COVIDPhase 4CAREDNCT04411446
Cholecalciferol to Improve the Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Vitamin D in people with COVID, run by Vitamin D Study Group at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
The recent inception of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has caused thousands of deaths globally. The most frequently reported complications among COVID-19 patients are from respiratory involvement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 218 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 11 Aug 2020to 28 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection;
- Admission to a hospital;
- Expected hospitalization in the center for at least for 24 hs;
- Oxygen Saturation >90% breathing without oxygen supplement;
- Age at least 45 years or the presence of one of the followings risk factors:
- Hypertension;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Diabetes (type I o II);
- At least moderate COPD or Asthma;
- Cardiovascular disease (history of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement surgery);
- Body Mass Index >=30;
- Signed Written consent.
Who cannot join
- <18 years old;
- Women in childbearing age;
- >= 72 hs since current admission;
- Requirement for high dose of oxygen (>5 liters/minute) or mechanical ventilation (non-invasive or invasive);
- History of Chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis or chronic liver failure;
- Inability for oral intake;
Show all 15Show fewer
- Previous treatment with pharmacological vitamin D;
- History of:
- previous treatment with anticonvulsants;
- sarcoidosis;
- malabsorption syndrome;
- Known hypercalcemia.
- Life expectancy less than 6 months;
- Known allergy to the study medication;
- Any condition impeding to bring informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Argentina1 site
Hospital de Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce
San Juan Bautista, Buenos Aires, 1888
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of High Dose of Vitamin D as Compared With Placebo to Prevent Complications Among COVID-19 Patients
The recent inception of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has caused thousands of deaths globally. The most frequently reported complications among COVID-19 patients are from respiratory involvement.
Vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects that could protect against COVID-19 infection. Indeed, there is good evidence from randomized clinical trials suggesting that high doses of vitamin D administered during cold seasons prevent viral respiratory infections in at risk individual, and more recently, observational studies suggested that the mortality rate from COVID-19 is inversely correlated with levels of serum 25(OH)vitamin D.
Read more
The hypothesis of the study is that a high dose of vitamin D given orally to patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 will prevent the occurrence of respiratory deragement and other adverse clinical events.
To evaluate the aforementioned hypothesis, a randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial comparing a 500.000 UI dose of vitamin D versus placebo among COVID-19 patients at moderate risk, requiring hospitalization but without requirements of critical care at admission was designed. The intervention will be one dose of 500.000 UI given orally or matching placebo.
The trial has a sequential design with two steps:
- The first step, projected to include 200 patients, will assess the effects of the intervention on the respiratory SOFA; and
- If there is a detectable effects, the second step, projected to include 1264 patients, will assess the effects on a combined event that includes need of high dose of oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
All study outcomes will be measured during the index hospitalization.
Read the detailed description
See above.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin DDrug
Also called Cholecalciferol
5 capsules of 100.000 UI Vitamin D orally given all at once. One dose.
PlaceboDrug
5 capsules of containing placebo orally given all at once. One dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | Experimental | 5 capsules containing 100.000 UI of vitamin D each. The intervention will be 5 capsules given in one-time oral intake. Receives: Drug: Vitamin D |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 5 capsules containing placebo. The intervention will be 5 capsules given in one-time oral intake. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory SOFA.
Is the respiratory component of the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score). It is a 4 points scale, each point indicate a deeper respiratory impairment. The score is based on the relationship between the arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2), as the ratio of both (PaFi). In the cases were arterial blood gas are not measured, the pulse oximetry will be used instead.
The respiratory SOFA is as follows:
- 1: PaO2/FiO2 >=300;
- 2: PaO2/FiO2 >=200 and <300;
- 3: PaO2/FiO2 >=100 and <200;
- 4: PaO2/FiO2 <100.
The minimum respiratory SOFA score will be record on daily basis during first week or to death or discharge, whichever occur first.
This outcome is the primary outcome of the first study phase.
Measured: One week
Need of a high dose of oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
The start of oxygen supplementation at FiO2 >40% or the initiation of invasive through orotracheal intubation) or non-invasive ventilation (Continuous positive airway pressure or Bilevel positive airway ventilation).
This outcome will be recorded during hospitalization to 30 days, the death or discharge, whichever occur first.
This is the primary outcome of the second study phase.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in oxygen saturation.
Difference between the oxygen saturation at study entry and the lowest oxygen saturation measured during the first week, the death or discharge, whichever occur first.
The oxygen saturation will be measured by pulse oximetry using commercially available devices.
Measured: One week
Oxygen desaturation.
Oxygen saturation equal or less than 90% in any moment during the hospitalization. This outcome will be measured by pulse oximetry using commercially available devices.
The outcome will be measured during the first week, the death or hospital discharge, whichever occur first.
Measured: One week
Change in Quick SOFA score.
The difference between the Quick SOFA score at study entry and the highest value recorded during the hospitalization.
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days.
Myocardial infarction.
Myocardial infarction is defined as suspicious symptoms with new Q waves in the EKG and enzymatic elevations compatible with the Fourth MI Definition.
