LGBTQNCT04408469
A Trial of Online LGBTQ-affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Depression and Associated Health Risks Among Young Adults
A study testing Online EQuIP in people with LGBTQ and Sexual Behavior, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is to test the efficacy of an online CBT intervention (EQuIP) that addresses the pathways through which minority stress compromises LGBTQ young adults' co-occurring mental (e.g., depression) and behavioral (e.g., substance use, condomless anal sex) health problems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- LGBTQ, Sexual Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Online EQuIP
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 May 2020to 18 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- identify as lesbian, bisexual, gay, or another sexual minority identity (e.g., pansexual, demisexual)
- past-week symptoms of depression or anxiety using the Brief Symptom Inventory-4 cutoff of 2.5 on either the depression subscale or anxiety subscale
- weekly access to internet on a laptop, desktop, or tablet device
- ability to read, write, and speak in English
- provision of informed consent.
Who cannot join
- current active suicidality or homicidality (defined as active intent or concrete plan, as opposed to passive suicidal ideation)
- evidence of active untreated mania, psychosis, or gross cognitive impairment - current enrollment in an intervention study
- current enrollment in intensive mental health treatment (i.e., receiving mental health treatment more than once per month or 8 or more sessions of CBT within the past year.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online LGBTQ-affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Depression and Associated Health Risks Among Young Adults
This study is to test the efficacy of an online CBT intervention (EQuIP) that addresses the pathways through which minority stress compromises LGBTQ young adults' co-occurring mental (e.g., depression) and behavioral (e.g., substance use, condomless anal sex) health problems. This purpose of this study is to determine if the treatment is efficacious when delivered online and if its efficacy exceeds that of the self-monitoring control.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of an LGBTQ-affirmative online CBT treatment and whether such an LGBTQ-affirmative focus adds benefit, a 2-arm RCT that would examine (1) whether online EQuIP demonstrates significant mental health improvements compared to self-monitoring of stress and mood, and (2) whether participant baseline LGBTQ-specific stress exposure moderates treatment efficacy, such that participants with the most LGBTQ-specific stress exposure benefit more from online EQuIP than self-monitoring of stress and mood.
The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, substance abuse, sexual risk behavior, and suicidality, all of which disproportionally affect LGBTQ young adults. Secondary outcomes include hypothesized cognitive, affective, and behavioral minority stress mechanisms, such as internalized homophobia, rejection sensitivity, concealment, social isolation, and emotional dysregulation.
Participants will be randomized to either self-monitoring control or Online EQuIP group.
Self-monitoring control: In this control condition, participants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey. This type of self-monitoring has been shown to yield improvement in behavioral health outcomes. Self-reporting LGBTQ stress experiences has also been shown to produce reductions in depression symptoms over time. Participants will record these experiences once per week for 10 weeks.
Online EQuIP: This online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks. Modules contain weekly psychoeducational text and vignettes about minority stress and mental health; brief videos illustrating the CBT skills; and homework exercises that therapists review and provide feedback on. Homework exercises include weekly tracking of stressful situations and mood, practicing new skills (e.g., mindfulness, cognitive restructuring), and exercises related to considering the origins of stress and negative emotions that participants may be experiencing. Therapists provide feedback after each homework assignment, including reviewing each participant's treatment goals as part of the first session's homework. Therapists who support this condition will be instructed to incorporate LGBTQ-specific content and feedback into homework reviews. Therapists will either be postdoctoral fellows in the Pachankis lab or clinical/counseling psychology interns/externs in the Pachankis lab who possess an advanced degree in a mental health field with significant prior experience treating LGBTQ young adults with mental health concerns. Modules were adapted directly from the in-person materials (e.g., therapist manual, participant handouts) used in our previously successful trials of this treatment. A team of six therapists and supervisors of the original in-person treatment adapted the text for the online modules, including realistic vignettes and easy-to-follow skills training. A video production company created accompanying videos with our clinical team's close input.
In preparation for this RCT, the online EQuIP treatment was delivered to 14 LGBTQ young adults who meet all eligibility criteria for the full trial. The purpose of this initial test was to ensure acceptability of the treatment content and usability of the technical platform.
