AzTrials
AzTrials

FoodNCT04396275

The Effect of Navy Beans and Yellow Peas on Satiety in Children

A study testing Food-1, Food-2 and Food-3 in people with Food and Eating, run by Mount Saint Vincent University at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The frequent consumption of pulses is associated with multiple cardiometabolic benefits in adults including a lower risk for overweight and obesity. However, it remains unclear whether these effects are mediated through the short-term mechanisms, including enhanced satiety and reduced food intake (FI), or through the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Food, Eating, Satiety
What is being tested?
Food-1, Food-2 and Food-3
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Aug 2017to 31 Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 14 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy boys and girls born at full-term
  • do not receive any medications

Who cannot join

  • Food sensitivities or allergies
  • Dietary restrictions
  • Health problems
  • Learning, emotional or behavioral problems.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mount Saint Vincent University

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M 2J6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Cooked Whole Navy Beans and Yellow Peas on Short-term Satiety and Food Intake in Children

The frequent consumption of pulses is associated with multiple cardiometabolic benefits in adults including a lower risk for overweight and obesity. However, it remains unclear whether these effects are mediated through the short-term mechanisms, including enhanced satiety and reduced food intake (FI), or through the long-term metabolic effects triggered by regular consumption of pulses. The objective of this study is to investigate the short-term effect of cooked pulses served in the amount similar to their recommended serving of 175ml (3/4 cup) on food intake in 12-14y children, and gastrointestinal comfort over 2-hours. The secondary objective is to evaluate how children perceive the sensory characteristics of the meals made with the whole pulses.

Being tested
Food-1, Food-2, Food-3
Keywords
Pulses, Satiety, Food intake, Appetite, Beans, Peas

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Food-1Other

    Cooked whole navy beans (300 kcal)

  • Food-2Other

    Cooked whole yellow split peas (300 kcal)

  • Food-3Other

    Cooked rice considered as control (300 kcal)

Study groups in NCT04396275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cooked whole navy beansExperimentalA meal consisting of cooked navy beans
Receives: Other: Food-1
Cooked whole yellow split peasExperimentalA meal consisting of cooked yellow peas
Receives: Other: Food-2
Cooked rice (control)ExperimentalA meal consisting of cooked rice
Receives: Other: Food-3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Food intake

    The amount of energy (kcal) consumed ad libitum with the breakfast meal or water control and with the test meal (pizza lunch) two hours later.

    Measured: 120 min

  2. Subjective appetite

    The subjective assessment of appetite parameters including desire to eat, fullness, hunger and a prospective food consumption measured with 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales with two opposite statements at each end (e.g., for the hunger scale, 0 mm means not hungry at all, and 100 mm means very hungry).

    Measured: 0-120 min

  3. Subjective feeling of physical comfort

    The subjective assessment of wellness and gastrointestinal symptoms including a feeling of nausea, diarrhea, flatulence, and other parameters measured with 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales with two opposite statements at each end.

    Measured: 0-120 min

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective perception of food palatability (pleasantness)

    The pleasantness of the meals measured with 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales with two opposite statements at each end (e.g., 0 mm means that food is not pleasant at all, and 100 mm means that the food is very pleasant).

    Measured: 0, 120 min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2020
  2. Study start1 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04396275
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-002
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
1 Apr 2020
Last updated
20 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Food-1, Food-2 and Food-3 in people with Food and Eating, run by Mount Saint Vincent University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Food intake (time frame: 120 min). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in