Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT04350710
Description of Respiratory Mechanics in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Associated ARDS
An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The aim of this observationnal study is to describe respiratory mechanics and lung recruitement in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome who underwent invasive ventilation on endotracheal tube, admitted to the medical ICU of Angers university hospital . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID
- What is being tested?
- PEEP trial
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 18 Mar 2020to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Mechanically Ventilated adult patients with COVID-19 Associated ARDS
Who may be able to join
- ARDS criteria according to Berlin classification criteria
- Invasive mechanical ventilation on endotracheal tube
- SARS Cov-2 infection
Who cannot join
- pneumothorax
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU
Angers, 49100
Francois BELONCLE, MCU-PH, 0241345866, Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics and Lung Recruitment in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
The aim of this observationnal study is to describe respiratory mechanics and lung recruitement in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome who underwent invasive ventilation on endotracheal tube, admitted to the medical ICU of Angers university hospital . Statics measurements of respiratory system compliance were performed at 2 differents levels of PEEP (15 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O). The recruited volume is computed as the difference between the volume expired from PEEP 15 to 5 cmH2O and the volume predicted by compliance at PEEP 5 cmH2O . The recruitment-to-Inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and CRS at PEEP 5 cmH2O) is used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 was used to define highly recruiter patients.
Read the detailed description
The investigators perform an observational prospective study in patients admitted to medical ICU in Angers University hospital with a confirmed COVID 19 pneumonia and who require invasive ventilation on endotracheal tube. Participants receive initially deep sedation and neuromuscular blockers for 24 hours and are ventilated in volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, a constant inspiratory flow of 60 L/minute and a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain pH above 7.35 when possible. A PEEP decremental trial from 15 to 5 cmH2O was performed (15 minutes by step).
Esophageal pressure monitoring and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are collected if available. Arterial blood gases and respiratory mechanics are measured at the end of each step.
The recruitment-to-Inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and CRS at PEEP 5 cmH2O) is used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 is used to define highly recruiter patients.
By the end of the recording time, a low-flow (5 L/min) inflation from PEEP 5 cmH2O (tidal volume = 6ml/kg PBW) is then performed after a prolonged expiration to identify a potential airway closure and the corresponding airway opening pressure (AOP).
Investigators perform these measurements at day 1, day 5 and day 10 from ICU admission if participants still require controlled ventilation.
The investigators also collect clinical data about each participant (past medical history, ICU discharge, hospital discharge, date of death, ventilator acquired pneumonia, thromboembolic event, use of NO, use of ECMO or renal replacement therapy).
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID
- Being tested
- PEEP trial
- Keywords
- COVID, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS CoV-2, Lung recruitability, Respiratory mechanics
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEP trialOther
Measurement of Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
no unit
Measured: Day 1
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
no unit
Measured: Day 5
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
no unit
Measured: Day 10
Secondary outcomes (43)
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Arterial blood gases
Measured: Day 1
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Arterial blood gases
Measured: Day 5
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Arterial blood gases
Measured: Day 10
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
mL
Measured: Day 1
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
mL
Measured: Day 5
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
mL
Measured: Day 10
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Obtained by inspiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 1
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Obtained by inspiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 5
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Obtained by inspiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 10
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 1
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 5
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 10
weight (Kg)
Measured: Day 1
weight (Kg)
Measured: Day 5
weight (Kg)
Measured: Day 10
urine output (mL)
Measured: day 1
urine output (mL)
Measured: day 5
urine output (mL)
Measured: day 10
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Measured: day 1
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Measured: day 5
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Measured: day 10
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Measured: day 1
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Measured: day 5
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Measured: day 10
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 1
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 5
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 10
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Obtained by expiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 1
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Obtained by expiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 5
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Obtained by expiratory pause of 5 seconds
Measured: Day 10
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 1
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 5
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Measured: Day 10
Height (cm)
Measured: Day 1
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: day 1
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: day 5
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Measured: day 10
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 1
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 5
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 10
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 5 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 1
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 5 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 5
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 5 cmH2O (mL)
respiratory rate decreased to 10 /min, expired tidal volume displayed by the ventilator is noted
Measured: Day 10
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2020
- Study start18 Mar 2020
- Primary completion20 Apr 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, AngersThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Angers
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- François BELONCLE, MCU PH, Principal investigator, CHU Angers, Médecine intensive réanimation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04350710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2030/31
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics and Lung Recruitment in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04350710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2030/31
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID
- Keywords
- COVID, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, SARS CoV-2, Lung recruitability, Respiratory mechanics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AngersOther government
- Study start
- 18 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this observationnal study is to describe respiratory mechanics and lung recruitement in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome who underwent invasive ventilation on endotracheal tube, admitted to the medical ICU of Angers university hospital . Statics measurements of respiratory system compliance were performed at 2 differents levels of PEEP (15 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O). The recruited volume is computed as the difference between the volume expired from PEEP 15 to 5 cmH2O and the volume predicted by compliance at PEEP 5 cmH2O . The recruitment-to-Inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and CRS at PEEP 5 cmH2O) is used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 was used to define highly recruiter patients.
