VitiligoNCT04374435
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure in the Treatment of Vitiligo
A study testing MKTP with Surgical blade, MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument and Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation in people with Vitiligo, run by University of California, Irvine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Vitiligo is a dermatologic disease characterized by depigmentation of the skin. While the loss of melanocytes observed in vitiligo is driven by the immune system, repigmentation of the skin that occurs during UV light treatment is driven by melanocytes that migrate out of the hair follicle and into the epidermis or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vitiligo
- What is being tested?
- MKTP with Surgical blade, MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument and Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2017to 1 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Verified diagnosis of vitiligo by a board-certified dermatologist
- Candidate for vitiligo treatment as determined by lead researcher
- Has a 5 cm2 area of vitiligo and an area on the upper thigh that is not affected by the disease
- Over 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Ability to understand, abide by and participate in study procedures
Who cannot join
- Inability to understand or abide by instructions for participation in study and procedure
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Less than 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Current use of tobacco products or within 1 month prior to procedure date
- History of coagulation disorder, platelet dysfunction disorder, platelet count less than <150,000 platelets per microliter
- History of poor wound healing or condition that would compromise optimal healing of graft site as deemed by lead researcher
- History of keloids
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697
About this study
Vitiligo is a dermatologic disease characterized by depigmentation of the skin. While the loss of melanocytes observed in vitiligo is driven by the immune system, repigmentation of the skin that occurs during UV light treatment is driven by melanocytes that migrate out of the hair follicle and into the epidermis or the activation of stem cells within the epidermis. Unfortunately, some skin areas affected by vitiligo have very few hair follicle melanocytes and an indeterminate number of epidermal melanocytes and therefore unable to respond to light therapy.
This pilot study seeks to examine the relative efficacy of different harvesting methods for the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure (MKTP) in the treatment of vitiligo.
Read more
In addition, this study will analyze the tissue of excess tissue harvested during the procedure to identify distinct cellular and molecular features of chronic vitiligo.
Patients in Dr. Ganesan's clinic at the UCI (University of California, Irvine) Department of Dermatology will be approached for participation in the study. The study will include both men and women and will not be limited by race or ethnicity. The investigators will exclude individuals less than 18 years old for the study as the investigators believe it would be difficult for these subjects to tolerate the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure. Participants will be offered a melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure with one of the three different tissue harvesting methods (a blade, suction blister) and the method without dissociation (Cellutome).
This study has three arms:
- MKTP with Surgical Blade
- MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument (suction blistering device).
- Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation utilizing Cellutome (a device used for treating chronic burn wounds)
Read the detailed description
In the first arm of the study, a normally pigmented area on the patient was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using a surgical knife, the investigator removed a small portion of the epidermis that is unaffected by vitiligo from a small area (2cm2) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells. Epidermis that was harvested with the surgical knife was washed with Lactated Ringer's solution three times and then dissociated using trypsin to separate the cells into a single cell suspension. The recipient area to be grafted was ablated with an Erbium YAG(yttrium aluminum garnet)laser. Half of the dissociated single cells from the donor area (thigh)was then transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the participant is interested in grafting (5 cm2 area).
The investigator then evaluated response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography and quantifying the VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index) score.
VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index)is the percentage of vitiligo involvement and is calculated in terms of hand units. One hand unit is approximately equivalent to 1% of the total body surface area.
In the second arm of the study, the investigator used a minimally invasive procedure (suction blister grafting) to sample the grafted skin and donor skin- this method can separate the epidermis from the dermis without inducing a scar. A normally pigmented area on the upper thigh was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using a suction blister technique, the investigator removed a small portion of the epidermis that was unaffected by vitiligo from a small area (4 cm2 or 0.6 inch cm2) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells. Epidermis that was harvested was washed with Lactated Ringer's solution three times and then dissociated using trypsin to separate the cells into a single cell suspension. The recipient areas to be grafted were used to harvest epidermis using a suction blister device. Half of the dissociated single cells from the donor area (thigh) were then transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the patient was interested in grafting (5 cm2 area or 0.7 inch2). The suction blister skin from the recipient sites was simultaneously dissociated into a single cell suspension. A portion of the remainder of the cells (from both the donor and recipient site) was subjected to flow sorting to quantify the populations of melanocytes and keratinocytes and to detailed molecular analysis (single-cell RNA sequencing and histology) to characterize the molecular features of chronic vitiligo. The investigator then evaluated response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography and quantifying the VASI score. This arm of the study is complete.
