Type 1 DiabetesLEMONNCT04352738
Role of the Liver in Glucose Homeostasis Using Metabolic Imaging
An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes and Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess hepatic glucose uptake using non-invasive metabolic imaging in three different populations that differ in terms of insulin and glucose kinetics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- What is being tested?
- Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2021to 30 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Healthy participants will be recruited through advertisement on the hospital staff website and website of the Medical faculty according to Swissethics guidelines. Patients with type 1 diabetes and post-bariatric surgery patients will be recruited through referring physicians from the University Hospital Bern or colleagues from local private outpatient clinics.
Who may be able to join
- Age≥18 years
- Capacity to give informed consent
- Willingness to adhere to the study protocol
- In group II (type 1 diabetes), the following criteria must be met in addition:
- T1D for ≥2 years or evidence of undetectable C-peptide (<100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose≥4.0mmol/l)
- HbA1c≤8.0mmol/l (64mmol/mol)
Show all 10Show fewer
- In group III (bariatric surgery), the following criteria must be met in addition:
- Female
- Bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) ≥1 year ago
- Lack of a history of diabetes or pre-diabetes (HbA1c≤5.6% in the absence of anaemia)
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Medication that interfere with glucose metabolism (participation requires discontinuation of these agents at least one week before the study visit) except for individuals with type 1 diabetes
- History of gastrointestinal surgery (other than bariatric surgery for group III)
- Known kidney, liver or heart disease
- Claustrophobia
- Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging according to designated questionnaire
- Substance abuse
- Physical or psychological condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University Hospital of Bern
Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: Deciphering the Role of the Liver in Glucose Homeostasis Using Metabolic Imaging
The primary objective of this study is to assess hepatic glucose uptake using non-invasive metabolic imaging in three different populations that differ in terms of insulin and glucose kinetics. Between-group comparison will address the following two hypotheses:
- Hepatic glucose uptake will be lower in participants with type 1 diabetes compared with matched controls due to lack of portal insulin and delayed pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous bolus insulin. ii) Hepatic glucose uptake will be higher in participants after bariatric surgery compared with matched health controls due to accelerated glucose absorption and earlier and higher peak portal glucose and insulin concentrations.
Read the detailed description
The liver has a central role in maintaining glucose homeostasis. During periods following food intake the liver stores glucose whilst during fasting periods it produces and releases glucose into the circulation. These key regulatory features prevent hyperglycaemia after meals via increase in hepatic glucose uptake and prevent hypoglycaemia during food deprivation via hepatic glucose output. Although the exact numbers are unknown, it is suggested that approximately 25%-30% of an oral glucose load are taken up by the liver. Since hepatic glucose uptake is closely linked with hepatic glycogen synthesis, the fraction of an oral glucose load that is converted to glycogen is similar or somewhat less. Other pathways downstream of hepatic glucose uptake are the conversion to lactate, oxidation to carbon dioxide (CO2) or synthesis of fatty acids. Glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis contribute to hepatic glucose output, in yet unknown proportions. Key regulators of hepatic glucose metabolism act through diverse mechanisms. Hepatic glucose uptake is mainly regulated by the level of insulin, the rate of glucose appearance in the portal vein, the portal-peripheral glucose and insulin gradient and neuronal signalling1. Hepatic glucose production is regulated by the provision of substrates such as lactate and glycerol, allosteric control by metabolites such as glucose, and balance of hormones such as insulin, glucagon and catecholamines. An imbalance between hepatic glucose uptake and hepatic glucose output results in dysglycaemia which can be both hyper- or hypoglycaemia.
