Hallucinations, AuditoryEarly Phase 1NCT04366518
Toward a Computationally-Informed, Personalized Treatment for Hallucinations
A Early Phase 1 study testing Rivastigmine Transdermal System and Scopolamine in people with Hallucinations, Auditory and Psychosis, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Auditory hallucinations are among the most distressing aspects of psychotic illness, and between 10 and 30% of people with hallucinations do not respond to antipsychotic medications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hallucinations, Auditory, Psychosis
- What is being tested?
- Rivastigmine Transdermal System and Scopolamine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Jul 2021to Aug 2032
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65
- English speaking
- Right handedness
- Diagnosed with schizophrenia schizoaffective, schizophreniform, schizotypal, or brief psychotic disorder
- History of auditory verbal hallucinations occurring at least weekly
Who cannot join
- Current substance dependence or active use as determined by drug test.
- Any neurological, medical or developmental problem that is known to impair cognition significantly
- Contraindications for MR scanning including metallic implants of any kind, pacemakers and history of accidents with metal, claustrophobia
- History of seizures
- History of violence
- History of suicide
Show all 14Show fewer
- Pregnancy (determined by urine pregnancy test)
- Concurrent participation in any other intervention study
- History of urinary retention
- History of delirium
- Current use of any cholinergic or anticholinergic medication
- History of asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease
- Evidence of cardiovascular disease on EKG
- Individuals who have been on dopamine-2 antagonists for less than 6 months (to limit risk of EPS)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Silmilly Toribio contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Connecticut Mental Health Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Albert Powers, M.D., Ph.D
About this study
Auditory hallucinations are among the most distressing aspects of psychotic illness, and between 10 and 30% of people with hallucinations do not respond to antipsychotic medications. The authors have used computational modeling of behavior to link brain activity to development of auditory hallucinations in the hope of guiding new treatment development. The proposed studies take the first step toward individualized treatment approaches to hallucinations by attempting causal, pharmacological manipulation of relevant model parameters underlying these phenomena.
Read the detailed description
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are present throughout the course of psychotic illness and are among its most distressing symptoms. The presence of hallucinations alone increases risk of suicide in patients with psychosis. While antipsychotic medications often succeed in ameliorating auditory hallucinations, 10-30% of those with hallucinations exhibit little to no response to these treatments. Understanding how the processes underlying auditory perception might go awry to produce auditory hallucinations is a critical next step in the development of new treatments that are more soundly based upon systems neuroscience and brain pathophysiology.
Perceptual systems do not rely entirely upon information coming from sensory organs like the retina and the cochlea. Rather, they blend this input with perceptual beliefs about the sensory environment in order to produce an internal model of that environment. The authors and others have proposed that hallucinations may be seen as an over-weighting of these perceptual beliefs when combined with sensory evidence during perceptual inference. In this work, the authors take advantage of a long history of sensory conditioning research to elicit hallucinatory experiences via traditional learning mechanisms: subjects are exposed to repeated pairings of visual and auditory stimuli and subsequently perceive the presence of the auditory stimulus when only the visual is present. The authors applied this Conditioned Hallucinations paradigm to four groups of subjects who varied orthogonally in having or not having hallucinations and psychosis. The authors found that conditioned hallucinations readily occur in all subjects but with markedly increased frequency in those who hallucinate compared to those who do not. The authors then employed a computational approach that formally models perception as a combination of prior knowledge and sensory input: the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF). Results indicate that the weight prior knowledge exerts during perception is significantly higher in those with hallucinations, and is related to prior-related functional activity specific brain regions like the anterior insula. This 'prior weighting' alteration may represent a novel, personalized, and computationally-informed target for the treatment of hallucinations.
Mathematically, prior weighting is the ratio of the precision of prior knowledge to the precision of incoming sensory evidence exhibited by an individual during perception. Therefore, it may be normalized by either decreasing the precision of prior knowledge or increasing the precision of incoming sensory evidence. The precision of sensory evidence appears to depend critically upon cholinergic signaling: acetylcholine increases auditory discrimination abilities and biases perceptual inference toward sensory data. Antagonism at central cholinergic receptors decreases sensory sensitivity and decreases reliance on incoming sensory evidence during perceptual inference. Consistent with this, scopolamine, a safe and reversible antagonist at the M1 cholinergic receptor used routinely for its anti-emetic effects, can both cause spontaneous hallucinations and enhance conditioned hallucinations. By contrast, increased cholinergic signaling ameliorates psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's Disease. Rivastigmine, a reversible, centrally-acting cholinesterase inhibitor, has been used study the cholinergic system and has been found to ameliorate hallucinations in some patients with schizophrenia.