- Conditions
- LGBTQ, Sexual Behavior
- Being tested
- Online EQuIP, Self-monitoring control
- Keywords
- on-line intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Sexual Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online EQuIPBehavioural
This online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks.
Self-monitoring controlBehavioural
Participants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey experience once per week for 10 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Online EQuIP | Experimental | The online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Online EQuIP |
| Self-Monitoring | Placebo comparator | Participants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey experience once per week for 10 weeks Receives: Behavioral: Self-monitoring control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Distress
Distress will be measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The BSI is an 18 item measure that uses a 0-4 rating scale for each item. An overall score of 72 would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate an extreme level of overall distress.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Depression
Depression will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies -- Depression Scale (CESD). This 20-item measure uses a 0-3 rating (Rarely or none of the time - Most or all of the time) scale and sums across the items with items 3, 11, 14, and 16 reversed. for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. In cases with internally missing data (items not answered), the sums are computed after imputation of the missing values: # items on scale / # actually answered, multiplied by the sum obtained from the answered items. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology during the past week.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Depression Severity
Depression severity will be measured using the Overall Depression Severity \& Impairment Scale (ODSIS). This 5 item measure uses a 0-4 rating scale and sums across the items for a maximum score of 20. The higher the score, the greater the severity of depression.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Anxiety symptoms will be measured by the Overall Anxiety Severity \& Impairment Scale (OASIS). This 5 item measure uses a 0-4 rating scale and sums across the items for a maximum score of 20. The higher the score, the greater the presence of anxiety symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Number of Participants Reporting Any Alcohol Use
Alcohol use in participants will be assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification (AUDIT) instrument. Any alcohol use over the past 3 months will be measured through the first item of the instrument ("How often, during the last 3 months did you have a drink containing alcohol?") with the creation of a binary variable (1 = any alcohol use, 0 = no alcohol use).
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Number of Participants Reporting Any Suicidal Ideation
Suicidal ideation will be measured using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS). Any suicidal ideation was assessed through the first item of this scale ("In the past month, how often have you had thoughts about suicide?") with the creation of a binary variable (1 = any suicidal ideation, 0 = no suicidal ideation).
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Number of Participants Reporting Any Sexual Risk Behavior
Sexual risk behavior is defined as: condomless anal or vaginal/frontal sex [not counting the sole use of prosthetics] in the absence of PrEP, with any HIV+ partner [except primary HIV+ partners with a known undetectable viral load] or status-unknown partner. A binary variable of any sexual risk behavior was constructed from reports of past-90 day sexual behavior (1 = any sexual risk behavior, 0 = no sexual risk behavior).
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2020
- Study start31 May 2020
- Primary completion18 Feb 2022
- Study completion18 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LGBTQStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Pachankis, PhD, Principal investigator, Yale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04408469
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000025803
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 26 May 2020
- Last updated
- 3 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kauer SD, Reid SC, Crooke AH, Khor A, Hearps SJ, Jorm AF, Sanci L, Patton G. Self-monitoring using mobile phones in the early stages of adolescent depression: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 25;14(3):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1858.
PubMed 22732135Pachankis JE, McConocha EM, Clark KA, Wang K, Behari K, Fetzner BK, Brisbin CD, Scheer JR, Lehavot K. A transdiagnostic minority stress intervention for gender diverse sexual minority women's depression, anxiety, and unhealthy alcohol use: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):613-630. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000508. Epub 2020 May 21.
PubMed 32437174Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML, Rendina HJ, Safren SA, Parsons JT. LGB-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adult gay and bisexual men: A randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic minority stress approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):875-89. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000037. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
PubMed 26147563van Spijker BA, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Farrer L, Christensen H, Reynolds J, Kerkhof AJ. The suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Aug;44(4):408-19. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12084. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
PubMed 24612048Bentley KH, Gallagher MW, Carl JR, Barlow DH. Development and validation of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale. Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):815-830. doi: 10.1037/a0036216. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
PubMed 24708078Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605.
PubMed 6622612Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20182.