Hepatic glucose metabolism is dysregulated in a broad spectrum of diseases. Prime examples are type 1 and type 2 diabetes in which altered hepatic glucose handling contributes to hyperglycaemia, although via distinct mechanisms. Whereas in type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and hence impaired suppression of hepatic glucose output is the key pathophysiological feature, lack of the portal-peripheral insulin gradient (insulin levels normally threefold higher in portal vein than in arterial blood due to drainage of secreted endogenous insulin into the portal vein) seems to be more relevant in type 1 diabetes. In the latter case absolute insulin deficiency and hence coverage of total insulin requirements by the exogenous subcutaneous route generates a very different vascular insulin profile compared with endogenously secreted insulin. Experiments in conscious dogs showed that glucose uptake is equally divided between the liver and muscle when insulin is infused via the portal vein, but when insulin is delivered peripherally the percentage of glucose taken up by the liver is less than half of normal. These findings suggest that peripherally delivered insulin cannot replicate the physiologic regulation of postprandial hepatic glucose uptake, but direct evidence in humans is currently lacking.
Another condition that is characterised by an altered portal milieu are patients having undergone bariatric surgery. The re-arrangement of the gastrointestinal tract substantially alters the portal milieu by accelerated glucose fluxes and higher and earlier gut peptide hormone patterns. The two most commonly performed bariatric surgery procedures, namely Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which re-routes the small intestine to a small stomach pouch, and sleeve gastrectomy, which reduces the stomach to about 15% of its original size, significantly accelerate glucose absorption. It was recently demonstrated that this effects is more pronounced after Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass than sleeve gastrectomy. Accelerated glucose absorption leads to higher glucose concentrations in the portal vein. Of note, animal experiments using portal vein catheterization showed that under elevated glucose levels in the portal vein promote hepatic glucose uptake, however direct evidence in post-bariatric surgery patients is lacking.
Organ-specific substrate exchanges (uptake and output) can be best studied by measuring arterio-venous substrate concentration difference and organ blood supply. The additional use of isotopically labelled substrates further allows calculating intra-organ turnover rate. Although invasive, this method can be applied for most organs or tissue, such as the kidney, heart, brain or whole limbs. The liver's anatomical location and connection to the portal circulation makes the the calculation of arterio-venous-substrate gradient in humans particularly challenging, however. Surgical catheterization of the portal vein in humans is not possible for practical and ethical reasons. As a consequence, current non-invasive approaches in humans rely on the use of stable isotopes and can only provide an estimate of splanchnic glucose uptake (sum of liver and intestinal glucose utilisation) but do not allow for the quantification of hepatic glucose uptake.
Since it is generally assumed that the liver is the sole source of glucose production (an assumption essentially verified in normal condition, since the kidney appears to contribute less than 10% total glucose output), a simplified tracer approach with analysis of the systemic dilution of infused labelled glucose can reliably estimate hepatic (endogenous) glucose output. However, such isotope dilution cannot estimate hepatic glucose uptake, which has essentially been indirectly assessed in multiple (oral+iv) glucose tracers experiment and calculation of the systemic appearance of ingested labelled glucose. These measurements are however tightly dependent on the mathematical model used and hence remain semiquantitative. Furthermore, they do not allow to differentiate gut and hepatic glucose uptake.
Thus, the only way to directly assess hepatic glucose uptake is through highly invasive portal vein catheterization which requires animal models. Such models can simulate postprandial hepatic glucose handling but applicability to humans are limited. Current concepts of hepatic glucose uptake under different conditions mainly stem from animal experiments in which overnight fasted conscious dogs underwent portal vein catheterization.
From the above mentioned dilemma it follows that obtaining quantitative data on hepatic glucose uptake in humans requires a non-invasive approach such as imaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with the tracer fluorine-18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), called FDG-PET enables direct observation of tissue glucose uptake by quantifying radioactivity over time in vivo. Some researchers have thus suggested to use FDG-PET to study human glucose metabolism. However, FDG-PET confers the major downside of exposing individuals to remarkable amounts of radiation, a risk that is not considered justified for research purposes only. In addition FDG-PET does not inform on metabolism downstream of glucose uptake and the intravenous administration route of the radioactive glucose is not reflective of normal physiology.
