AzTrials
AzTrials

CholedocholithiasisASDNCT04406961

Endoscopic Antegrade Sphincterotomy (ASD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy

A study testing Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko., The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko. and Endoscopic sphincterotomy. in people with Choledocholithiasis and Papillary Stenosis, run by Military Medical Clinical Center of the Southern Region, Ukraine at 1 site in Ukraine.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko (Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko, ASD) with conventional pull-type endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in patients undergoing transpapillary interventions for various indications, including biliary stone disease, major… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 102 years
What is being tested?
Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko., The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko. and Endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,521 participants
Where
1 siteUkraine
Study dates
1 Jan 2020to 21 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 102 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Gallstone Disease. Must have anatomy of the esophagus of the stomach and duodenum for the introduction of a duodenoscope to the major duodenal papilla.

Who cannot join

  • The acute form of viral hepatitis of any etiology. Acute decompensated heart failure complicated by respiratory failure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ukraine1 site
  • Oleg Dovbenko

    Odesa, Odesa Oblast, 65044

Other trials in Ukraine

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko (ASD) With Conventional Pull-Type Sphincterotomy in Patients Undergoing ERCP

This study compares endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko (Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko, ASD) with conventional pull-type endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in patients undergoing transpapillary interventions for various indications, including biliary stone disease, major duodenal papilla stenosis, choledocholithiasis, and other conditions requiring access to the biliary and/or pancreatic ducts. The ASD technique is performed using a dedicated sphincterotome designed by Dr. Dovbenko. Both the technique and the device are patented in Ukraine (Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019). This instrument enables selective incision of only the circular muscle layer of the sphincter of Oddi, thereby preserving its sphincteric function and minimizing trauma to the duodenal wall. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the relative risk of procedure-related complications, including bleeding, perforation, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and the need for cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Anatomical studies confirm that the sphincter of Oddi comprises an inner circular muscle layer, functionally and structurally distinct from the duodenum, and an outer longitudinal layer derived from the duodenal wall. Preservation of this architecture is critical to maintaining sphincteric function. Standard pull-type sphincterotomy frequently disrupts both layers and adjacent duodenal tissue, contributing to procedure-related complications in up to 23% of ERCPs, including bleeding (≤3%), perforation (≤1%), and post-sphincterotomy reflux complications.

Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko (ASD) was developed to address these limitations. Using a dedicated sphincterotome (Ukrainian Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019), ASD enables selective incision of the circular layer while sparing the longitudinal layer and duodenal integrity.

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial (NCT04406961) enrolled 1,521 patients requiring transpapillary intervention for biliary or pancreatic indications. Patients were assigned to ASD (n=761) or conventional EST (n=760).

In the ASD group, a trend toward reduced major complications was observed (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.18-1.67); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the low absolute number of events. Notably, cholecystectomy was avoided in 71.2% of ASD patients with gallstone disease, compared to approximately 10% in the EST group. Temporary stenting (5-10 days) was used selectively to manage post-procedural edema. ASD should be performed exclusively by endoscopists with advanced transpapillary expertise.

Being tested
Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko., The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko., Endoscopic sphincterotomy., The standard sphincterotome.
Keywords
endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy (ASD), antegrade sphincterotome, preservation of the function of the sph. of Oddi, avoid cholecystectomy
Medical subject headings
Choledocholithiasis, Cholelithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko.Procedure or surgery

    Also called ASD

    Sph. Oddi consists of a longitudinal and circular smooth muscle layers. Circular muscle fibers form the pancreatic and duodenal parts. Anatomical justification was cutting of only the circular layer of sph Oddi by special sphincterotome. Papillary stenosis and stenosis terminal part of common bile duct due to damage only circular layer sph Oddi. Anterograde direction and hooked form of sphincterotome (endoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy- ASD) allows to capture only need layer and control depth. Also ASD was performed patient with SOD (I-III) with preservation of the longitudinal muscular layer sph Oddi and septum of papilla.

