AzTrials
AzTrials

Compression FractureNCT04384211

QOCA®-Image Medical Platform - Smart VCF Risk Management System

An observational study of Compression Fracture, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project aims to develop and validate an automatic detection and classification system for vertebral compression fractures on computer tomography (CT) images using an artificial intelligence (AI) system (named Smart Bone) by Quanta. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Compression Fracture
What is being tested?
Computer Assisted Detection Software For Vertebral Fractures
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Jun 2019to 31 May 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A total of 1000-1500 subjects were recruited in both sex, aged 50 and above, and who had come to Wan Fang Hospital for CT scans, including those with or without vertebral compression fractures as the compression fractures group and the control group respectively.

Who may be able to join

  • Cases with CT examinations acquired between 2010.01-2018.09
  • Cases with CT examinations performed with one of the following protocol: whole body, abdomen, and spine
  • Cases must be >/= 50 years of age
  • Cases with reports from CT examinations ditched as positive or negative compression fractures within a search range from T12 to L5 vertebrae.
  • CT images with raw data that are allowed to be reconstructed in axial view with a slice thickness of 1.3 mm
  • CT images with raw data that are allowed to be reconstructed in sagittal view with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm

Who cannot join

  • CT images with imaging artifacts, foreign bodies, or implants
  • Cases with comorbid conditions, such as infection, cancer metastasis, chronic osteomyelitis, or other nonosteoporotic compression fracture

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Smart Bone: An Intelligent Fracture Risk Capture and Management System

This project aims to develop and validate an automatic detection and classification system for vertebral compression fractures on computer tomography (CT) images using an artificial intelligence (AI) system (named Smart Bone) by Quanta.

Read the detailed description

A computer search of CT scans (2010.01.01-2018.09.30) was performed in Wan Fang Hospital. Those CT images that were retrospectively reviewed by experienced radiologists. The CT scans of 1000-1500 subjects aged 50 and above with and without thoracic or lumbar compression fractures were included in this project for machine learning and deep learning. The control group included those without compression fractures while the patient group were those with compression fractures. Subjects that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded.

The cortical layer of the T12-L5 spine images were manually labelled with the labeling software by the the technologists and confirmed the correctness of the image by an experienced radiologist. All the de-linked and completed images were provided to Quanta Computer Inc. for subsequent classification and analysis of AI machines for deep learning to facilitate the development of a system for automatic detection of pressure fractures by CT. This newly developed automatic system will be of valuable clinical impact in assisting radiologists to detect and classify vertebral compression fractures precisely and accurately.

Being tested
Computer Assisted Detection Software For Vertebral Fractures
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Compression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Computer Assisted Detection Software For Vertebral FracturesOther

    Also called Smart Bone

    A device named Smart Bone that is using CT image retrospectively acquired to entails a second review of CT images with Vertebral Compression Fractures through an interactive AI program developed by Quanta Computer Inc. was applied to the CT images. The device is a computer-aided detection (CADe) software application and is designed to assist radiologists to analyze Spine CT images. The device uses deep learning methods to perform vertebrae detection and classification of images.

Study groups in NCT04384211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RadiologistsA computer search of CT scans (2010.01.01-2018.09.30) was performed in Wan Fang Hospital. These CT images were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist who classified and marked with annotations of vertebral fractures by the Genant's semiquantitative method.
Smart BoneThe same CT images were separately reviewed and processed by the artificial intelligence system (Smart Bone) by Quanta for compression fractures. The two results, one by the radiologists and the other by artificial intelligence system, will be compared to statistically quantify equivalence (CADe).
Receives: Other: Computer Assisted Detection Software For Vertebral Fractures

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Concordance rate

    CT Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors suggested by Smart Bone are in good agreement with those selected by experts. In other words, the CT Imaging Reporting and Data System generated by Smart Bone are not statistically different from the consensus of experts.

    CT Imaging Reporting and Data System Assessment Category Score: The user makes the final decision on the Assessment Category Score. Using this Score, Smart Bone displays the assessment description.

    Grade 0: Normal Vertebrae Grade 1: Mild Fracture, 20-25% Grade 2: Moderate Fracture, 26-40% Grade 3: Severe Fracture, >40%

    Measured: 2019.06 to 2020.03

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Accuracy

    Comparing to the accuracy of CT imaging results by radiologists with and without CADe will be evaluated.

    Measured: 2019.06 to 2020.03

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2020
  2. Study start1 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion31 May 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04384211
Sponsor's protocol ID
N201909056
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
7 May 2020
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Compression Fracture, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Concordance rate (time frame: 2019.06 to 2020.03). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in