Clearly, there is a demand for a non-invasive, non-radioactive and easily applicable approach to investigate human hepatic glucose metabolism including the quantification of hepatic glucose uptake. Deuterium metabolic imaging is a novel, non-invasive imaging approach that combines deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with oral intake or intravenous infusion of nonradioactive 2H-labeled substrates to generate three-dimensional metabolic maps. Deuterium metabolic imaging can reveal glucose metabolism beyond mere uptake and can be used with other Deuterium (2H)-labeled substrates as well. It has recently been demonstrated by De Feyter et al. that deuterium metabolic imaging allows mapping of glucose metabolism in the brain and liver of animal models and human subjects using 6,6-2H2-glucose. Deuterium metabolic imaging is a promising, non-invasive and easy-to-implement imaging technique that opens new avenues to address important knowledge gaps such as the extent and dynamics of postprandial hepatic glucose uptake and utilisation.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Being tested
- Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)
- Keywords
- Hepatic glucose metabolism, Deuterium metabolic imaging, Insulin and glucose kinetics, Metabolic imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Insulin Resistance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)Diagnostic test
Magnetic resonance scanning for 150 minutes involving ingestion of 60g of 6,6, 2H2-glucose diluted in 200ml of tap water. Frequent blood samples will be drawn for measurements of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glucagon
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy adults (group I) | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE) | |
| Adults with type 1 diabetes (group II) | * T1D for ≥2 years or evidence of undetectable C-peptide (<100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose≥4.0mmol/l).
* HbA1c≤8.0mmol/l (64mmol/mol). Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE) | |
| Adults after bariatric surgery (group III) | * Female.
* Bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) ≥1 year ago.
* Lack of a history of diabetes or pre-diabetes (HbA1c≤5.6% in the absence of anaemia). Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intrahepatic free glucose concentration
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Postprandial hepatic glycogen increment
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial glucose exposure
Incremental area under the glucose concentration curve
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial glucagon exposure
Incremental area under the glucagon concentration curve
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin secretion
Calculated using the Oral Glucose minimal Model
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin exposure
Incremental area under the insulin concentration curve
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin clearance
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial whole body insulin sensitivity
Calculated using the Oral Glucose Minimal Model
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial hepatic glucose production
Estimated using the single tracer oral minimal model based on the ingested dose of 6,6-2H2-glucose and plasma 6,6-2H2-glucose enrichment
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
First-pass hepatic extraction of glucose
Measured: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2020
- Study start15 Apr 2021
- Primary completion21 Apr 2022
- Study completion30 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lia Bally, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Investigators
- Lia Bally, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Bern & University of Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04352738
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LEMON
- Acronym
- LEMON
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Deciphering the Role of the Liver in Glucose Homeostasis Using Metabolic Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04352738
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEMON / LEMON
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Keywords
- Hepatic glucose metabolism, Deuterium metabolic imaging, Insulin and glucose kinetics, Metabolic imaging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to assess hepatic glucose uptake using non-invasive metabolic imaging in three different populations that differ in terms of insulin and glucose kinetics. Between-group comparison will address the following two hypotheses:
- Hepatic glucose uptake will be lower in participants with type 1 diabetes compared with matched controls due to lack of portal insulin and delayed pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous bolus insulin. ii) Hepatic glucose uptake will be higher in participants after bariatric surgery compared with matched health controls due to accelerated glucose absorption and earlier and higher peak portal glucose and insulin concentrations.
Detailed description
The liver has a central role in maintaining glucose homeostasis. During periods following food intake the liver stores glucose whilst during fasting periods it produces and releases glucose into the circulation. These key regulatory features prevent hyperglycaemia after meals via increase in hepatic glucose uptake and prevent hypoglycaemia during food deprivation via hepatic glucose output. Although the exact numbers are unknown, it is suggested that approximately 25%-30% of an oral glucose load are taken up by the liver. Since hepatic glucose uptake is closely linked with hepatic glycogen synthesis, the fraction of an oral glucose load that is converted to glycogen is similar or somewhat less. Other pathways downstream of hepatic glucose uptake are the conversion to lactate, oxidation to carbon dioxide (CO2) or synthesis of fatty acids. Glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis contribute to hepatic glucose output, in yet unknown proportions. Key regulators of hepatic glucose metabolism act through diverse mechanisms. Hepatic glucose uptake is mainly regulated by the level of insulin, the rate of glucose appearance in the portal vein, the portal-peripheral glucose and insulin gradient and neuronal signalling1. Hepatic glucose production is regulated by the provision of substrates such as lactate and glycerol, allosteric control by metabolites such as glucose, and balance of hormones such as insulin, glucagon and catecholamines. An imbalance between hepatic glucose uptake and hepatic glucose output results in dysglycaemia which can be both hyper- or hypoglycaemia.
