AzTrials
AzTrials

Hallux ValgusNCT04393545

Efficacy of Splinting, Exercise and Electrotherapy on Hallux Valgus

A study testing hallux valgus night splint, exercise and Electrotherapy in people with Hallux Valgus, run by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of splinting, exercise and electrotherapy on the hallux valgus (HV) angle, and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Sixty women (120 feet) with bilateral HV deformity were randomly assigned to one of three groups - an HV night splint (SP) group, an exercise… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Hallux Valgus
What is being tested?
hallux valgus night splint, exercise and Electrotherapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
2 Feb 2009to 3 Nov 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • a diagnosis of HV confirmed by an orthopedist experienced in foot surgery
  • female gender
  • bilateral HV deformity
  • aged 18-60 years.
  • Patients were then selected based on an HV deformity degree of '2' or '3' on the Manchester scale before randomization

Who cannot join

  • Patients with HV deformity degrees less than '2' or more than '3' according to the Manchester scale
  • Patients with systemic disease, cognitive or mental disturbance, a history of surgery to the lower extremity, or previous use of any foot splints were excluded.

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Splinting, Exercise and Electrotherapy in the Management of Hallux Valgus: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of splinting, exercise and electrotherapy on the hallux valgus (HV) angle, and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Sixty women (120 feet) with bilateral HV deformity were randomly assigned to one of three groups - an HV night splint (SP) group, an exercise (EX) group, and a high-voltage galvanic stimulation (EL) group. Angular degrees (hallux interphalangeal, HV, and intermetatarsal angles expressed as angles A, B and C, respectively) were determined before enrollment (t0) and three months after treatment (t2). Foot-specific quality of life was assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOFQ) at t0, after one month (t1), and at t2. All groups exhibited significant changes in the A, B, and C angles and outcome measures (p ≤0.001). Decreases in the A and C angles, and MOFQ-Pain subscale scores, were higher in the SP group than in the other two groups (p<0.05). C angle at t2, MOFQ-Walking score at t1 and t2 and MOFQ-Pain subscale score at t1 were lower in the SP group (p<0.05).

Conditions
Hallux Valgus
Being tested
hallux valgus night splint, exercise, Electrotherapy
Keywords
hallux valgus, Night splint, Exercise, High voltage galvanic stimulation, Radiographic angular degree, Foot-specific health-related quality of life
Medical subject headings
Hallux Valgus, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • hallux valgus night splintDevice

    The HV night splint holds the hallux in abduction in order to provide a correct position. The SP group was given splints consisting of a rigid polyethylene bar along the medial of the hallux, and soft polyform and Velcro fastener parts.

  • exerciseOther

    The exercises involved strengthening the AbdH (abductor hallucis) and plantar fascia muscles, and stretching the hallux

  • ElectrotherapyOther

    Two self-adhesive electrodes were used. One was placed over the medial distal end of the first metatarsal and the other was attached to the motor point of the AbdH (inferior and posterior to the navicular tuberosity).21 The stimulation intensity was increased until a contraction was observed without causing discomfort and pain. Twenty-minute HVPGS was applied in total over three weekly sessions for four weeks.

Study groups in NCT04393545
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HV night splint (SP) groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: hallux valgus night splint
exercise (EX) groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: exercise
high-voltage galvanic stimulation (EL) groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Electrotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Manchester Scale

    This scale determines the severity of HV and deformity using four foot photographs (0 'no deformity', 1 'mild', 2 'moderate' or 3: 'severe deformity').

    Measured: used once before enrollment for the inclusion

  2. change in hallux valgus angle

    Antero-posterior radiographs of patients' bilateral feet were taken before treatment and at three-month follow-up controls (in a standing position). HV, intermetatarsal, and hallux interphalangeal angles were measured on the radiographic images. These angles were abbreviated to angles A, B and C respectively.

    Measured: were taken before enrollment and at three-month follow-up controls

  3. change in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire score

    MOFQ Foot health-related quality of life was evaluated using the MOFQ. This consists of three categories - pain, walking/standing, and social interaction. The MOFQ contains 16 items, each scored on a Likert scale between 0 and 4. Possible scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating the most severe conditions

    Measured: were assessed three times: before enrollment, at 1st and 3rd months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2020
  2. Study start2 Feb 2009
  3. Primary completion7 Jul 2014
  4. Study completion3 Nov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04393545
Sponsor's protocol ID
KA08/143
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
13 May 2020
Last updated
19 May 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kulunkoglu BA, Akkubak Y, Celik D, Alkan A. A comparison of the effectiveness of splinting, exercise and electrotherapy in women patients with hallux valgus: A randomized clinical trial. Foot (Edinb). 2021 Sep;48:101828. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101828. Epub 2021 May 25.

    PubMed 34388424

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing hallux valgus night splint, exercise and Electrotherapy in people with Hallux Valgus, run by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Manchester Scale (time frame: used once before enrollment for the inclusion). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04393545, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in