AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyNCT04403113

The Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Feeding and Swallowing.

A study testing Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises, Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies and Caregiver training related to feeding in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our study is planned to investigate the effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises, which are structured from Neurodevelopmental therapy method-Bobath concept (NDT-B) principles, on feeding and swallowing activity in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) who take feeding and oral motor intervention strategies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 54 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy
What is being tested?
Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises, Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies and Caregiver training related to feeding
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
30 Apr 2018to 15 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 54 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Cases with Cerebral Palsy who had difficulties in feeding/swallowing skills.
  • Cases who were cooperative without communication barriers and volunteering to participate in the study were included.

Who cannot join

  • In the Videoendoscopic Swallowing Study, he/she was not included in the study if he/she had an aspiration or aspiration risk, had advanced vision and hearing loss, used any pharmacological agent to inhibit spasticity, or had undergone orthopaedic surgery or Botulinum Toxin-A injection in the past six months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Pendik, 0216 625 45 45/34899

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Feeding and Swallowing Activities in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Our study is planned to investigate the effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises, which are structured from Neurodevelopmental therapy method-Bobath concept (NDT-B) principles, on feeding and swallowing activity in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) who take feeding and oral motor intervention strategies. The cases were divided into two groups, which is the group receiving feeding and oral motor intervention strategies+structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises (n=20) (Study Group) and those receiving feeding and oral motor intervention strategies (n=20) (Control Group).

Read the detailed description

Feeding and oral motor interventions address different aspects of feeding difficulties, reflecting the range in specific problems associated with feeding and nutrition in CP.

The trunk plays an important role in the organization of postural control and balance reactions because it holds the centre of all body mass and holds therefore, the centre of gravity. The trunk also provides stable attachment points to those muscles that control the head and neck regions. "Neck and trunk stabilization exercises" were the basis of static and dynamic balance abilities, and that increased neck and trunk stability might have had a positive effect thereon.

To achieve the alignment of the head with the trunk, the pelvis must be stabilized. This has important consequences for the entire process of swallowing. If the head is not stable, then the fine movements of the jaw and tongue needed for feeding will be impaired. With feeding and oral motor interventions and structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises, these parameters are positively affected.

Conditions
Cerebral Palsy
Being tested
Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises, Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies, Caregiver training related to feeding
Keywords
Neck-trunk stabilization exercise. Feeding. Swallowing
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercisesOther

    Intensive structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises based on Neurodevelopmental therapy method-Bobath concept principles. These exercises were performed for 6 weeks, 2 days a week, 45 minutes for a total of 12 sessions.

  • Feeding and oral motor intervention strategiesOther

    Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies program were performed for 6 weeks, 2 days a week, 45 minutes for a total of 12 sessions.

  • Caregiver training related to feedingOther

    In caregiver training related to feeding; a) positioning and feeding technique during feeding, b) ensuring safety for aspiration, c) using suitable containers and ingredients, d) adjusting (adapting) food consistency properly, e) preparing small amounts of high-calorie, balanced diet and f) reducing food spillage while feeding and how to ensure efficacy for shortening the feeding time, g) providing appropriate postural and physical support for self-feeding. All of these activities were continued for 6 weeks with a home program.

Study groups in NCT04403113
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study Group (SG)Experimentalfeeding and oral motor intervention strategies+structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises+caregiver training related to feeding (Study Group)
Receives: Other: Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises; Other: Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies; Other: Caregiver training related to feeding
Control Group (CG).Placebo comparatorfeeding and oral motor intervention strategies+caregiver training related to feeding (Control Group)
Receives: Other: Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies; Other: Caregiver training related to feeding

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)

    The gross motor functions of children with cerebral palsy were classified with GMFCS. GMFCS is a 5-level classification system. It uses gross motor skills. The aim is to present an idea of how self-sufficient a child can be at home, at school, and outdoor and indoor venues. GMFCS includes levels that reflect abilities ranging from unlimited walking (level I) to severe head and trunk control limitations. Requires extensive use of assisted technology and physical assistance, and wheelchair (level V). The higher level in GMFCS means a worse and severe outcome. The low levels mean good motor function.

