (emergency clause)
- Affiliation to a social security scheme (or exemption from affiliation)
Who cannot join
- Allergy to polyvalent immunoglobulins
- Pregnant woman or minor patient
- Known IgA deficiency
- Patient with renal failure on admission defined by a 3 times baseline creatinine or creatinine >354 micromol/L or a diuresis of less than 0.3 mL/Kg for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours
- Participation in another interventional trial
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 1 country.
42 sites in 1 country
France42 sites
CHU Sud Amiens
Amiens
CHU Angers
Angers
Service de réanimation polyvalente, rond point de Girac
Angoulême
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil
CH Aulnay
Aulnay-sous-Bois
Centre hospitalier de Béthune
Beuvry
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny
CH Chalons en champagne
Châlons-en-Champagne
CH-Nord-Ardennes
Charleville-Mézières
Hopital d'instruction des armées Percy
Clamart
Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe
Dieppe
CH Etampes
Étampes
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Garches
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble
Grand hopital de l'est Francilien - site de Jossigny
Jossigny
Hopital Robert Boulin
Libourne
Pôle de Médecine intensive/réanimation Hôpital Salengro, CHRU de Lille
Lille
Groupement Hospitalier Edouar Herriot
Lyon
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Novembre 2019
Lyon
Hopital Jacques Cartier
Massy
Hopital Jacques Monod
Montivilliers
Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU
Nantes
CHR Orléans
Orléans
Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne
Paris
CHU Lariboisiere
Paris
CHU Pitié Salpétriere Service de réanimation chirurgicale
Paris
CHU Saint Antoine
Paris
Fondation ophtalmologique Rotschild
Paris
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers
CHU Robert Débré
Reims
CH Poissy
Saint-Germain-en-Laye
Groupe hospitalier Saint Vincent
Strasbourg
Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg
Hopital de Tarbes
Tarbes
Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté
Trévenans
CH Valenciennes
Valenciennes
Chu Nancy - Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Hopital de Vannes
Vannes
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
About this study
Official title: Value of Early Treatment With Polyvalent Immunoglobulin in the Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infections
As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35500 people died, essentially due to respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of the with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. The lung lesions are related to both the viral infection and to an intense inflammatory reaction. Because of it's action, as an immunomodulatory agent that can attenuate the inflammatory reaction and also strengthen the antiviral response, it is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin administration (IGIV) in patients developing ARDS post-SARS-CoV2. IGIV modulates immunity, and this effect results in a decrease of pro-inflammatory activity, key factor in the ARDS related to the COVID-19. It should be noted that IGIV is part of the treatments in various diseases such as autoimmune and inflammatory diffuse interstitial lung diseases. In addition, they have been beneficial in the post-influenza ARDS but also have been in 3 cases of post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS. IGIV is a treatment option because it is well tolerated, especially concerning the kidney. These elements encourage a placebo-controlled trial testing the benefit of IGIV in ARDS post-SARS-CoV2.
Read the detailed description
As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35 500 people have died, mainly from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of cases with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. Pulmonary lesions in these patients are related to both viral infection and an inflammatory reaction. Patients admitted to intensive care have an important inflammatory response and increased plasma concentrations of IL2, IL7, IL10, GCSF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα.
In the blood, the number of peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cells appears to be significantly reduced, while their status is hyperactivated. This is evidenced by immunoreactive cytometrics for HLA-DR (CD4 3-47%) and CD38 (CD8 39-4%) or by an increase in the proportion of highly pro-inflammatory Th 17 CCR6+ lymphocytes. In addition, CD8 T cells would exhibit a highly cytotoxic profile characterized by high concentrations of cytotoxic granules, perforin+, granulysin+ or double positive, suggesting associated complement activation. Because of their immunomodulatory action, which can attenuate the inflammatory response; and also strengthen the anti-viral defence, it is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) administration in patients developing post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
IGIV modifies cell function of dendritic cells, cytokine and chemokine networks and T-lymphocytes, resulting in the proliferation of regulatory T cells to regulate the activity of T lymphocytes CD4 or CD8. The action of IGIV induces an activation more particularly of lymphocytes T regulators that could modulate the effects of the lymphocyte populations described in the study by Xu et al during COVID-19. In addition, IGIV modulate humoral acquired immunity, through their effect on the idiotypic network and antibody production. They also act on innate immunity, through antigen neutralization and modulation of phagocytic cells. These effects result in a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and complement activation, key factors in post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
IGIV is part of the treatment for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The standard IGIV as well as polyclonal IGIV significantly reduced mortality in patients with septic shock and in Kawasaki disease, which is post-viral vasculitis of the child. In addition, they would not only be beneficial in post-influenza ARDS, but also would also in 3 cases of post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS. IVIG is a treatment option because it is well tolerated, especially regarding renal function.