Hepatic glucose metabolism is dysregulated in a broad spectrum of diseases. Prime examples are type 1 and type 2 diabetes in which altered hepatic glucose handling contributes to hyperglycaemia, although via distinct mechanisms. Whereas in type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and hence impaired suppression of hepatic glucose output is the key pathophysiological feature, lack of the portal-peripheral insulin gradient (insulin levels normally threefold higher in portal vein than in arterial blood due to drainage of secreted endogenous insulin into the portal vein) seems to be more relevant in type 1 diabetes. In the latter case absolute insulin deficiency and hence coverage of total insulin requirements by the exogenous subcutaneous route generates a very different vascular insulin profile compared with endogenously secreted insulin. Experiments in conscious dogs showed that glucose uptake is equally divided between the liver and muscle when insulin is infused via the portal vein, but when insulin is delivered peripherally the percentage of glucose taken up by the liver is less than half of normal. These findings suggest that peripherally delivered insulin cannot replicate the physiologic regulation of postprandial hepatic glucose uptake, but direct evidence in humans is currently lacking.
Another condition that is characterised by an altered portal milieu are patients having undergone bariatric surgery. The re-arrangement of the gastrointestinal tract substantially alters the portal milieu by accelerated glucose fluxes and higher and earlier gut peptide hormone patterns. The two most commonly performed bariatric surgery procedures, namely Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which re-routes the small intestine to a small stomach pouch, and sleeve gastrectomy, which reduces the stomach to about 15% of its original size, significantly accelerate glucose absorption. It was recently demonstrated that this effects is more pronounced after Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass than sleeve gastrectomy. Accelerated glucose absorption leads to higher glucose concentrations in the portal vein. Of note, animal experiments using portal vein catheterization showed that under elevated glucose levels in the portal vein promote hepatic glucose uptake, however direct evidence in post-bariatric surgery patients is lacking.
Organ-specific substrate exchanges (uptake and output) can be best studied by measuring arterio-venous substrate concentration difference and organ blood supply. The additional use of isotopically labelled substrates further allows calculating intra-organ turnover rate. Although invasive, this method can be applied for most organs or tissue, such as the kidney, heart, brain or whole limbs. The liver's anatomical location and connection to the portal circulation makes the the calculation of arterio-venous-substrate gradient in humans particularly challenging, however. Surgical catheterization of the portal vein in humans is not possible for practical and ethical reasons. As a consequence, current non-invasive approaches in humans rely on the use of stable isotopes and can only provide an estimate of splanchnic glucose uptake (sum of liver and intestinal glucose utilisation) but do not allow for the quantification of hepatic glucose uptake.
Since it is generally assumed that the liver is the sole source of glucose production (an assumption essentially verified in normal condition, since the kidney appears to contribute less than 10% total glucose output), a simplified tracer approach with analysis of the systemic dilution of infused labelled glucose can reliably estimate hepatic (endogenous) glucose output. However, such isotope dilution cannot estimate hepatic glucose uptake, which has essentially been indirectly assessed in multiple (oral+iv) glucose tracers experiment and calculation of the systemic appearance of ingested labelled glucose. These measurements are however tightly dependent on the mathematical model used and hence remain semiquantitative. Furthermore, they do not allow to differentiate gut and hepatic glucose uptake.
