AzTrials
AzTrials

COVID-19NCT04359251

Different PEEP Settings of COVID-19 Induced ARDS

A study testing Gas exchanges at different PEEP, lung mechanics at different PEEP and Hemodynamics changes at different PEEP in people with COVID-19 and Mechanical Ventilation Pressure High, run by Southeast University, China at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a multi-center prospective study. All consecutive severe cases of COVID-19 whose PO2/FiO2<300mmHg with invasive ventilation admitted to 5 fixed-point receive COVID-19 patients hospitals in Wuhan from 5 March to 15 March 2020 were included. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Gas exchanges at different PEEP, lung mechanics at different PEEP and Hemodynamics changes at different PEEP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
5 Mar 2020to 25 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • COVID-19 patients with mechanical ventilation
  • PO2/FIO2<300mmHg
  • ages>18 years

Who cannot join

  • pneumothorax
  • pregnant
  • hemodynamics is unstable

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Avoiding High PEEP in COVID-19 Induced ARDS: a Multi-center Study

This was a multi-center prospective study. All consecutive severe cases of COVID-19 whose PO2/FiO2<300mmHg with invasive ventilation admitted to 5 fixed-point receive COVID-19 patients hospitals in Wuhan from 5 March to 15 March 2020 were included. Epidemiological, clinical data, lung mechanics, artery blood gas test and hemodynamics at three methods to titrate PEEP, optimizing oxygenation, optimizing compliance, ARDSnet. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongda Hsopital, Southeast University.

Read the detailed description

After PEEP titration, PEEP settings could be set by optimizing oxygenation, optimizing compliance, ARDSnet.

Being tested
Gas exchanges at different PEEP, lung mechanics at different PEEP, Hemodynamics changes at different PEEP
Keywords
ARDS, COVID-19, mechanical ventilation, PEEP
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gas exchanges at different PEEPOther

    Gas exchanges measurement at different PEEP

  • lung mechanics at different PEEPOther

    lung mechanics measurement at different PEEP

  • Hemodynamics changes at different PEEPOther

    Hemodynamics changes measurement at different PEEP

Study groups in NCT04359251
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Optimizing oxygenationExperimentalBest oxygenation during PEEP titration
Receives: Other: Gas exchanges at different PEEP
Optimizing complianceExperimentalBest compliance during PEEP titration
Receives: Other: lung mechanics at different PEEP
ARDSnetExperimentalPEEP settings according to ARDSnet table
Receives: Other: Hemodynamics changes at different PEEP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory system compliance improvement

    the respiratory system compliance was compared among three groups

    Measured: 20 minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Gas echanges improvement

    P/Fwere compared among three groups

    Measured: 20 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2020
  2. Study start5 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion25 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion25 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04359251
Sponsor's protocol ID
COVID-19 PEEP titration
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
13 Apr 2020
Last updated
24 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Pan C, Lu C, She X, Ren H, Wei H, Xu L, Huang Y, Xia J, Yu Y, Chen L, Du B, Qiu H. Evaluation of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategies in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 20;8:637747. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.637747. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34355001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Gas exchanges at different PEEP, lung mechanics at different PEEP and Hemodynamics changes at different PEEP in people with COVID-19 and Mechanical Ventilation Pressure High, run by Southeast University, China at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory system compliance improvement (time frame: 20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04359251, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in