Non-valvular Atrial FibrillationNCT04429646
LAMax Vs. Watchman LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular AF to Reduce the Risk of Stroke
A study testing Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMax and Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-Watchman in people with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 12 sites in China.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LAMax Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure System. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMax and Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-Watchman
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 236 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2019to 10 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years old with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2
- There is one of the following: (1) Not suitable for long-term standard anticoagulation treatment; (2) On the basis of long-term standardized anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, stroke or embolism still occurred; (3) HAS-BLED ≥ 3.
- Provide written informed consent and agree to comply with required follow-ups.
Who cannot join
- . Patients with other diseases other than AF who need long-term warfarin anticoagulation therapy;
- . Those who need selective cardiac surgery;
- . Heart failure NYHA grade IV;
- . AF caused by rheumatic valvular disease, degenerative valvular disease, congenital valvular disease, severe mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, or other valvular diseases;
- . The early onset of AF and paroxysmal AF with definite causes, such as secondary to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hyperthyroidism;
- . Patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease (such as carotid stenosis > 50%);
Show all 30Show fewer
- . Patients with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or recent myocardial infarction < 3 months;
- . Stroke or TIA within 30 days;
- . Bleeding disease, coagulation-related diseases, and active peptic ulcer;
- . Active endocarditis, vegetations, or other infections causing bacteremia or sepsis;
- . Conditions may lead to difficulty in testing or significantly shorten the life expectancy of patients (< 1 year);
- . Pregnant, lactating or planned pregnancy during the trial;
- . Patients who have not reached the end of other clinical trials of drug or device;
- . Hematological abnormality (WBC < 3 × 109 / L, HB < 90g / L, or platelet count < 50 × 109 / L or > 700 × 109 / L));
- . Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0mg/dl or 265.2umoi / L), and / or advanced renal diseases requiring dialysis;
- . Severe liver dysfunction (AST / ALT is 5 times higher than the upper limit of normal value, or total bilirubin is 2 times higher than the upper limit of normal value);
- . The investigator believes that the patient is not suitable to participate in the clinical trial.
- . Left atrial appendage has been removed, post heart transplantation, post atrial septal repair, or post occluder implantation;
- . Radiofrequency ablation in 30 days before and after the implantation of LAA occluder;
- . Cardioversion within 30 days after the implantation of LAA occluder;
- . Post prosthetic heart valve replacement;
- . Allergic to or contraindication to metal nickel alloy, aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast agent, heparin and other anticoagulants, etc;
- . Patients who have placed other instruments in the cardiovascular cavity and are unable to place the LAA occluder;
- . LVEF(left ventricular ejection fraction )<35%;
- . Clear thrombus is found in the heart before device implantation;
- . TEE examination: refer to Watchman LAAC requirement to measure the orifice diameter of LAA, the maximum diameter is less than 17 mm, or more than 31 mm;
- . Patent foramen ovale with high risk;
- . mitral stenosis with a valve area ≤ 2 cm2;
- . left atrial diameter > 65mm, or pericardial effusion more than a small amount, the depth of local effusion > 10 mm;
- . Contraindications to X-ray, or not suitable for TEE examination.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
China12 sites
The Third Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital
Beijing, 100039
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, 400010
Ganzhou Municipal Hospital
Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341001
The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
The First Municipal hospital of Ningbo
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, 200011
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050003
General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
Tianjin, 300020
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Active Controlled, Clinical Trial of the LAMax LAA Closure System Compared to the Watchman® LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic Stroke
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LAMax Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure System.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LAMax Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) System. Subjects with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the Experimental Treatment Arm (LAMax LAAC system) or the Control Arm (Watchman LAAC system, Boston Scientific Inc., USA). The trial is designed to demonstrate that safety and effectiveness of the LAMax device are non-inferior to the Watchman device.
- Conditions
- Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMax, Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-Watchman
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Ischemic Stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMaxDevice
Interventional device, LAMax left atrial appendage closure system
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-WatchmanDevice
Interventional device, Watchman® LAA Closure Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LAMax left atrial appendage occluder | Experimental | Intervention device, LAMax left atrial appendage closure system Receives: Device: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMax |
| Watchman (control) | Active comparator | Intervention device, Watchman® LAA Closure Device Receives: Device: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-Watchman |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Successful sealing of the LAA
A composite rate of successful sealing of the left atrial appendage (defined as residual flow ≤ 5 mm) at the 12-month visit documented by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE).
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Ischemic stroke, TIA, or Systemic embolism
A composite rate of ischemic stroke, TIA or systemic embolism.
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Secondary outcomes (10)
All stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death
A composite rate of all stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death.
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Incidence of MACCE events
A composite rate of MACCE, includes all-cause mortality, stroke, device embolism, cardiac tamponade.
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Major Bleeding post-device implant
Major bleeding rate at 12 months post-implant: defined as Type 3a or greater based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition.
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Success rate of device collapse and reposition during implantation procedure
It is one of the measures to describe device performance during implantation procedure.
Measured: 0 day
Rate of cardiac temponade during implantation procedure
It is one of the measures to describe the performance of device and delivery system during implantation procedure.