In the third arm of the study, the investigator uses a minimally invasive procedure (suction blister grafting without cell dissociation) to sample the grafted skin and donor skin- this method can separate the epidermis from the dermis without inducing a scar. A normally pigmented area on the upper thigh will be anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using an epidermal harvesting system which is a suction blister technique, the investigator will remove multiple small portions (about 128 blisters-1.8 mm in diameter) of the epidermis unaffected by vitiligo from a small normal area (5 cm2 ) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells and using a regular negative pressure instrument for removing four samples for histopathological study (two from the vitiligo area and two from the normal donor skin). The epidermis from the donor area (thigh) will then be transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the patient is interested in grafting. Also, the four portions from the normal skin and the recipient site will be sent for the histopathological evaluation.
The investigator will then evaluate response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography, quantifying the change in depigmented surface area, and the VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index) score. Also, the investigator will evaluate the two vitiligo samples and two normal skin samples through histopathology to assess where the unique populations of cells identified in their RNA-sequencing analysis are localized (obtained from arm 2). The investigator hypothesizes that his transplant procedure will yield excellent to good repigmentation, resulting in a mean of 60% reduction in surface area (SD=30%) from baseline to 6-month follow up. With a sample size of 5 patients, this study will achieve 90% power to test this hypothesis based on a two-sided paired t-test at p=0.05 significance level. In addition, the investigator will compare the results from the 7 patients harvested using the surgical blade technique (procedure already completed and follow up results pending) with the results from 7 patients harvested with the suction blisters (completed) and seven patients from the newly proposed experimental group (three completed to date).
- Conditions
- Vitiligo
- Being tested
- MKTP with Surgical blade, MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument, Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation
- Keywords
- Vitiligo, Melanocyte, Keratinocyte, Transplantation, Procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Vitiligo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MKTP with Surgical bladeProcedure or surgery
In this procedure, the donor skin will be harvested with a surgical blade and the donor skin will be dissociated
MKTP with Negative Pressure InstrumentDevice
In this procedure, the investigator uses a negative pressure instrument to create a few blisters on the donor skin and use the blisters for grafting after cell dissociation.
Suction blister grafting without cell dissociationDevice
In this procedure, an automated suction blister device will be used to create micro domes and these micro domes will be used directly for grafting without dissociation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MKTP with Surgical Blade | Experimental | The investigator harvested skin from the donor site and skin from the recipient site using a surgical blade in the first arm of the study. Receives: Procedure: MKTP with Surgical blade |
| MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument | Experimental | Blister grafting technique with dissociation of the cells was performed in the second arm of the study. Receives: Device: MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument |
| Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation | Experimental | In this arm, transplanting the blisters without dissociation of the cells will be conducted. Receives: Device: Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients Who Had a Percent Change in Body Surface Area in Response Rate to Treatment
Number of patients who had a percent change in body surface area in response rate to treatment as assessed by photography.
Measured: 6 months
Change in VASI
Percent change in the transplanted areas as evaluated by VASI (Vitiligo Area Scoring Index). The negative scores mean improvement and positive scores means worsening.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Percent of Patients That Healed in One Week
The investigator will evaluate what percentage of patients healed at both the donor and graft site at one week.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Patients That Experience Complications
The investigator will record the percentage of patients that had complications in each group at either the donor or recipient site.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2020
- Study start29 Sep 2017
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021
- Study completion1 May 2022
Why it stopped: The blistering device used for harvesting the third arm was discontinued by the manufacturer.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for VitiligoStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, IrvineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- The investigators have completed two arms of the study in sequential study design (each arm has done individually with no random assignment). An exploratory third arm was initiated but then suspended.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Irvine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anand Ganesan, University of California, Irvine
- Investigators
- Anand K Ganesan, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, Irvine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04374435
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20173518
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shiu J, Zhang L, Lentsch G, Flesher JL, Jin S, Polleys C, Jo SJ, Mizzoni C, Mobasher P, Kwan J, Rius-Diaz F, Tromberg BJ, Georgakoudi I, Nie Q, Balu M, Ganesan AK. Multimodal analyses of vitiligo skin identify tissue characteristics of stable disease. JCI Insight. 2022 Jul 8;7(13):e154585. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.154585.
PubMed 35653192Mobasher P, Shiu J, Lentsch G, Ganesan AK. Comparing the Efficacy of 2 Different Harvesting Techniques for Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation in Vitiligo. Dermatol Surg. 2021 May 1;47(5):732-733. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002922. No abstract available.
