Chronic MigraineNCT04361721
Neurophysiological, Biomolecular and Psychological Aspects of Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine
An observational study of Chronic Migraine, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) proved effective in the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine as well as in difficult-to-treat patients such as those who had previously failed multiple prevention treatments or those with associated medication overuse (MO). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Migraine
- What is being tested?
- Erenumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2020to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Forty patients, affected by CM or CM+MO according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) -3 criteria were enrolled.
Who may be able to join
- age 18 to 65 years
- history of CM or CM+MO for at least 12 months prior to enrollment [10]
- previous failure of at least two different pharmacological classes of preventive therapies
Who cannot join
- other neurologic or neuropsychiatric diseases
- other chronic painful syndromes
- other types of primary or secondary headaches
- use of more than one preventive medication at baseline
- previous reported adverse reaction to latex
- pregnancy or lactation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRCCS Mondino Foundation
Pavia, 27100
Roberto De Icco, MD, 0039 382 380425, roberto.deicco@mondino.it
Cinzia Fattore, MD, 0039 382 380385, cinzia.fattore@mondino.it
About this study
Official title: Neurophysiological, Biomolecular and Psychological Aspects of Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine: an Open Label, Hypothesis Generator Study
Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) proved effective in the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine as well as in difficult-to-treat patients such as those who had previously failed multiple prevention treatments or those with associated medication overuse (MO).
A characteristic dysfunction in Chronic Migraine (CM) is sensitization, occurring peripherally in the trigeminovascular system but then spreading to the central nervous system, where it manifests with an increased neuronal excitability in multiple areas. Several neurophysiological studies in CM patients have demonstrated the occurrence of central sensitization in the brain as well as at the spinal level.
Read more
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in the generation and maintenance of chronic pain. Current evidence suggests that specific miRNAs may also play a role in migraine, thus representing possible biomarkers of the disease. A previous study reported an upregulation of miR-34a-5p and miR-382-5p, implicated in the regulation of GABAergic signaling and IL-10 gene expression respectively, during migraine attacks.
The aim of this open label, hypothesis generating study is the evaluation of the impact of erenumab treatment on neurophysiological, biomolecular and psychological aspects in a representative cohort of CM patients who had previously failed at least 2 preventive treatments.
Read the detailed description
This study consisted of a first screening visit with a Neurologist of the Headache Science Centre of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation, during which a full neurological and general examination was performed, and the data collected on the routine headache diary used by all patients attending Mondino Foundation was checked to confirm inclusion/exclusion criteria.
If a patient fulfilled criteria, he/she was enrolled in a baseline observation period for a month. At the end of the baseline observation period (T0), if inclusion/exclusion criteria were still satisfied, patients completed the following procedures: recording of clinical and demographical features, vital signs evaluation, neurophysiological assessment and psycological interview based on DSM (The Diagnostic and Statical Manual of Mental Disorders), venous blood sampling, and compilation of a set of self-administered questionnaires about psychological state, health status and quality of life.
At T0, the patients were treated with the first dose of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously.
After 28 days (4 full weeks), patients returned for the second visit (T1) to report clinical variables and adverse events. During T1, the second injection of erenumab 70 mg was administered, while a third and last dose of erenumab 70 mg was self-administered at home by the patients themselves after an additional 28-day interval (T2). The last visit of the study (T3) was then planned 56 days from T1, that was 28 days after the last dose of erenumab. At T3, the patients were tested with the same multi-disciplinary evaluation performed at T0: recording of clinical and demographical features, vital signs evaluation, neurophysiological assessment, venous blood sampling, and compilation of questionnaires concerning patients' psychological state, health status and quality of life.
Nociceptive withdrawal reflex measurements. The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is considered an objective and solid neurophysiological technique for the study of spinal nociceptive transmission. The reflex was recorded in the lower limb according to a well validated procedure, in a quiet environment by an expert technician between 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM. Patients were in a comfortable position with their ankle flexed at 90° and knee flexed at 130°. The sural nerve was stimulated electrically behind the lateral malleolus with a pair of Ag/AgCl surface electrodes. The electrical stimulation was made of 5 consecutive squared pulses (1 ms, 200 Hz), randomly delivered every 60-120 seconds. The electromyographic sweep (Synergy, Medelec, United Kingdom) was recorded from the capitis brevis of the homolateral biceps femoris with a pair of Ag/AgCl surface electrodes. A staircase method was used for all the threshold evaluations, and the intensity was increased by 0.3 mA per step. The recording parameters were: analysis time 300 ms, sensitivity 20 mV, and filter bandpass 3 to 3000 Hz.
