ARDSNCT04411160
Vitamin C Versus Nitric Oxide in Prolonged Ventilation
An observational study of ARDS, run by King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
This a prospective double-blind study done in King Abdul-Aziz specialist hospital between January 2019 and April 2020 in the intensive care unit on 60 patients with difficult weaning and ventilated for 10 days. Allocated randomly in two groups 30 patients in each. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ARDS
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin C, Nitric Oxide and ventilators
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2019to 21 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This a prospective cohort study done in King Abd el Aziz specialist hospital between January 2019 and April 2020 in the intensive care unit on 60 patients with respiratory failure and showed failure of weaning from ventilator either due to medical or surgical causes. King Abdelaziz research and ethical committee approved the project.
Who may be able to join
- ARDS
Who cannot join
- systemic disease as diabetes and hypertension
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study Between the Effect of Vitamin C vs. Nitric Oxide in Weaning of Patients With Prolonged Ventilation Due to ARDS
This a prospective double-blind study done in King Abdul-Aziz specialist hospital between January 2019 and April 2020 in the intensive care unit on 60 patients with difficult weaning and ventilated for 10 days. Allocated randomly in two groups 30 patients in each. All patients in both groups continued on the same conventional ventilation but Group A received nitric oxide (NO) while group B received vitamin C intravenous. The duration of the study last 16 days. during this period, APCHII score, Hemodynamics, Chest Xray, hypoxic index, lung compliance, Recruitment maneuver, arterial blood saturation, LDH, C-reactive protein used as indicator for improvement. Number of patients weaned from the ventilator and patients died also recorded.
Read the detailed description
All selected patients received conventional ventilation with protective lung strategy for 10 days with Controlled mechanical ventilation mode(CMV), fraction inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 100%, Positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP) of 10 cm H2O or more to achieve target arterial oxygen saturation(SPO2) of 90% or more with sedation by midazolam infusion to achieve Richmond Agitation- Sedation Scale (RASS) -2 to -3 and fentanyl infusion for pain control between 50-100 mg/min. Protective lung strategy was strictly applied in form of head elevation more than 30°, broad spectrum antibiotics according to our antibiotic regimen, daily assessment for both analgesic and sedative dose were given to patients, early naso-gastric feeding started to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia and daily trial was done to reduce PEEP to prevent more lung injury from ventilation also qualitative sputum culture was taken after one week from ventilation. After 10 days from the conventional ventilation those who could not be weaned from the ventilator and still had the former criteria mentioned before (Uncompensated hypercapnia with PH<7.25, and/or Hypoxic index less than 200) included in our study. Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy done for all patients in both groups. 60 patients randomly allocated in 2 groups. Randomization sequence was created using Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) with a 1:1 allocation using random block sizes of 2 and 4 by an independent doctor. In this way, sequence generation and type of randomization can be expressed at the same time. Each group included 30 patients. Patients of group A received inhalation of nitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose. While patients of group B received 4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration. Improvement of general condition of the patients monitored in our study by APACH II score and core body temperature. improvement of the lungs condition monitored in our study clinically by monitoring: oxygen saturation, hypoxic index, compliance and response to recruitment maneuver ( Recruitment maneuver is considered clinical test of lung compliance and start by increase the peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm/H2O for 40 sec and observe the saturation (SpO2) if improved to more than 95% considered responder in our study).(18) and radiologically by size of parenchymatous lung infiltration on chest X ray. The duration of the study 16 days
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Being tested
- Vitamin C, Nitric Oxide, ventilators
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin CDrug
4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration.
