Subdural Hematoma, ChronicSTEMNCT04410146
The SQUID Trial for the Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (STEM)
A study testing SQUID Embolization, SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation and Surgical Evacuation in people with Subdural Hematoma, Chronic, run by Balt USA at 32 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
STEM Study is a pivotal, international, multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled trial designed to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- SQUID Embolization, SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation and Surgical Evacuation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 319 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2020to 23 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female Subject whose age is ≥ 30 at the time of consent
- Pre-morbid mRS (Modified Rankin Scale) 0-1 within the previous 12 months
- cSDH measures ≥ 10 mm in greatest thickness
- cSDH exerts mass effect upon the subjacent brain, as indicated by local cortical flattening or midline shift
- Imaging characteristics indicative of chronicity (≥ 50% of the volume of the collection should be isodense or hypodense to normal cortical gray matter on Computed Tomography (CT))
- Subject presents with one or more of the following neurological symptoms: headache; cognitive decline; speech difficulty or aphasia; gait impairment or imbalance; focal neurological deficit (weakness, paresthesia or sensory deficit involving of one or more extremities or facial droop); and/or seizure
Show all 9Show fewer
- Subject, or his/her legally authorized representative, understands the nature of the procedure, consents to participation in the study and provides a signed Informed Consent Form
- Female Subjects of child-bearing potential must be able to provide a current negative urine pregnancy test and agree to an appropriate method of contraception throughout the trial
- Subject is able and willing to return to the investigational site for all follow-up visits (e.g., 30-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year), as required per protocol
Who cannot join
- Subject with prior ipsilateral craniotomy or burr hole evacuation of cSDH
- Subject with prior Embolization of either MMA
- Subject requires (in the opinion of the treating surgeon) a full or mini craniotomy
- Subject with urgent or emergent (within 1 hour of assessment) subdural hematoma evacuation needed
- Subject with a cSDH with a focal location (confined to the frontal or temporal base or the inter-hemispheric space without cerebral convexity involvement)
- cSDH developed due to underlying condition such as a vascular lesion, brain tumor, arachnoid cyst, spontaneous intracranial hypotension or secondary to a previous craniotomy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Life expectancy of <1 year
- Subject who presents with an intracranial mass other than subdural hematoma
- Subject who presents with a meningioma with mass effect and/or ≥1 cm or currently undergoing radiation therapy for carcinoma or sarcoma of the head or neck region
- Subject with serum creatinine level > 3.0 mg/dL at time of enrollment (this will restrict the use of contrast) and not on dialysis
- Subject with significant liver function impairment at the time of enrollment
- Subject with a life-threatening allergy to radiographic contrast (unless treatment for allergy is tolerated or can be managed medically)
- Subject who is currently enrolled in another investigational study protocol that could potentially confound the current study endpoints
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 4 countries.
32 sites in 4 countries
United States25 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Swedish Medical Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17918
Baptist Health
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Methodist University Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Baptist Memorial Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016
Nebraska Health
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Barrow Neurological Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Riverside Community Hospital
Riverside, California, 92501
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Santa Barbara, California, 93105
Swedish Cherry Hill
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Overlook Medical Center
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center
Thousand Oaks, California, 92360
Carondolet St. Joseph's
Tucson, Arizona, 85711
France4 sites
Chu Cote de Nacre
Caen, 14000
CHU Hopital Bicetre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
Hopital Pitie Salpetriere
Paris
CHU Hopital Maison Blanche
Reims
Germany2 sites
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg
Klinikum Nurnberg Sud
Nuremberg
About this study
STEM Study is a pivotal, international, multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled trial designed to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)
Read the detailed description
The study objective is to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH).
- Conditions
- Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
- Being tested
- SQUID Embolization, SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation, Surgical Evacuation, Standard Medical Management
- Keywords
- Meningeal Arteries, Intracranial Subdural Hematoma
- Medical subject headings
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SQUID EmbolizationDevice
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical EvacuationDevice
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical of the sub-dural hematoma
Surgical EvacuationProcedure or surgery
Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
Standard Medical ManagementOther
Standard Medical Management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SQUID | Experimental | Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) Receives: Device: SQUID Embolization; Device: SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation |
| No Embolization | Active comparator | Standard Management
For subjects in the surgery only group (i.e., surgical management but no adjunctive MMAE), the surgical evacuation was to occur within 48 hours of randomization. Surgery included hemorrhage evacuation through one or two burr-holes with irrigation of the hematoma (and the option for placement of a subgaleal or subdural drain) or twist-drill drainage, such as Subdural Evacuating Port System.
Subjects in the non-surgical management alone group were followed by the clinical team and treated as per the standard of care (SOC) established at the institution for the management of cSDH. Standard of care typically included cSDH monitoring, medical intervention to control symptoms, reversal or cessation of anti-coagulant and anti-platelet medications as well as the administration of anti-inflammatory medications (e.g., steroids, statins). Receives: Procedure: Surgical Evacuation; Other: Standard Medical Management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment failure as defined by the occurrence of any of the following events:
- Residual or re-accumulation of the SDH (≥10 mm) on 180-day scan from intervention.
- Re-operation (after index procedure) or surgical rescue within 180-days of intervention.
- Any new, major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death from any (neurological) cause within 180-days of intervention.
Measured: On 180-day from intervention
Primary Safety Endpoint-Number of Participants With Major Disabling Stroke or Any Death Within 30 Days of Intervention
Major disabling stroke or any death within 30-days from intervention.