Measured: 0 day
Success rate of delivering an occlusion device to the LAA by the delivery system
It is one of the measures to describe the performance of delivery system during implantation procedure.
Measured: 0 day
Success rate of withdrawing a delivery system after LAAC
It is one of the measures to describe the performance of delivery system.
Measured: 0 day
Device performance post-implantation
A composite rate of device migration, embolization, regurgitation, perivalvular leak post-implantation.
Measured: 12 months post-implantation
Device success rate
A composite rate to describe that the device can be successfully delivered in place and successfully implanted, and angiography shows that the implanted device is in the right position, no residual flow or residual flow is less than 5 mm, and the delivery system can be successfully withdrawn.
Measured: 0 day
Perioperative clinical success rate
A composite rate to describe that the device's function is normal, including that it was successfully implanted, the residual flow was less than 5mm, the implanted device had no effect on mitral valve movement and pulmonary vein blood flow, and there was no major adverse event (MAE) at the time of discharge.
Measured: 7 days post-implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2020
- Study start20 Apr 2019
- Primary completion11 Nov 2020
- Study completion10 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-valvular Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Primary Purpose: Prevention Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Masking: Open Label
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 236 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, The First Hospital of Jilin University, LanZhou University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The First Municipal hospital of Ningbo, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, ShenZhen KYD Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jian'an Wang,MD,PhD, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Jian-an Wang, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineDongxing Ma, MD, Principal investigator, Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04429646
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SAHZJU CT019
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 6 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Fan Y, Ma D, Wang C, Luo J, Ling Z, Li S, Peng X, Zhang Z, Chu H, Wang J; investigators in the present study. A Membrane Modification Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 1):374-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.008. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
PubMed 40049930
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Active Controlled, Clinical Trial of the LAMax LAA Closure System Compared to the Watchman® LAAC Device for Subjects With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04429646
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAHZJU CT019
- Conditions
- Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Ischemic Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 236 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, The First Hospital of Jilin University, LanZhou University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The First Municipal hospital of Ningbo, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, ShenZhen KYD Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LAMax Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure System.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LAMax Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) System. Subjects with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the Experimental Treatment Arm (LAMax LAAC system) or the Control Arm (Watchman LAAC system, Boston Scientific Inc., USA). The trial is designed to demonstrate that safety and effectiveness of the LAMax device are non-inferior to the Watchman device.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Primary Purpose: Prevention Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Masking: Open Label
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LAMax left atrial appendage occluder | Experimental | Device: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMaxIntervention device, LAMax left atrial appendage closure system |
| Watchman (control) | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-WatchmanIntervention device, Watchman® LAA Closure Device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years old with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2
- There is one of the following: (1) Not suitable for long-term standard anticoagulation treatment; (2) On the basis of long-term standardized anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, stroke or embolism still occurred; (3) HAS-BLED ≥ 3.
- Provide written informed consent and agree to comply with required follow-ups.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- . Patients with other diseases other than AF who need long-term warfarin anticoagulation therapy;
- . Those who need selective cardiac surgery;
- . Heart failure NYHA grade IV;
- . AF caused by rheumatic valvular disease, degenerative valvular disease, congenital valvular disease, severe mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, or other valvular diseases;
- . The early onset of AF and paroxysmal AF with definite causes, such as secondary to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hyperthyroidism;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMaxInterventional device, LAMax left atrial appendage closure system | Device | LAMax left atrial appendage occluder |
| Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-WatchmanInterventional device, Watchman® LAA Closure Device | Device | Watchman (control) |
Primary outcome
Successful sealing of the LAA
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
A composite rate of successful sealing of the left atrial appendage (defined as residual flow ≤ 5 mm) at the 12-month visit documented by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE).
Ischemic stroke, TIA, or Systemic embolism
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
A composite rate of ischemic stroke, TIA or systemic embolism.
10 secondary outcomes
All stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
Incidence of MACCE events
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
Major Bleeding post-device implant
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
Success rate of device collapse and reposition during implantation procedure
Time frame: 0 day
Rate of cardiac temponade during implantation procedure
Time frame: 0 day
Success rate of delivering an occlusion device to the LAA by the delivery system
Time frame: 0 day
Success rate of withdrawing a delivery system after LAAC
Time frame: 0 day
Device performance post-implantation
Time frame: 12 months post-implantation
Device success rate
Time frame: 0 day
Perioperative clinical success rate
Time frame: 7 days post-implantation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40049930Fan Y, Ma D, Wang C, Luo J, Ling Z, Li S, Peng X, Zhang Z, Chu H, Wang J; investigators in the present study. A Membrane Modification Technique for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 1):374-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.008. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
Related trials for Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
An Early Feasibility Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the Laminar Left Atrial Appendage Closure System in Subjects With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CHAMPION-AF Clinical Trial
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Vortosiran in Atrial Fibrillation
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
WATCHMAN FLX Pro European Registry
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Active, not recruiting
LAmbre™ II Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Occluder Delivery System for Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jian-an Wang, MD, PhD principal investigator
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
Dongxing Ma, MD principal investigator
Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-LAMax and Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-Watchman in people with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 12 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Successful sealing of the LAA (time frame: 12 months post-implantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04429646, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2022.