  • The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko.Device

    A device is represented by a teflon catheter in the distal part of which a double tube of variable shape is created. The proximal part of the ASD sphincterotome consists of a handle, and a metal wire is located inside the teflon catheter for connection to an electrosurgical unit. On the distal part, the teflon catheter is formed of a double tube length is 10 to 35 mm. The metal wire exits the catheter at a distance 10 to 35 mm from the tip and enters into the tip the second teflon tube. The distal part of the knife is formed shape a hook. A metal cutting wire is located between two tubes. Moving the handle the metal wire is shifted. Pushing the metal wire or approaching in the distal part the second tube sets the depth of cut. The incision is made by moving on guidewire in bile duct. The power settings vary.

  • Endoscopic sphincterotomy.Procedure or surgery

    Endoscopic standard sphincterotomy aims at opening bile duct or pancreatic duct by cutting the papilla and sphincter muscles. After deep bile duct cannulation, the standard sphincterotome is retracted until one fourth to one half of the wire length is exposed outside the papilla. The sphincterotome is slightly bowed so that the wire is in contact with the roof. The incision is made lifting the sphincterotome against the papillary roof using the elevator and up-down controls while applying short bursts of current. The power settings vary. The extent of the sphincterotomy is limited by the length of the intraduodenal portion of the common bile duct.

  • The standard sphincterotome.Device

    Also called "pull-type" model, the Erlangen.

    The standard sphincterotome, the Erlangen "pull-type" model, consists of a catheter containing a cautery wire exposed 15 to 25 mm near the tip of the instrument. The leading tip distal to the wire, the "nose," is 5 to 10 mm in diameter. After deep bile duct cannulation, the sphincterotome is retracted slowly, until one fourth to one half of the wire length is exposed outside the papilla. The sphincterotome is slightly bowed so that the wire is in contact with the roof. The incision is made by lifting the sphincterotome against the papillary roof using the elevator and up-down controls while applying short bursts of current. The power settings vary.

Study groups in NCT04406961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard sphincterotomy.Active comparatorPatients in this group underwent conventional retrograde endoscopic sphincterotomy using a standard Erlangen-type "pull" sphincterotome. Following deep biliary cannulation, the sphincterotome was used to perform a standard pull-type incision across the major duodenal papilla. In 20% of cases, a needle-knife precut papillotomy was performed to facilitate biliary access. A total of 760 patients were enrolled in this arm. Procedure-related complications were prospectively recorded, including: post-ERCP pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, recurrent choledocholithiasis, and papillary restenosis.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic sphincterotomy.; Device: The standard sphincterotome.
Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko (ASD)ExperimentalPatients underwent endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy (Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko, ASD) using a dedicated sphincterotome designed by Dr. Dovbenko (Ukrainian Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019). Following deep biliary cannulation, the sphincterotome was advanced transpapillary and used to perform an antegrade incision selectively targeting only the circular muscle layer of the sphincter of Oddi, with preservation of the longitudinal layer and duodenal integrity. In 20% of cases, needle-knife precut papillotomy was performed to facilitate initial biliary cannulation.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko.; Device: The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite incidence of major procedure-related adverse events

    Proportion of participants experiencing at least one of the following within 30 days: (1) post-ERCP pancreatitis (serum lipase ≥3× upper limit of normal plus abdominal pain persisting ≥24 hours requiring prolonged or unplanned hospitalization); (2) clinically significant bleeding (hemoglobin drop ≥2 g/dL and/or need for endoscopic, radiological, or surgical intervention); (3) duodenal or biliary perforation confirmed by imaging or surgery.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after the procedure.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of papillary restenosis requiring re-intervention

    Papillary restenosis is defined as recurrent biliary obstruction confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI, or cholangiography), characterized by:

    1. common bile duct diameter >11 mm, and
    2. total bilirubin >60 µmol/L (≈3.5 mg/dL) in the absence of other causes of obstruction.

