AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT04360226

Assessing the Utility of Peak Inspiratory Flow as a Predictor for COPD Exacerbations

An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Respiratory Effectiveness Group at 13 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an international, mulitcentre, observational, prospective study into Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD patients that aims to: A) Determine the prevalence of suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and inadequate inhaler choice and assess the baseline characteristics of these groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Non-interventional
How many people
400 participants
Where
13 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
14 Dec 2020to 25 Jan 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: COPD patients, who are clinically stable (4 exacerbations in previous 4 weeks) and have been taking inhaled medications for at least 6 months, but have no other chronic respiratory conditions, other than asthma or bronchiectasis.

Who may be able to join

  • Spirometry-defined COPD (i.e. post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)
  • Age ≥40 years
  • Smokers or ex-smokers of at least 10 pack-years
  • Clinically stable COPD (no exacerbations in the last 4 weeks)
  • Capable of performing serial lung function tests
  • Prescribed inhaled medication for at least 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Occurrence of an COPD exacerbation during the previous 4 weeks
  • Have any concomitant chronic respiratory condition other than asthma or bronchiectasis (e.g. cystic fibrosis, lung fibrosis, tuberculosis)
  • Are unable to understand the instructions of the study or to fill the questionnaires
  • Are unwilling to sign the informed consent
  • Are participating in a clinical trial

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 6 countries.

13 sites in 6 countries

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital University de Torrecárdenas

    Almería

  • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona

  • Hospital Inmaculada HLA

    Granada

  • HU Virgen de las Nieves

    Granada

  • Hospital Universitario de La Ribera

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

South Korea3 sites
  • Hanyang University Guri Hospital

    Hanyang

  • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

    Seoul

  • Ulsan University Hospital

    Ulsan

Other trials in South Korea

Singapore2 sites
  • Changi General Hospital

    Singapore

  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

Italy1 site
  • University Hospital Sassari

    Sassari

Other trials in Italy

Malta1 site
  • Mater Dei Hospital

    Valletta

Other trials in Malta

Slovenia1 site
  • Ljubljana University Medical Centre

    Ljubljana

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

This is an international, mulitcentre, observational, prospective study into Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD patients that aims to: A) Determine the prevalence of suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and inadequate inhaler choice and assess the baseline characteristics of these groups. B) Assess the clinical role of PIF and inhaler choice in predicting COPD exacerbations and symptom burden. C) Assess the variability and correlation of PIF with other lung function measurements and CAT score in stable COPD. It is a 12 month study comprising one baseline assessment and 2 follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months.

Being tested
Non-interventional
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-interventionalOther

    Non-interventional, subjects will only have routine testing (blood biomarkers, spirometry, peak inspiratory flow measurements) and be asked to complete questionnaires.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.

    Determine the prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Exacerbations

    Time to first exacerbation associated with different levels of PIF.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. PIF and symptom burden

    PIF measurements will be correlated with COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores. CAT scores range from 0-40 depending on the severity of a persons symptoms; higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 and 12 months

  2. Mortality

    Annual mortality rate associated with different PIF levels.

    Measured: 6 and 12 months

  3. Variability and correlation of PIF

    Variability of PIF over time and the correlation between PIF and other lung function measures (including FEV1, FVC, Inspiratory capacity), CAT scores, T2 markers (nasal polyps and dermatitis) and where available blood biomarkers.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 and 12 months

  4. Exacerbation rate

    Annual rate of exacerbations associated with different PIF levels

    Measured: 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2020
  2. Study start14 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2023
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04360226
Sponsor's protocol ID
REG-RES1801
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
19 Apr 2020
Last updated
10 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Respiratory Effectiveness Group at 13 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in Spain, South Korea, Singapore, Italy, Malta and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice. (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT04360226 | AzTrials