Spinal SurgeryNCT04370951
Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block in Posterior Thoraco- Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery
A study testing Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided in people with Spinal Surgery, run by Mater Misericordiae University Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Spinal Surgery can be associated with significant post operative pain. This can be a considerable source of morbidity, resulting in a longer duration of in- hospital stay and increasing opiate requirements. As a result the patient experiences a more arduous recovery process. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 1 May 2020to 3 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria:Male and Female participants providing written informed consent, ASA grade 1- 4, age group 18 and over undergoing Posterior approach Spinal surgery involving 2 or more levels of decompression in the lumbar or thoracic regions.
-
Exclusion Criteria:Absence of informed written consent, pre existing infection at block site, severe coagulopathy, allergy to local anaesthesia, , previous history of opiate abuse, pre existing chronic pain condition, pre-existing dementia [because of need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery], decompression involving cervical levels of vertebrae, decompression due to queried or confirmed malignancy
-
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ireland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Dublin, D07 R2WY
Dylan Finnerty, MB BCh BAO, 018032286, anaes@mater.ie
Donal Buggy, mb bch bao, 018032285, anaes@mater.ie
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Quality of Recovery in Posterior Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomised Control Trial
Spinal Surgery can be associated with significant post operative pain. This can be a considerable source of morbidity, resulting in a longer duration of in- hospital stay and increasing opiate requirements. As a result the patient experiences a more arduous recovery process.
Recently a new form of Regional Anaesthesia has been described for patients undergoing Spinal surgery. The Erector Spinae Plane Block involves depositing Local Anaesthetic under Ultra Sound guidance on top of the Transverse Process of the Spine and deep to the Erector Spinae Muscle. Patients who have had this procedure report lower pain scores and have a lesser opiate requirement in the post operative period.
Read the detailed description
This study will test the hypothesis that patients receiving ESP Block have higher QoR-15 scores and better post operative analgesia in comparison with patients receiving standard care after Spinal Surgery.
Objectives \& endpoints / outcome measures
- The Primary outcome in this study will be the patient centred QoR-15 score among ESB and Control patients;
- Secondary outcomes will be:
- Area under the VRS pain score versus time (24 hr post-op);
- VRS pain scores at 1 hr, 4 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr postop;
- time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block;
- documentation of adverse events : hypotension, pruritus, nausea and vomiting
- DAH -30 Days at home at 30 Days Proposed sample size The established minimum clinically important difference in QoR-15 is 8.0 and the SD of QoR-15 scores after major surgery is in the order of 10 [range of QoR score is 1-150]. Therefore, assuming Type I error = 0.05 and Type II error = 0.2 (80% power to detect this difference), then n=25 patients needed in each group. Study Design A prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial with participants masked to study arm (blocks will be performed under General Anaesthesia) and those involved in data collection also masked to the intervention. Patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire in the post operative period (QoR 15) which is a global assessment of the patients post operative recovery status. The QoR 15 scale is a validated means of assessing a patients quality of recovery. The questionnaire contains 15 questions and the mean+SD duration of time taken for patients to complete the questionnaire is 2.4+0.8 min. Treatment of study subjects Patients scheduled for Spinal Surgery will be screened for eligibility according to the criteria listed and eligible patients noted. These patients are admitted the day prior to surgery or morning of surgery when scheduled for an afternoon list. Eligible patients will be approached by an investigator and invited to give their consent to the study. They will be offered the Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) and the investigator will leave the patient for a minimum of ten minutes to consider. Patients who give written consent will be randomised to receive either ESB or No Block (control) after induction of general anaesthesia. Randomisation will be by table of random numbers, even numbers assigned ESB, odd numbers control. The designated group will then be written on a blank page and placed in a sealed envelope, which will be sequentially numbered, e.g. Patient Study Number 1 etc. Patients will be unconscious under GA when receiving either ESB , so will be masked to group allocation. Investigators collecting QoR-15 data will also be unaware of group allocation. All participants will have standard analgesia (Paracetamol, NSAIDS, Opiates) at the discretion of the treating Consultant Anaesthetist. 