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Stroke.
Stroke is defined as a focal neurological loss lasting >24 hs as reported by treating physician.
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Acute kidney injury.
Acute kidney injury is defined as an increase of at least 50% in serum creatinine levels (as compared with any previous value during the hospitalization).
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Pulmonary thromboembolism.
Pulmonary thromboembolism is defined as the presence of suspicious symptoms (i.e. dyspnea) confirmed with objective evidence of a thrombus in the pulmonary tree by CT or MRI or Pulmonary Angiography.
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Combined endpoint (stroke, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury and pulmonary thromboembolism.
Combined outcome of the aforementioned events, Stroke is defined as a focal neurological loss lasting >24 hs as reported by treating physician.
Myocardial infarction is defined as suspicious symptoms with new Q waves in the EKG and enzymatic elevations compatible with the Fourth MI Definition.
Pulmonary thromboembolism is defined as the presence of suspicious symptoms (i.e. dyspnea) confirmed with objective evidence of a thrombus in the pulmonary tree by CT or MRI or Pulmonary Angiography.
Acute kidney injury is defined as an increase of at least 50% in serum creatinine levels (as compared with any previous value during the hospitalization).
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Admission to ICU.
Admission to Intensive Care Unit due to clinical deterioration as judged by the treating physician.
The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.
The start of mechanical ventilation invasive during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days
Hospital Length of Stay.
Total duration of initial hospital stay in days. The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
In the cases with hospital stays longer than 30 days, it will considered as 30 days.
Measured: 30 days.
ICU length of stay.
Total duration of initial ICU stay in days. The outcome will be measured during the hospitalization until 30 days, the death or discharge whichever occur first.
In the cases with ICU stays longer than 30 days, it will considered as 30 days.
Measured: 30 days
Death
Death of any cause during the hospitalization until 30 days or discharge whichever occur first.
Measured: 30 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2020
- Study start11 Aug 2020
- Primary completion28 Jul 2021
- Study completion28 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVIDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two parallel arms randomized controlled trial. A sequential design will be used with the first primary outcome being the primary outcome for the first step. This step will include 200 patients. After reach this point, a review of the primary outcome (change in respiratory SOFA) will be done. According to these results, the Executive committee will decide to proceed the second step of the study and include the remaining 1064 patients to evaluate the second primary outcome (need for high dose of oxygen supplementation or mechanical ventilation).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vitamin D Study Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Walter Manucha, PhD, Study director, IMBECU, Univ Nac de Cuyo, Mendoza, ArgentinaCarlos Tajer, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce - Universidad Nacional Arturo JauretcheLaura Antonietti, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce - Universidad Nacional Arturo JauretcheLeón Ferder, MD, Principal investigator, Maimonides UniversityFelipe Inserra, MD, Principal investigator, Universidad Maimónides - Hospital Universitario AustralJavier Mariani, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce - Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04411446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 001
- Acronym
- CARED
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 26 May 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Martin Gimenez VM, Inserra F, Tajer CD, Mariani J, Ferder L, Reiter RJ, Manucha W. Lungs as target of COVID-19 infection: Protective common molecular mechanisms of vitamin D and melatonin as a new potential synergistic treatment. Life Sci. 2020 Aug 1;254:117808. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117808. Epub 2020 May 15.
PubMed 32422305Mariani J, Antonietti L, Tajer C, Ferder L, Inserra F, Sanchez Cunto M, Brosio D, Ross F, Zylberman M, Lopez DE, Luna Hisano C, Maristany Batisda S, Pace G, Salvatore A, Hogrefe JF, Turela M, Gaido A, Rodera B, Banega E, Iglesias ME, Rzepeski M, Gomez Portillo JM, Bertelli M, Vilela A, Heffner L, Annetta VL, Moracho L, Carmona M, Melito G, Martinez MJ, Luna G, Vensentini N, Manucha W. High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients: Multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0267918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267918. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35622854Mariani J, Tajer C, Antonietti L, Inserra F, Ferder L, Manucha W. High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CARED-TRIAL). Trials. 2021 Feb 1;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05073-3.
PubMed 33522946
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of High Dose of Vitamin D as Compared With Placebo to Prevent Complications Among COVID-19 Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04411446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARED / 001
- Conditions
- COVID
- Keywords
- COVID, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, Vitamin D, Cholecalciferol, Respiratory insufficiency
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vitamin D Study GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
- Study start
- 11 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The recent inception of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has caused thousands of deaths globally. The most frequently reported complications among COVID-19 patients are from respiratory involvement.
Vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects that could protect against COVID-19 infection. Indeed, there is good evidence from randomized clinical trials suggesting that high doses of vitamin D administered during cold seasons prevent viral respiratory infections in at risk individual, and more recently, observational studies suggested that the mortality rate from COVID-19 is inversely correlated with levels of serum 25(OH)vitamin D.
The hypothesis of the study is that a high dose of vitamin D given orally to patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 will prevent the occurrence of respiratory deragement and other adverse clinical events.
