Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOSNCT04373681
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of WOOS
An observational study of Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOS, run by Gazi University at 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Various clinical scales are available to investigate shoulder diseases. Some of them, culturally adapted to the Turkish population. However, none of them are specific for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOS
- What is being tested?
- patient-administered questionnaires
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2017to 15 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult male and female patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder
Who may be able to join
- Presence of the shoulder osteoarthritis, to be a native Turkish speaker
Who cannot join
- Illiteracy, cognitive impairment, presence of shoulder circumference fractures
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity, Child Health and Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology
Ankara, 006560
Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology
Ankara, 06230
Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department
Ankara, 06560
About this study
Official title: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index
Various clinical scales are available to investigate shoulder diseases. Some of them, culturally adapted to the Turkish population. However, none of them are specific for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Thus, this study aimed to translate the WOOS index into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties in the Turkish population.
Read the detailed description
Purpose; The aim of this study is to adapt the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) specific to shoulder osteoarthritis, to Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability.
Methods; WOOS index was translated and culturally adapted to Turkish, systematically. It was applied to 68 patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder treated conservatively. The reliability of the scale was checked through internal consistency and test-retest methods. Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha value. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient with 25 patients. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and The Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) score were used to conduct concurrent validity.
- Being tested
- patient-administered questionnaires
- Keywords
- WOOS, validation, Osteoarthritis, Shoulder, Turkish, Version
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
patient-administered questionnairesOther
patient-administered questionnaires
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale.
patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire
Measured: 1st day
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale.
patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire
Measured: 2 days later
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 2100 points (worst condition) on this scale.
patient administered, spesific to rotator cuff disease, multisectional questionnaire
Measured: 1st day
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 100 points (worst condition) on this scale.
patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire
Measured: 1st day
The Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment, patients get a minimum of 0 points (worst condition) and a maximum of 100 points (best condition) on this scale.
patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire
Measured: 1st day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2020
- Study start4 Dec 2017
- Primary completion10 Jan 2020
- Study completion15 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Gazi UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Şeyda ÖZAL, Gazi University
- Investigators
- Nevin A GÜZEL, Prof, Principal investigator, Gazi University Faculty of Health SciencesŞeyda ÖZAL, MSc, Study chair, Gazi University Faculty of Health SciencesAhmet Y KAPTAN, MD, Study chair, Dr. Sami Ulus HospitalNihan KAFA, Assc Prof, Study chair, Gazi University Faculty of Health SciencesToygun K EREN, MD, Study chair, Ankara Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04373681
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Gazi Unv
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Petersson CJ. Degeneration of the gleno-humeral joint. An anatomical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Apr;54(2):277-83. doi: 10.3109/17453678308996570.
PubMed 6846007Ozer M, Ataoglu MB, Cetinkaya M, Ayanoglu T, Kaptan AY, Kanatli U. Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019 Apr;30(1):2-9. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2019.62431.
PubMed 30885102Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 1;78(5):605-11.
PubMed 18788237Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Nov;9(8):771-8. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0474.
PubMed 11795997Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Ozkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 May;131(5):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1242-9. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
PubMed 21191606Celik D, Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Dirican A. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2184-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2183-3. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
PubMed 22932692Najafov E, Ozal S, Kaptan AY, Ulucakoy C, Kanatli U, Ataoglu B, Basar S. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of LHB Score. J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4;30(1):30-36. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0364.
PubMed 32131050Celik D. Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: reliability and validity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):69-75. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0354.
PubMed 26854052Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2002) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. New York: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12:1-9
El O, Bircan C, Gulbahar S, Demiral Y, Sahin E, Baydar M, Kizil R, Griffin S, Akalin E. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Rheumatol Int. 2006 Oct;26(12):1101-8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0151-2. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
PubMed 16799776Bumin G, Tüzün EH, Tonga E (2008) The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 21(1):57-62
Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, Hess R, Miller DM, Reeve BB, Santana M. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1305-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PubMed 22048932Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40. doi: 10.1519/15184.1.
PubMed 15705040Klintberg IH, Lind K, Marlow T, Svantesson U. Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index: a cross-cultural adaptation into Swedish, including evaluation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with subacromial pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.027. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
PubMed 22445627Rasmussen JV, Jakobsen J, Olsen BS, Brorson S. Translation and validation of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index - the Danish version. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2013 Sep 18;4:49-54. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S50976. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24133377
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04373681
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Gazi Unv
- Keywords
- WOOS, validation, Osteoarthritis, Shoulder, Turkish, Version
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Various clinical scales are available to investigate shoulder diseases. Some of them, culturally adapted to the Turkish population. However, none of them are specific for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Thus, this study aimed to translate the WOOS index into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties in the Turkish population.
Detailed description
Purpose; The aim of this study is to adapt the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) specific to shoulder osteoarthritis, to Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability.
Methods; WOOS index was translated and culturally adapted to Turkish, systematically. It was applied to 68 patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder treated conservatively. The reliability of the scale was checked through internal consistency and test-retest methods. Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha value. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient with 25 patients. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and The Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) score were used to conduct concurrent validity.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult male and female patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of the shoulder osteoarthritis, to be a native Turkish speaker
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Illiteracy, cognitive impairment, presence of shoulder circumference fractures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| patient-administered questionnairespatient-administered questionnaires | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale.
Time frame: 1st day
patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale.
Time frame: 2 days later
patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 2100 points (worst condition) on this scale.
Time frame: 1st day
patient administered, spesific to rotator cuff disease, multisectional questionnaire
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 100 points (worst condition) on this scale.
Time frame: 1st day
patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire
The Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment, patients get a minimum of 0 points (worst condition) and a maximum of 100 points (best condition) on this scale.
Time frame: 1st day
patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 6846007Petersson CJ. Degeneration of the gleno-humeral joint. An anatomical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Apr;54(2):277-83. doi: 10.3109/17453678308996570.
- Background: PubMed 30885102Ozer M, Ataoglu MB, Cetinkaya M, Ayanoglu T, Kaptan AY, Kanatli U. Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019 Apr;30(1):2-9. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2019.62431.
- Background: PubMed 18788237Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 1;78(5):605-11.
- Background: PubMed 11795997Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Nov;9(8):771-8. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0474.
- Background: PubMed 21191606Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Ozkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 May;131(5):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1242-9. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 22932692Celik D, Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Dirican A. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2184-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2183-3. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
- Background: PubMed 32131050Najafov E, Ozal S, Kaptan AY, Ulucakoy C, Kanatli U, Ataoglu B, Basar S. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of LHB Score. J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4;30(1):30-36. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0364.
- Background: PubMed 26854052Celik D. Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: reliability and validity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):69-75. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0354.
- BackgroundBeaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2002) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. New York: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12:1-9
- Background: PubMed 16799776El O, Bircan C, Gulbahar S, Demiral Y, Sahin E, Baydar M, Kizil R, Griffin S, Akalin E. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Rheumatol Int. 2006 Oct;26(12):1101-8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0151-2. Epub 2006 Jun 24.
- BackgroundBumin G, Tüzün EH, Tonga E (2008) The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 21(1):57-62
- Background: PubMed 22048932Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, Hess R, Miller DM, Reeve BB, Santana M. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1305-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nevin A GÜZEL, Prof principal investigator
Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences
Şeyda ÖZAL, MSc study chair
Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences
Ahmet Y KAPTAN, MD study chair
Dr. Sami Ulus Hospital
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOS, run by Gazi University at 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale. (time frame: 1st day). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04373681, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021.