20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine plus 2mg Dexamethasone will be used on each side in the ESP block. Patient characteristics and data will be prospectively recorded for 24 hr postoperatively. Intraoperative haemodynamic recordings and the use of rescue analgesia during the operation and in the recovery room will be taken from the Centricity Anaesthesia Information Management System an electronic recording system that has been in use in the Mater Anaesthesia department since 2016. Patients will complete QoR questionnaires manually on paper which will then be transferred into an electronic format. The questionnaires will be administered by Doctors or Nurses involved with the study. Patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire while they are in the recovery area after the operation and once they are fully awake. Inclusion Criteria Male and Female participants providing written informed consent, ASA grade 1- 4, age group 18 and over undergoing Posterior approach Spinal surgery involving 2 or more levels of decompression in the lumbar or thoracic regions. Exclusion Criteria Absence of informed written consent, pre existing infection at block site, severe coagulopathy, allergy to local anaesthesia, , previous history of opiate abuse, pre existing chronic pain condition, pre-existing dementia [because of need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery], decompression involving cervical levels of vertebrae Anticipated study start date 1st August 2019 Anticipated study duration 6 months Safety Reporting Patients' routine medical care will continue during this clinical trial as per current practice. Both regional blocks are routinely used in our institution and therefore the health of participants will be monitored as it would be for all patients regardless of their participation in the trial. Adverse events will be recorded and managed along already existing local policies and guidelines. Statistics QoR and other variables will be compared between the groups using independent samples (unpaired) t-test for normally distributed continuous data and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data Data Handling and record keeping Only the investigators will have access to the collated data. Data will be recorded initially on paper and then transcribed to electronic spreadsheet format, in coded format. Patients' names will not be recorded, study numbers assigned by randomisation will be recorded. This will allow follow up at 24 hours to assess block performance. The investigators will retain the "key" to identification. Data will be stored securely in the Department of Anaesthesia at the Mater Hospital, on a password-protected desktop computer stored in a locked office, such that only the investigators will have access. Electronically-recorded data will be secured by means of password protection/encryption. Data recorded on paper will be secured by lock and key Retention of essential documents The collated data collected by the investigators will be retained for 5 yr after analysis has completed. The original data in the patients' paper and electronic medical records will be unaffected. Quality Control and Quality assurance procedures ESP blocks are in routine use in our department currently. All Blocks will be performed by Anaesthesiologists with expertise in regional anaesthesia and who are familiar with the study. We will be following our local and international guidelines in terms of safe block performance. This would include appropriate monitoring of the patient as set out in the RA - UK guidelines, availability of resuscitation and airway equipment including the ready availability of Intra - lipid. All blocks will be performed by or supervised by experienced Anaesthesiologists using a validated in plane Ultrasound technique. Ethics There are no ethical issues regarding this study. Financing and Insurance/Indemnity All investigators will be MMUH staff covered by the clinical indemnity scheme [CIS] Clinical Study Report and publication policy Conclusions from the clinical trial, once complete, will be prepared for presentation at an academic meeting and for submission to an appropriate international, peer-reviewed journal
- Conditions
- Spinal Surgery
- Being tested
- Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided
- Keywords
- erector spinae plane block, post operative recovery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guidedProcedure or surgery
20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine ultrasound guided bilaterally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane Block | Active comparator | Patients will receive a ESP block with 20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine bilaterally, pre incision plus standardised multimodal analgesia Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided |
| Control | No intervention | no ESP block, standardised multimodal analgesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
QoR 15 score
a objective assessment of quality of recovery post surgery
Measured: 24 hours post operatively
Secondary outcomes (2)
AUC of VRS Pain score versus time
Area under the VRS pain score versus time
Measured: 24 hours post op
time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block
Measured: 24 hours post op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2020
- Study start1 May 2020
- Primary completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion3 Jan 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dylan Finnerty, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
- Investigators
- Donal Buggy, MB Bch Bao, Principal investigator, Professor of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1/378/2088
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 13 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Case report forms,
Publications
Finnerty D, Ni Eochagain A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ. A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1499-1503. doi: 10.1111/anae.15488. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PubMed 33878196Finnerty DT, Buggy DJ. Efficacy of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block for quality of recovery in posterior thoraco-lumbar spinal decompression surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 17;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05101-2.