These factors are encouraging to quickly conduct a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial testing the benefit of IGIV in post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
We hypothesize that the number of days without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is 10 days in the placebo group and 15 days in the experimental group with a standard deviation of 6 days, considering a mortality of 50% and 40% in the placebo and experimental groups respectively (26, 27). The number of days without IMV in the placebo group is (50% x 10 D) + (50% x 0 D) or 5 D on average, and following the same calculation for the experimental group of (60% x 15 D) + (40% x 0 D) or 9 D.
Therefore, a mean value of 5 days without ventilation in the placebo group versus 9 in the experimental group is assumed, and the 6-day standard deviation is assumed to be stable. Given the uncertainty regarding the assumption of normality of distributions, the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (U-test) was used for the estimation of the sample size. Considering a bilateral alpha risk of 5% and a power of 90% and an effect size of 0.6, the number of subjects to be included is 138 patients, 69 in each arm.
The primary and secondary analyses will be stratified by age categories, sex and other clinically relevant factors (comorbidities). Demographic characteristics and parameters identified at enrolment will be summarized using descriptive statistical methods.
Demographic summaries will include gender, race/ethnicity, and age. For demographic and categorical background characteristics, a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test will be used to compare treatment groups. For continuous demographic and baseline characteristics, a Wilcoxon test will be used to compare treatment groups.
The number of days without mechanical ventilation will be presented as a mean with standard deviation. The groups will be analyzed in terms of intention to treat and the difference between the two groups will be analyzed by a non-parametric test of comparison of means, stratified for the primary endpoint. The point estimate of the difference between treatments and the associated 95% confidence interval will be provided.
A regression model for censored data (Cox model) will explore prognostic factors. The IGIV immunological and pathological related efficacy endpoints will also be compared according to their distribution and analyzed using Student, Mann-Whitney and Fisher tests.
Other variables will be presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges according to their distribution and analyzed by Student, Mann-Whitney and Fisher tests.
Parameters that are measured on a time scale from randomization or start of administration will be compared between treatment groups using the Log-Rank test.
The choice of statistical tests and multivariate models (parametric or non-parametric) will be made for each variable based on observed characteristics (normality of distributions and residuals, collinearity).
The statistical analyses relating to the main objective will be carried out as intention to treat. Secondary analyses on the population per protocol may also be carried out.
All tests will be bilateral with a significance threshold of 5%. The software used will be SPSS v26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An interim analysis will be performed after 50 participants are enrolled and another after 100 inclusions.
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID-19
- Being tested
- Human immunoglobulin, Placebo
- Keywords
- acute respiratory distress syndrome, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Immunoglobulin
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Human immunoglobulinDrug
Also called Clairyg
Human immunoglobulin 2g/kg over 4 days (0.5g/kg/d)
PlaceboDrug
Also called Sodium chloride 0.9%
Sodium chloride 0.9% in the same volume and over the same time as the immunoglobulin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - IGIV | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group will receive a 2g/Kg infusion of human immunoglobulin which should be started before the 96th hours after the start of mechanical ventilation in 4 injections of 0.5 g/Kg over 4 consecutive days. Receives: Drug: Human immunoglobulin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants of the placebo group will receive an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.9% for the same duration. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ventilator-free days
Sum of the days the patient did not receive VM, but if death occurs before D28, the score is zero
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (15)
Mortality
Vital status at 28 and 90 days
Measured: 28 and 90 days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score
Used to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure, from 0 to 24, with severity increasing the higher the score
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
P/F ratio
Ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2 in mmHg) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2 expressed as a fraction, not a percentage)
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Lung compliance
Measure of lung compliance
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Radiological score
Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Biological efficacy endpoints - C-reactive protein
Concentration in mg/L
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Biological efficacy endpoints - Procalcitonin
Concentration in microgram/L
Measured: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Immunological profile
Number of CD4 HLA-DR+ and CD38+, CD8 lymphocytes
Measured: Up to 28 days
Number of patients using other treatments for COVID-19 related ARDS
Use of corticosteroids, antiretroviral, chloroquine
Measured: Up to 28 days
Occurrence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism through imaging exam (eg ultrasound and CT scan)
Measured: 28 days
Total duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilatory weaning and curarisation
Total time of mechanical ventilation, weaning and use of neuromuscular blockade
Measured: 28 days