The investigators first evaluated the single stimulus reflex threshold of the NWR (RTh), defined as the lowest intensity (mA) able to induce 3 consecutive stable muscular responses of at least 20 mV and 10 ms. They also evaluated the average AUC (Area Under the Curve - mV x ms), the average latency (ms), and the subjective pain perception rated on a 0-10 points visual analogue scale (VAS-RTh).
Then the investigators evaluated the temporal summation threshold (TST), by means of a train of 5 electrical stimuli at a frequency of 2 Hz. TST was defined as the lowest intensity (mA) able to elicit 3 consecutive stable muscular responses of at least 20 mV and 10 ms in the fourth and fifth electromyographic sweeps. They also evaluated the subjective pain perception of the first (VAS-TST-1) and fifth (VAS-TST-5) stimulus of the TST on a 0-10 points visual analogue scale.
MicroRNAs expression. The microRNA expression was evaluated by real-time reverse transcription (RT) PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs).
PBMCs isolation: blood samples (10 ml) was collected within ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid containing tube from participants. The blood samples were diluted in 1:1 ratio with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (Sigma). Diluted blood samples were slowly loaded into Ficoll separating solution (10 ml) (Sigma) and centrifuged at 800 g for 30 min at room temperature. PBMCs accumulated as the middle white monolayer, were washed twice in sterile PBS at 300 g for 15 min. After washing, PBMCs were pelleted and stored at -80° C until use.
MicroRNAs gene expression: isolation of RNA from PBMCs was carried out using the Direct-zol RNA Mini prep plus (Zymo Research). RNA concentration was determined by absorbance at 230 and 280 nm using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop™ Thermo Fisher Scientific, Euroclone Milano). Synthesis of cDNA was performed by using MirXMirna First strand Synthesis (Takara-Diatech, Jesi-An Italy) and TB Green q-Rt PCR is used (Takara-Diatech, Jesi-An Italy) to determine expression levels of miRNA-34a-5p and miRNA-382-5p. The denaturation was performed at 95°C and the amplification was performed through two-step cycling (95-60°C) for 40 cycles with a Light Cycler 480 Instrument RT-PCR Detection System (Roche, Milan, Italy). Target gene expression levels was normalized with U6 (a type of small nuclear RNA), used as housekeeping gene. Gene expression levels were calculated according to 2-∆Ct = 2 - (Ct gene - Ct housekeeping gene) formula by using Ct values.
Disability and psychological evaluations.
The battery included evaluations for:
- Migraine-related disability and associated features:
- the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) test: 0-5 (grade I): minimal disability, 6-10 (grade II): mild disability, 11-20 (grade III): moderate disability, 21-40 (grade IVa): severe disability, 41 and higher (grade IVb): very severe disability;
- the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6): 49 or less: no impact, 50-55: some impact, 56-59: substantial impact, 60-78 severe impact;
- Nociceptive Rating Scale for the assessment of average intensity of migraine pain: 0 no pain - 10 very severe;
- Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12): 0-3: mild cutaneous allodynia, 6-8: moderate cutaneous allodynia, 9 and higher: severe cutaneous allodynia.
- Quality of life:
- the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ): 14-item assessment, with each item rated on a 6-point scale (ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time"). Raw scores are then transformed to a 100-point scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life;
- Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): 11-item assessment referring to two main sub-domains, namely the Mental Component Summary (MCS), and the Physical Component Summary (PCS);
- HEALTH 0-100: patients were asked to score on a scale range of 0-100 their general health status at the precise moment of evaluation.
- Psychological State:
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): a 14-items questionnaire on a 4-point (0-3) Likert scale assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression. A score of 8 or higher in the two different domains is considered significant for anxiety and/or depression;
- Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a 10-item instrument on 0-3 scale to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. No cut-off score indicative of dependence has been established;
- Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): a 20-item questionnaire on a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale assessing alexithymia traits, i.e., individuals' difficulty in expressing their own feelings in words. A score of 61 or higher was considered significant for the presence of alexithymia;
- Childhood trauma questionnaire: including 13 items referring to different types of childhood traumas that were considered in term of total number of traumatic experiences;
- Stressful life-events questionnaire: consisting in a list of 58 stressful life events (e.g., moving, divorce, new work, dismissal, etc.). Patients were requested to tick those events that had occurred to them in the last 10 years.