Nitric OxideDrug
nitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose
ventilatorsDevice
All selected patients received conventional ventilation with protective lung strategy for 10 days with Controlled mechanical ventilation mode(CMV), fraction inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 100%, Positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP) of 10 cm H2O or more to achieve target arterial oxygen saturation(SPO2) of 90%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Patients of group A received inhalation of nitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose. Receives: Drug: Nitric Oxide; Device: ventilators | |
| Group B | While patients of group B received 4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration. Receives: Drug: Vitamin C; Device: ventilators |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
tissue oxygenation
observe the arterial oxygen saturation SpO2
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2020
- Study start15 Jan 2019
- Primary completion19 Apr 2020
- Study completion21 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ARDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04411160
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICU-32-20
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 21 May 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study Between the Effect of Vitamin C vs. Nitric Oxide in Weaning of Patients With Prolonged Ventilation Due to ARDS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04411160
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICU-32-20
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King Abdul Aziz Specialist HospitalResearch network
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This a prospective double-blind study done in King Abdul-Aziz specialist hospital between January 2019 and April 2020 in the intensive care unit on 60 patients with difficult weaning and ventilated for 10 days. Allocated randomly in two groups 30 patients in each. All patients in both groups continued on the same conventional ventilation but Group A received nitric oxide (NO) while group B received vitamin C intravenous. The duration of the study last 16 days. during this period, APCHII score, Hemodynamics, Chest Xray, hypoxic index, lung compliance, Recruitment maneuver, arterial blood saturation, LDH, C-reactive protein used as indicator for improvement. Number of patients weaned from the ventilator and patients died also recorded.
Detailed description
All selected patients received conventional ventilation with protective lung strategy for 10 days with Controlled mechanical ventilation mode(CMV), fraction inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 100%, Positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP) of 10 cm H2O or more to achieve target arterial oxygen saturation(SPO2) of 90% or more with sedation by midazolam infusion to achieve Richmond Agitation- Sedation Scale (RASS) -2 to -3 and fentanyl infusion for pain control between 50-100 mg/min. Protective lung strategy was strictly applied in form of head elevation more than 30°, broad spectrum antibiotics according to our antibiotic regimen, daily assessment for both analgesic and sedative dose were given to patients, early naso-gastric feeding started to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia and daily trial was done to reduce PEEP to prevent more lung injury from ventilation also qualitative sputum culture was taken after one week from ventilation. After 10 days from the conventional ventilation those who could not be weaned from the ventilator and still had the former criteria mentioned before (Uncompensated hypercapnia with PH<7.25, and/or Hypoxic index less than 200) included in our study. Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy done for all patients in both groups. 60 patients randomly allocated in 2 groups. Randomization sequence was created using Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) with a 1:1 allocation using random block sizes of 2 and 4 by an independent doctor. In this way, sequence generation and type of randomization can be expressed at the same time. Each group included 30 patients. Patients of group A received inhalation of nitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose. While patients of group B received 4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration. Improvement of general condition of the patients monitored in our study by APACH II score and core body temperature. improvement of the lungs condition monitored in our study clinically by monitoring: oxygen saturation, hypoxic index, compliance and response to recruitment maneuver ( Recruitment maneuver is considered clinical test of lung compliance and start by increase the peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm/H2O for 40 sec and observe the saturation (SpO2) if improved to more than 95% considered responder in our study).(18) and radiologically by size of parenchymatous lung infiltration on chest X ray. The duration of the study 16 days
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | – | Drug: Nitric Oxide, Device: ventilatorsPatients of group A received inhalation of nitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose. |
| Group B | – | Drug: Vitamin C, Device: ventilatorsWhile patients of group B received 4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This a prospective cohort study done in King Abd el Aziz specialist hospital between January 2019 and April 2020 in the intensive care unit on 60 patients with respiratory failure and showed failure of weaning from ventilator either due to medical or surgical causes. King Abdelaziz research and ethical committee approved the project.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ARDS
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- systemic disease as diabetes and hypertension
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C4 gram of vitamin c slowly intravenous once daily for 4 days duration. | Drug | Group B |
| Nitric Oxidenitric oxide stared by 50 parts/billion(ppb) as starting dose titrated according to patient's saturation reaching to 90 ppb as a maximum dose | Drug | Group A |
| ventilatorsAll selected patients received conventional ventilation with protective lung strategy for 10 days with Controlled mechanical ventilation mode(CMV), fraction inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 100%, Positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP) of 10 cm H2O or more to achieve target arterial oxygen saturation(SPO2) of 90% | Device | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
tissue oxygenation
Time frame: 2 weeks
observe the arterial oxygen saturation SpO2
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ARDS
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Prospective Validation of the AutoEIT Foundation Model for ARDS
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Fostamatinib for Treating Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Adults
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
RecruitingObservational study
Pulmonary Immune Cell-microbiome Interactions in ARDS
ARDS, Human
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ARDS, run by King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
tissue oxygenation (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2020.