Lung CancerNCT04395651
The Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT Scan in Lung Cancer Patients
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
Describe strengths and limitations of FDG PET/CT for staging. Evaluate the utility of PET/CT in assessment of therapy response and restaging Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- PET/CT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2020to Jun 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All eligible patients during the period of the study will be included (total coverage). Expected number according to patients flow is 30 patients.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with pathologically proven lung cancer and referred to nuclear medicine unit to perform PET/CT for staging and patient referred for assessment of response of therapy and re staging.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women.
- Patients unable to sleep in a fixed position for 20 minutes.
- Severely ill patients who aren't capable of complying with study procedures or comatose patients.
- Patients with known second primary
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Describe strengths and limitations of FDG PET/CT for staging. Evaluate the utility of PET/CT in assessment of therapy response and restaging
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and it represents the main cause of cancer mortality worldwide.
It is histopathological classified into main groups: Small cell lung cancer (15%) and Non-small cell lung cancer (85%). NSCLCs are generally subcategorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and large cell carcinoma. Positron emission tomography (PET) is now an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosis and staging, as well as offering prognostic information based on response.
PET sets the gold standard in the evaluation of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule or mass, where PET has proven to be significantly more accurate than computed tomography (CT).
For NSCLC chest CT is the standard imaging modality for assessing primary tumor size and identifying its margins. PET-CT may be helpful in assessing a nodule located in same lobe. It can also provide information on parietal or mediastinal involvement. PET is useful for differentiating tumor tissue from atelectasis, which may be helpful if radiotherapy is planned to determine the target volume .
In the evaluation of metastatic spread to loco-regional lymph nodes, PET is significantly more accurate than CT, so that invasive surgical staging may be omitted in many patients with negative mediastinal PET images.
In patients with positive mediastinal PET images, invasive surgical staging remains mandatory because of the possibility of false-positive findings due to inflammatory nodes or granulomatous disorders.
Forty percent of patients with NSCLC have distant metastases at presentation, most commonly in the adrenal glands, bones, liver, or brain .
In the search for metastatic spread, PET is a useful adjunct to conventional imaging. This may be due to the finding of unexpected metastatic lesions or due to exclusion of malignancy in lesions that are equivocal on standard imaging. However, at this time, PET does not replace conventional imaging.
The diagnostic accuracy of initial pre-therapy PET-CT results in improved staging, and thus is of high prognostic value.
Many studies conducted the value of using semi-quantitative measures as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in predicting prognosis and survival rather than the traditional method of measuring Standard uptake value (SUV).
Several studies have demonstrated that PET imaging proves useful for assessing the response to chemo therapy or targeted therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- PET/CT
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PET/CTDevice
It is a prospective clinical study that will include patients known to have lung cancer and referred to nuclear medicine unit to perform 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and therapy planning as well as patients referred for assessment of response of therapy and restaging.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PET/CT in lung cancer
- Analysis of the number and type of metastatic lesions detected by PET/CT in lung cancer patients(staging).
- Analysis of the number and type of metastatic lesions detected by PET/CT in lung cancer patients after therapy(re staging).
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (1)
PET/CT in lung cancer
-To evaluate risk benefit of PET/CT examination in lung cancer patients.
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2020
- Study startMay 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Walaa Otify Thabet, Assiut University
- Investigators
- Taha Zaky Mahran, Prof.Dr., Study chair, Assiut UniversityAhmad Zaher, Prof .Dr., Study chair, National Cancer Institute (NCI)Nesreen Mekkawy, Dr., Study chair, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04395651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PET/CT in lung cancer
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 13 May 2020
- Last updated
- 20 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ambrosini V, Nicolini S, Caroli P, Nanni C, Massaro A, Marzola MC, Rubello D, Fanti S. PET/CT imaging in different types of lung cancer: an overview. Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5):988-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
PubMed 21458181Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z, Liang C, Tian J, Liang C. Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage (I or II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):947-957. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152234. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PubMed 27347764Inamura K. Lung Cancer: Understanding Its Molecular Pathology and the 2015 WHO Classification. Front Oncol. 2017 Aug 28;7:193. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00193. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28894699Groheux D, Quere G, Blanc E, Lemarignier C, Vercellino L, de Margerie-Mellon C, Merlet P, Querellou S. FDG PET-CT for solitary pulmonary nodule and lung cancer: Literature review. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016 Oct;97(10):1003-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PubMed 27567555Chao F, Zhang H. PET/CT in the staging of the non-small-cell lung cancer. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:783739. doi: 10.1155/2012/783739. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PubMed 22577296Quint LE, Tummala S, Brisson LJ, Francis IR, Krupnick AS, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jul;62(1):246-50. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00220-2.
PubMed 8678651Chang CF, Rashtian A, Gould MK. The use and misuse of positron emission tomography in lung cancer evaluation. Clin Chest Med. 2011 Dec;32(4):749-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.08.012.
PubMed 22054883Ma W, Wang M, Li X, Huang H, Zhu Y, Song X, Dai D, Xu W. Quantitative 18F-FDG PET analysis in survival rate prediction of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018 Oct;16(4):4129-4136. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9166. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
PubMed 30214552Yoon DH, Baek S, Choi CM, Lee DH, Suh C, Ryu JS, Moon DH, Lee JS, Kim SW. FDG-PET as a potential tool for selecting patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who may be spared maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 1;17(15):5093-100. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2791. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
PubMed 21673067Takahashi R, Hirata H, Tachibana I, Shimosegawa E, Inoue A, Nagatomo I, Takeda Y, Kida H, Goya S, Kijima T, Yoshida M, Kumagai T, Kumanogoh A, Okumura M, Hatazawa J, Kawase I. Early [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography at two days of gefitinib treatment predicts clinical outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):220-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0868. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
PubMed 22019513
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT Scan in Lung Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04395651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PET/CT in lung cancer
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Describe strengths and limitations of FDG PET/CT for staging. Evaluate the utility of PET/CT in assessment of therapy response and restaging
Detailed description
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and it represents the main cause of cancer mortality worldwide.