PubMed 33596968
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Quality of Recovery in Posterior Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomised Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1/378/2088
- Conditions
- Spinal Surgery
- Keywords
- erector spinae plane block, post operative recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mater Misericordiae University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 3 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal Surgery can be associated with significant post operative pain. This can be a considerable source of morbidity, resulting in a longer duration of in- hospital stay and increasing opiate requirements. As a result the patient experiences a more arduous recovery process.
Recently a new form of Regional Anaesthesia has been described for patients undergoing Spinal surgery. The Erector Spinae Plane Block involves depositing Local Anaesthetic under Ultra Sound guidance on top of the Transverse Process of the Spine and deep to the Erector Spinae Muscle. Patients who have had this procedure report lower pain scores and have a lesser opiate requirement in the post operative period.
Detailed description
This study will test the hypothesis that patients receiving ESP Block have higher QoR-15 scores and better post operative analgesia in comparison with patients receiving standard care after Spinal Surgery.
Objectives \& endpoints / outcome measures
- The Primary outcome in this study will be the patient centred QoR-15 score among ESB and Control patients;
- Secondary outcomes will be:
- Area under the VRS pain score versus time (24 hr post-op);
- VRS pain scores at 1 hr, 4 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr postop;
- time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block;
- documentation of adverse events : hypotension, pruritus, nausea and vomiting
- DAH -30 Days at home at 30 Days Proposed sample size The established minimum clinically important difference in QoR-15 is 8.0 and the SD of QoR-15 scores after major surgery is in the order of 10 [range of QoR score is 1-150]. Therefore, assuming Type I error = 0.05 and Type II error = 0.2 (80% power to detect this difference), then n=25 patients needed in each group. Study Design A prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial with participants masked to study arm (blocks will be performed under General Anaesthesia) and those involved in data collection also masked to the intervention. Patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire in the post operative period (QoR 15) which is a global assessment of the patients post operative recovery status. The QoR 15 scale is a validated means of assessing a patients quality of recovery. The questionnaire contains 15 questions and the mean+SD duration of time taken for patients to complete the questionnaire is 2.4+0.8 min. Treatment of study subjects Patients scheduled for Spinal Surgery will be screened for eligibility according to the criteria listed and eligible patients noted. These patients are admitted the day prior to surgery or morning of surgery when scheduled for an afternoon list. Eligible patients will be approached by an investigator and invited to give their consent to the study. They will be offered the Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) and the investigator will leave the patient for a minimum of ten minutes to consider. Patients who give written consent will be randomised to receive either ESB or No Block (control) after induction of general anaesthesia. Randomisation will be by table of random numbers, even numbers assigned ESB, odd numbers control. The designated group will then be written on a blank page and placed in a sealed envelope, which will be sequentially numbered, e.g. Patient Study Number 1 etc. Patients will be unconscious under GA when receiving either ESB , so will be masked to group allocation. Investigators collecting QoR-15 data will also be unaware of group allocation. All participants will have standard analgesia (Paracetamol, NSAIDS, Opiates) at the discretion of the treating Consultant Anaesthetist. 20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine plus 2mg Dexamethasone will be used on each side in the ESP block. Patient characteristics and data will be prospectively recorded for 24 hr postoperatively. Intraoperative haemodynamic recordings and the use of rescue analgesia during the operation and in the recovery room will be taken from the Centricity Anaesthesia Information Management System an electronic recording system that has been in use in the Mater Anaesthesia department since 2016. Patients will complete QoR questionnaires manually on paper which will then be transferred into an electronic format. The questionnaires will be administered by Doctors or Nurses involved with the study. Patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire while they are in the recovery area after the operation and once they are fully awake. Inclusion Criteria Male and Female participants providing written informed consent, ASA grade 1- 4, age group 18 and over undergoing Posterior approach Spinal surgery involving 2 or more levels of decompression in the lumbar or thoracic regions. Exclusion Criteria Absence of informed written consent, pre existing infection at block site, severe coagulopathy, allergy to local anaesthesia, , previous history of opiate