    Only cases requiring endoscopic, radiological, or surgical re-intervention are counted as events.

    Measured: From 6 months to 5 years after the procedure

  2. Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

    Post-ERCP pancreatitis is defined as new-onset abdominal pain persisting for at least 24 hours plus serum lipase level at least 3 times the upper limit of normal, requiring prolonged or unplanned hospitalization for pain management and monitoring.

    Measured: Within 72 hours after the procedure

  3. Incidence of duodenal or biliary perforation.

    Perforation is defined as a full-thickness defect of the duodenal or bile duct wall, confirmed by: (1) extraluminal contrast on cholangiography or fluoroscopy, (2) free air on abdominal X-ray or CT scan, or (3) intraoperative diagnosis. Perforations are classified as periampullary, duodenal, or biliary.

    Measured: From the start of the procedure up to 30 days after.

  4. Incidence of clinically significant post-sphincterotomy bleeding

    Clinically significant bleeding is defined as: (1) a decrease in hemoglobin level of ≥2 g/dL from pre-procedure baseline, and/or (2) requirement for endoscopic, radiological, or surgical intervention to achieve hemostasis. Minor oozing not requiring intervention is not counted as an event.

    Measured: From the start of the procedure up to 30 days after

  5. Rate of cholecystectomy within 12 months

    Proportion of participants with concomitant gallstone disease who undergo cholecystectomy within 12 months following the index ERCP procedure, regardless of symptoms. Only elective or urgent cholecystectomies performed for biliary pathology are included; procedures for unrelated indications are excluded.

    Measured: From the date of the procedure up to 12 months

  6. Technical success: complete bile duct stone clearance

    Defined as the absence of residual filling defects in the common bile duct on post-procedure cholangiography (intraoperative or fluoroscopic). Clearance is confirmed before the end of the index ERCP session.

    Measured: During the procedure

  7. Need for repeat ERCP within 30 days

    Proportion of participants requiring a repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) within 30 days after the index procedure due to: (1) incomplete stone clearance, (2) recurrent biliary obstruction, (3) post-procedure complications (e.g., cholangitis, bleeding, or stent dysfunction), or (4) other biliary or pancreatic indications directly related to the initial intervention.

    Elective ERCP for unrelated reasons is excluded.

    Measured: From the date of the index procedure up to 30 days after

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion21 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This parallel-group, randomized controlled trial compares two endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques in patients undergoing transpapillary interventions: (1) conventional pull-type endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and (2) antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko (Antegrade Sphincterotomy Dovbenko, ASD), which selectively incises only the circular muscle layer of the sphincter of Oddi using a dedicated sphincterotome (Ukrainian Patent No. UA 117987C2, 2019). The primary analysis evaluates the relative risk and 95% confidence interval for procedure-related complications, including bleeding, perforation, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and need for cholecystectomy.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,521 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04406961
Sponsor's protocol ID
Protocol-273
Other IDs
273
Acronym
ASD
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
2 May 2020
Last updated
7 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial, including de-identified baseline characteristics, procedural details, outcomes, and adverse events, will be available.

Publications

  • Dovbenko O, Herasymenko O. Endoscopic management of hepaticojejunal anastomosis fistula after Whipple's resection. Endoscopy. 2024 Dec;56(S 01):E72-E73. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-0276. Epub 2024 Jan 23. No abstract available.

    PubMed 38262462

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endoscopic transpapillary antegrade sphincterotomy developed by Dr. Dovbenko., The antegrade sphincterotome developed by Dr. Dovbenko. and Endoscopic sphincterotomy. in people with Choledocholithiasis and Papillary Stenosis, run by Military Medical Clinical Center of the Southern Region, Ukraine at 1 site in Ukraine.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite incidence of major procedure-related adverse events (time frame: Up to 30 days after the procedure.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04406961, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in