Myelodysplastic SyndromesMPO-MDS-DevelpNCT04399018
Development and Prospective Validation of a Standardized Flow Cytometric Assay of Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase Expression for Ruling Out Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
An observational study of Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal bone marrow neoplasms that predominate in the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. The diagnosis of MDS relies on peripheral blood cytopenia and morphologic dysplasia for one or more hematopoietic cell lineage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Diagnostic Test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2020to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Eligible participants are unselected consecutive adults referred for suspected MDS. Suspicion of MDS is based on medical history and peripheral blood cytopenia. To be eligible, patients will be required to meet all five inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
Who may be able to join
- Age at enrollment ≥18 years
- Clinical suspicion of MDS
- Indication for bone marrow examination
- ≥1 peripheral blood cytopenia defined by hemoglobin concentration <12 g/dL for female and <13g/dL for male patients, platelet count <150 x109/L, absolute neutrophil count <1.8 x109/L
- Inpatient and outpatient care patients
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate
- History of or active documented MDS
- Enrollment in intensive or critical care unit
- Incarcerated or individuals protected by French regulation (Article L1121.5 and following, Code de la Santé Publique)
- Not affiliated with social security system
- Previous enrollment in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal bone marrow neoplasms that predominate in the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. The diagnosis of MDS relies on peripheral blood cytopenia and morphologic dysplasia for one or more hematopoietic cell lineage. Cytopenia is evidenced with hemogram while dysplasia requires bone marrow aspirate, which is an invasive procedure .
Considering the low prevalence of disease among subjects referred for suspected MDS, many patients are exposed to unnecessary bone marrow aspiration-related discomfort and harms. Therefore, an objective assay based on a peripheral blood sample that accurately discriminates MDS from other cytopenia etiologies is highly desirable.
Read more
We have previously developed and refined a flow cytometric analysis protocol for quantifying neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood at three university-affiliated hospitals (i.e., Clermont-Ferrand, Saint-Etienne, and Grenoble) (Raskovalova et al, Hematologica 2019). We found that the robust coefficient of variation (RCV, computed as the robust standard deviation divided by the median) within an individual subject was the best parameter in discriminating patients with versus without MDS.
Although promising, flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood is technically complex, time consuming, and not standardized. Hence, its performance requires specific expertise and the results show substantial variability. A single ready-to-use tube with lyophilized antibodies would have the potential to standardize the measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood across laboratories, with results available within 30-60 min in routine practice.
In this study, the investigators hypothesize that a standardized and semi-automatic flow cytometric assay of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood could accurately rule out MDS and obviate the need for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, with sensitivity and negative predictive value estimates approaching 100%.
In this observational diagnostic accuracy study, burden will be null for recruited patients. No specific intervention is assigned to participants. All diagnostic testing, procedures, and medication ordering are performed at the discretion of attending physicians. A test result will have no impact on patient management. .Compliance with current guidelines disseminated by the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) will be advocated for the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected MDS. No follow-up visits are planned in this cross-sectional study.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of MPO-MDS-develop study is to estimate the discriminative accuracy (i.e., area under the ROC curve along with 95% CI) of a standardized and semi-automatic flow cytometric assay of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS in adult patients.
The secondary objectives are to assess:
- intra-laboratory reproducibility (intra- and inter-assay precision) for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood;
- specimen stability for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood at different time points in comparison with H0 (stored at 4°C and at room temperature);
- inter-laboratory reproducibility for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood;
- the negative predictive value for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood (with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) in ruling out MDS in consecutive adult patients.
The MPO-MDS-Develop project is a multicenter, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study of an index test by comparison with a reference standard, in unselected consecutive patients.
Screening: All consecutive patients referred to the immuno-hematology lab at the study sites for suspicion of MDS will be screened for eligibility. A lab physician will review inclusion and exclusion criteria, using computerized medical and laboratory records.
Recruitment: Participants will be included in the study once all the screening activities have been conducted and only if the patient meets all inclusion and none exclusion criteria. The consent for flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood sample and data collection through chart review will be sought under a regime of "non-opposition" (opt-out): after appropriate written information is delivered, cross-sectional data will be collected except in case of opposition from the patient. All patients included in the study will be assigned a unique patient identification number. This number will be used to identify the patient throughout the study.
Index test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood will be performed using a single ready-to-use tube with lyophilized antibodies developed in partnership with Becton Dickinson France SAS and blinded to the reference standard.