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) score and need for dialysis
Divided in 3 stages, with higher severity of kidney injury in higher stages
Measured: 28 days
Occurrence of adverse event related to immunoglobulins
Kidney failure, hypersensitivity with cutaneous or hemodynamic manifestations, aseptic meningitis, hemolytic anemia, leuko-neutropenia, transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI)
Measured: 28 days
Occurrence of critical illness neuromyopathy
Medical research council sum score on awakening
Measured: Up to 28 days
Occurrence of ventilator-acquired pneumonia
Radiological and clinical context associated with a bacteriological sampling in culture of tracheal secretions, bronchiolar-alveolar lavage or a protected distal sampling
Measured: Up to 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2020
- Study start11 Apr 2020
- Primary completion20 Nov 2020
- Study completion20 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier St AnneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The participant will be randomized to either the group of treatment with IVIG or the placebo group. Participants in the treatment group will receive infusions of polyvalent immunoglobulins for 4 consecutive days. Participants in the placebo group will receive an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.9% for the same duration.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier St Anne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences, Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tarek Sharshar, MD, PHD, Study chair, Centre Hospitalier Sainte AnneAurélien Mazeraud, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04350580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D20-P013
- Other IDs
- 2020-001570-30
- Acronym
- ICAR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
PubMed 31986264Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, Tai Y, Bai C, Gao T, Song J, Xia P, Dong J, Zhao J, Wang FS. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420-422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. Epub 2020 Feb 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 32085846Chaigne B, Mouthon L. Mechanisms of action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Feb;56(1):45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.12.017. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
PubMed 28161150Arish N, Eldor R, Fellig Y, Bogot N, Laxer U, Izhar U, Rokach A. Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia associated with common variable immunodeficiency resolved with intravenous immunoglobulins. Thorax. 2006 Dec;61(12):1096-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.029819.
PubMed 17114373Oates-Whitehead RM, Baumer JH, Haines L, Love S, Maconochie IK, Gupta A, Roman K, Dua JS, Flynn I. Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Kawasaki disease in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(4):CD004000. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004000.
PubMed 14584002Alejandria MM, Lansang MA, Dans LF, Mantaring JB 3rd. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 16;2013(9):CD001090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001090.pub2.
PubMed 24043371Mazeraud A, Jamme M, Mancusi RL, Latroche C, Megarbane B, Siami S, Zarka J, Moneger G, Santoli F, Argaud L, Chillet P, Muller G, Bruel C, Asfar P, Beloncle F, Reignier J, Vinsonneau C, Schimpf C, Amour J, Goulenok C, Lemaitre C, Rohaut B, Mateu P, De Rudnicki S, Mourvillier B, Declercq PL, Schwebel C, Stoclin A, Garnier M, Madeux B, Gaudry S, Bailly K, Lamer C, Aegerter P, Rieu C, Sylla K, Lucas B, Sharshar T. Intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with COVID-19-associated moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ICAR): multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Feb;10(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00440-9. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
PubMed 34774185Mazeraud A, Goncalves B, Aegerter P, Mancusi L, Rieu C, Bozza F, Sylla K, Siami S, Sharshar T. Effect of early treatment with polyvalent immunoglobulin on acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections (ICAR trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 28;22(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05118-7.
PubMed 33648563
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Value of Early Treatment With Polyvalent Immunoglobulin in the Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infections
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04350580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICAR / D20-P013
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID-19
- Keywords
- acute respiratory distress syndrome, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Immunoglobulin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier St AnneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences, Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies
- Study start
- 11 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35500 people died, essentially due to respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of the with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. The lung lesions are related to both the viral infection and to an intense inflammatory reaction. Because of it's action, as an immunomodulatory agent that can attenuate the inflammatory reaction and also strengthen the antiviral response, it is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin administration (IGIV) in patients developing ARDS post-SARS-CoV2. IGIV modulates immunity, and this effect results in a decrease of pro-inflammatory activity, key factor in the ARDS related to the COVID-19. It should be noted that IGIV is part of the treatments in various diseases such as autoimmune and inflammatory diffuse interstitial lung diseases. In addition, they have been beneficial in the post-influenza ARDS but also have been in 3 cases of post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS. IGIV is a treatment option because it is well tolerated, especially concerning the kidney. These elements encourage a placebo-controlled trial testing the benefit of IGIV in ARDS post-SARS-CoV2.
