ExerciseNCT04420806
Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown in Exercising Early Postmenopausal Women
A study testing HIT-exercise in people with Exercise and Detraining, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
While "conditioning" by exercise training has been widely evaluated, the available literature on "passive deconditioning" (i.e. forced deconditioning) is predominately limited to studies with or with almost complete mechanical and/or metabolic immobilization/sedation of the respective functional system (e.g. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 48 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Exercise, Detraining, Muscle Weakness
- What is being tested?
- HIT-exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 14 Mar 2020to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 48 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- (early)postmenopausal women, ( normal menopause, 1-5 years post)
- Osteopenia and osteoporosis (Bone Mineral Density <-1.0 SD T-Score)
Who cannot join
- BMD <-4.0 SD T-Score
- Prevalent clinical, low-trauma fractures
- Diseases and drugs with relevant effects on bone and muscle metabolism (e.g. glucocorticoids >7.5 mg/d or bisphosphonate therapy); individual case assessment
- Diseases and drugs with relevant effects on cardiometabolic risk factors (e.g. severe hypertension with corresponding medical therapy); individual case assessment
- Severe cardiovascular events (e.g. stroke, coronary infarction) in the past.
- Other conditions, diseases that exclude exercise training or testing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexanden University Erlangen-Nürnberg
Erlangen, 91052
About this study
Official title: Effects of Three Months of COVID-19 Lockdown Induced Deconditioning After 13 Months of High Intensity Exercise Training in Early Postmenopausal Women
While "conditioning" by exercise training has been widely evaluated, the available literature on "passive deconditioning" (i.e. forced deconditioning) is predominately limited to studies with or with almost complete mechanical and/or metabolic immobilization/sedation of the respective functional system (e.g. paralysis, bedriddenness). Vice versa, the effects of moderately long interruptions of dedicated types of exercise while maintaining everyday activity are rarely addressed. However, this topic is of high relevance, e.g. considering that breaks of health-related exercise programs due to increased family/occupational stress, vacation or temporary orthopedic limitation are rather frequent in everyday life. In the present project we aimed to determine the effects of 3 months of physical deconditioning due to COVID-19 induced lockdown after 13 month of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise in early postmenopausal women on parameters related to health and physical fitness.
- Conditions
- Exercise, Detraining, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Atrophy
- Being tested
- HIT-exercise, Sham intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Muscle Weakness, Muscular Atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HIT-exerciseOther
13 months of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise, 3x 45 min/week - 3 months of COVID-19 induced exercise break
Sham interventionOther
Types of exercise (flexibility, relaxation) that did not affect the present outcomes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIT-exercise | Active comparator | 13 months of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise - 3 months of exercise break Receives: Other: HIT-exercise |
| control | Sham comparator | no exercise intervention that affect the present study outcomes Receives: Other: Sham intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Body composition
Body composition as determined by Dual-Energy x-Ray Absorptiometry
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Secondary outcomes (5)
Hip-/Leg extension strength
Hip-/Leg extension strength as determined by an isokinetic leg press
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Metabolic Syndrome
cardio-metabolic risk factors summarized in the Metabolic Syndrome Z-Score according to the definition of the International Diabetes Federation
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip as determined by Dual Energy x-Ray Absorptiometry
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Menopausal symptoms
Menopausal symptoms as determined by the "Menopausal Rating Scale" (MRS) with a scale from 0 (no complaints) to 4 (very serious complaints).
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Back and joint pain
Back and joint pain as determined by a standardized pain questionnaire with a scale from 0 (never) to 7 (permanent) for pain frequency or 0 (no pain) to 7 (extremely) for pain severity.
Measured: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2020
- Study start14 Mar 2020
- Primary completion30 Jul 2020
- Study completion30 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ExerciseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- One exercise versus one control group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Hettchen, MSc, Principal investigator, Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04420806
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ER_ACTLIFE_FU
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kemmler W, Hettchen M, Kohl M, Murphy M, Bragonzoni L, Julin M, Risto T, von Stengel S. Detraining Effects on Musculoskeletal Parameters in Early Postmenopausal Osteopenic Women: 3-Month Follow-Up of the Randomized Controlled ACTLIFE Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Jul;109(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00829-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
PubMed 33712920
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Three Months of COVID-19 Lockdown Induced Deconditioning After 13 Months of High Intensity Exercise Training in Early Postmenopausal Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04420806
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ER_ACTLIFE_FU
- Conditions
- Exercise, Detraining, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Atrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
While "conditioning" by exercise training has been widely evaluated, the available literature on "passive deconditioning" (i.e. forced deconditioning) is predominately limited to studies with or with almost complete mechanical and/or metabolic immobilization/sedation of the respective functional system (e.g. paralysis, bedriddenness). Vice versa, the effects of moderately long interruptions of dedicated types of exercise while maintaining everyday activity are rarely addressed. However, this topic is of high relevance, e.g. considering that breaks of health-related exercise programs due to increased family/occupational stress, vacation or temporary orthopedic limitation are rather frequent in everyday life. In the present project we aimed to determine the effects of 3 months of physical deconditioning due to COVID-19 induced lockdown after 13 month of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise in early postmenopausal women on parameters related to health and physical fitness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- One exercise versus one control group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIT-exercise | Active comparator | Other: HIT-exercise13 months of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise - 3 months of exercise break |
| control | Sham comparator | Other: Sham interventionno exercise intervention that affect the present study outcomes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 48 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (early)postmenopausal women, ( normal menopause, 1-5 years post)
- Osteopenia and osteoporosis (Bone Mineral Density <-1.0 SD T-Score)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- BMD <-4.0 SD T-Score
- Prevalent clinical, low-trauma fractures
- Diseases and drugs with relevant effects on bone and muscle metabolism (e.g. glucocorticoids >7.5 mg/d or bisphosphonate therapy); individual case assessment
- Diseases and drugs with relevant effects on cardiometabolic risk factors (e.g. severe hypertension with corresponding medical therapy); individual case assessment
- Severe cardiovascular events (e.g. stroke, coronary infarction) in the past.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HIT-exercise13 months of high intensity endurance and resistance exercise, 3x 45 min/week - 3 months of COVID-19 induced exercise break | Other | HIT-exercise |
| Sham interventionTypes of exercise (flexibility, relaxation) that did not affect the present outcomes | Other | control |
Primary outcome
Body composition
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Body composition as determined by Dual-Energy x-Ray Absorptiometry
5 secondary outcomes
Hip-/Leg extension strength
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Metabolic Syndrome
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Menopausal symptoms
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Back and joint pain
Time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33712920Kemmler W, Hettchen M, Kohl M, Murphy M, Bragonzoni L, Julin M, Risto T, von Stengel S. Detraining Effects on Musculoskeletal Parameters in Early Postmenopausal Osteopenic Women: 3-Month Follow-Up of the Randomized Controlled ACTLIFE Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Jul;109(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00829-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Exercise
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Hettchen, MSc principal investigator
Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HIT-exercise in people with Exercise and Detraining, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Body composition (time frame: From intervention end to 3 months FU). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04420806, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020.