AzTrials
AzTrials

Atherosclerosis of ArteryExcellentNCT04365062

Clinical Study of Excimer Laser and Drug Coated Balloon Versus Excimer Laser and Plain Balloon Versus Plain Balloon and Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Femoropopliteal In-stent Restenosis

A study testing Excimer laser and drug coated balloon, Excimer laser and plain balloon and plain balloon and drug coated balloon in people with Atherosclerosis of Artery and In-stent Arterial Restenosis, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized study comparing Excimer laser and drug coated balloon Versus Excimer laser and plain balloon versus plain balloon and drug coated balloon to Treat femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Excimer laser and drug coated balloon, Excimer laser and plain balloon and plain balloon and drug coated balloon
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provides written informed consent Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times Has claudication or rest pain due to peripheral arterial In-stent restenosis Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery Patient has a In-stent restenosis lesion(s) with >50% stenosis documented angiographically Patient has symptoms of peripheral arterial disease classified as Rutherford Category 2 or greater.

Who cannot join

  • They were excluded if they had one or more of the following: 1. Acute or subacute lower limb ischemia; 2. Severe calcification lesions; 3. Total occlusions lesions more significant than 10 cm or total occlusion lesions with a suspicion of subintimal wire recanalization 4. untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis>70%, or the distal runoff artery <1 root; 5. Previously lower extremity intervention or surgical graft artery bypass; 6. Severe renal insufficiency, creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dL; 7. The patient's platelet count is less than 100,000/uL, antiplatelet or anticoagulant contraindications to required medications; 8. Patients with immune system diseases or malignant tumours; 9. ongoing active infection 10. decompensated congestive heart failure or acute coronary syndrome; 11. Unwillingness to return for future follow-up visits

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Gu Yong Quan

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053

    Yang Li, M.D., 17198643706, liyang0603@aliyun.com

    Yong quan Gu, M.D., 15901598209, 15901598209@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Excellent:Clinical Study of Excimer Laser and Drug Coated Balloon Versus Excimer Laser and Plain Balloon Versus Plain Balloon and Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Femoropopliteal In-stent Restenosis

This is a randomized study comparing Excimer laser and drug coated balloon Versus Excimer laser and plain balloon versus plain balloon and drug coated balloon to Treat femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized study comparing Excimer laser and drug coated balloon Versus Excimer laser and plain balloon versus plain balloon and drug coated balloon to Treat femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

Being tested
Excimer laser and drug coated balloon, Excimer laser and plain balloon, plain balloon and drug coated balloon
Keywords
Excimer laser, drug coated balloon, femoropopliteal, In-stent Restenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Excimer laser and drug coated balloonDevice

    Excimer laser and drug coated balloon

  • Excimer laser and plain balloonDevice

    Excimer laser and plain balloon

  • plain balloon and drug coated balloonDevice

    plain balloon and drug coated balloon

Study groups in NCT04365062
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention: Excimer laser and drug coated balloonExperimentalIntervention: Excimer laser and drug coated balloon group
Receives: Device: Excimer laser and drug coated balloon
Excimer laser and plain balloonActive comparatorExcimer laser and plain balloon group
Receives: Device: Excimer laser and plain balloon
plain balloon and drug coated balloonActive comparatorplain balloon and drug coated balloon group
Receives: Device: plain balloon and drug coated balloon

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Patency Rate

    Primary patency is defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by Duplex ultrasound through the index lesion and no further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim. Significant reduction of flow is binary restenosis defined as the diameter stenosis >50% with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 as measured by Duplex ultrasound.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Technical success

    Technical success is defined as residual stenosis less than 30% by final angiography and/or a flow-limiting dissection.

    Measured: 1 day

  2. freedom from clinically-driven TLR

    it is defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Major Adverse Events

    Major adverse events included death, index limb ischemia, index limb amputation, and significant embolic events, which were defined as causing end-organ damage.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Limb Salvage Rate

    Limb Salvage is defined as the freedom from secondary major amputation

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04365062
Sponsor's protocol ID
FPA-ISR
Acronym
Excellent
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
24 Apr 2020
Last updated
28 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yongquan G, Lianrui G, Lixing Q, Xuefeng L, Zhu T, Shijun C, Yingfeng W, Jianming G, Jian Z, Zhonggao W. Plaque excision in the management of lower-limb ischemia of atherosclerosis and in-stent restenosis with the SilverHawk atherectomy catheter. Int Angiol. 2013 Aug;32(4):362-7.

    PubMed 23822938

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Excimer laser and drug coated balloon, Excimer laser and plain balloon and plain balloon and drug coated balloon in people with Atherosclerosis of Artery and In-stent Arterial Restenosis, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact li yang (17198643706, 1093075829@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Patency Rate (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04365062, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in