Detailed description
As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35 500 people have died, mainly from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of cases with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. Pulmonary lesions in these patients are related to both viral infection and an inflammatory reaction. Patients admitted to intensive care have an important inflammatory response and increased plasma concentrations of IL2, IL7, IL10, GCSF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα.
In the blood, the number of peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cells appears to be significantly reduced, while their status is hyperactivated. This is evidenced by immunoreactive cytometrics for HLA-DR (CD4 3-47%) and CD38 (CD8 39-4%) or by an increase in the proportion of highly pro-inflammatory Th 17 CCR6+ lymphocytes. In addition, CD8 T cells would exhibit a highly cytotoxic profile characterized by high concentrations of cytotoxic granules, perforin+, granulysin+ or double positive, suggesting associated complement activation. Because of their immunomodulatory action, which can attenuate the inflammatory response; and also strengthen the anti-viral defence, it is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) administration in patients developing post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
IGIV modifies cell function of dendritic cells, cytokine and chemokine networks and T-lymphocytes, resulting in the proliferation of regulatory T cells to regulate the activity of T lymphocytes CD4 or CD8. The action of IGIV induces an activation more particularly of lymphocytes T regulators that could modulate the effects of the lymphocyte populations described in the study by Xu et al during COVID-19. In addition, IGIV modulate humoral acquired immunity, through their effect on the idiotypic network and antibody production. They also act on innate immunity, through antigen neutralization and modulation of phagocytic cells. These effects result in a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and complement activation, key factors in post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
IGIV is part of the treatment for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The standard IGIV as well as polyclonal IGIV significantly reduced mortality in patients with septic shock and in Kawasaki disease, which is post-viral vasculitis of the child. In addition, they would not only be beneficial in post-influenza ARDS, but also would also in 3 cases of post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS. IVIG is a treatment option because it is well tolerated, especially regarding renal function.
These factors are encouraging to quickly conduct a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial testing the benefit of IGIV in post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS.
We hypothesize that the number of days without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is 10 days in the placebo group and 15 days in the experimental group with a standard deviation of 6 days, considering a mortality of 50% and 40% in the placebo and experimental groups respectively (26, 27). The number of days without IMV in the placebo group is (50% x 10 D) + (50% x 0 D) or 5 D on average, and following the same calculation for the experimental group of (60% x 15 D) + (40% x 0 D) or 9 D.
Therefore, a mean value of 5 days without ventilation in the placebo group versus 9 in the experimental group is assumed, and the 6-day standard deviation is assumed to be stable. Given the uncertainty regarding the assumption of normality of distributions, the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (U-test) was used for the estimation of the sample size. Considering a bilateral alpha risk of 5% and a power of 90% and an effect size of 0.6, the number of subjects to be included is 138 patients, 69 in each arm.
The primary and secondary analyses will be stratified by age categories, sex and other clinically relevant factors (comorbidities). Demographic characteristics and parameters identified at enrolment will be summarized using descriptive statistical methods.
Demographic summaries will include gender, race/ethnicity, and age. For demographic and categorical background characteristics, a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test will be used to compare treatment groups. For continuous demographic and baseline characteristics, a Wilcoxon test will be used to compare treatment groups.
The number of days without mechanical ventilation will be presented as a mean with standard deviation. The groups will be analyzed in terms of intention to treat and the difference between the two groups will be analyzed by a non-parametric test of comparison of means, stratified for the primary endpoint. The point estimate of the difference between treatments and the associated 95% confidence interval will be provided.
A regression model for censored data (Cox model) will explore prognostic factors. The IGIV immunological and pathological related efficacy endpoints will also be compared according to their distribution and analyzed using Student, Mann-Whitney and Fisher tests.
Other variables will be presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges according to their distribution and analyzed by Student, Mann-Whitney and Fisher tests.
Parameters that are measured on a time scale from randomization or start of administration will be compared between treatment groups using the Log-Rank test.
The choice of statistical tests and multivariate models (parametric or non-parametric) will be made for each variable based on observed characteristics (normality of distributions and residuals, collinearity).