    Measured: Immediately before the intervention, the evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).

  2. the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS)

    EDACS describes the eating and drinking skills of children with cerebral palsy from the age of 3. It is an ordered scale that defines the degree of assistance required during the meal and the individual's ability to eat and drink between five levels. Level I, safely and efficiently eating and drinking; at level V, it indicates unable to eat or drink safely, relies on tube feeding and is at high risk for aspiration.

    Measured: Immediately before the intervention, the evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).

  3. the Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (Mini-MACS)

    Mini-MACS is a functional classification that defines how children with cerebral palsy between the ages of 1 and 4 use their hands while holding objects in daily activities. Skill classes at five levels, based on the need for self-help and adaptation when children hold objects. Level I. Handles objects easily and successfully. Level V. Does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions.

    Measured: Immediately before the intervention, the evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).

  4. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)

    TIS is a validated scale for cerebral palsy that evaluates the trunk functionally in terms of strength in a sitting position. It also complies with the International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health in terms of evaluating the static and dynamic balance and trunk coordination of the trunk and the relationship between body function and structures. TIS consists of three subscales: static, dynamic and coordination. For each item; sequential scales with 2, 3 or 4 values are used. The highest scores that can be obtained from the static, dynamic and coordination subscales are; it is 7, 10 and 6 points. Total points are obtained by adding all subscales. The total TIS score ranges from 0 to 23. A high score indicates good trunk control.

    Measured: Change from TIS was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).

  5. Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA)

    SOMA is a measure which identifies "oral-motor dysfunction" (OMD). SOMA involves videotaping children and later assessing their feeding skills. Test was implemented in the presence of the child's main caregiver. The entire assessment lasted 20-30 minutes. SOMA has 7 subcategories. Each subcategory has its own cut-off point. Among the "yes" or "no" options opposite the observed parameters, the appropriate one is marked. In some options, the "yes" option indicates an abnormal function, while in some options the "no" option indicates the presence of an abnormal function. BOTTLE, TRAINER CUP, CUP(Cutting Score): ≥ 5 indicates OMD. < 5 indicates normal oral-motor function(OMF). PUREE: ≥ 3 indicates OMD. < 3 indicates normal OMF. SEMI-SOLIDS, SOLIDS: ≥ 4 indicates OMD. < 4 indicates normal OMF. CRACKER: ≥ 9 indicates OMD. < 9 indicates normal OMF. BOTTLE, CUP, PUREE, SOLIDS; minimum(mi) score: 0, maximum(ma): 9. TRAINER CUP; mi: 0, ma: 14. SEMI-SOLIDS; mi: 0, ma: 8. CRACKER; mi: 0, ma: 22.

    Measured: Change from SOMA was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session, Before treatment), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session, After treatment).

  6. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)

    The Quality of Life Scale for Children is a general quality of life scale which assesses the physical and psychosocial experiences independent of disease in children between the ages of 2 and 18 years. The scale is composed of 23 items. The items are scored between 0 and 100. The higher the score for the Quality of Life Scale for children, the better is the perception of health-related quality of life. In our study, the total score of the scale was used.

    Measured: Change from PedsQL was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 May 2020
  2. Study start30 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion31 May 2019
  4. Study completion15 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04403113
Sponsor's protocol ID
09.2018.278
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
21 May 2020
Last updated
8 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Acar G, Ejraei N, Turkdogan D, Enver N, Ozturk G, Aktas G. The Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Feeding and Swallowing Activities in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):800-811. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10329-w. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

    PubMed 34173063

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Structured neck and trunk stabilization exercises, Feeding and oral motor intervention strategies and Caregiver training related to feeding in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (time frame: Immediately before the intervention, the evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04403113, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in