AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric CancerNCT04384575

Study on the Effectiveness of Gastroscope Operation Quality Control Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology

An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to construct a real-time quality monitoring system based on artificial intelligence technology. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Cancer
What is being tested?
blind spots
How many people
1,570 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
22 Feb 2020to 1 May 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who meet the criteria for gastroscopy examination.

Who may be able to join

  • Patiens aged 18 years or above undergoing gastroscopy;
  • Be able to read, understand and sign informed consent;

Who cannot join

  • Patients with absolute contraindications to endoscopy examination;
  • pregnant women;
  • previous history of gastric surgery;
  • the researcher considers that the subject is not suitable for clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Beijing Cancer Hospital

    Beijing, Haidian, 100142

Other trials in China

About this study

This study aims to construct a real-time quality monitoring system based on artificial intelligence technology.

Read the detailed description

Gastroscopy plays an important role in the detection and diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases. It is necessary for endoscopists to operate gastroscope according to the standardized process, in order to avoid missing early lesions. However, with the rapid increase in the number of endoscopies, the workload of endoscopists increases further. High workload reduces the quality of endoscopy, resulting in incomplete observation of anatomical parts that are easy to be missed in the process of gastroscopy. There are significant differences in the operation level of different endoscopists. Therefore, carrying out artificial intelligence methods has good academic research and practical value for improving the quality of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment.

Artificial intelligence devices need to use a large number of endoscopic images, based on this, we intends to collect endoscopic image data from our hospitals for training and validation of the model.

Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Being tested
blind spots
Keywords
gastric cancer, artificial intelligence, endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • blind spotsDiagnostic test

    missed part during map the entire stomach through endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy

    Calculate the accuracy of AI's judgment on images

    Measured: 2020.2.22-2020.7.1

  2. Sensitivity

    number of images in which AI correctly diagnosed positive/all images with positive

    Measured: 2020.2.22-2020.7.1

  3. Specificity

    number of images in which AI correctly diagnosed negative/all images negative

    Measured: 2020.2.22-2020.7.1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2020
  2. Study start22 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion13 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion1 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,570 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04384575
Sponsor's protocol ID
PX2020047
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
8 May 2020
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Yuan P, Ma ZH, Yan Y, Li SJ, Wang J, Wu Q. Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Anatomical Sites in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Images. Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 12;17:6127-6138. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S481127. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 39691834

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy (time frame: 2020.2.22-2020.7.1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04384575, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in