- Conditions
- Chronic Migraine
- Being tested
- Erenumab
- Keywords
- Spinal sensitization, Biomarkers, Anti CGRP monoclonal antibodies, Migraine phenotypes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ErenumabDrug
First injection of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously was administered in hospital. The second injection of erenumab 70 mg was administered in hospital after 28 days, while the third and last dose of erenumab 70 mg was self-administered at home by the patients themselves after an additional 28-day interval.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic migraine patients | Three monthly administration of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously. Receives: Drug: Erenumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Spinal sensitization
Measured by the temporal summation threshold (TST) of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex
Measured: Change in TST (mA) at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Spinal sensitization
Measured by the single stimulus reflex threshold (RTh) of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex.
Measured: Change in RTh (mA) at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Inflammatory biomarker profile
Measured by plasma levels of miR-382-5p
Measured: Change in miR-382-5p at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
inflammatory biomarker profile
Measured by plasma levels of miR-34a-5p
Measured: Change in miR-34a-5p at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS)
Migraine-related disability as measured by MIDAS test: 0-5 (grade I): minimal disability, 6-10 (grade II): mild disability, 11-20 (grade III): moderate disability, 21-40 (grade IVa): severe disability, 41 and higher (grade IVb): very severe disability.
Measured: Change in MIDAS score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)
Migraine-related disability as measured by HIT-6 test: 49 or less: no impact, 50-55: some impact, 56-59: substantial impact, 60-78 severe impact.
Measured: Change in HIT-6 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12)
Migraine-related disability as measured by ASC-12 test: 0-2: none; 3-5: mild; 6-8: moderate; 9 or more: severe.
Measured: Change in ASC-12 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Quality of life measured by MSQ. 14-item assessment, with each item rated on a 6-point scale (ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time"). We evaluated 3 scores, namely Role Function-Restrictive (RR), Role Function- Preventive (RP), and Emotional Function (EF). Raw scores have been transformed to a 100-point scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Measured: Change in MSQ2 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Quality of life measured by SF-36. 36-item assessment that gives us information about 8 different domains: physical functioning (10 items), role-physical (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), and general health (5 items). The mental health measure is composed of vitality (4 items), social functioning (2 items), role-emotional (3 items), and mental health (5 items)
Measured: Change in SF-36 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Psychological state as measured by HADS. a 14-items questionnaire on a 4-point (0-3) Likert scale assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression. A score of 8 or higher in the two different domains is considered significant for anxiety and/or depression;
Measured: Change in HADS score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ)
Psychological state measured by LDQ. It is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. No cut-off score indicative of dependence has been established
Measured: Change in LDQ score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)
Psychological state measured by TAS-20. It is a 20-item questionnaire on a 5-point (1-5). Likert scale assessing alexithymia traits, i.e., individuals' difficulty in expressing their own feelings in words. A score of 61 or higher was considered significant for the presence of alexithymia.
Measured: Change in TAS-20 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Percentage of patients with positive clinical outcome
Measured by percentage of patients with a reduction in migraine days of a least 30% (30% Responder).
Measured: Percentage of 30% Responder patients at T3 (12 weeks after T0)
Percentage of patients with positive clinical outcome
Measured by percentage of patients with a reduction in migraine days of a least 50% (50% Responder).
Measured: Percentage of 50% Responder patients at T3 (12 weeks after T0)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2020
- Study start15 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic MigraineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cristina Tassorelli, MD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Mondino Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04361721
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EreCM2019
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P. Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: a new era in migraine therapy. Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1765-1774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32504-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
PubMed 31668411Ashina M, Tepper S, Brandes JL, Reuter U, Boudreau G, Dolezil D, Cheng S, Zhang F, Lenz R, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018 Sep;38(10):1611-1621. doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
PubMed 29984601Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U, Cheng S, Nilsen J, Leonardi DK, Lenz RA, Mikol DD. Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology. 2019 May 14;92(20):e2309-e2320. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 30996056Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F. Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain. 2013 Jul 30;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-65.
PubMed 23899115De Icco R, Perrotta A, Grillo V, Cosentino G, Sances G, Sandrini G, Tassorelli C. Experimentally induced spinal nociceptive sensitization increases with migraine frequency: a single-blind controlled study. Pain. 2020 Feb;161(2):429-438. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001726.
