Coronary Artery DiseaseFLAVOUR IINCT04397211
Angiography-Derived FFR And IVUS for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
A study testing Angiography-derived FFR and IVUS in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 23 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Comparison of Angiography-derived Fractional FLow Reserve And IntraVascular Ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with CoRonary Artery Disease Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Angiography-derived FFR and IVUS
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,872 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 29 May 2020to Sep 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ① Subject must be ≥ 18 years. ② Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive physiologic or imaging evaluation and PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure. ③ Patients suspected with ischemic heart disease. ④ Patients with ≥ 50% stenosis by angiography-based visual estimation eligible for stent implantation. ⑤ Target vessel size ≥ 2.5mm in visual estimation. ⑥ Target vessels are limited to major epicardial coronary arteries (left anterior descending artery[LAD], left circumflex artery [LCX], right coronary artery [RCA])
Who cannot join
- ① The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Contrast media (Patients with documented sensitivity to contrast media which can be effectively premedicated with steroids and diphenhydramine [e.g. rash] may be enrolled.) ② Patients with active pathologic bleeding. ③ Gastrointestinal or genitourinary major bleeding within the prior 3 months. ④ History of bleeding. diathesis, known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). ⑤Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy < 1 year. ⑥ Target vessel total occlusion. ⑦ Target lesion located in coronary arterial bypass graft. ⑧ Left main coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%. ⑨ Not eligible for angiography-derived FFR (ostial RCA ≥ 50% stenosis, myocardial bridging, severe tortuosity, severe overlap, poor image quality)
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 2 countries.
23 sites in 2 countries
China21 sites
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing
Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Guangdong
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital
Hangzhou
The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University
Hangzhou
Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital
Hangzhou
Changxing People's Hospital
Huzhou
Huzhou Central Hospital
Huzhou
The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan
Jinan
Dongyang People's Hospital
Jinhua
Jinhua Central Hospital
Jinhua
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang
The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Ningbo University
Ningbo
Shandong Jining No.1 People's Hospital
Shandong
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Shandong
Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai
Second hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Taiyuan
The first affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou
The second affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan
South Korea2 sites
Seoul National University Hospital,
Seoul
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Angiography-derived Fractional FLow Reserve- And IntraVascular Ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients With CoRonary Artery Disease
Comparison of Angiography-derived Fractional FLow Reserve And IntraVascular Ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with CoRonary Artery Disease
Read the detailed description
- The primary hypothesis is that angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy for PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) will show non-inferiority in rates of patients-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) at 12 months after randomization, compared with IVUS-guided strategy for PCI with a DES in patients with coronary artery disease.
- Study population and sample size calculation: Sample size calculation based on the event rates of previous trials, investigators predicted the rates of POCO at 12 months after PCI will be 7% in the Angiography-derived FFR-guided arm, and 8% in the IVUS-guided arm
- Primary endpoint: patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, MI, any revascularization) at 12 months after PCI
- Design: non-inferiority, delta = 2.5%
- Sampling ratio: angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy: IVUS-guided strategy = 1:1
- Type I error (α): One-sided 2.5%
- Accrual time: 3 years
- Total time: 4 years (accrual 3 years + follow-up 1 years)
- Assumption: POCO 7.0% vs. 8.0% in angiography-derived FFR or IVUS-guided strategy, respectively
- Statistical power (1- β): 80%
- Primary statistical method: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test
- Estimated attrition rate: total 5%
- Stratification in Randomization: Presence of diabetes mellitus (35% of patients in each group) Based on the above assumption, we would need total 1,872 patients (936 patients in each group) with consideration of an attrition rate.
- Research Materials and Indication for Revascularization: For the angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy arm, criteria for revascularization: angiography-derived FFR ≤ 0.80. For the IVUS-guided strategy arm, the criterion for revascularization is MLA ≤ 3mm2 or [3mm2 < MLA ≤ 4mm2 and plaque burden > 70%].
