The Initial Aim of This Project is to Perform in Vitro Validation of Neoepitope Candidates Selected From Available Mutanome DataCanVacNCT04379960
Identification of Immunogenic Neo-epitopes for the Development of Personalised Pancreatic Cancer Vaccines
An observational study of The Initial Aim of This Project is to Perform in Vitro Validation of Neoepitope Candidates Selected From Available Mutanome Data, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Human pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis with an overall survival rate of less than 5%. Current treatment regimens are ineffective and even if the patient responds to initial treatments, relapse is common due to the survival of small populations of resistant cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 17 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- The Initial Aim of This Project is to Perform in Vitro Validation of Neoepitope Candidates Selected From Available Mutanome Data
- What is being tested?
- Peptides
- How many people
- 192 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Oct 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 17 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Healthy blood donors, who donate their blood at the Blood Donation Centres in London.
Who may be able to join
- fit and healthy;
- weigh over 7 stone 12 lbs or 50kg;
- are aged between 17 and 66 (or 70 if you have given blood before);
- are over 70 and have given blood in the last two years.
Who cannot join
- receiving treatment;
- taking medication;
- travelling outside of the UK;
- tattoos;
- pregnancy;
- illness;
- cancer;
- received blood, blood products or organs.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Human pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis with an overall survival rate of less than 5%. Current treatment regimens are ineffective and even if the patient responds to initial treatments, relapse is common due to the survival of small populations of resistant cancer cells.
The immune system is capable of recognising and eliminating invading organisms by virtue of differences in their appearance when compared to normal components of the body. Cancer cells also have a different appearance compared to normal cells. However, these differences are often too small and weak to stimulate the immune system sufficiently to respond effectively to eliminate the tumour.
Read more
Our aim is to analyse the small differences between healthy and cancer cells in pancreatic cancer patients. Analysis of the genetic information from 100 pancreatic cancer patients has allowed us to design molecules that display each of these small differences. We now intend to analyse each of these, with respect to their ability to stimulate an immune response against cancer. We then intend to take all validated molecules and incorporate them into vaccines carried by viral vectors. These vaccines can be used to train the patient's immune system to respond more effectively when it encounters these particular differences in the patient's body and thus mount an efficient attack on the cancer cells specifically.
Surplus material from blood donations will be used to isolate individual components of the immune system, which can be examined for their response to these altered molecules in the laboratory. On completion of this project, we will have viral vaccine libraries that can be tested in future research projects. Ultimately, we hope to transfer this regime to the clinic by selecting an appropriate viral vaccine library to deliver as a personalised therapeutic that can eliminate cancer and prevent cancer recurrence within each patient.
Read the detailed description
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive tumour types, with an extremely poor prognosis. Without active treatment, patients with metastatic PDAC have a mean survival of 3-5 months [1]. Current advances in surgical and adjuvant treatments have failed to improve overall survival rates since the 1970s. Thus, new treatment strategies, that are not cross resistant with conventional chemotherapy-based regimes are imperative. Recently, attention in cancer therapy has focused more heavily on immune-based strategies as these therapies act through a mechanism that is distinct from chemotherapy or radiation therapy and represent a non-cross-resistant treatment option [2]. Immune based therapies aim to stimulate robust T cell responses against tumour antigens. However, significant challenges exist in the development of these regimes. These include poor immunogenicity of the tumours and the presence of a highly immunosuppressive environment within the tumour [3, 4]. The clinical potential of various tumour vaccination strategies has been demonstrated in early phase clinical trials, with some promising immunological and clinical responses in PDAC patients [5-8]. A number of hurdles still need to be overcome in the development of an ideal PDAC vaccine. Crucially, specific tumour antigens must be identified that elicit a strong and specific immune response as failure of past cancer vaccine trials can be attributed in large part to selection of inappropriate tumour antigens that have weak inherent immune potential [9, 10]. Current advances in high throughput profiling technologies as enabled rapid determination of the genomic states of cancer cells such that comprehensive data regarding individual mutanomes is now available [11, 12]. It is also now possible to select missense mutations identified through the exome sequencing on the basis of their HLA binding capacity for production of synthetic peptides that can be presented by a desired HLA molecule [12, 13]. The development of this platform has allowed us to analysed published data from 100 PDAC patients [14] and establish a dataset containing high-affinity HLA-A2 and HLA-DP4 (the most abundant HLA class I and II molecules [15, 16]) and HLA-E*01:01 and HLA-E*01:03-restricted neo-epitopes for analysis as peptide vaccine candidates.