The statistical analyses relating to the main objective will be carried out as intention to treat. Secondary analyses on the population per protocol may also be carried out.
All tests will be bilateral with a significance threshold of 5%. The software used will be SPSS v26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An interim analysis will be performed after 50 participants are enrolled and another after 100 inclusions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The participant will be randomized to either the group of treatment with IVIG or the placebo group. Participants in the treatment group will receive infusions of polyvalent immunoglobulins for 4 consecutive days. Participants in the placebo group will receive an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.9% for the same duration.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - IGIV | Experimental | Drug: Human immunoglobulinParticipants in the intervention group will receive a 2g/Kg infusion of human immunoglobulin which should be started before the 96th hours after the start of mechanical ventilation in 4 injections of 0.5 g/Kg over 4 consecutive days. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants of the placebo group will receive an equivalent volume of sodium chloride 0.9% for the same duration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any patient in intensive care:
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Allergy to polyvalent immunoglobulins
- Pregnant woman or minor patient
- Known IgA deficiency
- Patient with renal failure on admission defined by a 3 times baseline creatinine or creatinine >354 micromol/L or a diuresis of less than 0.3 mL/Kg for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours
- Participation in another interventional trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Human immunoglobulinAlso: ClairygHuman immunoglobulin 2g/kg over 4 days (0.5g/kg/d) | Drug | Intervention - IGIV |
| PlaceboAlso: Sodium chloride 0.9%Sodium chloride 0.9% in the same volume and over the same time as the immunoglobulin | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Ventilator-free days
Time frame: 28 days
Sum of the days the patient did not receive VM, but if death occurs before D28, the score is zero
15 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
P/F ratio
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Lung compliance
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Radiological score
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Biological efficacy endpoints - C-reactive protein
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Biological efficacy endpoints - Procalcitonin
Time frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Immunological profile
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Number of patients using other treatments for COVID-19 related ARDS
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Occurrence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Time frame: 28 days
Total duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilatory weaning and curarisation
Time frame: 28 days
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) score and need for dialysis
Time frame: 28 days
Occurrence of adverse event related to immunoglobulins
Time frame: 28 days
Occurrence of critical illness neuromyopathy
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Occurrence of ventilator-acquired pneumonia
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31986264Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 32085846Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, Tai Y, Bai C, Gao T, Song J, Xia P, Dong J, Zhao J, Wang FS. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420-422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. Epub 2020 Feb 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28161150Chaigne B, Mouthon L. Mechanisms of action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Feb;56(1):45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.12.017. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 17114373Arish N, Eldor R, Fellig Y, Bogot N, Laxer U, Izhar U, Rokach A. Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia associated with common variable immunodeficiency resolved with intravenous immunoglobulins. Thorax. 2006 Dec;61(12):1096-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.029819.
- Background: PubMed 14584002Oates-Whitehead RM, Baumer JH, Haines L, Love S, Maconochie IK, Gupta A, Roman K, Dua JS, Flynn I. Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Kawasaki disease in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(4):CD004000. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004000.
- Background: PubMed 24043371Alejandria MM, Lansang MA, Dans LF, Mantaring JB 3rd. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 16;2013(9):CD001090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001090.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34774185Mazeraud A, Jamme M, Mancusi RL, Latroche C, Megarbane B, Siami S, Zarka J, Moneger G, Santoli F, Argaud L, Chillet P, Muller G, Bruel C, Asfar P, Beloncle F, Reignier J, Vinsonneau C, Schimpf C, Amour J, Goulenok C, Lemaitre C, Rohaut B, Mateu P, De Rudnicki S, Mourvillier B, Declercq PL, Schwebel C, Stoclin A, Garnier M, Madeux B, Gaudry S, Bailly K, Lamer C, Aegerter P, Rieu C, Sylla K, Lucas B, Sharshar T. Intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with COVID-19-associated moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ICAR): multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Feb;10(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00440-9. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33648563Mazeraud A, Goncalves B, Aegerter P, Mancusi L, Rieu C, Bozza F, Sylla K, Siami S, Sharshar T. Effect of early treatment with polyvalent immunoglobulin on acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections (ICAR trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 28;22(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05118-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tarek Sharshar, MD, PHD study chair
Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne
Aurélien Mazeraud, MD, PHD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne
42 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Human immunoglobulin in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19, run by Centre Hospitalier St Anne at 42 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ventilator-free days (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04350580, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2021.