Nephrolithiasis, Uric AcidPhase 4NCT04370093
Pathogenesis of Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: Role of Pioglitazone/Weight Loss
A Phase 4 study testing Pioglitazone 45 mg, Weight Loss and Pioglitazone + Weight Loss in people with Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators will randomize overweight and obese iuan patients to Pio (45 mg/day, highest approved dose or placebo), WL (10% of body weight, following the established program used in the Diabetes Prevention Program), or Pio+WL. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid
- What is being tested?
- Pioglitazone 45 mg, Weight Loss and Pioglitazone + Weight Loss
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2019to 28 May 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis, with last stone analysis showing that stone has >90% uric acid in composition Age >21 years Any gender, race/ethnicity (from weight loss), but weight <165 Kg (to fit into MR instrument); eGFR>60ml/min/1.73 m2
Who cannot join
- Bariatric surgery, chronic diarrhea, recurrent UTIs current insulin use use of a thiazolidinedione in past 2 years contraindication to thiazolidinedione use (liver dz, pedal edema, CHF NYHA class III/IV, no contraception) Bladder cancer Use of SGLT2-i, GLP-1 analogs, gemfibrozil, topiramate, rifampin Hba1c > 8.5%
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9107
About this study
The investigators will randomize overweight and obese iuan patients to Pio (45 mg/day, highest approved dose or placebo), WL (10% of body weight, following the established program used in the Diabetes Prevention Program), or Pio+WL. Participants will be evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of intervention while on a fixed metabolic diet to exclude the confounding effects of diet and perspiration. The primary endpoint will be change in upH, and multiple additional endpoints (serum, urine, imaging) will be assessed.
Read the detailed description
In IUAN patients, the investigator will compare 1. PPAR activation; 2. weight loss; or 3. combination; on urine acid-base parameters relevant to UA stone risk. The investigator will assess the effect of these interventions on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and serum adiponectin, and correlate these changes with urine chemistry.
Hypothesis: Weight loss + TZD independently result in durable changes in urine chemistry.
Significance: Epidemiology of uric acid nephrolithiasis: Nephrolithiasis is an increasingly prevalent condition that leads to significant pain1, work productivity loss2, reduced quality of life3, urinary tract infection4, chronic kidney disease5,6 and end-stage renal disease7. In the U.S., nephrolithiasis prevalence doubled in the past 30 years to a level similar to diabetes, and is the most expensive non-malignant urologic condition (2006 U.S. annual cost: $10 billion)8. Compared with other stone types, uric acid stones recur at a higher rate9, lead to more CKD10, and comprise a rising fraction of stones11,12 , in part due to the growing prevalence of obesity and diabetes13-18. The single most important pathogenic factor in human IUAN is an overly acidic urine, promoting protonation of urate to the insoluble UA16,19. In previously completed NIH-supported studies, the Investigator identified increased net acid excretion and blunted ammoniagenesis to be the principal metabolic defects underlying aciduria in humans IUAN and in rodent models of IUAN risk16,18,20-23. Treatment has been empirical urinary alkalinization24 which is efficacious but has not changed since 1986. Limitations include frequent dosing25, need for high dose in obese patients26, medication intolerance27, and need for periodic urine collections disliked by patients. Therapy that targets the underlying pathophysiologic defect rather than urinary chemistry is directly needed. The Investigator showed that the thiazolidinedione (TZD) pioglitazone that activates PPAR, improves systemic and urinary abnormalities in IUAN including impaired excessive acid excretion and ammoniagenesis, and results in a rise in UpH. TZD treatment of rodent IUAN model shows similar improvements28. The Investigator may have a therapy targeting the underlying pathobiology.
The translational potential of our regimen is extremely high and immediate. If combined TZD and weight loss (Aim) are efficacious in reducing stone risk, one can move straight to a clinical trial using hard outcomes such as stone events, and stone count by imaging to test this regimen. None of these maneuvers requires FDA approval to initiate. Patients will then have instant control of urinary chemistry with empiric alkali therapy (existing therapy), but also a chance to achieve more lasting improvement with TZD and weight loss, which reverses the pathophysiology. Separately, adiponectin (APN) receptor agonists are being developed as potential pharmacological agents for the management of metabolic syndrome complications including diabetes and dyslipidemia29,30. If approved, such agents could be tested as therapy for aciduria in the metabolic syndrome if adiponectin mediates the impact of TZD on renal ammoniagenesis.
UA nephrolithiasis is the clinically palpable sentinel of some complex underlying systemic pathophysiology; hence the impact of these studies extends beyond UA stones. The Investigator is examining a novel multi-organ paradigm of increased acid production from the gut that escapes hepatic metabolism, and ending up as an acid load imposed on the kidney. When compounded with renal ammoniagenesis defect, this leads to aciduria and UA lithogenesis. The Investigator will address some fundamental pathobiologic mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome. Due to the time and budget limits, the Investigator will concentrate our efforts to yield informative data; hence the renal focus. Our long-term goal is to use this as a portal to study multiple aspects of the gut, hepatic, and adipose pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome.