Reference standard: The diagnosis of MDS will be established according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, based on clinical data, peripheral blood cytopenia, cytomorphology of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate, and cytogenetic analysis. The criteria for MDS diagnosis are 1) the presence of ≥10% dysplastic cells in any hematopoietic lineage, 2) the exclusion of acute myeloid leukemia (defined by the presence of ≥20% peripheral blood or bone marrow blasts), and 3) the exclusion of reactive etiologies of dysplasia. Cytopenia is defined by hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL, platelet count <100x109/L, and/or absolute neutrophil count <1.8 x109/L. Yet a diagnosis of MDS could be made with milder levels of cytopenia. Idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) is defined by unexplained mild persistent cytopenia for at least 6 months and the failure to establish the diagnosis to MDS according to published guidelines. Consistent with WHO classification, MDS subcategorization will rely on the degree of dysplasia (unilineage versus multilineage), blast percentages, presence of ring sideroblasts, and cytogenetic analysis (del(5q)). The criteria for CMML diagnosis are 1) the presence of persistent peripheral blood monocytosis ≥1 x109/L, and 2) monocyte accounting for more than 10% of the white blood cell differential count. Evaluation of bone marrow cytomorphology will be performed prospectively by experienced hematopathologists who are blinded to the index test results.
Patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is confirmed by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS.
Patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is ruled out by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS. This latter subgroup will include patients with ICUS, as defined in accordance with published guidelines.
Follow-up: No follow-up visit is planned in this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- Diagnostic Test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression
- Keywords
- Diagnostic accuracy study, Flow cytometry analysis, Myeloperoxidase, Peripheral blood sample
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diagnostic Test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expressionOther
Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood samples will be performed within 24 h of MDS diagnostic evaluation and blinded to the reference standard. Peripheral blood samples will be collected in 5 ml (EDTA) anticoagulant plastic tubes and processed within 24 h maximum of collection.
Blood sample will be stained according to the manufacturers' recommendations with a lyophilized cocktail ("LyotubeTM ready-to-use", BD Bioscience).
At least 10,000 neutrophils will be acquired on a 3-laser, 8-color BD FACSCanto-II TM flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San José, CA).
Each marker will be expressed as median, geometric and arithmetic mean, regular and robust coefficient of variation.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reference diagnosis of MDS or CMML established by bone marrow examination
The primary outcome is the reference diagnosis of MDS or CMML established by bone marrow examination (with Perls staining) by two independent experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test results. Disagreements will be solved by a third hematopathologist. Bone marrow aspirate will be repeated within 4 to 6 months for patients with idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) or non-conclusive bone marrow examination.
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (4)
Intra-laboratory coefficient of variation for intra-individual RCV, computed as the standard deviation multiplied by 100 and divided by the mean (intra- and inter-assay precision)
Measured: Baseline
Relative change from baseline, expressed in percentages for intra-individual RCV
Measured: Baseline
Inter-laboratory coefficient of variation for intra-individual RCV
Measured: Baseline
Negative predictive value point estimates (along with 95% confidence interval) of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS or CMML
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2020
- Study start27 Jul 2020
- Primary completionAug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tatiana Raskovalova, MD, Study chair, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble AlpesRichard Veyrat-Masson, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont FerrandCarmen Aanei, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Étienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04399018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 38RC19.425
- Other IDs
- 2019-A03341-56
- Acronym
- MPO-MDS-Develp
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 18 May 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The principal investigators will respond directly to data requests by providing a de-identified data set. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published articles (i.e., main text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be supplied.
Publications
Planta C, Scheffen L, Jacob MC, Szymanski G, Chevalier S, Tondeur S, Bulabois B, Meunier M, Lefebvre C, Gonnet N, Garban F, Molina L, Paradis C, Seigneurin A, Chiriac R, Merle R, Labarere J, Park S, Raskovalova T. Flow cytometric lyophilised reagent tube assay for peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression to rule out myelodysplastic neoplasms at a university hospital: a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e095640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095640.
PubMed 40846335Raskovalova T, Scheffen L, Jacob MC, Chevalier S, Tondeur S, Bulabois B, Meunier M, Szymanski G, Lefebvre C, Planta C, Dumestre-Perard C, Gonnet N, Garban F, Merle R, Park S, Labarere J. Flow cytometry lyophilised-reagent tube for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MPO-MDS-Develop): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e065850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065850.