To evaluate the aforementioned hypothesis, a randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial comparing a 500.000 UI dose of vitamin D versus placebo among COVID-19 patients at moderate risk, requiring hospitalization but without requirements of critical care at admission was designed. The intervention will be one dose of 500.000 UI given orally or matching placebo.
The trial has a sequential design with two steps:
- The first step, projected to include 200 patients, will assess the effects of the intervention on the respiratory SOFA; and
- If there is a detectable effects, the second step, projected to include 1264 patients, will assess the effects on a combined event that includes need of high dose of oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
All study outcomes will be measured during the index hospitalization.
Detailed description
See above.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two parallel arms randomized controlled trial. A sequential design will be used with the first primary outcome being the primary outcome for the first step. This step will include 200 patients. After reach this point, a review of the primary outcome (change in respiratory SOFA) will be done. According to these results, the Executive committee will decide to proceed the second step of the study and include the remaining 1064 patients to evaluate the second primary outcome (need for high dose of oxygen supplementation or mechanical ventilation).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | Experimental | Drug: Vitamin D5 capsules containing 100.000 UI of vitamin D each. The intervention will be 5 capsules given in one-time oral intake. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo5 capsules containing placebo. The intervention will be 5 capsules given in one-time oral intake. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection;
- Admission to a hospital;
- Expected hospitalization in the center for at least for 24 hs;
- Oxygen Saturation >90% breathing without oxygen supplement;
- Age at least 45 years or the presence of one of the followings risk factors:
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- <18 years old;
- Women in childbearing age;
- >= 72 hs since current admission;
- Requirement for high dose of oxygen (>5 liters/minute) or mechanical ventilation (non-invasive or invasive);
- History of Chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis or chronic liver failure;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin DAlso: Cholecalciferol5 capsules of 100.000 UI Vitamin D orally given all at once. One dose. | Drug | Vitamin D |
| Placebo5 capsules of containing placebo orally given all at once. One dose. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Respiratory SOFA.
Time frame: One week
Is the respiratory component of the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score). It is a 4 points scale, each point indicate a deeper respiratory impairment. The score is based on the relationship between the arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2), as the ratio of both (PaFi). In the cases were arterial blood gas are not measured, the pulse oximetry will be used instead. The respiratory SOFA is as follows: * 1: PaO2/FiO2 >=300; * 2: PaO2/FiO2 >=200 and <300; * 3: PaO2/FiO2 >=100 and <200; * 4: PaO2/FiO2 <100. The minimum respiratory SOFA score will be record on daily basis during first week or to death or discharge, whichever occur first. This outcome is the primary outcome of the first study phase.
Need of a high dose of oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: 30 days
The start of oxygen supplementation at FiO2 >40% or the initiation of invasive through orotracheal intubation) or non-invasive ventilation (Continuous positive airway pressure or Bilevel positive airway ventilation). This outcome will be recorded during hospitalization to 30 days, the death or discharge, whichever occur first. This is the primary outcome of the second study phase.
13 secondary outcomes
Change in oxygen saturation.
Time frame: One week
Oxygen desaturation.
Time frame: One week
Change in Quick SOFA score.
Time frame: 30 days.
Myocardial infarction.
Time frame: 30 days
Stroke.
Time frame: 30 days
Acute kidney injury.
Time frame: 30 days
Pulmonary thromboembolism.
Time frame: 30 days
Combined endpoint (stroke, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury and pulmonary thromboembolism.
Time frame: 30 days
Admission to ICU.
Time frame: 30 days
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.
Time frame: 30 days
Hospital Length of Stay.
Time frame: 30 days.
ICU length of stay.
Time frame: 30 days
Death
Time frame: 30 days.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 32422305Martin Gimenez VM, Inserra F, Tajer CD, Mariani J, Ferder L, Reiter RJ, Manucha W. Lungs as target of COVID-19 infection: Protective common molecular mechanisms of vitamin D and melatonin as a new potential synergistic treatment. Life Sci. 2020 Aug 1;254:117808. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117808. Epub 2020 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35622854Mariani J, Antonietti L, Tajer C, Ferder L, Inserra F, Sanchez Cunto M, Brosio D, Ross F, Zylberman M, Lopez DE, Luna Hisano C, Maristany Batisda S, Pace G, Salvatore A, Hogrefe JF, Turela M, Gaido A, Rodera B, Banega E, Iglesias ME, Rzepeski M, Gomez Portillo JM, Bertelli M, Vilela A, Heffner L, Annetta VL, Moracho L, Carmona M, Melito G, Martinez MJ, Luna G, Vensentini N, Manucha W. High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients: Multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0267918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267918. eCollection 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33522946Mariani J, Tajer C, Antonietti L, Inserra F, Ferder L, Manucha W. High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CARED-TRIAL). Trials. 2021 Feb 1;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05073-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COVID
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Walter Manucha, PhD study director
IMBECU, Univ Nac de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
Carlos Tajer, MD principal investigator
Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce - Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche
Laura Antonietti, MD principal investigator
Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce - Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Vitamin D in people with COVID, run by Vitamin D Study Group at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory SOFA. (time frame: One week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04411446, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2021.