PubMed 16688739Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
PubMed 8329970
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online LGBTQ-affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Depression and Associated Health Risks Among Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04408469
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2000025803
- Conditions
- LGBTQ, Sexual Behavior
- Keywords
- on-line intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 May 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to test the efficacy of an online CBT intervention (EQuIP) that addresses the pathways through which minority stress compromises LGBTQ young adults' co-occurring mental (e.g., depression) and behavioral (e.g., substance use, condomless anal sex) health problems. This purpose of this study is to determine if the treatment is efficacious when delivered online and if its efficacy exceeds that of the self-monitoring control.
Detailed description
To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of an LGBTQ-affirmative online CBT treatment and whether such an LGBTQ-affirmative focus adds benefit, a 2-arm RCT that would examine (1) whether online EQuIP demonstrates significant mental health improvements compared to self-monitoring of stress and mood, and (2) whether participant baseline LGBTQ-specific stress exposure moderates treatment efficacy, such that participants with the most LGBTQ-specific stress exposure benefit more from online EQuIP than self-monitoring of stress and mood.
The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, substance abuse, sexual risk behavior, and suicidality, all of which disproportionally affect LGBTQ young adults. Secondary outcomes include hypothesized cognitive, affective, and behavioral minority stress mechanisms, such as internalized homophobia, rejection sensitivity, concealment, social isolation, and emotional dysregulation.
Participants will be randomized to either self-monitoring control or Online EQuIP group.
Self-monitoring control: In this control condition, participants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey. This type of self-monitoring has been shown to yield improvement in behavioral health outcomes. Self-reporting LGBTQ stress experiences has also been shown to produce reductions in depression symptoms over time. Participants will record these experiences once per week for 10 weeks.
Online EQuIP: This online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks. Modules contain weekly psychoeducational text and vignettes about minority stress and mental health; brief videos illustrating the CBT skills; and homework exercises that therapists review and provide feedback on. Homework exercises include weekly tracking of stressful situations and mood, practicing new skills (e.g., mindfulness, cognitive restructuring), and exercises related to considering the origins of stress and negative emotions that participants may be experiencing. Therapists provide feedback after each homework assignment, including reviewing each participant's treatment goals as part of the first session's homework. Therapists who support this condition will be instructed to incorporate LGBTQ-specific content and feedback into homework reviews. Therapists will either be postdoctoral fellows in the Pachankis lab or clinical/counseling psychology interns/externs in the Pachankis lab who possess an advanced degree in a mental health field with significant prior experience treating LGBTQ young adults with mental health concerns. Modules were adapted directly from the in-person materials (e.g., therapist manual, participant handouts) used in our previously successful trials of this treatment. A team of six therapists and supervisors of the original in-person treatment adapted the text for the online modules, including realistic vignettes and easy-to-follow skills training. A video production company created accompanying videos with our clinical team's close input.
In preparation for this RCT, the online EQuIP treatment was delivered to 14 LGBTQ young adults who meet all eligibility criteria for the full trial. The purpose of this initial test was to ensure acceptability of the treatment content and usability of the technical platform.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Online EQuIP | Experimental | Behavioral: Online EQuIPThe online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks. |
| Self-Monitoring | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Self-monitoring controlParticipants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey experience once per week for 10 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- identify as lesbian, bisexual, gay, or another sexual minority identity (e.g., pansexual, demisexual)
- past-week symptoms of depression or anxiety using the Brief Symptom Inventory-4 cutoff of 2.5 on either the depression subscale or anxiety subscale
- weekly access to internet on a laptop, desktop, or tablet device
- ability to read, write, and speak in English
- provision of informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- current active suicidality or homicidality (defined as active intent or concrete plan, as opposed to passive suicidal ideation)
- evidence of active untreated mania, psychosis, or gross cognitive impairment - current enrollment in an intervention study
- current enrollment in intensive mental health treatment (i.e., receiving mental health treatment more than once per month or 8 or more sessions of CBT within the past year.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online EQuIPThis online CBT treatment consists of 10 weekly modules that participants will complete over the course of 10 weeks. | Behavioural | Online EQuIP |
| Self-monitoring controlParticipants will be asked to indicate their past 7-day mood; stress experiences; and mental and behavioral health on an online survey experience once per week for 10 weeks | Behavioural | Self-Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Change in Distress
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Distress will be measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The BSI is an 18 item measure that uses a 0-4 rating scale for each item. An overall score of 72 would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate an extreme level of overall distress.