PubMed 31633594Andersen HH, Duroux M, Gazerani P. Serum MicroRNA Signatures in Migraineurs During Attacks and in Pain-Free Periods. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;53(3):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9106-5. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
PubMed 25636687Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
PubMed 29368949Demartini C, Greco R, Zanaboni AM, Sances G, De Icco R, Borsook D, Tassorelli C. Nitroglycerin as a comparative experimental model of migraine pain: From animal to human and back. Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Jun;177:15-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
PubMed 30771365Sandrini G, Serrao M, Rossi P, Romaniello A, Cruccu G, Willer JC. The lower limb flexion reflex in humans. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;77(6):353-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
PubMed 16386347Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73.
PubMed 18546601Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S20-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s20.
PubMed 11294956Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr, Garber WH, Batenhorst A, Cady R, Dahlof CG, Dowson A, Tepper S. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1026119331193.
PubMed 14651415Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Ashina S, Burstein R, Silberstein S, Reed ML, Serrano D, Stewart WF; American Migraine Prevalence Prevention Advisory Group. Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population. Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):148-58. doi: 10.1002/ana.21211.
PubMed 18059010Jhingran P, Osterhaus JT, Miller DW, Lee JT, Kirchdoerfer L. Development and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Headache. 1998 Apr;38(4):295-302. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x.
PubMed 9595870Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1025-36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00094-8.
PubMed 9817120
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurophysiological, Biomolecular and Psychological Aspects of Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine: an Open Label, Hypothesis Generator Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04361721
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EreCM2019
- Conditions
- Chronic Migraine
- Keywords
- Spinal sensitization, Biomarkers, Anti CGRP monoclonal antibodies, Migraine phenotypes
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) proved effective in the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine as well as in difficult-to-treat patients such as those who had previously failed multiple prevention treatments or those with associated medication overuse (MO).
A characteristic dysfunction in Chronic Migraine (CM) is sensitization, occurring peripherally in the trigeminovascular system but then spreading to the central nervous system, where it manifests with an increased neuronal excitability in multiple areas. Several neurophysiological studies in CM patients have demonstrated the occurrence of central sensitization in the brain as well as at the spinal level.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in the generation and maintenance of chronic pain. Current evidence suggests that specific miRNAs may also play a role in migraine, thus representing possible biomarkers of the disease. A previous study reported an upregulation of miR-34a-5p and miR-382-5p, implicated in the regulation of GABAergic signaling and IL-10 gene expression respectively, during migraine attacks.
The aim of this open label, hypothesis generating study is the evaluation of the impact of erenumab treatment on neurophysiological, biomolecular and psychological aspects in a representative cohort of CM patients who had previously failed at least 2 preventive treatments.
Detailed description
This study consisted of a first screening visit with a Neurologist of the Headache Science Centre of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation, during which a full neurological and general examination was performed, and the data collected on the routine headache diary used by all patients attending Mondino Foundation was checked to confirm inclusion/exclusion criteria.
If a patient fulfilled criteria, he/she was enrolled in a baseline observation period for a month. At the end of the baseline observation period (T0), if inclusion/exclusion criteria were still satisfied, patients completed the following procedures: recording of clinical and demographical features, vital signs evaluation, neurophysiological assessment and psycological interview based on DSM (The Diagnostic and Statical Manual of Mental Disorders), venous blood sampling, and compilation of a set of self-administered questionnaires about psychological state, health status and quality of life.
At T0, the patients were treated with the first dose of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously.
After 28 days (4 full weeks), patients returned for the second visit (T1) to report clinical variables and adverse events. During T1, the second injection of erenumab 70 mg was administered, while a third and last dose of erenumab 70 mg was self-administered at home by the patients themselves after an additional 28-day interval (T2). The last visit of the study (T3) was then planned 56 days from T1, that was 28 days after the last dose of erenumab. At T3, the patients were tested with the same multi-disciplinary evaluation performed at T0: recording of clinical and demographical features, vital signs evaluation, neurophysiological assessment, venous blood sampling, and compilation of questionnaires concerning patients' psychological state, health status and quality of life.
Nociceptive withdrawal reflex measurements. The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is considered an objective and solid neurophysiological technique for the study of spinal nociceptive transmission. The reflex was recorded in the lower limb according to a well validated procedure, in a quiet environment by an expert technician between 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM. Patients were in a comfortable position with their ankle flexed at 90° and knee flexed at 130°. The sural nerve was stimulated electrically behind the lateral malleolus with a pair of Ag/AgCl surface electrodes. The electrical stimulation was made of 5 consecutive squared pulses (1 ms, 200 Hz), randomly delivered every 60-120 seconds. The electromyographic sweep (Synergy, Medelec, United Kingdom) was recorded from the capitis brevis of the homolateral biceps femoris with a pair of Ag/AgCl surface electrodes. A staircase method was used for all the threshold evaluations, and the intensity was increased by 0.3 mA per step. The recording parameters were: analysis time 300 ms, sensitivity 20 mV, and filter bandpass 3 to 3000 Hz.