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Angiography-derived FFR, IVUS
- Keywords
- Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, Intravascular ultrasound, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Fractional flow reserve
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Angiography-derived FFRProcedure or surgery
The percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the Angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy arm
*Criteria for revascularization: Angiography-derived FFR ≤ 0.80
IVUSProcedure or surgery
The percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the IVUS-guided strategy arm
*Criteria for revascularization: Minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤ 3mm2 or 3< MLA ≤ 4mm2 \& Plaque burden > 70%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Angiography-derived FFR-guided PCI group | Active comparator | Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent(s) will be performed by Angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy Receives: Procedure: Angiography-derived FFR |
| IVUS-guided PCI group | Active comparator | Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent(s) will be performed by IVUS-guided strategy Receives: Procedure: IVUS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-oriented composite outcome
Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), defined as a composite of all death, myocardial infarction (MI) or any revascularization at 12 months after randomization according to the ARC definitions.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO)
POCO at 24 and 60 months after randomization according to the ARC consensus
Measured: 24, 60 months
Target vessel failure
Target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization)
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
All-cause and cardiac death
All-cause and cardiac death
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any nonfatal MI without peri-procedural MI
Any nonfatal MI without peri-procedural MI
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any nonfatal MI with peri-procedural MI
Any nonfatal MI with peri-procedural MI
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any target vessel/lesion revascularization
Any target vessel/lesion revascularization
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any non-target vessel/lesion revascularization
Any non-target vessel/lesion revascularization
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any revascularization (ischemia-driven or all)
Any revascularization (ischemia-driven or all)
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Stent thrombosis (definite/probable/possible)
Stent thrombosis (definite/probable/possible)
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)
Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)
Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months
Acute success of procedure and rate of PCI optimization
Acute success of procedure and rate of PCI optimization
Measured: At discharge (1 week after index procedure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2020
- Study start29 May 2020
- Primary completionSep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,872 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Wuhan University, Peking University Third Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, RenJi Hospital, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Changxing People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Ningbo University, Jinhua Central Hospital, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jining First People's Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Ulsan University Hospital, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital, The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jian'an Wang, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineBon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397211
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-303
- Acronym
- FLAVOUR II
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 17 May 2020
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The deidentified data will be shared after publication of first manuscript
Publications
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 22070834De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd K, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Limacher A, Nuesch E, Juni P; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1208-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
PubMed 25176289Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, De Winter O, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010.
PubMed 20298990Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
PubMed 17531660Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X, Koltowski L, Chang Y, Liu T, Yang J, Andersen BK, Eftekhari A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, Wijns W, Xu B, Holm NR. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):693-701. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28283. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
PubMed 30963676Fearon WF, Achenbach S, Engstrom T, Assali A, Shlofmitz R, Jeremias A, Fournier S, Kirtane AJ, Kornowski R, Greenberg G, Jubeh R, Kolansky DM, McAndrew T, Dressler O, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Leon MB, De Bruyne B; FAST-FFR Study Investigators. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography. Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):477-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037350.
PubMed 30586699Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, Holck EN, Fox Maule C, Johansen JK, Andreasen LN, Simonsen JK, Zhang Y, Kristensen SD, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, Terkelsen CJ, Krusell LR, Jakobsen L, Reiber JHC, Lassen JF, Bottcher M, Botker HE, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107.
PubMed 29555835Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Di Serafino L, Di Girolamo D, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Botker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.
PubMed 29980523Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, Asano T, Vandeloo B, Kornowski R, Tu S, Westra J, Holm NR, Xu B, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, Miyazaki Y, Katagiri Y, Tenekecioglu E, Modolo R, Chichareon P, Cosyns B, Schoors D, Roosens B, Lochy S, Argacha JF, van Rosendael A, Bax J, Reiber JHC, Escaned J, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Serruys PW. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3314-3321. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445.
PubMed 30137305Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PubMed 29101020Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
PubMed 27712739Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, Yang YM, Moussa I, Weisz G, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Kreps EM, Collins M, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 5;45(7):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.066.
PubMed 15808753Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Park HW, Kang SM, Lee JY, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Mintz GS, Park SJ. Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;113(8):1338-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.043. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
PubMed 24685326Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Hur SH, Kim YN, Chung IS, Koo BK, Tahk SJ, Fearon WF, Kim KB. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016.
PubMed 20723852Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28317458
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Angiography-derived Fractional FLow Reserve- And IntraVascular Ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients With CoRonary Artery Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397211
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLAVOUR II / 2019-303
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, Intravascular ultrasound, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Fractional flow reserve
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,872 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Wuhan University, Peking University Third Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, RenJi Hospital, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Changxing People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Ningbo University, Jinhua Central Hospital, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jining First People's Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Ulsan University Hospital, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital, The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
- Study start
- 29 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparison of Angiography-derived Fractional FLow Reserve And IntraVascular Ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with CoRonary Artery Disease
Detailed description
- The primary hypothesis is that angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy for PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) will show non-inferiority in rates of patients-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) at 12 months after randomization, compared with IVUS-guided strategy for PCI with a DES in patients with coronary artery disease.
- Study population and sample size calculation: Sample size calculation based on the event rates of previous trials, investigators predicted the rates of POCO at 12 months after PCI will be 7% in the Angiography-derived FFR-guided arm, and 8% in the IVUS-guided arm
- Primary endpoint: patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, MI, any revascularization) at 12 months after PCI
- Design: non-inferiority, delta = 2.5%
- Sampling ratio: angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy: IVUS-guided strategy = 1:1
- Type I error (α): One-sided 2.5%
- Accrual time: 3 years
- Total time: 4 years (accrual 3 years + follow-up 1 years)
- Assumption: POCO 7.0% vs. 8.0% in angiography-derived FFR or IVUS-guided strategy, respectively
- Statistical power (1- β): 80%
- Primary statistical method: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test
- Estimated attrition rate: total 5%
- Stratification in Randomization: Presence of diabetes mellitus (35% of patients in each group) Based on the above assumption, we would need total 1,872 patients (936 patients in each group) with consideration of an attrition rate.