abuse, pre existing chronic pain condition, pre-existing dementia [because of need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery], decompression involving cervical levels of vertebrae Anticipated study start date 1st August 2019 Anticipated study duration 6 months Safety Reporting Patients' routine medical care will continue during this clinical trial as per current practice. Both regional blocks are routinely used in our institution and therefore the health of participants will be monitored as it would be for all patients regardless of their participation in the trial. Adverse events will be recorded and managed along already existing local policies and guidelines. Statistics QoR and other variables will be compared between the groups using independent samples (unpaired) t-test for normally distributed continuous data and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data Data Handling and record keeping Only the investigators will have access to the collated data. Data will be recorded initially on paper and then transcribed to electronic spreadsheet format, in coded format. Patients' names will not be recorded, study numbers assigned by randomisation will be recorded. This will allow follow up at 24 hours to assess block performance. The investigators will retain the "key" to identification. Data will be stored securely in the Department of Anaesthesia at the Mater Hospital, on a password-protected desktop computer stored in a locked office, such that only the investigators will have access. Electronically-recorded data will be secured by means of password protection/encryption. Data recorded on paper will be secured by lock and key Retention of essential documents The collated data collected by the investigators will be retained for 5 yr after analysis has completed. The original data in the patients' paper and electronic medical records will be unaffected. Quality Control and Quality assurance procedures ESP blocks are in routine use in our department currently. All Blocks will be performed by Anaesthesiologists with expertise in regional anaesthesia and who are familiar with the study. We will be following our local and international guidelines in terms of safe block performance. This would include appropriate monitoring of the patient as set out in the RA - UK guidelines, availability of resuscitation and airway equipment including the ready availability of Intra - lipid. All blocks will be performed by or supervised by experienced Anaesthesiologists using a validated in plane Ultrasound technique. Ethics There are no ethical issues regarding this study. Financing and Insurance/Indemnity All investigators will be MMUH staff covered by the clinical indemnity scheme [CIS] Clinical Study Report and publication policy Conclusions from the clinical trial, once complete, will be prepared for presentation at an academic meeting and for submission to an appropriate international, peer-reviewed journal
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane Block | Active comparator | Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guidedPatients will receive a ESP block with 20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine bilaterally, pre incision plus standardised multimodal analgesia |
| Control | No intervention | –no ESP block, standardised multimodal analgesia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided20mls 0.25% Levobupivicaine ultrasound guided bilaterally | Procedure or surgery | Erector Spinae Plane Block |
Primary outcome
QoR 15 score
Time frame: 24 hours post operatively
a objective assessment of quality of recovery post surgery
2 secondary outcomes
AUC of VRS Pain score versus time
Time frame: 24 hours post op
time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block
Time frame: 24 hours post op
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33878196Finnerty D, Ni Eochagain A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ. A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1499-1503. doi: 10.1111/anae.15488. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33596968Finnerty DT, Buggy DJ. Efficacy of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block for quality of recovery in posterior thoraco-lumbar spinal decompression surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 17;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05101-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Case report forms,
Related trials for Spinal Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Recruiting
Lumbar Paravertebral Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
Spine Disease
Recruiting
Tranexamic Acid in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
Scoliosis Idiopathic, Scoliosis; Adolescence
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Ondansetron on the Incidence of Spinal Anaesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Fracture Hip Surgery
Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Donal Buggy, MB Bch Bao principal investigator
Professor of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Erector Spinae Plane Block - Ultrasound guided in people with Spinal Surgery, run by Mater Misericordiae University Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
QoR 15 score (time frame: 24 hours post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04370951, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2020.