The investigators first evaluated the single stimulus reflex threshold of the NWR (RTh), defined as the lowest intensity (mA) able to induce 3 consecutive stable muscular responses of at least 20 mV and 10 ms. They also evaluated the average AUC (Area Under the Curve - mV x ms), the average latency (ms), and the subjective pain perception rated on a 0-10 points visual analogue scale (VAS-RTh).
Then the investigators evaluated the temporal summation threshold (TST), by means of a train of 5 electrical stimuli at a frequency of 2 Hz. TST was defined as the lowest intensity (mA) able to elicit 3 consecutive stable muscular responses of at least 20 mV and 10 ms in the fourth and fifth electromyographic sweeps. They also evaluated the subjective pain perception of the first (VAS-TST-1) and fifth (VAS-TST-5) stimulus of the TST on a 0-10 points visual analogue scale.
MicroRNAs expression. The microRNA expression was evaluated by real-time reverse transcription (RT) PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs).
PBMCs isolation: blood samples (10 ml) was collected within ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid containing tube from participants. The blood samples were diluted in 1:1 ratio with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (Sigma). Diluted blood samples were slowly loaded into Ficoll separating solution (10 ml) (Sigma) and centrifuged at 800 g for 30 min at room temperature. PBMCs accumulated as the middle white monolayer, were washed twice in sterile PBS at 300 g for 15 min. After washing, PBMCs were pelleted and stored at -80° C until use.
MicroRNAs gene expression: isolation of RNA from PBMCs was carried out using the Direct-zol RNA Mini prep plus (Zymo Research). RNA concentration was determined by absorbance at 230 and 280 nm using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop™ Thermo Fisher Scientific, Euroclone Milano). Synthesis of cDNA was performed by using MirXMirna First strand Synthesis (Takara-Diatech, Jesi-An Italy) and TB Green q-Rt PCR is used (Takara-Diatech, Jesi-An Italy) to determine expression levels of miRNA-34a-5p and miRNA-382-5p. The denaturation was performed at 95°C and the amplification was performed through two-step cycling (95-60°C) for 40 cycles with a Light Cycler 480 Instrument RT-PCR Detection System (Roche, Milan, Italy). Target gene expression levels was normalized with U6 (a type of small nuclear RNA), used as housekeeping gene. Gene expression levels were calculated according to 2-∆Ct = 2 - (Ct gene - Ct housekeeping gene) formula by using Ct values.
Disability and psychological evaluations.
The battery included evaluations for:
- Migraine-related disability and associated features:
- the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) test: 0-5 (grade I): minimal disability, 6-10 (grade II): mild disability, 11-20 (grade III): moderate disability, 21-40 (grade IVa): severe disability, 41 and higher (grade IVb): very severe disability;
- the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6): 49 or less: no impact, 50-55: some impact, 56-59: substantial impact, 60-78 severe impact;
- Nociceptive Rating Scale for the assessment of average intensity of migraine pain: 0 no pain - 10 very severe;
- Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12): 0-3: mild cutaneous allodynia, 6-8: moderate cutaneous allodynia, 9 and higher: severe cutaneous allodynia.
- Quality of life:
- the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ): 14-item assessment, with each item rated on a 6-point scale (ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time"). Raw scores are then transformed to a 100-point scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life;
- Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): 11-item assessment referring to two main sub-domains, namely the Mental Component Summary (MCS), and the Physical Component Summary (PCS);
- HEALTH 0-100: patients were asked to score on a scale range of 0-100 their general health status at the precise moment of evaluation.
