AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic BleedingNCT04424563

Activated Factor Seven in Traumatic Retro Peritoneal Hematoma

An observational study of Traumatic Bleeding, run by King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

80 patients with traumatic retro-peritoneal hematoma allocated into two groups 40 patients each. Patients of Group A received aminocaproic acid while patients of group B received aFVII. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Traumatic Bleeding
What is being tested?
ventilators, aminocaproic acid and Novo Seven
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
5 May 2017to 30 Dec 2019
How long will I take part?
2 Days
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 80 patients admitted to King Abdul-Aziz Specialist Hospital in Taif, KSA between May 2017 and December 2019 with polytrauma and severe retroperitoneal bleeding diagnosed by abdominal computerized tomography. King Abdelaziz research and ethical committee approved the project under heading of ethical approval and heading of human and animal rights along with Helsinki Declaration.

Who may be able to join

  • severe bleeding

Who cannot join

  • post arrest

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Saudi Arabia1 site
  • King abd el Aziz specialist hospital

    Ta'if, 21944

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Activated Factor Seven (aFVII) Versus Aminocaproic Acid For Treatment of Traumatic Retro-Peritoneal Hematoma

80 patients with traumatic retro-peritoneal hematoma allocated into two groups 40 patients each. Patients of Group A received aminocaproic acid while patients of group B received aFVII. Number of packed RBCs given to get target Hb level and time to get this target Hb level (>10 gm%) recorded as indicators for control bleeding. Blood pressure, pulse, Arterial blood gasses and urine output recorded as indicator for treatment of hypovolemic shock. hypoxic index, chest X ray and coagulation profile used as indicator for complication.

Read the detailed description

80 patients admitted to King Abdul-Aziz Specialist Hospital in Taif, KSA between May 2017 and December 2019 with polytrauma and severe retroperitoneal bleeding diagnosed by abdominal computerized tomography.

King Abdelaziz research and ethical committee approved the project under heading of ethical approval and heading of human and animal rights along with Helsinki Declaration.

A written consent from the patient or from their 1st degree relative was obtained if patient intubated. The primary outcome of This study divided into 3 parts. 1st 0ne compare the ability of both drugs to stop retroperitoneal bleeding efficiently and in shorter time for these 2 measurable indicators selected in our study the number of packed RBCS needed to achieve hemoglobin level (Hb) > 10 gm% and the time needed to achieve this target Hb. the 2nd part indicators divided into clinical indicators (blood pressure, pulse and urine output) and laboratory indicators [arterial blood gases especially PH, and bicarbonate concentration (HCO3)]. the 3rd part indicators PT, PTT and Platelets count were used as indicator for DIC and hypoxic index and chest x ray were used as indicator for TRALI (transfusion related acute lung injury).

Resuscitation done in all patients in both groups according to hospital protocol by crystalloid (normal saline), colloids [plasma protein fraction-packed RBCs, fresh frozen plasma], until achieve satisfactory stable vital data. All laboratory work samples were collected (CBC complete blood picture, Blood chemistry included liver enzymes and kidney function tests, Coagulation profile, arterial blood gasses).

Urine output collected hourly. Our study included any patient who received more than 50ml/kg blood during the first 8hours after admission in order to achieved a hemoglobin level >10 gram %, with platelet count more than 50, 000/mm3 after resuscitation and Their temperature was more than 36 degree centigrade after warming. Which considered criteria needed to get maximum effect from aFVII if used intravenously. Patient randomized into 2 groups, 40 patients in each, this done by randomization numbers. Patients of group A received aminocaproic acid at dose of 4 gram slowly intravenous infusion over 1 hour and continues slowly intravenous infusion 1 gram/ hour for 8 hours. While patients of group B received aFVII according to the following protocol, First dose 200 microgram/kg. If patient still oozing, vital data not stable and/or could not achieve and keep the target Hb (>10 gm%) another 2 doses of aFVII received each dose 100microgram /kg 1 hour and 3 hours apart from the initial dose if needed. The exclusion criteria in our study, if patient had cardiac arrest before giving aFVII, deeply comatose with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 3/15 and pupil dilated fixed.

All patient in both groups observed for 48hours and the following indicators recorded.

Indicators for efficacy of stop bleeding (number of packed RBCs needed to keep hemoglobin level >10 gm% and time needed to reach this target Hb).

Indicators for ability of both drugs to treatment the hemorrhagic shock and restore tissue perfusion (and this assessed by clinical indicators blood pressure, pulse and urine output and laboratory indicators as arterial PH and bicarbonate concentration ( HCO3) Indicators for ability of both drugs to protect the patients with retroperitoneal hematoma from complications of massive blood transfusion and in this 2 complications were selected the disseminated intra-vascular coagulopathy (DIC) and PT, PTT, Platelets count were used as indicators and (TRALI) transfusion related acute lung injury and the hypoxic index and chest x ray were used as indicators. The duration of the study only two days and the data recorded every 8 hours.

Being tested
ventilators, aminocaproic acid, Novo Seven

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ventilatorsDevice

    all patients in both groups will be ventilated if shocked and no recordable blood pressure

  • aminocaproic acidDrug

    Also called Amicar

    4 gram slowly intravenous infusion over 1 hour and continues slowly intravenous infusion 1 gram/ hour for 8 hours.

  • Novo SevenDrug

    Also called activated factor seven

    200 microgram/kg. If patient still oozing, vital data not stable and/or could not achieve and keep the target Hb (>10 gm%) another 2 doses of aFVII received

Study groups in NCT04424563
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group APatients of group A include 40 patients, received aminocaproic acid at dose of 4 gram slowly intravenous infusion over 1 hour and continues slowly intravenous infusion 1 gram/ hour for 8 hours.
Receives: Device: ventilators; Drug: aminocaproic acid
Group BWhile patients of group B include 40 patients, received aFVII according to the following protocol, First dose 200 microgram/kg. If patient still oozing, vital data not stable and/or could not achieve and keep the target Hb (>10 gm%) another 2 doses of aFVII received each dose 100microgram /kg 1 hour and 3 hours apart from the initial dose if needed.
Receives: Device: ventilators; Drug: Novo Seven

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. stop bleeding

    efficacy of activated factor seven with aminocaproic acid in medical treatment of retroperitoneal bleeding,

    Measured: 2 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2020
  2. Study start5 May 2017
  3. Primary completion19 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Days
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04424563
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICU-8-20
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
6 Jun 2020
Last updated
11 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Traumatic Bleeding, run by King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

stop bleeding (time frame: 2 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in