Hypothesis Sequence analysis has allowed us to develop a peptide library of neo-epitopes that are expressed at high frequency in patient populations and have high binding affinities compared to their wild-type counterpart to HLA-A2, HLA-DP4, HLA-E*01:01 or HLA-*01:03 molecules. We hypothesise that a number of these will be sufficiently immunogenic to stimulate a T cell interferon-γ (IFN-γ) response in vitro, that will translate to an in vivo anti-tumour response. Immunogenic neo-epitopes can then be combined in a peptide vaccination program using adjuvants such as oncolytic viruses for targeted delivery and expression within tumours of PDAC patients to stimulate robust and long-term anti-tumour responses.
Aim The initial aim of this project is to perform in vitro validation of neo-epitope candidates selected from available mutanome data to determine their immunogenicity using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals.
Research Plan PBMC samples from healthy individuals will be HLA typed using commercially available reagents from thermofisher scientific. HLA-A2, HLA-DP4, HLA-E*01:01 and/or HLA-E*01:03 positive samples will be pulsed with peptides selected after bioinformatics analysis of available sequence data. IFN-γ and interleukin-2 (IL-2) production by the T cells in the samples will be evaluated by ELISA after two rounds of stimulation within a two weeks time as a measure of peptide immunogenicity. Once immunogenic peptides have been identified, their wild-type counterparts will be analysed in parallel to confirm specificity for the mutated epitope. Immunogenic peptides whose wild-type counterparts do not elicit immune responses will then be selected for inclusion in an oncolytic virus-based vaccine to be analysed in vivo using transgenic HLA-A2/HLA-DP4 mice [17].
- Being tested
- Peptides
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PeptidesOther
Peptides will be added to PBMCs in in vitro cell culture.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Peptides | PBMCs will be incubated with peptides. Receives: Other: Peptides | |
| W/o peptides | PBMCs will be incubated without peptides. Receives: Other: Peptides |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Develop Vaccinia virus and Adenovirus vaccine libraries expressing the identified immunogenic neo-epitopes.
To perform in vitro validation of neo-epitope candidates selected from available mutanome data to determine their immunogenicity using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2020
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionOct 2021
- Study completionOct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for The Initial Aim of This Project is to Perform in Vitro Validation of Neoepitope Candidates Selected From Available Mutanome DataStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04379960
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16/LO/1512
- Acronym
- CanVac
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 5 May 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The research data will be made public on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Identification of Immunogenic Neo-epitopes for the Development of Personalised Pancreatic Cancer Vaccines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04379960
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CanVac / 16/LO/1512
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Human pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis with an overall survival rate of less than 5%. Current treatment regimens are ineffective and even if the patient responds to initial treatments, relapse is common due to the survival of small populations of resistant cancer cells.
The immune system is capable of recognising and eliminating invading organisms by virtue of differences in their appearance when compared to normal components of the body. Cancer cells also have a different appearance compared to normal cells. However, these differences are often too small and weak to stimulate the immune system sufficiently to respond effectively to eliminate the tumour.
Our aim is to analyse the small differences between healthy and cancer cells in pancreatic cancer patients. Analysis of the genetic information from 100 pancreatic cancer patients has allowed us to design molecules that display each of these small differences. We now intend to analyse each of these, with respect to their ability to stimulate an immune response against cancer. We then intend to take all validated molecules and incorporate them into vaccines carried by viral vectors. These vaccines can be used to train the patient's immune system to respond more effectively when it encounters these particular differences in the patient's body and thus mount an efficient attack on the cancer cells specifically.
Surplus material from blood donations will be used to isolate individual components of the immune system, which can be examined for their response to these altered molecules in the laboratory. On completion of this project, we will have viral vaccine libraries that can be tested in future research projects. Ultimately, we hope to transfer this regime to the clinic by selecting an appropriate viral vaccine library to deliver as a personalised therapeutic that can eliminate cancer and prevent cancer recurrence within each patient.
