CancereReachNCT04353973
Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Metastatic Cancer Patients
A study testing Pre-Test Intervention and Post-Test Intervention in people with Cancer, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to determine if web-based eHealth delivery of pre-test and/or post-test counseling in cancer patients and/or those at risk for cancer can provide equal or improved cognitive and affective outcomes when compared to the standard of care delivery model. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Pre-Test Intervention and Post-Test Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 256 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Aug 2020to 13 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Speak and understand English
- Male or Female
- A personal history of one or more of the following:
- metastatic breast cancer
- advanced ovarian cancer (Stage III-IV)
Show all 9Show fewer
- metastatic pancreatic cancer
- metastatic prostate cancer
- Naive to previous cancer germline genetic testing
Who cannot join
- Communication difficulties such as:
- Uncorrected or uncompensated hearing and/or vision impairment
- Uncorrected or uncompensated speech defects
- Uncontrolled psychiatric/mental condition or severe physical, neurological or cognitive deficits rendering individual unable to understand study goals and tasks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Abramson Cancer Center at University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Metastatic Breast, Ovarian, Prostate and Pancreatic Cancer Patients
This study aims to determine if web-based eHealth delivery of pre-test and/or post-test counseling in cancer patients and/or those at risk for cancer can provide equal or improved cognitive and affective outcomes when compared to the standard of care delivery model.
Read the detailed description
Cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and cancer screening guidelines for genetic carriers. With FDA approval for PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer, there is an additional therapeutic rationale for testing all breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients for germline genetic mutations. Yet, access to genetic specialists is limited in many area, and the traditional model of pre- and post-test counseling with a genetic professional will not support the rising indications for cancer genetic testing. Thus, there is an urgent need to consider alternative delivery models to increase access and uptake of testing, while maintaining adequate patient outcomes.
This study aims to assess if traditional pre-test (visit 1) and post-test (visit 2: disclosure) counseling delivered by a genetic counselor can be replaced with a self-directed web-based eHealth intervention to provide critical data to inform optimal ways to deliver cancer genetic testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer, while maintaining quality of care and favorable cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if web-based eHealth delivery of pre-test and/or post-test counseling can provide equal or improved cognitive and affective short-term and 6-month outcomes as compared to the two-visit standard of care delivery model with a genetic counselor. The investigator's primary outcomes will be changes in knowledge and anxiety. Secondary outcomes will include uptake of testing, depression, cancer specific distress, uncertainty and health behaviors and provider time.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Pre-Test Intervention, Standard of Care, Post-Test Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pre-Test InterventionOther
Secure and accessable by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.
Standard of CareOther
Standard of Care with a Genetic Counselor either In-Person or by Remote Services (Telephone or Video Conferencing)
Post-Test InterventionOther
Secure and accessable by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A | Experimental | Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing).
Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). Receives: Other: Standard of Care |
| ARM B | Experimental | Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing).
Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention. Receives: Other: Standard of Care; Other: Post-Test Intervention |
| ARM C | Experimental | Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention.
Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). Receives: Other: Pre-Test Intervention; Other: Standard of Care |
| ARM D | Experimental | Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention.
Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention. Receives: Other: Pre-Test Intervention; Other: Post-Test Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Knowledge
Knowledge Scale - Score Range = 0-16 Increased change score indicates increase in knowledge (better).
Measured: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Change in Anxiety
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Score Range = 4-20 Decreased score change indicates a decrease in anxiety (better).
Measured: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Depression
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Score Range = 4-20 Decreased score change indicates a decrease in depression (better).
Measured: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Change in Cancer Specific Distress
Impact of Events Scale (IES) - Score Range = 0-40 Decreased score change indicates a decrease in distress (better).
Measured: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Change in Uncertainty
Multi-dimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment Questionnaire (MICRA) - Score Range = 0-85 Decrease in score change indicates a decrease in uncertainty (better).
Measured: Within 7 days of Visit 2 - 6-Month Follow-Up
Change in Health Behaviors
Change in treatment plan and communication of results - Yes/No
Measured: Within 7 days of Visit 2 - 6-Month Follow-Up
Provider Time
Time (minutes) provider spends per study participant
Measured: Within 7 days of Standard of Care V1
Provider Time
Time (minutes) provider spends per study participant
Measured: Within 7 days of Standard of Care V2
Frequency of Uptake of Testing
Testing uptake per arm - Yes/No
Measured: Within 7 days of Visit 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2020
- Study start17 Aug 2020
- Primary completion15 Aug 2024
- Study completion13 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Basser Center for BRCA, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04353973
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UPCC 11919
- Other IDs
- IRB#833370
- Acronym
- eReach
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lee KT, McLeod B, Egleston B, Brown S, Howe S, Fetzer D, Gutstein L, Cacioppo C, Clark D, Domchek SM, Ebrahimzadeh J, Falcone D, Ofidis D, Griffin H, Mim R, Hernandez S, Fleisher L, Karpink K, Selmani E, Tahsin A, Wagner L, Weinberg M, Yi-Wen K, Wood E, Bradbury AR. An eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Patients With Metastatic Cancers: Protocol for a Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 25;14:e72515. doi: 10.2196/72515.