The authors plan to characterize the effects of cholinergic agents on the perceptual, computational, physiological, and clinical signatures of hallucinations in healthy participants and individuals with psychosis via the following aims:
Aim 1: Characterize the effects of cholinergic antagonism on the behavioral, computational, and neural signatures of conditioned hallucinations in healthy subjects. Hypotheses: 1) Non-hallucinating healthy subjects will show increases in prior weighting and conditioned hallucinations with scopolamine vs. saline. 2) Scopolamine-related changes in prior weighting will be accompanied by increased prior-related activity in anterior insula on functional MRI (fMRI).
Aim 2: Determine the effect of cholinergic potentiation on the behavioral, computational, and neural signatures of conditioned hallucinations in subjects with psychosis and hallucinations. Hypotheses: 1) Subjects with hallucinations and high prior weighting will show decreases in prior weighting and conditioned hallucinations with rivastigmine patch vs placebo patch. 2) Rivastigmine-related changes in prior weighting will be accompanied by lower prior-related functional activity in anterior insula. 3) Subjects with hallucinations and lower prior weighting will show none of these physostigmine-related changes.
In proposing these aims, the authors apply a formalized, theoretical understanding of perceptual processing to probe the interplay between perceptual, computational, circuit-level, and neurotransmitter-level dysfunction seen in hallucinations. This approach also has the potential for an immediate clinical impact: it is the first attempt to leverage the powerful tools of computational psychiatry to identify distinct patient subgroups likely to respond to emerging cholinergically-mediated treatments for hallucinations.
- Conditions
- Hallucinations, Auditory, Psychosis
- Being tested
- Rivastigmine Transdermal System, Scopolamine, Placebo Patch
- Medical subject headings
- Hallucinations, Psychotic Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rivastigmine Transdermal SystemDrug
Rivastigmine doses will be administered transdermally using 9.5 mg/24 hr transdermal patches. Participants will be randomized to two treatments with oral rivastigmine vs. placebo separated by a 15-hour washout period (>5 half-lives to eliminate any residual effects). This will require three separate visits: a baseline visit, a visit for the first transdermal treatment and a visit for the second transdermal treatment. All visits include fMRI scans. The first transdermal patch will be administered 8-14 hours before the scan. After the washout period, the second transdermal patch will be administered 8-14 hours before the scan. No study team member except for the unblinded team member will know which capsule the participant receives first. Because we are interested in rivastigmine as a probe for a pre-identified computational/physiological abnormality, we will median-split groups post-hoc for the purposes of analysis.
ScopolamineDrug
The authors have chosen to use scopolamine to determine the effects of cholinergic antagonism, as treatment with scopolamine demonstrates a dose-related increase in propensity toward conditioned hallucinations and in doses much higher than those proposed here, can cause spontaneous hallucinations. At the proposed dose, scopolamine has an excellent safety profile and has been used routinely for nearly 20 years for treatment of nausea due to surgery or motion sickness in adults and children. Scopolamine is available in the US only as a 1mg / 72 hours transdermal patch, and peak plasma levels are reached within 24 hours. This standard dosage level is very well tolerated in the general population.
Placebo PatchDrug
Participants in Aim 2 will receive a placebo patch versus rivastigmine patch.
Placebo PatchDrug
Participants in Aim 1 will receive a placebo patch versus scopolamine patch.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Those with psychosis/hallucinations | Experimental | Participants who have a psychosis spectrum diagnosis and frequent auditory hallucinations will be given Rivastigmine capsule versus placebo capsule. Receives: Drug: Rivastigmine Transdermal System; Drug: Placebo Patch |
| Aim 1: Healthy Controls | Placebo comparator | Healthy controls will be given scopolamine patches versus placebo patch. Receives: Drug: Scopolamine; Drug: Placebo Patch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of conditioned hallucinations exhibited during saline vs placebo administration
Participants will perform the Conditioned Hallucinations task while in the scanner; the authors hypothesize that number of conditioned hallucinations exhibited during the task will be higher under placebo than physostigmine, but only in those who have high prior weighting on baseline assessment.
Measured: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Prior-Weighting Parameter of the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter
Behavioral responses will be used to fit a parameter of the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter model corresponding to the ratio of precision of priors to precision of incoming sensory evidence.
Measured: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Functional correlation with model belief trajectories
Behavioral responses will be used to fit belief trajectories across the course of the experiment, and whole-brain analyses will measure correlation of brain activity with these computed trajectories.
