AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress, PhysiologicalNCT04381572

The Impact of High Fidelity Simulation on Stress Level in Medical Students.

An observational study of Stress, Physiological and High Fidelity Simulation Training, run by Medical University of Silesia at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

High fidelity simulation (HFS) is an established method of training in various fields of medicine, especially emergency medicine, anesthesiology and intensive therapy. One of the benefits of HFS as an educational tool is the protective environment, where the risk of error do not bring harm to the patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
High fidelity simulation training
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Apr 2017to 30 Jun 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Medical faculty students (fifth and sixth year) scheduled to undergo high fidelity medical simulation as a part of standard scholastic program.

Who may be able to join

  • willingness to take part in the study

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy,
  • active infections
  • diseases of immune system
  • metabolic or endocrine disturbances
  • current use of any medication (except for oral contraceptives)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1

    Zabrze, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-800

Other trials in Poland

About this study

High fidelity simulation (HFS) is an established method of training in various fields of medicine, especially emergency medicine, anesthesiology and intensive therapy. One of the benefits of HFS as an educational tool is the protective environment, where the risk of error do not bring harm to the patients.

It is proven that HFS is successful in acquisition of new knowledge and skills and may facilitate positive behavioral change in medical students. However, this education method may cause elevated stress levels as well as other physiological reactions. Other than sympathetic nervous system reactions such as heart rate and blood pressure, there are a few laboratory stress level markers such as cortisol, alpha-amylase, testosterone and secretory immunoglobulin A. Our aim was to evaluate the change of stress level induced by high-fidelity simulation in medical students.

Being tested
High fidelity simulation training

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High fidelity simulation trainingBehavioural

    At the beginning of scheduled classes in the simulation center, students were placed sitting at rest for 30 min. In each team a leader was chosen. Other team members were also assigned detailed functions. Before starting the scenario, participants were oriented for 10 -15 minutes by a physician instructor about the simulation room setup and manikin features. The simulated scenarios were performed using a high fidelity computer-based manikin simulator, with the possibility of remote control of vital signs. All medications and equipment required during the clinical scenarios were available. The scenario used was prepared and validated by experienced simulation instructors. All student groups were given the same standardized scenario.

Study groups in NCT04381572
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High fidelity simulation trainingGroup consisting of medical students scheduled to undergo high fidelity medical simulation as a part of standard scholastic program.
Receives: Behavioral: High fidelity simulation training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Α-amylase activity in saliva [U/ml]

    Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG \& Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. Α-amylase activity assay was performed by a static method with AMYLAZA kit (Aqua-Med Łodz, Poland). The samples were diluted 100 times using 0,9% chloride solution. 2-chloro-4-nitrofenylo-maltotrioside is a substrate in this method. The reaction was performed in pH 6,0 MES buffer at 37 ° C rendering a colored reaction product. The product was then analyzed via spectrophotometry at 405 nm.

    Measured: 120 minutes

  2. Secretory immunoglobulin class A concentration in saliva [ug/ml]

    Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG \& Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. Determination of secretory immunoglobulin class A (sIgA) concentration was established using an ELISA (Immunodiagnostic AG, Germany). The analytical procedure was carried out in accordance to the instructions provided by the manufacturer in the user manual. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (BioTek, USA), the results were processed using the KCJunior program (BioTek, USA).

    Measured: 120 minutes

  3. Cortisol concentration in saliva [ng/ml]

    Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG \& Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests.

    The commercial ELISA (Diapra, Italy) were used to determine the concentration of cortisol in saliva. The analytical procedure was carried out with accordance to the manufacturer's instructions in the technical manual supplied with the kit. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (Biotek, USA), while results were processed using KCJunior (Biotek, USA).

    Measured: 120 minutes

  4. Testosterone concentration in saliva [pg/ml]

    Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG \& Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests.

    The commercial ELISA (Diapra, Italy) was used to determine the concentration of testosterone in saliva. The analytical procedure was carried out with accordance to the manufacturer's instructions in the technical manual supplied with the kit. Absorbance readings were taken using a μQuant reader (Biotek, USA), while results were processed using KCJunior (Biotek, USA).

    Measured: 120 minutes

  5. Total protein concentration [mg/ml]

    Saliva was collected using a disposable Salivette tube (Sarstedt AG \& Co, Germany) by placing a sterile tampon under the tongue or chewing for 30-45 seconds. Next the tube was centrifuged (1000 x g for 10 min.) to obtain a ready to test saliva supernatant. Samples were frozen after centrifugation at - 85°C until performing laboratory tests. To determine the total protein concentration the Lowry method was used. This method base on the reactions between peptide bonds, tyrosine and Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The absorbance of the resulting color was read at a wavelength of 650-750 nm, 30 minutes after the addition of the reagent. Bovine serum albumin water solution (BSA - Sigma Aldrich, Germany) at slightly basic pH was used as standard.

    Measured: 120 minutes

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Heart rate [bpm]

    Heart rate was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).

    Measured: 120 minutes

  2. Blood pressure [mmHg]

    Blood pressure was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).

    Measured: 120 minutes

  3. Saturation [%]

    Saturation level was measured using a cardiomonitor (Infinity Delta, Dräger; Germany).

    Measured: 120 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2020
  2. Study start1 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04381572
Sponsor's protocol ID
SSS-01
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
2 May 2020
Last updated
11 May 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stress, Physiological and High Fidelity Simulation Training, run by Medical University of Silesia at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Α-amylase activity in saliva [U/ml] (time frame: 120 minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in