Change in Depression
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Depression will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies -- Depression Scale (CESD). This 20-item measure uses a 0-3 rating (Rarely or none of the time - Most or all of the time) scale and sums across the items with items 3, 11, 14, and 16 reversed. for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. In cases with internally missing data (items not answered), the sums are computed after imputation of the missing values: # items on scale / # actually answered, multiplied by the sum obtained from the answered items. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology during the past week.
Change in Depression Severity
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Depression severity will be measured using the Overall Depression Severity \& Impairment Scale (ODSIS). This 5 item measure uses a 0-4 rating scale and sums across the items for a maximum score of 20. The higher the score, the greater the severity of depression.
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Anxiety symptoms will be measured by the Overall Anxiety Severity \& Impairment Scale (OASIS). This 5 item measure uses a 0-4 rating scale and sums across the items for a maximum score of 20. The higher the score, the greater the presence of anxiety symptoms.
Number of Participants Reporting Any Alcohol Use
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Alcohol use in participants will be assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification (AUDIT) instrument. Any alcohol use over the past 3 months will be measured through the first item of the instrument ("How often, during the last 3 months did you have a drink containing alcohol?") with the creation of a binary variable (1 = any alcohol use, 0 = no alcohol use).
Number of Participants Reporting Any Suicidal Ideation
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Suicidal ideation will be measured using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS). Any suicidal ideation was assessed through the first item of this scale ("In the past month, how often have you had thoughts about suicide?") with the creation of a binary variable (1 = any suicidal ideation, 0 = no suicidal ideation).
Number of Participants Reporting Any Sexual Risk Behavior
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Sexual risk behavior is defined as: condomless anal or vaginal/frontal sex [not counting the sole use of prosthetics] in the absence of PrEP, with any HIV+ partner [except primary HIV+ partners with a known undetectable viral load] or status-unknown partner. A binary variable of any sexual risk behavior was constructed from reports of past-90 day sexual behavior (1 = any sexual risk behavior, 0 = no sexual risk behavior).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22732135Kauer SD, Reid SC, Crooke AH, Khor A, Hearps SJ, Jorm AF, Sanci L, Patton G. Self-monitoring using mobile phones in the early stages of adolescent depression: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 25;14(3):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1858.
- Background: PubMed 32437174Pachankis JE, McConocha EM, Clark KA, Wang K, Behari K, Fetzner BK, Brisbin CD, Scheer JR, Lehavot K. A transdiagnostic minority stress intervention for gender diverse sexual minority women's depression, anxiety, and unhealthy alcohol use: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):613-630. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000508. Epub 2020 May 21.
- Background: PubMed 26147563Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML, Rendina HJ, Safren SA, Parsons JT. LGB-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adult gay and bisexual men: A randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic minority stress approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):875-89. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000037. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 24612048van Spijker BA, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Farrer L, Christensen H, Reynolds J, Kerkhof AJ. The suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Aug;44(4):408-19. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12084. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 24708078Bentley KH, Gallagher MW, Carl JR, Barlow DH. Development and validation of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale. Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):815-830. doi: 10.1037/a0036216. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 6622612Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605.
- Results publication: PubMed 16688739Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20182.
- Results publicationRadloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.
- Results publication: PubMed 8329970Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
Related trials for LGBTQ
Not yet recruiting
Brief Single-Session Body Neutrality Program for LGBTQ+ Adults in Central Alabama
Body Image
Not yet recruiting
An Interrupted Time-Series Pilot Trial of LGBTQ-Affirming Cognitive Processing Therapy for Interpersonal and Developmental Trauma
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic, Depressed Mood
Not yet recruiting
Lakota Family Acceptance Project Pilot RCT
LGBTQ, Racial Disparities
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Improving Mental Health Among the LGBTQ+ Community
Anxiety, Depression
Recruiting
The Gender Inclusive Sexuality Talks Program
HIV/STI Incidence, Communication About Health Information
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Pachankis, PhD principal investigator
Yale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Online EQuIP in people with LGBTQ and Sexual Behavior, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Distress (time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04408469, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2024.