AzTrials
AzTrials

Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IIPhase 2NCT04398199

Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy and Radiation Boost in people with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage II and Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Stage III, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research study is to find out what effects (good or bad) may come from a new way of doing radiation therapy for lung cancer. This study is for patients who are not able to get surgery or chemotherapy with their radiation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy and Radiation Boost
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Oct 2020to 20 Nov 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histological confirmation of non-small cell lung cancer by either biopsy or cytology
  • American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Stage II-III or ultracentral Stage IB disease as determined by PET/CT and MRI Brain
  • Ultracentral disease will be defined as edge of gross visible tumor within 1.0 cm of the proximal bronchial tree.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-3
  • Participant is not eligible for or has declined surgical resection or stereotactic body radiotherapy as determined by the treating physician
  • Participant is not eligible for or has declined concurrent chemotherapy as determined by the treating physician
Show all 9Show fewer
  • While investigators expect it to be an uncommon event, sequential use of systemic therapy after completion of radiation therapy is permissible if the participant's status improves such that they become eligible for such therapies, per the discretion of a multidisciplinary tumor board.
  • Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks of the date of enrollment for women of child-bearing potential.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an IRB-approved informed consent document (either directly or via a legally authorized representative).

Who cannot join

  • History of previous thoracic radiotherapy with the exception of prior radiotherapy for breast cancer without overlap of the fields with the cancer to be treated.
  • Prior systemic therapy or surgery for the study cancer.
  • Prior malignancy within the past two years except for non-melanoma skin cancer, prostate cancer, or any in-situ malignancy.
  • Receipt of anti-angiogenic therapy, such as bevacizumab, within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because radiation therapy has known potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Single Arm Phase II Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Decline or Are Ineligible for Surgery or Chemotherapy

The purpose of this research study is to find out what effects (good or bad) may come from a new way of doing radiation therapy for lung cancer. This study is for patients who are not able to get surgery or chemotherapy with their radiation. The way of doing radiation therapy in this trial is called hypofractionated radiation therapy which is a standard approach, but this study allows the actual tumor to get an extra radiation dose while still protecting the organs that are near the tumor.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

  • To determine the in-field control of hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 70 Gy in 25 fractions without concurrent chemotherapy measured at two years after the first post- radiotherapy scan.

Secondary Objective(s):

  • To determine the toxicity profile of thoracic hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 70 Gy in 25 fractions as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0
  • To determine proportion with local, regional, and distant progression at 1 and 2 years after the first post-radiotherapy scan, and compute progression-free and overall survival (progression-free survival and overall survival, respectively).
Being tested
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy, Radiation Boost
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hypofractionated Radiation TherapyDrug

    The prescribed dose will be 70 Gy in 25 fractions. Participants will radiation therapy once a day for 25 days, Monday through Friday (around 5 weeks).

  • Radiation BoostRadiation

    Undergo simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to treat both planned target volumes with daily image guidance. This approach allows daily confirmation of target localization and simultaneous delivery of lower dose per fraction to low risk areas while maintaining a high dose per fraction to the highest risk areas.

Study groups in NCT04398199
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hypofractionated Radiation TherapyExperimentalHypofractionated radiation therapy will be delivered to all participants. The radiation will be planned in a special way to give the biggest parts of the tumors that are the most difficult to control a little more radiation every day than the lower risk areas.
Receives: Drug: Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy; Radiation: Radiation Boost

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Presence or Absence of In-Field Progression

    In-field progression is defined as growth of the targeted lesions beyond the treated volume. The treated volume will be defined as the 28.75 Gy isodose line (50% of 57.5 Gy). Pathologic confirmation of tumor progression is preferred, but can be determined radiographically by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program consensus if biopsy of the lesion in question is not feasible or safe. Investigators will compare the proportion of the sample with any in-field progression at 2 years to the historical control proportion of 0.5, using a one-sample z-test.

    Measured: At 2 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Proportion of Participants Experiencing Grade 2 or Higher Toxicities

    Toxicities will be evaluated per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 constructed with a 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: 25 months

  2. Proportion of Participants That Experienced Local Progression

    Participants who have experienced local progression by 13 months (1 year following first post-radiotherapy scan) and by 25 months (2 years following first post-radiotherapy scan), and will also compute the same two proportions considering regional progression, distant progression, and any (of the 3 categories) progression. A 95% confidence intervals around these proportions will be constructed. Participants for whom investigators are unable to determine progression status at 1 and 2 years (e.g., because they do not return for the necessary scans, or because they die without evidence of progression) will be left out of these analyses.

    Measured: At 1 and 2 years after first post-radiotherapy scan

  3. Progression-Free Survival

    Progression-free survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to progression of disease or death; those who do not experience either outcome will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  4. Overall Survival

    Overall survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to death from any cause; those who do not die will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2020
  2. Study start16 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion20 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion20 Nov 2020

Why it stopped: Low accruals

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04398199
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00065905
Other IDs
WFBCCC 62220
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
18 May 2020
Last updated
5 Oct 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy and Radiation Boost in people with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage II and Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Stage III, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Presence or Absence of In-Field Progression (time frame: At 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in