PubMed 33905400
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Efficacy of the Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure in the Treatment of Vitiligo
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04374435
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20173518
- Conditions
- Vitiligo
- Keywords
- Vitiligo, Melanocyte, Keratinocyte, Transplantation, Procedure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The blistering device used for harvesting the third arm was discontinued by the manufacturer.
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, IrvineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Vitiligo is a dermatologic disease characterized by depigmentation of the skin. While the loss of melanocytes observed in vitiligo is driven by the immune system, repigmentation of the skin that occurs during UV light treatment is driven by melanocytes that migrate out of the hair follicle and into the epidermis or the activation of stem cells within the epidermis. Unfortunately, some skin areas affected by vitiligo have very few hair follicle melanocytes and an indeterminate number of epidermal melanocytes and therefore unable to respond to light therapy.
This pilot study seeks to examine the relative efficacy of different harvesting methods for the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure (MKTP) in the treatment of vitiligo.
In addition, this study will analyze the tissue of excess tissue harvested during the procedure to identify distinct cellular and molecular features of chronic vitiligo.
Patients in Dr. Ganesan's clinic at the UCI (University of California, Irvine) Department of Dermatology will be approached for participation in the study. The study will include both men and women and will not be limited by race or ethnicity. The investigators will exclude individuals less than 18 years old for the study as the investigators believe it would be difficult for these subjects to tolerate the melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure. Participants will be offered a melanocyte keratinocyte transplant procedure with one of the three different tissue harvesting methods (a blade, suction blister) and the method without dissociation (Cellutome).
This study has three arms:
- MKTP with Surgical Blade
- MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument (suction blistering device).
- Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation utilizing Cellutome (a device used for treating chronic burn wounds)
Detailed description
In the first arm of the study, a normally pigmented area on the patient was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using a surgical knife, the investigator removed a small portion of the epidermis that is unaffected by vitiligo from a small area (2cm2) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells. Epidermis that was harvested with the surgical knife was washed with Lactated Ringer's solution three times and then dissociated using trypsin to separate the cells into a single cell suspension. The recipient area to be grafted was ablated with an Erbium YAG(yttrium aluminum garnet)laser. Half of the dissociated single cells from the donor area (thigh)was then transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the participant is interested in grafting (5 cm2 area).
The investigator then evaluated response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography and quantifying the VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index) score.
VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index)is the percentage of vitiligo involvement and is calculated in terms of hand units. One hand unit is approximately equivalent to 1% of the total body surface area.
In the second arm of the study, the investigator used a minimally invasive procedure (suction blister grafting) to sample the grafted skin and donor skin- this method can separate the epidermis from the dermis without inducing a scar. A normally pigmented area on the upper thigh was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using a suction blister technique, the investigator removed a small portion of the epidermis that was unaffected by vitiligo from a small area (4 cm2 or 0.6 inch cm2) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells. Epidermis that was harvested was washed with Lactated Ringer's solution three times and then dissociated using trypsin to separate the cells into a single cell suspension. The recipient areas to be grafted were used to harvest epidermis using a suction blister device. Half of the dissociated single cells from the donor area (thigh) were then transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the patient was interested in grafting (5 cm2 area or 0.7 inch2). The suction blister skin from the recipient sites was simultaneously dissociated into a single cell suspension. A portion of the remainder of the cells (from both the donor and recipient site) was subjected to flow sorting to quantify the populations of melanocytes and keratinocytes and to detailed molecular analysis (single-cell RNA sequencing and histology) to characterize the molecular features of chronic vitiligo. The investigator then evaluated response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography and quantifying the VASI score. This arm of the study is complete.
In the third arm of the study, the investigator uses a minimally invasive procedure (suction blister grafting without cell dissociation) to sample the grafted skin and donor skin- this method can separate the epidermis from the dermis without inducing a scar. A normally pigmented area on the upper thigh will be anesthetized with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. Using an epidermal harvesting system which is a suction blister technique, the investigator will remove multiple small portions (about 128 blisters-1.8 mm in diameter) of the epidermis unaffected by vitiligo from a small normal area (5 cm2 ) on the patient's thigh to obtain donor cells and using a regular negative pressure instrument for removing four samples for histopathological study (two from the vitiligo area and two from the normal donor skin). The epidermis from the donor area (thigh) will then be transplanted on to the area affected by vitiligo that the patient is interested in grafting. Also, the four portions from the normal skin and the recipient site will be sent for the histopathological evaluation.
