StrokeNCT04351178
F@ce 2.0 - Information and Communication Technology-based Rehabilitation Intervention After Stroke in Sweden
A study testing Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation and Rehabilitation as usual in people with Stroke, run by Karolinska Institutet at 12 sites in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate a new model for mobile phone supported and family-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) with regard to functioning in activities in daily living and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in rural and urban… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation and Rehabilitation as usual
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesSweden
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2021to 28 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Persons who have had a stroke
- Enrolled in one of the participating home rehabilitation teams in Stockholm and Dalarna
- Able to participate in eight weeks of intervention
Who cannot join
- Inability to formulate activity goals
- Inability to express themselves in Swedish
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Sweden12 sites
Avesta
Avesta
Borlänge hemrehab
Borlänge
Falun hemrehab
Falun
Externa stroketeamet Gävle
Gävle
Externa stroketeamet Hudiksvall
Hudiksvall
Mora hemrehab
Mora
Primärvårdsrehab Bromma, Stockholms Sjukhem
Stockholm, Bromma, 168 62
Neuroteam Värmdö Rehab
Stockholm, Gustavsberg, 134 40
Aleris Rudans rehab Haninge
Stockholm, Handen, 136 46
Aleris Rehab Skärholmen Neuroteam
Stockholm, Skärholmen, 127 48
Neuroteam Kungsholmen, Stockholms sjukhem
Stockholm, 112 19
Aleris Rehab Älvsjö Neuroteam
Stockholm, Älvsjö, 125 44
About this study
Official title: F@ce 2.0 - Implementation and Evaluation of a Model for a Person-centred, Information and Communication Technology and Team Based Rehabilitation Intervention for People Who Have Had Stroke in Sweden
The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate a new model for mobile phone supported and family-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) with regard to functioning in activities in daily living and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in rural and urban areas in Sweden.
Read the detailed description
The investigators' previous feasibility study suggested beneficial effects on occupational performance and satisfaction of a mobile phone supported and person-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce1.0) after stroke in Stockholm, Sweden. The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate F@ce 2.0 on functioning in activities in daily living (ADL) and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their significant others (someone identified by the person with stroke as close i.e.partner, friend, son, daughter).
With recommendations on evaluation of complex interventions both outcomes and processes will be studied and hence both quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. In a randomized controlled trial F@ce 2.0 will be evaluated compared to ordinary rehabilitation in urban/rural Sweden regarding; self-efficacy, perceived performance and participation in everyday activities, independence in ADL, health care utilization and the families´ perceived participation in everyday activities. Qualitative data will explore experiences of people with stroke, significant others and rehabilitation staff of participating in F@ce 2.0. The research project has a multidisciplinary perspective for sustainable rehabilitation interventions, a prerequisite for better participation in everyday life for people with stroke.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation, Rehabilitation as usual
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitationBehavioural
Participants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0).The participants will be introduced to a problem-solving strategy intended to facilitate the learning and problem-solving process to be used during the intervention. The strategy will provide a structure for healthcare professionals delivering the intervention. Three goals in daily activities will be formulated that the person wants and needs to do within the home environment. Each activity will be practiced together with the healthcare professionals and significant others. The significant others will be informed about the participant's goals and the planned strategies for reaching the goals. The participants will practice the activities in their home environment supported by mobile phone calls and text messages. In addition they will be given information about stroke.
Rehabilitation as usualBehavioural
Control group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) Receives: Behavioral: Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation |
| Rehabilitation as usual | Active comparator | Control group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke. Receives: Behavioral: Rehabilitation as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-efficacy Scale
Participants are instructed to rate how confident they feel about performing each of 16 everyday activities on a 10-point rating scale ranging from 1) "not confident at all in my ability" to 10) "very confident in my ability". The average of all responses are calculated
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) measures performance and satisfaction in self-care, productivity and leisure from the individual's perspective. The participant is asked 1) to rate performance of the specified activities using a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale and 2) to score his or her satisfaction with that performance using the same scale. Weighted scores of the chosen activities are added separately for performance and satisfaction to create two summative scores. The summative scores are then divided by the number of rated activities to provide COPM scores.
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Caregiver Burden Scale
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Secondary outcomes (5)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0
Assesses the perceived impact on functioning in everyday life in eight domains: Strength, Memory and thinking, Emotions, Communication, ADL/ Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), Mobility, Hand function and Participation. The SIS includes 59 items within these eight domains. Aggregated scores ranges from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the lower the perceived impact of stroke, i.e. fewer problems in everyday life. The SIS 3.0 also includes a question to assess the participant's global perception of recovery presented in a vertical analogue scale ranging from '0 = no recovery to 100 = full recovery'
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Frenchay Activities Index
Questionnaire consisting of 15 items on frequency of social everyday activities and the score is based on the frequency with which an activity has been performed during the previous 3 or 6 months. The total score ranges from 0 (inactive) to 45 (very active).
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Fatigue Severity Scale-7
Questionnaire that assesses fatigue. The final score is the mean of the seven items graded between 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Scores are categorized as no fatigue (1-3) or fatigue (4-7)
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Questionnaire that assesses anxiety and depression comprising two subscales, each ranging from 0-21. Scores are categorised as no anxiety and depression (0-7), mild (8-10) or moderate to severe anxiety and depression (10-21)
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Life Satisfaction Checklist
Questionnaire that assesses life satisfaction with the global item "Life as a whole" and ten domain specific items. Answering alternatives range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)
Measured: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2020
- Study start11 Feb 2021
- Primary completion28 Apr 2023
- Study completion28 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to participate in F@ce 2.0 (IG) or a control group (CG) receiving usual rehabilitation at two different sites; both an urban (IG+CG) and rural site (CG+IG) in Sweden
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forte
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Susanne Guidetti, Karolinska Institutet
- Investigators
- Susanne Guidetti, Professor, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04351178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HELD, Karolinska Institutet
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Soderhielm K, Hawkins J, Ytterberg C, Tistad M, Guidetti S. Process evaluation of F@ce 2.0, a team-based, person-centred intervention for rehabilitation after stroke supported by ICT. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 May 7;26(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14628-6.