Measured: Within 30-days from intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Any Investigational Device/MMAE Procedure-related AE/SAE
Number of participants with an adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) adjudicated as probably or causally related to the investigational device or Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) procedure.
Measured: Through 1-year visit
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is an ordinal scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death):
0: No symptoms
- No significant disability
- Slight disability
- Moderate disability
- Moderately severe disability
- Severe disability
- Dead The Shift Analysis (also known as an ordinal analysis) evaluates the distribution of mRS scores to identify a general improvement or 'shift' across the entire range of the scale, rather than just comparing 'good' vs. 'poor' outcomes.
Measured: 180-day from intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Nov 2020
- Primary completion23 May 2024
- Study completion23 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Subdural Hematoma, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 319 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Balt USA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Fiorella, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Stony Brook University Medical CenterAdam Arthur, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Semmes-Murphy Neurologic and Spine Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04410146
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP-201912-SQUID
- Acronym
- STEM
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 27 May 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fiorella D, Monteith SJ, Hanel R, Atchie B, Boo S, McTaggart RA, Zauner A, Tjoumakaris S, Barbier C, Benitez R, Spelle L, Pierot L, Hirsch JA, Froehler M, Arthur AS; STEM Investigators. Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2025 Feb 27;392(9):855-864. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409845. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
PubMed 39565980
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The SQUID Trial for the Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (STEM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04410146
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STEM / CIP-201912-SQUID
- Conditions
- Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
- Keywords
- Meningeal Arteries, Intracranial Subdural Hematoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 319 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Balt USAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
STEM Study is a pivotal, international, multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled trial designed to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)
Detailed description
The study objective is to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SQUID | Experimental | Device: SQUID Embolization, Device: SQUID Embolization and Surgical EvacuationEmbolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) |
| No Embolization | Active comparator | Procedure: Surgical Evacuation, Other: Standard Medical ManagementStandard Management For subjects in the surgery only group (i.e., surgical management but no adjunctive MMAE), the surgical evacuation was to occur within 48 hours of randomization. Surgery included hemorrhage evacuation through one or two burr-holes with irrigation of the hematoma (and the option for placement of a subgaleal or subdural drain) or twist-drill drainage, such as Subdural Evacuating Port System. Subjects in the non-surgical management alone group were followed by the clinical team and treated as per the standard of care (SOC) established at the institution for the management of cSDH. Standard of care typically included cSDH monitoring, medical intervention to control symptoms, reversal or cessation of anti-coagulant and anti-platelet medications as well as the administration of anti-inflammatory medications (e.g., steroids, statins). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female Subject whose age is ≥ 30 at the time of consent
- Pre-morbid mRS (Modified Rankin Scale) 0-1 within the previous 12 months
- cSDH measures ≥ 10 mm in greatest thickness
- cSDH exerts mass effect upon the subjacent brain, as indicated by local cortical flattening or midline shift
- Imaging characteristics indicative of chronicity (≥ 50% of the volume of the collection should be isodense or hypodense to normal cortical gray matter on Computed Tomography (CT))
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subject with prior ipsilateral craniotomy or burr hole evacuation of cSDH
- Subject with prior Embolization of either MMA
- Subject requires (in the opinion of the treating surgeon) a full or mini craniotomy
- Subject with urgent or emergent (within 1 hour of assessment) subdural hematoma evacuation needed
- Subject with a cSDH with a focal location (confined to the frontal or temporal base or the inter-hemispheric space without cerebral convexity involvement)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SQUID EmbolizationEmbolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent | Device | SQUID |
| SQUID Embolization and Surgical EvacuationEmbolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical of the sub-dural hematoma | Device | SQUID |
| Surgical EvacuationSurgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma | Procedure or surgery | No Embolization |
| Standard Medical ManagementStandard Medical Management | Other | No Embolization |
Primary outcome
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time frame: On 180-day from intervention
Treatment failure as defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: 1. Residual or re-accumulation of the SDH (≥10 mm) on 180-day scan from intervention. 2. Re-operation (after index procedure) or surgical rescue within 180-days of intervention. 3. Any new, major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death from any (neurological) cause within 180-days of intervention.
Primary Safety Endpoint-Number of Participants With Major Disabling Stroke or Any Death Within 30 Days of Intervention
Time frame: Within 30-days from intervention
Major disabling stroke or any death within 30-days from intervention.
2 secondary outcomes
Any Investigational Device/MMAE Procedure-related AE/SAE
Time frame: Through 1-year visit
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
Time frame: 180-day from intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39565980Fiorella D, Monteith SJ, Hanel R, Atchie B, Boo S, McTaggart RA, Zauner A, Tjoumakaris S, Barbier C, Benitez R, Spelle L, Pierot L, Hirsch JA, Froehler M, Arthur AS; STEM Investigators. Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2025 Feb 27;392(9):855-864. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409845. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Recruiting
MMA Embolization With NeoCast for Subacute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Fiorella, MD, PhD principal investigator
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Adam Arthur, MD, MPH principal investigator
Semmes-Murphy Neurologic and Spine Institute
32 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SQUID Embolization, SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation and Surgical Evacuation in people with Subdural Hematoma, Chronic, run by Balt USA at 32 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in United States, France, Germany, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure (time frame: On 180-day from intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04410146, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.