AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4SMART-CHOICE3NCT04418479

SMart Angioplasty Research Team: CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 3

A Phase 4 study testing Aspirin and Clopidogrel in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Joo-Yong Hahn at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy beyond the standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (more than 12 months for myocardial infarction [MI] and more than 6 months for non-MI) after… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Aspirin and Clopidogrel
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5,506 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
10 Aug 2020to 12 Nov 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject must be at least 19 years of age
  • Patients at high risk of recurrence of ischemic events who have undergone PCI using a DES and are receiving standard DAPT (12 months* or more for myocardial infarction and 6 months* or more for non-myocardial infarction)
  • Patients at high risk for recurrent ischemic events, which were defined as one or more of the following clinical or lesion characteristics.
  • Clinical characteristics
  • Patients with prior myocardial infarction.
  • Patients with diabetes mellitus who receive oral hypoglycemic agent or insulin.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Complex lesion characteristics Complex lesion was defined as one or more of the following.
  • True bifurcation lesion (Medina 1,1,1/1,0,1/0,1,1) and is able to assess the side branch ostium
  • Chronic total occlusion (≥3 months) as target lesion
  • PCI for unprotected left main disease (left main ostium, body, or distal bifurcation including non-true bifurcation lesions)
  • Long coronary lesions (implanted stent length ≥38 mm)
  • Multi-vessel PCI (≥ 2 vessels treated at one PCI session)
  • Multiple stent needed (≥ 3 stents per patient)
  • In-stent restenosis lesion as target lesion
  • Severely calcified lesion (encircling calcium in angiography) i . Ostial lesions of left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, or right coronary artery
  • Subject who is able to understand risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and sign informed consent voluntarily.

Who cannot join

  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to study medications (aspirin or clopidogrel)
  • Patients who need continuous anticoagulant therapy.
  • Patients who require DAPT due to atherosclerotic disease other than coronary artery disease
  • Patients who are scheduled for revascularization treatment of coronary artery
  • A patient who are taking single antiplatelet therapy at screening
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 06351

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients At High Risk for Recurrent Ischemic Events

This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy beyond the standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (more than 12 months for myocardial infarction [MI] and more than 6 months for non-MI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic events.

Read the detailed description

After the introduction of the second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), the rates of device-related failure or target lesion failure such as restenosis and stent thrombosis has been markedly decreased, compared with the era of bare-metal stents or first-generation DES. Nevertheless, the risk of ischemic events including very late stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has still remained even though the use of second-generation DES. In this regard, the ACC (American College of Cardiology)/AHA (American Heart Association) and ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines recommended that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be considered for 12 months or longer in patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and for 6 months or longer in patients presented with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) after PCI with DES. In particular, patients presented with a high risk of ischemic events such as diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, or complex coronary lesions were associated with significantly increased future recurrent ischemic events after PCI with DES. In addition, maintenance of DAPT for 12 months or longer has been shown to reduce the recurrence of ischemic events up to 44% in patients treated with PCI for complex coronary artery lesion; therefore the current guideline recommended that prolonged DAPT might be considered when performing complex PCI. However, prolonged DAPT increases bleeding risk and cost. Endoscopic, dental, and surgical procedures are often delayed due to prolonged DAPT, which may affect the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to determine the optimal or minimal necessary duration of DAPT is very important.

The other important issue is that which antiplatelet agent is more appropriate after DAPT. Aspirin monotherapy has been recommended traditionally. However, there is no randomized comparison study between aspirin monotherapy versus clopidogrel monotherapy after DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with DES. Furthermore, clopidogrel is also actively used as a monotherapy after DAPT in real-world practice. In CAPRIE (clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events) trial, clopidogrel showed a superior efficacy in preventing ischemic events compared with aspirin. Moreover, the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly lower with clopidogrel than with aspirin. Clopidogrel monotherapy can reduce ischemic events and bleeding risk compared with aspirin monotherapy.

Therefore, the purpose of the SMART-CHOICE 3 (SMart Angioplasty Research Team: CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 3) trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy beyond the standard duration of DAPT after PCI with current-generation DES in patients at high risk for recurrent ischemic events.

Being tested
Aspirin, Clopidogrel
Keywords
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Antiplatelet Therapy, Complex Coronary Lesion, Aspirin, Clopidogrel
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AspirinDrug

    Also called Aspirin monotherapy

    Randomization will be performed 1:1 between clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy in patients who completed standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and who were at high risk for recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES).

