AppendicitisNCT04407117
Appendicitis During the National Lockdown During the COVID-19 Pandemic
An observational study of Appendicitis, run by Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The study aims to examine whether a nationwide lock-down with an entire population subjugated to social distancing reduces the incidence of appendicitis. If a reduction is detected it supports the hypothesis that infectious disease may play a role in the etiology of appendicitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Appendicitis
- What is being tested?
- Lock-down and social distancing
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 6,000,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 23 Mar 2017to 19 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All persons registered in the Danish National Patient Register, i.e. all persons resident in Denmark
Who may be able to join
- Registered in the Danish National Patient Register during the study period
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Change in the Incidence of Appendicitis in a Controlled Environment During the National Lockdown Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic
The study aims to examine whether a nationwide lock-down with an entire population subjugated to social distancing reduces the incidence of appendicitis. If a reduction is detected it supports the hypothesis that infectious disease may play a role in the etiology of appendicitis.
- Conditions
- Appendicitis
- Being tested
- Lock-down and social distancing
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Pandemic, Incidence
- Medical subject headings
- Appendicitis, COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lock-down and social distancingBehavioural
Lock-down and social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Appendectomy
Appendectomy or other surgery for appendicitis
Measured: 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Postoperative length of stay
Postoperative length of stay
Measured: 30 days
Mortality
Overall mortality
Measured: 30 days
Incidence of complicated appendicitis
Perforated appendicitis or periappendicular abscess
Measured: 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2020
- Study start23 Mar 2017
- Primary completion19 Apr 2020
- Study completion19 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AppendicitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 6,000,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD, Nordsjaellands Hospital
- Investigators
- Claus A Bertelsen, PhD, Study director, Nordsjaellands Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04407117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APPCOVID-19
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 27 May 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
PubMed 2239906Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
PubMed 26460662Lamps LW. Infectious causes of appendicitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;24(4):995-1018, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2010.07.012.
PubMed 20937462Dzabic M, Bostrom L, Rahbar A. High prevalence of an active cytomegalovirus infection in the appendix of immunocompetent patients with acute appendicitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008 Feb;14(2):236-41. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20299.
PubMed 17973298Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000 Feb;4(1):46-58. doi: 10.1016/s1092-9134(00)90011-x.
PubMed 10684382Hsu YJ, Fu YW, Chin T. Seasonal variations in the occurrence of acute appendicitis and their relationship with the presence of fecaliths in children. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 16;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1824-9.
PubMed 31731890Wei PL, Chen CS, Keller JJ, Lin HC. Monthly variation in acute appendicitis incidence: a 10-year nationwide population-based study. J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):670-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
PubMed 22795352Stein GY, Rath-Wolfson L, Zeidman A, Atar E, Marcus O, Joubran S, Ram E. Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;397(7):1087-92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0958-0. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
PubMed 22661078Ilves I, Fagerstrom A, Herzig KH, Juvonen P, Miettinen P, Paajanen H. Seasonal variations of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain in Finland. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4037-42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4037.
PubMed 24833844Reinisch A, Heil J, Woeste G, Bechstein W, Liese J. The meteorological influence on seasonal alterations in the course of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2017 Sep;217:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 10.
PubMed 28599958Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
PubMed 21775347Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965.
PubMed 21775345Kleif J, Thygesen LC, Gogenur I. Validity of the diagnosis of appendicitis in the Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2020 Feb;48(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/1403494818761765. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
PubMed 29554842Jantzen AT, Bang-Nielsen A, Bertelsen CA, Torp-Pedersen C, Kleif J. Incidence of appendicitis during COVID-19 lockdown: A nationwide population-based study. Scand J Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;111(2):14574969221089387. doi: 10.1177/14574969221089387.
PubMed 35488422
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Change in the Incidence of Appendicitis in a Controlled Environment During the National Lockdown Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04407117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APPCOVID-19
- Conditions
- Appendicitis
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Pandemic, Incidence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6,000,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to examine whether a nationwide lock-down with an entire population subjugated to social distancing reduces the incidence of appendicitis. If a reduction is detected it supports the hypothesis that infectious disease may play a role in the etiology of appendicitis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All persons registered in the Danish National Patient Register, i.e. all persons resident in Denmark
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Registered in the Danish National Patient Register during the study period
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lock-down and social distancingLock-down and social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Appendectomy
Time frame: 5 weeks
Appendectomy or other surgery for appendicitis
3 secondary outcomes
Postoperative length of stay
Time frame: 30 days
Mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of complicated appendicitis
Time frame: 5 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 2239906Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
- Background: PubMed 26460662Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
- Background: PubMed 20937462Lamps LW. Infectious causes of appendicitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;24(4):995-1018, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2010.07.012.
- Background: PubMed 17973298Dzabic M, Bostrom L, Rahbar A. High prevalence of an active cytomegalovirus infection in the appendix of immunocompetent patients with acute appendicitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008 Feb;14(2):236-41. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20299.
- Background: PubMed 10684382Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000 Feb;4(1):46-58. doi: 10.1016/s1092-9134(00)90011-x.
- Background: PubMed 31731890Hsu YJ, Fu YW, Chin T. Seasonal variations in the occurrence of acute appendicitis and their relationship with the presence of fecaliths in children. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 16;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1824-9.
- Background: PubMed 22795352Wei PL, Chen CS, Keller JJ, Lin HC. Monthly variation in acute appendicitis incidence: a 10-year nationwide population-based study. J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):670-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
- Background: PubMed 22661078Stein GY, Rath-Wolfson L, Zeidman A, Atar E, Marcus O, Joubran S, Ram E. Sex differences in the epidemiology, seasonal variation, and trends in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;397(7):1087-92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0958-0. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 24833844Ilves I, Fagerstrom A, Herzig KH, Juvonen P, Miettinen P, Paajanen H. Seasonal variations of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain in Finland. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4037-42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4037.
- Background: PubMed 28599958Reinisch A, Heil J, Woeste G, Bechstein W, Liese J. The meteorological influence on seasonal alterations in the course of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2017 Sep;217:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 21775347Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
- Background: PubMed 21775345Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Appendicitis
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comparison of Pro-Adrenomedullin, C-Reactive Protein, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Acute Appendicitis
Active, not recruiting
PAINED: Project Addressing INequities in the Emergency Department
Pain, Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis
Appendicitis, Perforated Appendicitis
Recruiting
Feasibility and Safety of a Pediatric ERAS Protocol for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Acute Appendicitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Laparoscopic Antibiotic Lavage to Prevent Intra-abdominal Abscess Formation in Complicated Appendicitis
Complicated Appendicitis, Intra-Abdominal Abscess
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claus A Bertelsen, PhD study director
Nordsjaellands Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Appendicitis, run by Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Appendectomy (time frame: 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04407117, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2020.