PubMed 42092907Soderhielm K, Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Guidetti S. Experiences of F@ce 2.0: a person-centred intervention for home-based rehabilitation after stroke supported by digital technology - a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e089147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089147.
PubMed 40669890Eriksson G, Tistad M, Elf M, Fors U, von Koch L, Ytterberg C, Guidetti S. Study protocol of a non-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the F@ce 2.0 programme: a person-centred, ICT-supported and interdisciplinary rehabilitation intervention after stroke. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e058748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058748.
PubMed 35926996
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- F@ce 2.0 - Implementation and Evaluation of a Model for a Person-centred, Information and Communication Technology and Team Based Rehabilitation Intervention for People Who Have Had Stroke in Sweden
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04351178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HELD, Karolinska Institutet
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forte
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate a new model for mobile phone supported and family-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) with regard to functioning in activities in daily living and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in rural and urban areas in Sweden.
Detailed description
The investigators' previous feasibility study suggested beneficial effects on occupational performance and satisfaction of a mobile phone supported and person-centred rehabilitation intervention (F@ce1.0) after stroke in Stockholm, Sweden. The purpose of the present proposal is to implement and evaluate F@ce 2.0 on functioning in activities in daily living (ADL) and participation in everyday life among persons with stroke and their significant others (someone identified by the person with stroke as close i.e.partner, friend, son, daughter).
With recommendations on evaluation of complex interventions both outcomes and processes will be studied and hence both quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. In a randomized controlled trial F@ce 2.0 will be evaluated compared to ordinary rehabilitation in urban/rural Sweden regarding; self-efficacy, perceived performance and participation in everyday activities, independence in ADL, health care utilization and the families´ perceived participation in everyday activities. Qualitative data will explore experiences of people with stroke, significant others and rehabilitation staff of participating in F@ce 2.0. The research project has a multidisciplinary perspective for sustainable rehabilitation interventions, a prerequisite for better participation in everyday life for people with stroke.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to participate in F@ce 2.0 (IG) or a control group (CG) receiving usual rehabilitation at two different sites; both an urban (IG+CG) and rural site (CG+IG) in Sweden
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitationParticipants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0) |
| Rehabilitation as usual | Active comparator | Behavioral: Rehabilitation as usualControl group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Persons who have had a stroke
- Enrolled in one of the participating home rehabilitation teams in Stockholm and Dalarna
- Able to participate in eight weeks of intervention
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Inability to formulate activity goals
- Inability to express themselves in Swedish
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitationParticipants in the intervention group will receive an 8-week mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation intervention (F@ce 2.0).The participants will be introduced to a problem-solving strategy intended to facilitate the learning and problem-solving process to be used during the intervention. The strategy will provide a structure for healthcare professionals delivering the intervention. Three goals in daily activities will be formulated that the person wants and needs to do within the home environment. Each activity will be practiced together with the healthcare professionals and significant others. The significant others will be informed about the participant's goals and the planned strategies for reaching the goals. The participants will practice the activities in their home environment supported by mobile phone calls and text messages. In addition they will be given information about stroke. | Behavioural | Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation |
| Rehabilitation as usualControl group participants will receive rehabilitation as usual and in addition information about stroke. | Behavioural | Rehabilitation as usual |
Primary outcome
Self-efficacy Scale
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Participants are instructed to rate how confident they feel about performing each of 16 everyday activities on a 10-point rating scale ranging from 1) "not confident at all in my ability" to 10) "very confident in my ability". The average of all responses are calculated
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) measures performance and satisfaction in self-care, productivity and leisure from the individual's perspective. The participant is asked 1) to rate performance of the specified activities using a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale and 2) to score his or her satisfaction with that performance using the same scale. Weighted scores of the chosen activities are added separately for performance and satisfaction to create two summative scores. The summative scores are then divided by the number of rated activities to provide COPM scores.
Caregiver Burden Scale
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Questionnaire that consists of 22 items for different types of subjective caregiver burden, covering areas of the caregiver's health, feelings of psychological well-being, relations, social network, physical workload, and environmental aspects. The items are scored on a scale from 1 to 4 and the higher the score the greater the burden.
5 secondary outcomes
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Frenchay Activities Index
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Fatigue Severity Scale-7
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Life Satisfaction Checklist
Time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42092907Soderhielm K, Hawkins J, Ytterberg C, Tistad M, Guidetti S. Process evaluation of F@ce 2.0, a team-based, person-centred intervention for rehabilitation after stroke supported by ICT. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 May 7;26(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14628-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40669890Soderhielm K, Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Guidetti S. Experiences of F@ce 2.0: a person-centred intervention for home-based rehabilitation after stroke supported by digital technology - a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e089147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089147.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35926996Eriksson G, Tistad M, Elf M, Fors U, von Koch L, Ytterberg C, Guidetti S. Study protocol of a non-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the F@ce 2.0 programme: a person-centred, ICT-supported and interdisciplinary rehabilitation intervention after stroke. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e058748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058748.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Symptomatic Carotid Outcomes Registry
Carotid Stenosis, Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Prophylactic Use of Stress Ulcer Drugs and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Anterior Circulation Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susanne Guidetti, Professor principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation and Rehabilitation as usual in people with Stroke, run by Karolinska Institutet at 12 sites in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-efficacy Scale (time frame: Change between enrollment, after the 8 weeks of intervention and 6 months after enrollment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04351178, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.