Detailed description
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive tumour types, with an extremely poor prognosis. Without active treatment, patients with metastatic PDAC have a mean survival of 3-5 months [1]. Current advances in surgical and adjuvant treatments have failed to improve overall survival rates since the 1970s. Thus, new treatment strategies, that are not cross resistant with conventional chemotherapy-based regimes are imperative. Recently, attention in cancer therapy has focused more heavily on immune-based strategies as these therapies act through a mechanism that is distinct from chemotherapy or radiation therapy and represent a non-cross-resistant treatment option [2]. Immune based therapies aim to stimulate robust T cell responses against tumour antigens. However, significant challenges exist in the development of these regimes. These include poor immunogenicity of the tumours and the presence of a highly immunosuppressive environment within the tumour [3, 4]. The clinical potential of various tumour vaccination strategies has been demonstrated in early phase clinical trials, with some promising immunological and clinical responses in PDAC patients [5-8]. A number of hurdles still need to be overcome in the development of an ideal PDAC vaccine. Crucially, specific tumour antigens must be identified that elicit a strong and specific immune response as failure of past cancer vaccine trials can be attributed in large part to selection of inappropriate tumour antigens that have weak inherent immune potential [9, 10]. Current advances in high throughput profiling technologies as enabled rapid determination of the genomic states of cancer cells such that comprehensive data regarding individual mutanomes is now available [11, 12]. It is also now possible to select missense mutations identified through the exome sequencing on the basis of their HLA binding capacity for production of synthetic peptides that can be presented by a desired HLA molecule [12, 13]. The development of this platform has allowed us to analysed published data from 100 PDAC patients [14] and establish a dataset containing high-affinity HLA-A2 and HLA-DP4 (the most abundant HLA class I and II molecules [15, 16]) and HLA-E*01:01 and HLA-E*01:03-restricted neo-epitopes for analysis as peptide vaccine candidates.
Hypothesis Sequence analysis has allowed us to develop a peptide library of neo-epitopes that are expressed at high frequency in patient populations and have high binding affinities compared to their wild-type counterpart to HLA-A2, HLA-DP4, HLA-E*01:01 or HLA-*01:03 molecules. We hypothesise that a number of these will be sufficiently immunogenic to stimulate a T cell interferon-γ (IFN-γ) response in vitro, that will translate to an in vivo anti-tumour response. Immunogenic neo-epitopes can then be combined in a peptide vaccination program using adjuvants such as oncolytic viruses for targeted delivery and expression within tumours of PDAC patients to stimulate robust and long-term anti-tumour responses.
Aim The initial aim of this project is to perform in vitro validation of neo-epitope candidates selected from available mutanome data to determine their immunogenicity using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals.
Research Plan PBMC samples from healthy individuals will be HLA typed using commercially available reagents from thermofisher scientific. HLA-A2, HLA-DP4, HLA-E*01:01 and/or HLA-E*01:03 positive samples will be pulsed with peptides selected after bioinformatics analysis of available sequence data. IFN-γ and interleukin-2 (IL-2) production by the T cells in the samples will be evaluated by ELISA after two rounds of stimulation within a two weeks time as a measure of peptide immunogenicity. Once immunogenic peptides have been identified, their wild-type counterparts will be analysed in parallel to confirm specificity for the mutated epitope. Immunogenic peptides whose wild-type counterparts do not elicit immune responses will then be selected for inclusion in an oncolytic virus-based vaccine to be analysed in vivo using transgenic HLA-A2/HLA-DP4 mice [17].
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Peptides | – | Other: PeptidesPBMCs will be incubated with peptides. |
| W/o peptides | – | Other: PeptidesPBMCs will be incubated without peptides. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 17 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Healthy blood donors, who donate their blood at the Blood Donation Centres in London.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- fit and healthy;
- weigh over 7 stone 12 lbs or 50kg;
- are aged between 17 and 66 (or 70 if you have given blood before);
- are over 70 and have given blood in the last two years.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- receiving treatment;
- taking medication;
- travelling outside of the UK;
- tattoos;
- pregnancy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PeptidesPeptides will be added to PBMCs in in vitro cell culture. | Other | Peptides, W/o peptides |
Primary outcome
Develop Vaccinia virus and Adenovirus vaccine libraries expressing the identified immunogenic neo-epitopes.
Time frame: 1 month
To perform in vitro validation of neo-epitope candidates selected from available mutanome data to determine their immunogenicity using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The research data will be made public on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of The Initial Aim of This Project is to Perform in Vitro Validation of Neoepitope Candidates Selected From Available Mutanome Data, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Develop Vaccinia virus and Adenovirus vaccine libraries expressing the identified immunogenic neo-epitopes. (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2022.