Detailed description
The investigators perform an observational prospective study in patients admitted to medical ICU in Angers University hospital with a confirmed COVID 19 pneumonia and who require invasive ventilation on endotracheal tube. Participants receive initially deep sedation and neuromuscular blockers for 24 hours and are ventilated in volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, a constant inspiratory flow of 60 L/minute and a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain pH above 7.35 when possible. A PEEP decremental trial from 15 to 5 cmH2O was performed (15 minutes by step).
Esophageal pressure monitoring and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are collected if available. Arterial blood gases and respiratory mechanics are measured at the end of each step.
The recruitment-to-Inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and CRS at PEEP 5 cmH2O) is used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 is used to define highly recruiter patients.
By the end of the recording time, a low-flow (5 L/min) inflation from PEEP 5 cmH2O (tidal volume = 6ml/kg PBW) is then performed after a prolonged expiration to identify a potential airway closure and the corresponding airway opening pressure (AOP).
Investigators perform these measurements at day 1, day 5 and day 10 from ICU admission if participants still require controlled ventilation.
The investigators also collect clinical data about each participant (past medical history, ICU discharge, hospital discharge, date of death, ventilator acquired pneumonia, thromboembolic event, use of NO, use of ECMO or renal replacement therapy).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Mechanically Ventilated adult patients with COVID-19 Associated ARDS
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ARDS criteria according to Berlin classification criteria
- Invasive mechanical ventilation on endotracheal tube
- SARS Cov-2 infection
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- pneumothorax
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP trialMeasurement of Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
Time frame: Day 1
no unit
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
Time frame: Day 5
no unit
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio)
Time frame: Day 10
no unit
43 secondary outcomes
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 1
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 5
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 10
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
Time frame: Day 1
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
Time frame: Day 5
Lung volume recruited (VRec)
Time frame: Day 10
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 1
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 5
Plateau pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 10
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 1
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 5
Oesophagal pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 10
weight (Kg)
Time frame: Day 1
weight (Kg)
Time frame: Day 5
weight (Kg)
Time frame: Day 10
urine output (mL)
Time frame: day 1
urine output (mL)
Time frame: day 5
urine output (mL)
Time frame: day 10
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Time frame: day 1
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Time frame: day 5
serum creatinine (Umo/L)
Time frame: day 10
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: day 1
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: day 5
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: day 10
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 1
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 5
Peak Pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 10
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 1
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 5
PEEP total (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 10
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 1
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 5
PEP Set (cm H2O)
Time frame: Day 10
Height (cm)
Time frame: Day 1
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: day 1
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: day 5
Airway pening pressure (cm H2O)
Time frame: day 10
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
Time frame: Day 1
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
Time frame: Day 5
Expired volume in PEEP setted at 15 cmH2O (mL)
Time frame: Day 10
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
François BELONCLE, MCU PH principal investigator
CHU Angers, Médecine intensive réanimation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact François BELONCLE, MCU PH (0241345866, Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment-to Inflation ratio (R/I ratio) (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2020.