AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver CancerVisCanNCT04409340

Viscoelasticity Imaging to Assess Liver Cancer

An observational study of Liver Cancer, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ultrasound (US) used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance suffers from low sensitivity (60-78%) due to fatty liver, obesity, and diffusely nodular appearance in cirrhosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Liver Cancer
What is being tested?
Magnetic Resonance Viscoelastography and QUS
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
5 Oct 2020to 22 Dec 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The investigators propose a cross-sectional prospective clinical study with two sequential cohorts: 1) a training cohort of 100 patients at risk for HCC to optimize QUS biomarkers for classification of solid liver lesions using MRI and/or biopsy as gold standard clinical references; and 2) a validation cohort of 100 patients to confirm diagnostic performance. The investigators will recruit patients seen at the hepatology clinic of the University of Montreal Hospital (CHUM).

Who may be able to join

  • Are at least 18 years old at screening;
  • Able to comprehend and willingness to provide voluntary consent;
  • Are able to have a MRI;
  • Understand French or English;
  • Patients enrolled in a monitoring program or referred for the characterization of a focal liver lesion;
  • Focal liver lesion is visible during ultrasound screening in B-mode.

Who cannot join

  • Are pregnant or trying to become pregnant;
  • Have a weight or girth preventing from entering the MR magnet bore;
  • Are unable to understand or unwilling to provide written informed consent for this study;
  • Have a contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, insurmountable claustrophobia);
  • Have chronic kidney disease preventing the injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

    Guy Cloutier, PhD, 514-890-8000 ext. 24703, guy.cloutier@umontreal.ca

    Louise Allard, PhD, 514-890-8000 ext. 24705, louise.allard@crchum.qc.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Added Value of Shear Wave Viscoelasticity Imaging, Homodyned-K Tissue Imaging and Acoustic Attenuation to Assess Liver Cancer at Ultrasound: a Multiparametric Learning Approach

Ultrasound (US) used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance suffers from low sensitivity (60-78%) due to fatty liver, obesity, and diffusely nodular appearance in cirrhosis. Once a suspicious malignant lesion is detected at US, guidelines recommend contrast-enhanced US, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans to confirm suspicion. The investigators' team has developed innovative quantitative US (QUS) techniques that have a high potential to improve tissue characterization in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The investigators hypothesize that advanced QUS providing tumor viscoelasticity assessment, sub-resolution tissue structure characterization and US attenuation in the framework of a machine learning classification model can improve HCC diagnosis compared with standard US.

Early detection through systematic US surveillance translates into curative therapy in a higher proportion of patients and into improvements in survival rates. Thus, there is an urgent need to investigate innovative and cost-effective imaging techniques for improving detection and characterization of HCC. The proposed QUS methods are experimental and will be validated in this proof-of-concept clinical study. A major impact of this work, for patients and medical institutions, will be to improve early-stage detection and characterization of HCC, and offer alternatives in patients with negative or inconclusive conventional US. QUS are low-cost, non-invasive and non-irradiating imaging modalities available from a single exam (i.e., no additional imaging session is necessary).

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH QUESTION AND BACKGROUND: Primary liver cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh in women and is the second cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In Canada, HCC is the only cancer for which mortality is increasing. More than 80% of HCC cases occur in individuals with advanced liver fibrosis (cirrhosis) due to viral hepatitis infection (B and C), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and alcoholic liver disease. Once cirrhosis is established, there is a significantly increased risk of developing HCC. Furthermore, HCC is observed in obese diabetic individuals without cirrhosis, increasing the population of patients at risk with a disease that has high fatality rate. HCC surveillance is associated with significantly prolonged survival. However, only 52% of patients undergoing surveillance have early HCCs that are eligible for curative treatment, whereas remainder of patients have intermediate- or advanced-stage disease eligible for bridge or palliative treatment only. HCC surveillance is also associated with significant improvements in early-stage detection, curative-treatment rates, and survival, even after adjusting for lead-time bias. North American guidelines recommend ultrasound (US) surveillance every 6 months in at-risk patients who are non-cirrhotic hepatitis B carriers and cirrhotic. However, a key challenge for US is the low sensitivity (60-78%) for identifying a lesion due to liver steatosis and cirrhosis. Once a suspicious malignant lesion is detected at US, current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines recommend contrast-enhanced US, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans to confirm suspicion.

GOAL: The long-term reaching goal is to develop US biomarkers of focal liver lesions and strategies to improve diagnostic sensitivity to HCC while maintaining a high specificity. This would constitute a major breakthrough because HCC diagnosis currently requires a combination of US for screening and confirmation using MRI, CT and less often biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: 1) Develop a machine learning model based on QUS for classification of solid hepatocellular carcinomas identified at US and diagnosed with MRI (or biopsy if required); 2) Determine if QUS maps can improve visual detection of suspected lesions at US; 3) Compare performance of QUS- versus MRI-based viscoelastography for lesion characterization.

Hypothesis: the investigators hypothesize that advanced QUS providing tumor viscoelasticity assessment, sub-resolution tissue structure characterization and US attenuation in the framework of a machine learning classification model can improve HCC diagnosis compared with standard US.

METHODOLOGY - Study design: This will be a clinical study with two sequential cohorts: 1) a training cohort of 100 patients at risk for HCC to optimize QUS biomarkers for classification of solid liver lesions using MRI and/or biopsy as gold standard clinical references; and 2) a validation cohort of 100 patients to confirm diagnostic performance.

Data analysis: Random forests machine learning to develop QUS classification models. Sensitivity and specificity to assess diagnostic accuracy, according to MRI and/or biopsy, with bootstrapping to obtain confidence intervals with training set. Confirmation of accuracy on test set. Inter-observer assessment of lesion detectability on clinical B-mode US versus QUS maps. Comparison of US- and MRI-based elasticity and viscosity according to diagnostic results.

Conditions
Liver Cancer
Being tested
Magnetic Resonance Viscoelastography, QUS
Keywords
quantitative ultrasound, Viscoelasticity, Homodyned-K imaging, Liver cancer, Viscoelastography, Ultrasound attenuation
Medical subject headings
Liver Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic Resonance ViscoelastographyDevice

    Magnetic Resonance Viscoelastography

  • QUSDevice

    QUS

Study groups in NCT04409340
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training cohortAll patients enrolled will undergo: * Magnetic Resonance Viscoelastography * Quantitative ultrasound (QUS)
Receives: Device: Magnetic Resonance Viscoelastography; Device: QUS
Validation cohortAll patients enrolled will undergo: • Quantitative ultrasound (QUS)
Receives: Device: QUS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Liver viscoelastography determined by MRI

    Measure of liver viscoelastography using magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver echography

  2. Liver viscoelastography determined by QUS

    Measure of liver viscoelastography using quantitative ultrasound (QUS).

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver echography

  3. Detection of focal HCC lesions

    Detection of focal HCC lesions using quantitative ultrasound (QUS).

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of liver echography

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2020
  2. Study start5 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04409340
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-8561
Acronym
VisCan
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
27 May 2020
Last updated
17 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: plan undicided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Liver Cancer, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Guy Cloutier, PhD (514-890-8000 ext. 24703, guy.cloutier@umontreal.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Liver viscoelastography determined by MRI (time frame: Within 6 weeks of liver echography). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in