    This group will be taken aspirin 100 mg once daily during the study period.

  • ClopidogrelDrug

    Also called Clopidogrel monotherapy

    Randomization will be performed 1:1 between clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy in patients who completed standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and who were at high risk for recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES).

    This group will be taken clopidogrel 75 mg once daily during the study period.

Study groups in NCT04418479
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aspirin monotherapy armActive comparatorPatients will receive 100 mg of aspirin once daily.
Receives: Drug: Aspirin
Clopidogrel monotherapy armExperimentalPatients will receive 75 mg of clopidogrel once daily.
Receives: Drug: Clopidogrel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)

    a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Rates of all-cause death

    Death by any cause

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  2. Rates of cardiovascular death

    Death by cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  3. Rates of myocardial infarction

    Myocardial infarction

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  4. Rates of stroke

    Stroke

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  5. Rates of stent thrombosis

    definite or probable by Academic Research Consortium [ARC] definition

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  6. Rates of all-cause death or MI

    A composite of all-cause death or MI

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  7. Rates of cardiovascular death or MI

    A composite of cardiovascular death or MI

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  8. Rates of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke

    A composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  9. Rates of cardiovascular death, MI, or stent thrombosis

    A composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stent thrombosis

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  10. Rates of major Bleeding

    BARC [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium] types 3 or 5

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  11. Rates of bleeding

    BARC [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium] types 2, 3, or 5

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  12. Rates of upper gastrointestinal clinical event

    A composite of upper gastrointestinal clinical event

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  13. Rates of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding

    A composite of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  14. New diagnosed rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

    Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  15. Rates of NACE (Net adverse clinical events)

    MACCE + BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  16. Rates of Target-lesion revascularization (TLR)

    Target-lesion revascularization (TLR)

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  17. Rates of Target-vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Target-vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  18. Rates of any revascularization

    any revascularization including TLR, TVR, and non-TVR re-percutaneous coronary intervention

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

  19. Medical cost

    Medical cost

    Measured: 1-year after last patient enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2020
  2. Study start10 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion12 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5,506 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04418479
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHOICE-3
Acronym
SMART-CHOICE3
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
1 Jun 2020
Last updated
30 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Lee JM, Gim DH, Park YH, Lee JY, Jeong JO, Kim CJ, Yun KH, Lee HC, Chang K, Park MW, Bae JW, Doh JH, Cho BR, Kim HY, Kim W, Kim U, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Ahn SG, Kim DI, Cho JH, Her SH, Jeon DS, Han SH, Lee JB, Lee CW, Kang D, Choi KH, Park TK, Yang JH, Lee SY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Song YB, Hahn JY; SMART-CHOICE 3 Investigators. Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy According to Atherothrombotic Risk Profile. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Oct 29:e017277. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.126.017277. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42953942
  • Lee SY, Joo D, Lee JM, Park YH, Lee JY, Jeong JO, Kim CJ, Lee HC, Chang K, Park MW, Bae JW, Doh JH, Cho BR, Kim HY, Kim W, Kim U, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Ahn SG, Kim DI, Cho JH, Her SH, Jeon DS, Han SH, Lee JB, Lee CW, Kang D, Choi KH, Park TK, Yang JH, Lee SY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Song YB, Hahn JY, Yun KH; SMART-CHOICE 3 Investigators. Clopidogrel vs Aspirin According to Diabetes Mellitus: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Jun 22:S1936-8798(26)01539-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2026.05.013. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42461194
  • Choi KH, Park YH, Lee JY, Jeong JO, Kim CJ, Yun KH, Lee HC, Chang K, Park MW, Bae JW, Doh JH, Cho BR, Kim HY, Kim W, Kim U, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Ahn SG, Kim DI, Cho JH, Her SH, Jeon DS, Han SH, Lee JB, Lee CW, Kang D, Lee JM, Park TK, Yang JH, Lee SY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Song YB, Hahn JY; SMART-CHOICE 3 investigators. Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients at high risk of subsequent cardiovascular event after percutaneous coronary intervention (SMART-CHOICE 3): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2025 Apr 12;405(10486):1252-1263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00449-0. Epub 2025 Mar 30.

    PubMed 40174599

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Aspirin and Clopidogrel in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Joo-Yong Hahn at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (time frame: 1-year after last patient enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04418479, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
SMART-CHOICE3 Clinical Trial NCT04418479 | AzTrials