- Psychological State:
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): a 14-items questionnaire on a 4-point (0-3) Likert scale assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression. A score of 8 or higher in the two different domains is considered significant for anxiety and/or depression;
- Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a 10-item instrument on 0-3 scale to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. No cut-off score indicative of dependence has been established;
- Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): a 20-item questionnaire on a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale assessing alexithymia traits, i.e., individuals' difficulty in expressing their own feelings in words. A score of 61 or higher was considered significant for the presence of alexithymia;
- Childhood trauma questionnaire: including 13 items referring to different types of childhood traumas that were considered in term of total number of traumatic experiences;
- Stressful life-events questionnaire: consisting in a list of 58 stressful life events (e.g., moving, divorce, new work, dismissal, etc.). Patients were requested to tick those events that had occurred to them in the last 10 years.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic migraine patients | – | Drug: ErenumabThree monthly administration of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Forty patients, affected by CM or CM+MO according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) -3 criteria were enrolled.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age 18 to 65 years
- history of CM or CM+MO for at least 12 months prior to enrollment [10]
- previous failure of at least two different pharmacological classes of preventive therapies
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- other neurologic or neuropsychiatric diseases
- other chronic painful syndromes
- other types of primary or secondary headaches
- use of more than one preventive medication at baseline
- previous reported adverse reaction to latex
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ErenumabFirst injection of erenumab 70 mg subcutaneously was administered in hospital. The second injection of erenumab 70 mg was administered in hospital after 28 days, while the third and last dose of erenumab 70 mg was self-administered at home by the patients themselves after an additional 28-day interval. | Drug | Chronic migraine patients |
Primary outcome
Spinal sensitization
Time frame: Change in TST (mA) at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Measured by the temporal summation threshold (TST) of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex
13 secondary outcomes
Spinal sensitization
Time frame: Change in RTh (mA) at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Inflammatory biomarker profile
Time frame: Change in miR-382-5p at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
inflammatory biomarker profile
Time frame: Change in miR-34a-5p at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS)
Time frame: Change in MIDAS score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)
Time frame: Change in HIT-6 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12)
Time frame: Change in ASC-12 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Time frame: Change in MSQ2 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: Change in SF-36 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: Change in HADS score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ)
Time frame: Change in LDQ score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)
Time frame: Change in TAS-20 score at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)
Percentage of patients with positive clinical outcome
Time frame: Percentage of 30% Responder patients at T3 (12 weeks after T0)
Percentage of patients with positive clinical outcome
Time frame: Percentage of 50% Responder patients at T3 (12 weeks after T0)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31668411Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P. Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: a new era in migraine therapy. Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1765-1774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32504-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 29984601Ashina M, Tepper S, Brandes JL, Reuter U, Boudreau G, Dolezil D, Cheng S, Zhang F, Lenz R, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018 Sep;38(10):1611-1621. doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
- Background: PubMed 30996056Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U, Cheng S, Nilsen J, Leonardi DK, Lenz RA, Mikol DD. Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology. 2019 May 14;92(20):e2309-e2320. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Background: PubMed 23899115Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F. Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain. 2013 Jul 30;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-65.
- Background: PubMed 31633594De Icco R, Perrotta A, Grillo V, Cosentino G, Sances G, Sandrini G, Tassorelli C. Experimentally induced spinal nociceptive sensitization increases with migraine frequency: a single-blind controlled study. Pain. 2020 Feb;161(2):429-438. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001726.
- Background: PubMed 25636687Andersen HH, Duroux M, Gazerani P. Serum MicroRNA Signatures in Migraineurs During Attacks and in Pain-Free Periods. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;53(3):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9106-5. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 29368949Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30771365Demartini C, Greco R, Zanaboni AM, Sances G, De Icco R, Borsook D, Tassorelli C. Nitroglycerin as a comparative experimental model of migraine pain: From animal to human and back. Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Jun;177:15-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 16386347Sandrini G, Serrao M, Rossi P, Romaniello A, Cruccu G, Willer JC. The lower limb flexion reflex in humans. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;77(6):353-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
- Background: PubMed 18546601Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73.
- Background: PubMed 11294956Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S20-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s20.
- Background: PubMed 14651415Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr, Garber WH, Batenhorst A, Cady R, Dahlof CG, Dowson A, Tepper S. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1026119331193.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Migraine
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Enrolling by invitation
App-based Breathing Program for Migraine Relief
Migraine, Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of EVO756 in Adults With Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
MMA Embolization for Refractory Chronic Migraine
Migraine Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Intra-Nasal Mechanical Stimulation (INMEST) as a Potential Preventative Treatment for Migraine
Migraine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cristina Tassorelli, MD principal investigator
IRCCS Mondino Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Migraine, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Roberto De Icco, MD (0039 382 380425, roberto.deicco@mondino.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Spinal sensitization (time frame: Change in TST (mA) at T3 (12 weeks later) when compared to baseline (T0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04361721, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021.