Thus, the only way to directly assess hepatic glucose uptake is through highly invasive portal vein catheterization which requires animal models. Such models can simulate postprandial hepatic glucose handling but applicability to humans are limited. Current concepts of hepatic glucose uptake under different conditions mainly stem from animal experiments in which overnight fasted conscious dogs underwent portal vein catheterization.
From the above mentioned dilemma it follows that obtaining quantitative data on hepatic glucose uptake in humans requires a non-invasive approach such as imaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with the tracer fluorine-18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), called FDG-PET enables direct observation of tissue glucose uptake by quantifying radioactivity over time in vivo. Some researchers have thus suggested to use FDG-PET to study human glucose metabolism. However, FDG-PET confers the major downside of exposing individuals to remarkable amounts of radiation, a risk that is not considered justified for research purposes only. In addition FDG-PET does not inform on metabolism downstream of glucose uptake and the intravenous administration route of the radioactive glucose is not reflective of normal physiology.
Clearly, there is a demand for a non-invasive, non-radioactive and easily applicable approach to investigate human hepatic glucose metabolism including the quantification of hepatic glucose uptake. Deuterium metabolic imaging is a novel, non-invasive imaging approach that combines deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with oral intake or intravenous infusion of nonradioactive 2H-labeled substrates to generate three-dimensional metabolic maps. Deuterium metabolic imaging can reveal glucose metabolism beyond mere uptake and can be used with other Deuterium (2H)-labeled substrates as well. It has recently been demonstrated by De Feyter et al. that deuterium metabolic imaging allows mapping of glucose metabolism in the brain and liver of animal models and human subjects using 6,6-2H2-glucose. Deuterium metabolic imaging is a promising, non-invasive and easy-to-implement imaging technique that opens new avenues to address important knowledge gaps such as the extent and dynamics of postprandial hepatic glucose uptake and utilisation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy adults (group I) | – | Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE) |
| Adults with type 1 diabetes (group II) | – | Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)* T1D for ≥2 years or evidence of undetectable C-peptide (<100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose≥4.0mmol/l). * HbA1c≤8.0mmol/l (64mmol/mol). |
| Adults after bariatric surgery (group III) | – | Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)* Female. * Bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) ≥1 year ago. * Lack of a history of diabetes or pre-diabetes (HbA1c≤5.6% in the absence of anaemia). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Healthy participants will be recruited through advertisement on the hospital staff website and website of the Medical faculty according to Swissethics guidelines. Patients with type 1 diabetes and post-bariatric surgery patients will be recruited through referring physicians from the University Hospital Bern or colleagues from local private outpatient clinics.
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age≥18 years
- Capacity to give informed consent
- Willingness to adhere to the study protocol
- T1D for ≥2 years or evidence of undetectable C-peptide (<100pmol/l with concomitant plasma glucose≥4.0mmol/l)
- HbA1c≤8.0mmol/l (64mmol/mol)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Medication that interfere with glucose metabolism (participation requires discontinuation of these agents at least one week before the study visit) except for individuals with type 1 diabetes
- History of gastrointestinal surgery (other than bariatric surgery for group III)
- Known kidney, liver or heart disease
- Claustrophobia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multiparametric, multinuclear MR (DMI/ 13C-MRS/ GlycoCEST/GlycoNOE)Magnetic resonance scanning for 150 minutes involving ingestion of 60g of 6,6, 2H2-glucose diluted in 200ml of tap water. Frequent blood samples will be drawn for measurements of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glucagon | Diagnostic test | Adults after bariatric surgery (group III), Adults with type 1 diabetes (group II), Healthy adults (group I) |
Primary outcome
Intrahepatic free glucose concentration
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
9 secondary outcomes
Postprandial hepatic glycogen increment
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial glucose exposure
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial glucagon exposure
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin secretion
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin exposure
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial insulin clearance
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial whole body insulin sensitivity
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Postprandial hepatic glucose production
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
First-pass hepatic extraction of glucose
Time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lia Bally, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital Bern & University of Bern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes and Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intrahepatic free glucose concentration (time frame: Over postprandial period (0 to 150 minutes post glucose-ingestion)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2022.