- Conditions
- Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid
- Being tested
- Pioglitazone 45 mg, Weight Loss, Pioglitazone + Weight Loss
- Keywords
- Biomedical Sciences
- Medical subject headings
- Nephrolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pioglitazone 45 mgDrug
45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study
Weight LossBehavioural
Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.
Pioglitazone + Weight LossOther
Pioglitazone + Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone Drug (including Placebo) | Experimental | 45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone 45 mg |
| Weight Loss, Behavioral | Experimental | Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. Receives: Behavioral: Weight Loss |
| Pioglitazone + Weight Loss | Other | Pioglitazone 45 mg/day + Weight Loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. Receives: Other: Pioglitazone + Weight Loss |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delta Urine pH
24-hour urine pH is the main determinant of uric acid stone formation and recurrence.
There is no universally accepted clinical scale for Δ (delta) urine pH like there is for some other biomarkers. In research, Δ urine pH is simply:
Δ urine pH = Post-intervention urine pH - Baseline urine pH
A practical interpretation commonly used in renal physiology and stone research is:
Δ Urine pH Interpretation < 0 Urine became more acidic 0 to +0.2 No meaningful change
- 0.2 to +0.5 Mild alkalinization
- 0.5 to +1.0 Moderate alkalinization > +1.0 Marked alkalinization Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Ratio of Urine Ammonium/Net Acid Excretion
The ratio of urine ammonium to net acid excretion (NH4+/NAE). This is calculated from 24 hr urine ammonium and 24 hr urine net acid excretion.
Secondary endpoints include MMRM analysis of weight and urinary stone risk variables.
Higher score means positive response.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Ratio of Urine Net Acid Excretion/Sulphate
Urine Net Acid Excretion to Sulphate ratio represents the diet-independent fraction of acid excreted. This is calculated from 24 hr urine net acid excretion and 24 hr urine sulphate.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Delta Supersaturation Index of Uric Acid
Supersaturation Index of Uric Acid is a calculated parameters that indicates the degree of urinary saturation with respect to uric acid.
There is no universally accepted grading scale (e.g., mild, moderate, severe) for ΔSSI itself. Most studies simply report the numerical change or the percentage change from baseline. When reporting the change in SSI:
ΔSSI < 0 → Improvement (supersaturation decreased) ΔSSI = 0 → No change ΔSSI > 0 → Worsening (supersaturation increased) There is no minimum or maximum threshold. A lower score indicates better outcome.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2020
- Study start17 Oct 2019
- Primary completion28 May 2025
- Study completion28 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Nephrolithiasis, Uric AcidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Khashayar Sakhaee, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Investigators
- Khashayar Sakhaee, MD, Principal investigator, UTSW
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU-2019-0907
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pathogenesis of Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: Role of Pioglitazone/Weight Loss
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU-2019-0907
- Conditions
- Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid
- Keywords
- Biomedical Sciences
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 31 Aug 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will randomize overweight and obese iuan patients to Pio (45 mg/day, highest approved dose or placebo), WL (10% of body weight, following the established program used in the Diabetes Prevention Program), or Pio+WL. Participants will be evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of intervention while on a fixed metabolic diet to exclude the confounding effects of diet and perspiration. The primary endpoint will be change in upH, and multiple additional endpoints (serum, urine, imaging) will be assessed.
Detailed description
In IUAN patients, the investigator will compare 1. PPAR activation; 2. weight loss; or 3. combination; on urine acid-base parameters relevant to UA stone risk. The investigator will assess the effect of these interventions on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and serum adiponectin, and correlate these changes with urine chemistry.
Hypothesis: Weight loss + TZD independently result in durable changes in urine chemistry.
Significance: Epidemiology of uric acid nephrolithiasis: Nephrolithiasis is an increasingly prevalent condition that leads to significant pain1, work productivity loss2, reduced quality of life3, urinary tract infection4, chronic kidney disease5,6 and end-stage renal disease7. In the U.S., nephrolithiasis prevalence doubled in the past 30 years to a level similar to diabetes, and is the most expensive non-malignant urologic condition (2006 U.S. annual cost: $10 billion)8. Compared with other stone types, uric acid stones recur at a higher rate9, lead to more CKD10, and comprise a rising fraction of stones11,12 , in part due to the growing prevalence of obesity and diabetes13-18. The single most important pathogenic factor in human IUAN is an overly acidic urine, promoting protonation of urate to the insoluble UA16,19. In previously completed NIH-supported studies, the Investigator identified increased net acid excretion and blunted ammoniagenesis to be the principal metabolic defects underlying aciduria in humans IUAN and in rodent models of IUAN risk16,18,20-23. Treatment has been empirical urinary alkalinization24 which is efficacious but has not changed since 1986. Limitations include frequent dosing25, need for high dose in obese patients26, medication intolerance27, and need for periodic urine collections disliked by patients. Therapy that targets the underlying pathophysiologic defect rather than urinary chemistry is directly needed. The Investigator showed that the thiazolidinedione (TZD) pioglitazone that activates PPAR, improves systemic and urinary abnormalities in IUAN including impaired excessive acid excretion and ammoniagenesis, and results in a rise in UpH. TZD treatment of rodent IUAN model shows similar improvements28. The Investigator may have a therapy targeting the underlying pathobiology.