Measured: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2020
- Study start15 Jul 2021
- Primary completionAug 2032 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hallucinations, AuditoryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Rivastigmine vs Placebo
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Albert Powers, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Yale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04366518
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000024774
- Other IDs
- R21MH122940
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Toward a Computationally-Informed, Personalized Treatment for Hallucinations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04366518
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2000024774
- Conditions
- Hallucinations, Auditory, Psychosis
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- 15 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2032 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Auditory hallucinations are among the most distressing aspects of psychotic illness, and between 10 and 30% of people with hallucinations do not respond to antipsychotic medications. The authors have used computational modeling of behavior to link brain activity to development of auditory hallucinations in the hope of guiding new treatment development. The proposed studies take the first step toward individualized treatment approaches to hallucinations by attempting causal, pharmacological manipulation of relevant model parameters underlying these phenomena.
Detailed description
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are present throughout the course of psychotic illness and are among its most distressing symptoms. The presence of hallucinations alone increases risk of suicide in patients with psychosis. While antipsychotic medications often succeed in ameliorating auditory hallucinations, 10-30% of those with hallucinations exhibit little to no response to these treatments. Understanding how the processes underlying auditory perception might go awry to produce auditory hallucinations is a critical next step in the development of new treatments that are more soundly based upon systems neuroscience and brain pathophysiology.
Perceptual systems do not rely entirely upon information coming from sensory organs like the retina and the cochlea. Rather, they blend this input with perceptual beliefs about the sensory environment in order to produce an internal model of that environment. The authors and others have proposed that hallucinations may be seen as an over-weighting of these perceptual beliefs when combined with sensory evidence during perceptual inference. In this work, the authors take advantage of a long history of sensory conditioning research to elicit hallucinatory experiences via traditional learning mechanisms: subjects are exposed to repeated pairings of visual and auditory stimuli and subsequently perceive the presence of the auditory stimulus when only the visual is present. The authors applied this Conditioned Hallucinations paradigm to four groups of subjects who varied orthogonally in having or not having hallucinations and psychosis. The authors found that conditioned hallucinations readily occur in all subjects but with markedly increased frequency in those who hallucinate compared to those who do not. The authors then employed a computational approach that formally models perception as a combination of prior knowledge and sensory input: the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF). Results indicate that the weight prior knowledge exerts during perception is significantly higher in those with hallucinations, and is related to prior-related functional activity specific brain regions like the anterior insula. This 'prior weighting' alteration may represent a novel, personalized, and computationally-informed target for the treatment of hallucinations.
Mathematically, prior weighting is the ratio of the precision of prior knowledge to the precision of incoming sensory evidence exhibited by an individual during perception. Therefore, it may be normalized by either decreasing the precision of prior knowledge or increasing the precision of incoming sensory evidence. The precision of sensory evidence appears to depend critically upon cholinergic signaling: acetylcholine increases auditory discrimination abilities and biases perceptual inference toward sensory data. Antagonism at central cholinergic receptors decreases sensory sensitivity and decreases reliance on incoming sensory evidence during perceptual inference. Consistent with this, scopolamine, a safe and reversible antagonist at the M1 cholinergic receptor used routinely for its anti-emetic effects, can both cause spontaneous hallucinations and enhance conditioned hallucinations. By contrast, increased cholinergic signaling ameliorates psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's Disease. Rivastigmine, a reversible, centrally-acting cholinesterase inhibitor, has been used study the cholinergic system and has been found to ameliorate hallucinations in some patients with schizophrenia.
The authors plan to characterize the effects of cholinergic agents on the perceptual, computational, physiological, and clinical signatures of hallucinations in healthy participants and individuals with psychosis via the following aims:
Aim 1: Characterize the effects of cholinergic antagonism on the behavioral, computational, and neural signatures of conditioned hallucinations in healthy subjects. Hypotheses: 1) Non-hallucinating healthy subjects will show increases in prior weighting and conditioned hallucinations with scopolamine vs. saline. 2) Scopolamine-related changes in prior weighting will be accompanied by increased prior-related activity in anterior insula on functional MRI (fMRI).
Aim 2: Determine the effect of cholinergic potentiation on the behavioral, computational, and neural signatures of conditioned hallucinations in subjects with psychosis and hallucinations. Hypotheses: 1) Subjects with hallucinations and high prior weighting will show decreases in prior weighting and conditioned hallucinations with rivastigmine patch vs placebo patch. 2) Rivastigmine-related changes in prior weighting will be accompanied by lower prior-related functional activity in anterior insula. 3) Subjects with hallucinations and lower prior weighting will show none of these physostigmine-related changes.