PubMed 36207039
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Prospective Validation of a Standardized Flow Cytometric Assay of Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase Expression for Ruling Out Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04399018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MPO-MDS-Develp / 38RC19.425
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- Diagnostic accuracy study, Flow cytometry analysis, Myeloperoxidase, Peripheral blood sample
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal bone marrow neoplasms that predominate in the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. The diagnosis of MDS relies on peripheral blood cytopenia and morphologic dysplasia for one or more hematopoietic cell lineage. Cytopenia is evidenced with hemogram while dysplasia requires bone marrow aspirate, which is an invasive procedure .
Considering the low prevalence of disease among subjects referred for suspected MDS, many patients are exposed to unnecessary bone marrow aspiration-related discomfort and harms. Therefore, an objective assay based on a peripheral blood sample that accurately discriminates MDS from other cytopenia etiologies is highly desirable.
We have previously developed and refined a flow cytometric analysis protocol for quantifying neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood at three university-affiliated hospitals (i.e., Clermont-Ferrand, Saint-Etienne, and Grenoble) (Raskovalova et al, Hematologica 2019). We found that the robust coefficient of variation (RCV, computed as the robust standard deviation divided by the median) within an individual subject was the best parameter in discriminating patients with versus without MDS.
Although promising, flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood is technically complex, time consuming, and not standardized. Hence, its performance requires specific expertise and the results show substantial variability. A single ready-to-use tube with lyophilized antibodies would have the potential to standardize the measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood across laboratories, with results available within 30-60 min in routine practice.
In this study, the investigators hypothesize that a standardized and semi-automatic flow cytometric assay of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood could accurately rule out MDS and obviate the need for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, with sensitivity and negative predictive value estimates approaching 100%.
In this observational diagnostic accuracy study, burden will be null for recruited patients. No specific intervention is assigned to participants. All diagnostic testing, procedures, and medication ordering are performed at the discretion of attending physicians. A test result will have no impact on patient management. .Compliance with current guidelines disseminated by the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) will be advocated for the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected MDS. No follow-up visits are planned in this cross-sectional study.
Detailed description
The primary objective of MPO-MDS-develop study is to estimate the discriminative accuracy (i.e., area under the ROC curve along with 95% CI) of a standardized and semi-automatic flow cytometric assay of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS in adult patients.
The secondary objectives are to assess:
- intra-laboratory reproducibility (intra- and inter-assay precision) for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood;
- specimen stability for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood at different time points in comparison with H0 (stored at 4°C and at room temperature);
- inter-laboratory reproducibility for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood;
- the negative predictive value for intra-individual RCV measurement of neutrophil MPO expression in peripheral blood (with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) in ruling out MDS in consecutive adult patients.
The MPO-MDS-Develop project is a multicenter, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study of an index test by comparison with a reference standard, in unselected consecutive patients.
Screening: All consecutive patients referred to the immuno-hematology lab at the study sites for suspicion of MDS will be screened for eligibility. A lab physician will review inclusion and exclusion criteria, using computerized medical and laboratory records.
Recruitment: Participants will be included in the study once all the screening activities have been conducted and only if the patient meets all inclusion and none exclusion criteria. The consent for flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood sample and data collection through chart review will be sought under a regime of "non-opposition" (opt-out): after appropriate written information is delivered, cross-sectional data will be collected except in case of opposition from the patient. All patients included in the study will be assigned a unique patient identification number. This number will be used to identify the patient throughout the study.
Index test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood will be performed using a single ready-to-use tube with lyophilized antibodies developed in partnership with Becton Dickinson France SAS and blinded to the reference standard.
Reference standard: The diagnosis of MDS will be established according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, based on clinical data, peripheral blood cytopenia, cytomorphology of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate, and cytogenetic analysis. The criteria for MDS diagnosis are 1) the presence of ≥10% dysplastic cells in any hematopoietic lineage, 2) the exclusion of acute myeloid leukemia (defined by the presence of ≥20% peripheral blood or bone marrow blasts), and 3) the exclusion of reactive etiologies of dysplasia. Cytopenia is defined by hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL, platelet count <100x109/L, and/or absolute neutrophil count <1.8 x109/L. Yet a diagnosis of MDS could be made with milder levels of cytopenia. Idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) is defined by unexplained mild persistent cytopenia for at least 6 months and the failure to establish the diagnosis to MDS according to published guidelines. Consistent with WHO classification, MDS subcategorization will rely on the degree of dysplasia (unilineage versus multilineage), blast percentages, presence of ring sideroblasts, and cytogenetic analysis (del(5q)). The criteria for CMML diagnosis are 1) the presence of persistent peripheral blood monocytosis ≥1 x109/L, and 2) monocyte accounting for more than 10% of the white blood cell differential count. Evaluation of bone marrow cytomorphology will be performed prospectively by experienced hematopathologists who are blinded to the index test results.
Patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is confirmed by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS.
Patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is ruled out by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS. This latter subgroup will include patients with ICUS, as defined in accordance with published guidelines.
Follow-up: No follow-up visit is planned in this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Eligible participants are unselected consecutive adults referred for suspected MDS. Suspicion of MDS is based on medical history and peripheral blood cytopenia. To be eligible, patients will be required to meet all five inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age at enrollment ≥18 years
- Clinical suspicion of MDS
- Indication for bone marrow examination
- ≥1 peripheral blood cytopenia defined by hemoglobin concentration <12 g/dL for female and <13g/dL for male patients, platelet count <150 x109/L, absolute neutrophil count <1.8 x109/L
- Inpatient and outpatient care patients
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Refusal to participate
- History of or active documented MDS
- Enrollment in intensive or critical care unit
- Incarcerated or individuals protected by French regulation (Article L1121.5 and following, Code de la Santé Publique)
- Not affiliated with social security system
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Test: Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expressionFlow cytometry analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood samples will be performed within 24 h of MDS diagnostic evaluation and blinded to the reference standard. Peripheral blood samples will be collected in 5 ml (EDTA) anticoagulant plastic tubes and processed within 24 h maximum of collection. Blood sample will be stained according to the manufacturers' recommendations with a lyophilized cocktail ("LyotubeTM ready-to-use", BD Bioscience). At least 10,000 neutrophils will be acquired on a 3-laser, 8-color BD FACSCanto-II TM flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San José, CA). Each marker will be expressed as median, geometric and arithmetic mean, regular and robust coefficient of variation. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Reference diagnosis of MDS or CMML established by bone marrow examination
Time frame: Baseline
The primary outcome is the reference diagnosis of MDS or CMML established by bone marrow examination (with Perls staining) by two independent experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test results. Disagreements will be solved by a third hematopathologist. Bone marrow aspirate will be repeated within 4 to 6 months for patients with idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) or non-conclusive bone marrow examination.
4 secondary outcomes
Intra-laboratory coefficient of variation for intra-individual RCV, computed as the standard deviation multiplied by 100 and divided by the mean (intra- and inter-assay precision)
Time frame: Baseline
Relative change from baseline, expressed in percentages for intra-individual RCV
Time frame: Baseline
Inter-laboratory coefficient of variation for intra-individual RCV
Time frame: Baseline
Negative predictive value point estimates (along with 95% confidence interval) of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS or CMML
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40846335Planta C, Scheffen L, Jacob MC, Szymanski G, Chevalier S, Tondeur S, Bulabois B, Meunier M, Lefebvre C, Gonnet N, Garban F, Molina L, Paradis C, Seigneurin A, Chiriac R, Merle R, Labarere J, Park S, Raskovalova T. Flow cytometric lyophilised reagent tube assay for peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression to rule out myelodysplastic neoplasms at a university hospital: a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e095640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095640.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36207039Raskovalova T, Scheffen L, Jacob MC, Chevalier S, Tondeur S, Bulabois B, Meunier M, Szymanski G, Lefebvre C, Planta C, Dumestre-Perard C, Gonnet N, Garban F, Merle R, Park S, Labarere J. Flow cytometry lyophilised-reagent tube for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MPO-MDS-Develop): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e065850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065850.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The principal investigators will respond directly to data requests by providing a de-identified data set. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published articles (i.e., main text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be supplied.
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Trisomy 8-Associated Autoinflammatory Disease (TRIAD) and Related Disorders
Trisomy 8 Mosaicism, Trisomy 8 Associated Autoinflammatory Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Overlap Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study in Adult Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) to Evaluate How Safe Long-term Treatment With Pozelimab + Cemdisiran Combination Therapy is and How Well it Works
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
RecruitingPhase 2
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia and Other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Using G-CSF Mobilized CD34+ Selected Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Co-Infused With a Reduced Dose of Non-Mobilized Donor T-cells
Severe Aplastic Anemia, MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tatiana Raskovalova, MD study chair
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes
Richard Veyrat-Masson, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont Ferrand
Carmen Aanei, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Étienne
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reference diagnosis of MDS or CMML established by bone marrow examination (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04399018, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2024.