It is histopathological classified into main groups: Small cell lung cancer (15%) and Non-small cell lung cancer (85%). NSCLCs are generally subcategorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and large cell carcinoma. Positron emission tomography (PET) is now an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosis and staging, as well as offering prognostic information based on response.
PET sets the gold standard in the evaluation of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule or mass, where PET has proven to be significantly more accurate than computed tomography (CT).
For NSCLC chest CT is the standard imaging modality for assessing primary tumor size and identifying its margins. PET-CT may be helpful in assessing a nodule located in same lobe. It can also provide information on parietal or mediastinal involvement. PET is useful for differentiating tumor tissue from atelectasis, which may be helpful if radiotherapy is planned to determine the target volume .
In the evaluation of metastatic spread to loco-regional lymph nodes, PET is significantly more accurate than CT, so that invasive surgical staging may be omitted in many patients with negative mediastinal PET images.
In patients with positive mediastinal PET images, invasive surgical staging remains mandatory because of the possibility of false-positive findings due to inflammatory nodes or granulomatous disorders.
Forty percent of patients with NSCLC have distant metastases at presentation, most commonly in the adrenal glands, bones, liver, or brain .
In the search for metastatic spread, PET is a useful adjunct to conventional imaging. This may be due to the finding of unexpected metastatic lesions or due to exclusion of malignancy in lesions that are equivocal on standard imaging. However, at this time, PET does not replace conventional imaging.
The diagnostic accuracy of initial pre-therapy PET-CT results in improved staging, and thus is of high prognostic value.
Many studies conducted the value of using semi-quantitative measures as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in predicting prognosis and survival rather than the traditional method of measuring Standard uptake value (SUV).
Several studies have demonstrated that PET imaging proves useful for assessing the response to chemo therapy or targeted therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All eligible patients during the period of the study will be included (total coverage). Expected number according to patients flow is 30 patients.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with pathologically proven lung cancer and referred to nuclear medicine unit to perform PET/CT for staging and patient referred for assessment of response of therapy and re staging.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant women.
- Patients unable to sleep in a fixed position for 20 minutes.
- Severely ill patients who aren't capable of complying with study procedures or comatose patients.
- Patients with known second primary
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PET/CTIt is a prospective clinical study that will include patients known to have lung cancer and referred to nuclear medicine unit to perform 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and therapy planning as well as patients referred for assessment of response of therapy and restaging. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
PET/CT in lung cancer
Time frame: one year
* Analysis of the number and type of metastatic lesions detected by PET/CT in lung cancer patients(staging). * Analysis of the number and type of metastatic lesions detected by PET/CT in lung cancer patients after therapy(re staging).
1 secondary outcome
PET/CT in lung cancer
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21458181Ambrosini V, Nicolini S, Caroli P, Nanni C, Massaro A, Marzola MC, Rubello D, Fanti S. PET/CT imaging in different types of lung cancer: an overview. Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5):988-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 27347764Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z, Liang C, Tian J, Liang C. Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage (I or II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):947-957. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152234. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 28894699Inamura K. Lung Cancer: Understanding Its Molecular Pathology and the 2015 WHO Classification. Front Oncol. 2017 Aug 28;7:193. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00193. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 27567555Groheux D, Quere G, Blanc E, Lemarignier C, Vercellino L, de Margerie-Mellon C, Merlet P, Querellou S. FDG PET-CT for solitary pulmonary nodule and lung cancer: Literature review. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016 Oct;97(10):1003-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 22577296Chao F, Zhang H. PET/CT in the staging of the non-small-cell lung cancer. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:783739. doi: 10.1155/2012/783739. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 8678651Quint LE, Tummala S, Brisson LJ, Francis IR, Krupnick AS, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jul;62(1):246-50. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00220-2.
- Background: PubMed 22054883Chang CF, Rashtian A, Gould MK. The use and misuse of positron emission tomography in lung cancer evaluation. Clin Chest Med. 2011 Dec;32(4):749-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.08.012.
- Background: PubMed 30214552Ma W, Wang M, Li X, Huang H, Zhu Y, Song X, Dai D, Xu W. Quantitative 18F-FDG PET analysis in survival rate prediction of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018 Oct;16(4):4129-4136. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9166. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 21673067Yoon DH, Baek S, Choi CM, Lee DH, Suh C, Ryu JS, Moon DH, Lee JS, Kim SW. FDG-PET as a potential tool for selecting patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who may be spared maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 1;17(15):5093-100. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2791. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 22019513Takahashi R, Hirata H, Tachibana I, Shimosegawa E, Inoue A, Nagatomo I, Takeda Y, Kida H, Goya S, Kijima T, Yoshida M, Kumagai T, Kumanogoh A, Okumura M, Hatazawa J, Kawase I. Early [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography at two days of gefitinib treatment predicts clinical outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):220-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0868. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Taha Zaky Mahran, Prof.Dr. study chair
Assiut University
Ahmad Zaher, Prof .Dr. study chair
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nesreen Mekkawy, Dr. study chair
Assiut University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Walaa Otify Thabet, MD (01020140716, dr.walaaotify@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PET/CT in lung cancer (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04395651, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020.