The translational potential of our regimen is extremely high and immediate. If combined TZD and weight loss (Aim) are efficacious in reducing stone risk, one can move straight to a clinical trial using hard outcomes such as stone events, and stone count by imaging to test this regimen. None of these maneuvers requires FDA approval to initiate. Patients will then have instant control of urinary chemistry with empiric alkali therapy (existing therapy), but also a chance to achieve more lasting improvement with TZD and weight loss, which reverses the pathophysiology. Separately, adiponectin (APN) receptor agonists are being developed as potential pharmacological agents for the management of metabolic syndrome complications including diabetes and dyslipidemia29,30. If approved, such agents could be tested as therapy for aciduria in the metabolic syndrome if adiponectin mediates the impact of TZD on renal ammoniagenesis.
UA nephrolithiasis is the clinically palpable sentinel of some complex underlying systemic pathophysiology; hence the impact of these studies extends beyond UA stones. The Investigator is examining a novel multi-organ paradigm of increased acid production from the gut that escapes hepatic metabolism, and ending up as an acid load imposed on the kidney. When compounded with renal ammoniagenesis defect, this leads to aciduria and UA lithogenesis. The Investigator will address some fundamental pathobiologic mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome. Due to the time and budget limits, the Investigator will concentrate our efforts to yield informative data; hence the renal focus. Our long-term goal is to use this as a portal to study multiple aspects of the gut, hepatic, and adipose pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone Drug (including Placebo) | Experimental | Drug: Pioglitazone 45 mg45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study |
| Weight Loss, Behavioral | Experimental | Behavioral: Weight LossWeight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. |
| Pioglitazone + Weight Loss | Other | Other: Pioglitazone + Weight LossPioglitazone 45 mg/day + Weight Loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis, with last stone analysis showing that stone has >90% uric acid in composition Age >21 years Any gender, race/ethnicity (from weight loss), but weight <165 Kg (to fit into MR instrument); eGFR>60ml/min/1.73 m2
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Bariatric surgery, chronic diarrhea, recurrent UTIs current insulin use use of a thiazolidinedione in past 2 years contraindication to thiazolidinedione use (liver dz, pedal edema, CHF NYHA class III/IV, no contraception) Bladder cancer Use of SGLT2-i, GLP-1 analogs, gemfibrozil, topiramate, rifampin Hba1c > 8.5%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone 45 mg45 mg/day- one pioglitazone tablet once daily throughout the 24 weeks of the study | Drug | Pioglitazone Drug (including Placebo) |
| Weight LossWeight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. | Behavioural | Weight Loss, Behavioral |
| Pioglitazone + Weight LossPioglitazone + Weight loss following the Group Lifestyle Balance Program based on the Diabetes Prevention Program that utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies (goal setting, problem solving, self-monitoring, stimulus control),and provides written education materials to support health and nutrition behavior changes for weight management and disease prevention. | Other | Pioglitazone + Weight Loss |
Primary outcome
Delta Urine pH
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
24-hour urine pH is the main determinant of uric acid stone formation and recurrence. There is no universally accepted clinical scale for Δ (delta) urine pH like there is for some other biomarkers. In research, Δ urine pH is simply: Δ urine pH = Post-intervention urine pH - Baseline urine pH A practical interpretation commonly used in renal physiology and stone research is: Δ Urine pH Interpretation < 0 Urine became more acidic 0 to +0.2 No meaningful change * 0.2 to +0.5 Mild alkalinization * 0.5 to +1.0 Moderate alkalinization > +1.0 Marked alkalinization Higher scores mean a better outcome.
3 secondary outcomes
Ratio of Urine Ammonium/Net Acid Excretion
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Ratio of Urine Net Acid Excretion/Sulphate
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Delta Supersaturation Index of Uric Acid
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Khashayar Sakhaee, MD principal investigator
UTSW
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Pioglitazone 45 mg, Weight Loss and Pioglitazone + Weight Loss in people with Nephrolithiasis, Uric Acid, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Aug 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delta Urine pH (time frame: Baseline and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2026.