PubMed 40853717
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Metastatic Breast, Ovarian, Prostate and Pancreatic Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04353973
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eReach / UPCC 11919
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Basser Center for BRCA, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 17 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to determine if web-based eHealth delivery of pre-test and/or post-test counseling in cancer patients and/or those at risk for cancer can provide equal or improved cognitive and affective outcomes when compared to the standard of care delivery model.
Detailed description
Cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and cancer screening guidelines for genetic carriers. With FDA approval for PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer, there is an additional therapeutic rationale for testing all breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients for germline genetic mutations. Yet, access to genetic specialists is limited in many area, and the traditional model of pre- and post-test counseling with a genetic professional will not support the rising indications for cancer genetic testing. Thus, there is an urgent need to consider alternative delivery models to increase access and uptake of testing, while maintaining adequate patient outcomes.
This study aims to assess if traditional pre-test (visit 1) and post-test (visit 2: disclosure) counseling delivered by a genetic counselor can be replaced with a self-directed web-based eHealth intervention to provide critical data to inform optimal ways to deliver cancer genetic testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer, while maintaining quality of care and favorable cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if web-based eHealth delivery of pre-test and/or post-test counseling can provide equal or improved cognitive and affective short-term and 6-month outcomes as compared to the two-visit standard of care delivery model with a genetic counselor. The investigator's primary outcomes will be changes in knowledge and anxiety. Secondary outcomes will include uptake of testing, depression, cancer specific distress, uncertainty and health behaviors and provider time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A | Experimental | Other: Standard of CareVisit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). |
| ARM B | Experimental | Other: Standard of Care, Other: Post-Test InterventionVisit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention. |
| ARM C | Experimental | Other: Pre-Test Intervention, Other: Standard of CareVisit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention. Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor either in-person or by remote services (Telephone or Video Conferencing). |
| ARM D | Experimental | Other: Pre-Test Intervention, Other: Post-Test InterventionVisit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention. Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Speak and understand English
- Male or Female
- A personal history of one or more of the following:
- Naive to previous cancer germline genetic testing
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Communication difficulties such as:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Test InterventionSecure and accessable by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included. | Other | ARM C, ARM D |
| Standard of CareStandard of Care with a Genetic Counselor either In-Person or by Remote Services (Telephone or Video Conferencing) | Other | ARM A, ARM B, ARM C |
| Post-Test InterventionSecure and accessable by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included. | Other | ARM B, ARM D |
Primary outcome
Change in Knowledge
Time frame: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Knowledge Scale - Score Range = 0-16 Increased change score indicates increase in knowledge (better).
Change in Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) - Score Range = 4-20 Decreased score change indicates a decrease in anxiety (better).
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Depression
Time frame: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Change in Cancer Specific Distress
Time frame: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2
Change in Uncertainty
Time frame: Within 7 days of Visit 2 - 6-Month Follow-Up
Change in Health Behaviors
Time frame: Within 7 days of Visit 2 - 6-Month Follow-Up
Provider Time
Time frame: Within 7 days of Standard of Care V1
Provider Time
Time frame: Within 7 days of Standard of Care V2
Frequency of Uptake of Testing
Time frame: Within 7 days of Visit 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40853717Lee KT, McLeod B, Egleston B, Brown S, Howe S, Fetzer D, Gutstein L, Cacioppo C, Clark D, Domchek SM, Ebrahimzadeh J, Falcone D, Ofidis D, Griffin H, Mim R, Hernandez S, Fleisher L, Karpink K, Selmani E, Tahsin A, Wagner L, Weinberg M, Yi-Wen K, Wood E, Bradbury AR. An eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Patients With Metastatic Cancers: Protocol for a Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 25;14:e72515. doi: 10.2196/72515.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pre-Test Intervention and Post-Test Intervention in people with Cancer, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Knowledge (time frame: Baseline - Within 7 days of Visit 2). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04353973, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2025.