The investigator will then evaluate response to treatment in the transplanted areas at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and 6 months by both photography, quantifying the change in depigmented surface area, and the VASI(Vitiligo Area Scoring Index) score. Also, the investigator will evaluate the two vitiligo samples and two normal skin samples through histopathology to assess where the unique populations of cells identified in their RNA-sequencing analysis are localized (obtained from arm 2). The investigator hypothesizes that his transplant procedure will yield excellent to good repigmentation, resulting in a mean of 60% reduction in surface area (SD=30%) from baseline to 6-month follow up. With a sample size of 5 patients, this study will achieve 90% power to test this hypothesis based on a two-sided paired t-test at p=0.05 significance level. In addition, the investigator will compare the results from the 7 patients harvested using the surgical blade technique (procedure already completed and follow up results pending) with the results from 7 patients harvested with the suction blisters (completed) and seven patients from the newly proposed experimental group (three completed to date).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The investigators have completed two arms of the study in sequential study design (each arm has done individually with no random assignment). An exploratory third arm was initiated but then suspended.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MKTP with Surgical Blade | Experimental | Procedure: MKTP with Surgical bladeThe investigator harvested skin from the donor site and skin from the recipient site using a surgical blade in the first arm of the study. |
| MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument | Experimental | Device: MKTP with Negative Pressure InstrumentBlister grafting technique with dissociation of the cells was performed in the second arm of the study. |
| Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation | Experimental | Device: Suction blister grafting without cell dissociationIn this arm, transplanting the blisters without dissociation of the cells will be conducted. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Verified diagnosis of vitiligo by a board-certified dermatologist
- Candidate for vitiligo treatment as determined by lead researcher
- Has a 5 cm2 area of vitiligo and an area on the upper thigh that is not affected by the disease
- Over 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Ability to understand, abide by and participate in study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inability to understand or abide by instructions for participation in study and procedure
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Less than 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent form
- Current use of tobacco products or within 1 month prior to procedure date
- History of coagulation disorder, platelet dysfunction disorder, platelet count less than <150,000 platelets per microliter
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MKTP with Surgical bladeIn this procedure, the donor skin will be harvested with a surgical blade and the donor skin will be dissociated | Procedure or surgery | MKTP with Surgical Blade |
| MKTP with Negative Pressure InstrumentIn this procedure, the investigator uses a negative pressure instrument to create a few blisters on the donor skin and use the blisters for grafting after cell dissociation. | Device | MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument |
| Suction blister grafting without cell dissociationIn this procedure, an automated suction blister device will be used to create micro domes and these micro domes will be used directly for grafting without dissociation. | Device | Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients Who Had a Percent Change in Body Surface Area in Response Rate to Treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients who had a percent change in body surface area in response rate to treatment as assessed by photography.
Change in VASI
Time frame: 6 months
Percent change in the transplanted areas as evaluated by VASI (Vitiligo Area Scoring Index). The negative scores mean improvement and positive scores means worsening.
2 secondary outcomes
Percent of Patients That Healed in One Week
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Patients That Experience Complications
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 35653192Shiu J, Zhang L, Lentsch G, Flesher JL, Jin S, Polleys C, Jo SJ, Mizzoni C, Mobasher P, Kwan J, Rius-Diaz F, Tromberg BJ, Georgakoudi I, Nie Q, Balu M, Ganesan AK. Multimodal analyses of vitiligo skin identify tissue characteristics of stable disease. JCI Insight. 2022 Jul 8;7(13):e154585. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.154585.
- Results publication: PubMed 33905400Mobasher P, Shiu J, Lentsch G, Ganesan AK. Comparing the Efficacy of 2 Different Harvesting Techniques for Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation in Vitiligo. Dermatol Surg. 2021 May 1;47(5):732-733. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002922. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vitiligo
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of EB06 Versus Placebo in Adults With Moderate to Severe Non-segmental Vitiligo
Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV)
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Two Trials to Evaluate TEV-53408 in Participants With Non-Segmental Vitiligo
Vitiligo
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of LY4005130 in Adult Participants With Non-Segmental Vitiligo
Vitiligo, Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Nonsegmental Vitiligo
Nonsegmental Vitiligo
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anand K Ganesan, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of California, Irvine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MKTP with Surgical blade, MKTP with Negative Pressure Instrument and Suction blister grafting without cell dissociation in people with Vitiligo, run by University of California, Irvine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients Who Had a Percent Change in Body Surface Area in Response Rate to Treatment (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04374435, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2024.