AzTrials
AzTrials

Health BehaviorNCT04382599

Designing Impactful Warnings for Sugary Drinks

A study testing Text warning with square background, Text warning with octagon background and Icon warning in people with Health Behavior, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this online RCT study is to examine how sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) health warnings influence US adults' perceptions and reactions. The investigators have the following predictions: 1. SSB warnings will be perceived as more effective than the control (message topic) 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Health Behavior
What is being tested?
Text warning with square background, Text warning with octagon background and Icon warning
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,078 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Oct 2019to 4 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • at least 18 years old
  • Prime Panels member
  • have at least one child ages 2-12
  • Currently reside in the US

Who cannot join

  • less than 18 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this online RCT study is to examine how sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) health warnings influence US adults' perceptions and reactions. The investigators have the following predictions:

  1. SSB warnings will be perceived as more effective than the control (message topic)
  2. Icon and graphic warnings will be perceived as more effective than text-only warnings (message type)
Read more

The investigators will also examine the interaction of warning topic and warning type, but have no specific hypothesis about this interaction.

Finally, the investigators will test the following predictions about the secondary outcomes:

SSB warnings (vs. control), as well as icon and graphic warnings (vs text.warnings), will lead to lower perceived product healthfulness, lower purchase intentions, and higher cognitive elaboration.

Read the detailed description

Childhood obesity is a major public health problem in the US among racial and ethnic minorities, including among the US's growing Latino population. One promising but understudied policy for addressing childhood obesity is requiring warnings on the front of sugar-sweetened beverage containers. However, the topic and design of warnings that are most effective in communicating the harms of sugar-sweetened beverages remains unknown. This study assess which warning topics and which warning designs lead to the greatest perceived message effectiveness among US Latino and non-Latino parents of children ages 2-12. The investigators focus on parents as they are the primary decision-makers and purchasers of food products for children and exert strong influence over their children's dietary intake and food attitudes.

Setting: The trial will take place online on a survey developed using Qualtrics.

Recruitment: Participants will be recruited online by CloudResearch PrimePanels, a survey research platform with access to over 20 million participants. As such, participants will have to be PrimePanels members in order to participate.

Informed Consent: After determining eligibility, eligible participants will be directed to a page on Qualtrics with the consent form. Participants acknowledge their consent in the study by clicking the "next page" arrow and proceeding to the study.

Randomization: After consenting, the participant is randomly assigned to to view one of the 5 warning topics. "WARNING: High in added sugar" (added sugar), "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to weight gain" (weight gain), "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to type 2 diabetes" (Type 2 diabetes), "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to heart damage" (heart damage), and "Please refrain from littering" (control). Within each of the four experimental arms, participants see the message displayed on four different types of warning designs: a text warning on a square background, a text warning on a octagon background, and icon warning, and a graphic warning. Within the control arm, participants see the message displayed on three different types of warning designs: a text warning on a square background, an icon warning, and a graphic warning. Participants randomly see the different warning designs in a random order.

Survey: The participants complete a survey answering behavioral perceptions and intentions questions about the different warning labels.

Conditions
Health Behavior
Being tested
Text warning with square background, Text warning with octagon background, Icon warning, Graphic warning
Medical subject headings
Health Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Text warning with square backgroundBehavioural

    The warning message is in white text on a black square background

  • Text warning with octagon backgroundBehavioural

    The warning message is in white text on a black octagon background

  • Icon warningBehavioural

    The warning message in in white text on a black background, below an icon that conveys the topic the warning is about

  • Graphic warningBehavioural

    The warning message in in white text on a black background, below a graphic that conveys the topic the warning is about

Study groups in NCT04382599
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Added sugar warning messageExperimentalMessage displayed on warning labels is: "WARNING: High in added sugar."
Receives: Behavioral: Text warning with square background; Behavioral: Text warning with octagon background; Behavioral: Icon warning; Behavioral: Graphic warning
Weight gain warning messageExperimentalMessage displayed on warning labels is: "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to weight gain."
Receives: Behavioral: Text warning with square background; Behavioral: Text warning with octagon background; Behavioral: Icon warning; Behavioral: Graphic warning
Type 2 diabetes warning messageExperimentalMessage displayed on warning labels is: "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to type 2 diabetes."
Receives: Behavioral: Text warning with square background; Behavioral: Text warning with octagon background; Behavioral: Icon warning; Behavioral: Graphic warning
Heart damage warning messageExperimentalMessage displayed on warning labels is: "WARNING: Excess consumption of drinks with added sugar contributes to heart damage."
Receives: Behavioral: Text warning with square background; Behavioral: Text warning with octagon background; Behavioral: Icon warning; Behavioral: Graphic warning
Neutral messageActive comparatorMessage displayed on control label is: "Please refrain from littering."
Receives: Behavioral: Text warning with square background; Behavioral: Icon warning; Behavioral: Graphic warning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perceived message effectiveness

    Perceived message effectiveness as measured by average response to three statements:

    This message makes me concerned about the health effects of drinking beverages with added sugar. Response options are on a scale (1=Strongly disagree...5=Strongly agree).

    This message makes drinking beverages with added sugar seem unpleasant to me. Response options are on a scale (1=Strongly disagree...5=Strongly agree).

    This message discourages me from wanting to drink beverages with added sugar. Response options are on a scale (1=Strongly disagree...5=Strongly agree).

    Measured: During survey, which lasts approximately 12-15 minutes.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Perceived product healthfulness of beverages with added sugar

    Measured with the question, "How healthy or unhealthy would it be for your child to drink beverages with added sugar every day?" Response options are on a scale (1= Very unhealthy...5=Very healthy).

    Measured: During survey, which lasts approximately 12-15 minutes.

  2. Intentions to purchase beverages with added sugar

    Measured with the question, "How likely are you to buy beverages with added sugar for your child in the next four weeks?" Response options are on a scale (1 = Not at all likely...5 = Extremely likely).

    Measured: During survey, which lasts approximately 12-15 minutes.

  3. Thinking about the health problems from beverages with added sugar

    Measured with the question, "How much does this message make you think about the health problems caused by drinking beverages with added sugar?" Response options are on a scale (1=Not at all...5=Very much).

    Measured: During survey, which lasts approximately 12-15 minutes.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2020
  2. Study start7 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion4 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion4 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,078 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04382599
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-0277a
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
6 May 2020
Last updated
25 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hall MG, Lazard AJ, Grummon AH, Higgins ICA, Bercholz M, Richter APC, Taillie LS. Designing warnings for sugary drinks: A randomized experiment with Latino parents and non-Latino parents. Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106562. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106562. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

    PubMed 33878350

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Text warning with square background, Text warning with octagon background and Icon warning in people with Health Behavior, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perceived message effectiveness (time frame: During survey, which lasts approximately 12-15 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04382599, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in