- Research Materials and Indication for Revascularization: For the angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy arm, criteria for revascularization: angiography-derived FFR ≤ 0.80. For the IVUS-guided strategy arm, the criterion for revascularization is MLA ≤ 3mm2 or [3mm2 < MLA ≤ 4mm2 and plaque burden > 70%].
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Angiography-derived FFR-guided PCI group | Active comparator | Procedure: Angiography-derived FFRPercutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent(s) will be performed by Angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy |
| IVUS-guided PCI group | Active comparator | Procedure: IVUSPercutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent(s) will be performed by IVUS-guided strategy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ① Subject must be ≥ 18 years. ② Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive physiologic or imaging evaluation and PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure. ③ Patients suspected with ischemic heart disease. ④ Patients with ≥ 50% stenosis by angiography-based visual estimation eligible for stent implantation. ⑤ Target vessel size ≥ 2.5mm in visual estimation. ⑥ Target vessels are limited to major epicardial coronary arteries (left anterior descending artery[LAD], left circumflex artery [LCX], right coronary artery [RCA])
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ① The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Contrast media (Patients with documented sensitivity to contrast media which can be effectively premedicated with steroids and diphenhydramine [e.g. rash] may be enrolled.) ② Patients with active pathologic bleeding. ③ Gastrointestinal or genitourinary major bleeding within the prior 3 months. ④ History of bleeding. diathesis, known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). ⑤Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy < 1 year. ⑥ Target vessel total occlusion. ⑦ Target lesion located in coronary arterial bypass graft. ⑧ Left main coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%. ⑨ Not eligible for angiography-derived FFR (ostial RCA ≥ 50% stenosis, myocardial bridging, severe tortuosity, severe overlap, poor image quality)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Angiography-derived FFRThe percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the Angiography-derived FFR-guided strategy arm *Criteria for revascularization: Angiography-derived FFR ≤ 0.80 | Procedure or surgery | Angiography-derived FFR-guided PCI group |
| IVUSThe percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent will be indicated according to following criteria in the IVUS-guided strategy arm *Criteria for revascularization: Minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤ 3mm2 or 3< MLA ≤ 4mm2 \& Plaque burden > 70% | Procedure or surgery | IVUS-guided PCI group |
Primary outcome
Patient-oriented composite outcome
Time frame: 12 months
Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), defined as a composite of all death, myocardial infarction (MI) or any revascularization at 12 months after randomization according to the ARC definitions.
12 secondary outcomes
Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO)
Time frame: 24, 60 months
Target vessel failure
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
All-cause and cardiac death
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any nonfatal MI without peri-procedural MI
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any nonfatal MI with peri-procedural MI
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any target vessel/lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any non-target vessel/lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Any revascularization (ischemia-driven or all)
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Stent thrombosis (definite/probable/possible)
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Acute success of procedure and rate of PCI optimization
Time frame: At discharge (1 week after index procedure)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 22070834Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 25176289De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd K, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Limacher A, Nuesch E, Juni P; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1208-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20298990Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, De Winter O, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010.
- Results publication: PubMed 17531660Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 30963676Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X, Koltowski L, Chang Y, Liu T, Yang J, Andersen BK, Eftekhari A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, Wijns W, Xu B, Holm NR. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):693-701. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28283. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 30586699Fearon WF, Achenbach S, Engstrom T, Assali A, Shlofmitz R, Jeremias A, Fournier S, Kirtane AJ, Kornowski R, Greenberg G, Jubeh R, Kolansky DM, McAndrew T, Dressler O, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Leon MB, De Bruyne B; FAST-FFR Study Investigators. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography. Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):477-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037350.
- Results publication: PubMed 29555835Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, Holck EN, Fox Maule C, Johansen JK, Andreasen LN, Simonsen JK, Zhang Y, Kristensen SD, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, Terkelsen CJ, Krusell LR, Jakobsen L, Reiber JHC, Lassen JF, Bottcher M, Botker HE, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107.
- Results publication: PubMed 29980523Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Di Serafino L, Di Girolamo D, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Botker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.
- Results publication: PubMed 30137305Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, Asano T, Vandeloo B, Kornowski R, Tu S, Westra J, Holm NR, Xu B, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, Miyazaki Y, Katagiri Y, Tenekecioglu E, Modolo R, Chichareon P, Cosyns B, Schoors D, Roosens B, Lochy S, Argacha JF, van Rosendael A, Bax J, Reiber JHC, Escaned J, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Serruys PW. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3314-3321. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445.
- Results publication: PubMed 29101020Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 27712739Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
- Results publication: PubMed 15808753Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, Yang YM, Moussa I, Weisz G, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Kreps EM, Collins M, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 5;45(7):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.066.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The deidentified data will be shared after publication of first manuscript
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jian'an Wang, MD, PhD principal investigator
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
23 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Angiography-derived FFR and IVUS in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 23 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in China, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-oriented composite outcome (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04397211, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2024.