In proposing these aims, the authors apply a formalized, theoretical understanding of perceptual processing to probe the interplay between perceptual, computational, circuit-level, and neurotransmitter-level dysfunction seen in hallucinations. This approach also has the potential for an immediate clinical impact: it is the first attempt to leverage the powerful tools of computational psychiatry to identify distinct patient subgroups likely to respond to emerging cholinergically-mediated treatments for hallucinations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Rivastigmine vs Placebo
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Those with psychosis/hallucinations | Experimental | Drug: Rivastigmine Transdermal System, Drug: Placebo PatchParticipants who have a psychosis spectrum diagnosis and frequent auditory hallucinations will be given Rivastigmine capsule versus placebo capsule. |
| Aim 1: Healthy Controls | Placebo comparator | Drug: Scopolamine, Drug: Placebo PatchHealthy controls will be given scopolamine patches versus placebo patch. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18-65
- English speaking
- Right handedness
- Diagnosed with schizophrenia schizoaffective, schizophreniform, schizotypal, or brief psychotic disorder
- History of auditory verbal hallucinations occurring at least weekly
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Current substance dependence or active use as determined by drug test.
- Any neurological, medical or developmental problem that is known to impair cognition significantly
- Contraindications for MR scanning including metallic implants of any kind, pacemakers and history of accidents with metal, claustrophobia
- History of seizures
- History of violence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Transdermal SystemRivastigmine doses will be administered transdermally using 9.5 mg/24 hr transdermal patches. Participants will be randomized to two treatments with oral rivastigmine vs. placebo separated by a 15-hour washout period (>5 half-lives to eliminate any residual effects). This will require three separate visits: a baseline visit, a visit for the first transdermal treatment and a visit for the second transdermal treatment. All visits include fMRI scans. The first transdermal patch will be administered 8-14 hours before the scan. After the washout period, the second transdermal patch will be administered 8-14 hours before the scan. No study team member except for the unblinded team member will know which capsule the participant receives first. Because we are interested in rivastigmine as a probe for a pre-identified computational/physiological abnormality, we will median-split groups post-hoc for the purposes of analysis. | Drug | Aim 2: Those with psychosis/hallucinations |
| ScopolamineThe authors have chosen to use scopolamine to determine the effects of cholinergic antagonism, as treatment with scopolamine demonstrates a dose-related increase in propensity toward conditioned hallucinations and in doses much higher than those proposed here, can cause spontaneous hallucinations. At the proposed dose, scopolamine has an excellent safety profile and has been used routinely for nearly 20 years for treatment of nausea due to surgery or motion sickness in adults and children. Scopolamine is available in the US only as a 1mg / 72 hours transdermal patch, and peak plasma levels are reached within 24 hours. This standard dosage level is very well tolerated in the general population. | Drug | Aim 1: Healthy Controls |
| Placebo PatchParticipants in Aim 2 will receive a placebo patch versus rivastigmine patch. | Drug | Aim 2: Those with psychosis/hallucinations |
| Placebo PatchParticipants in Aim 1 will receive a placebo patch versus scopolamine patch. | Drug | Aim 1: Healthy Controls |
Primary outcome
Number of conditioned hallucinations exhibited during saline vs placebo administration
Time frame: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Participants will perform the Conditioned Hallucinations task while in the scanner; the authors hypothesize that number of conditioned hallucinations exhibited during the task will be higher under placebo than physostigmine, but only in those who have high prior weighting on baseline assessment.
2 secondary outcomes
Prior-Weighting Parameter of the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter
Time frame: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Functional correlation with model belief trajectories
Time frame: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hallucinations, Auditory
Recruiting
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Schizophrenia
Not yet recruiting
DecNef for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (AVH) in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Disorder, Schizoaffecitve Disorder
Recruiting
Neuronavigated rTMS for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Schizophrenia, Auditory Verbal Hallucinations
Recruiting
fMRI-based Neurofeedback to Relieve Drug-resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Schizophrenia, Hallucinations, Auditory
Recruiting
Reduction of Auditory-Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia Through Cortical Neuromodulation
Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Silmilly Toribio contact
Albert Powers, MD, PhD principal investigator
Yale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Rivastigmine Transdermal System and Scopolamine in people with Hallucinations, Auditory and Psychosis, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Albert Powers, MD, PhD (203-974-7329, albert.powers@yale.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of conditioned hallucinations exhibited during saline vs placebo administration (time frame: During fMRI scans / task completion which will take approximately 90 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2025.