AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Non-Small Cell CarcinomaNCT04430725

Microwave Ablation or Wedge Resection for the Treatment of Lung, Sarcoma and Colorectal Lesions, ALLUME Study

An observational study of Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the outcomes and safety of two standard treatment options called microwave ablation and surgical wedge resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, sarcoma and colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Computed Tomography with Contrast, Microwave Ablation and Questionnaire Administration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Aug 2019to 1 Jan 2028
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic sarcoma, or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient has a lung lesion(s) that is either biopsy-proven cancer or shows sequential growth on CT imaging with clinical suspicion for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-stage I; NSCLC-stage > 1; metastatic sarcoma; or metastatic colorectal (CRC) cancer
  • 3 cm or less tumor size
  • Other sites for cancer are either controlled or there are plans for control
  • Expected margin at least 1 cm from critical structures, allowing for protective strategies such as induction of therapeutic pneumothorax. Critical structures include the trachea, main bronchi, esophagus, aorta, aortic arch branches, superior vena cava (SVC), main, right or left pulmonary artery, or heart.

Who cannot join

  • Patient is considered high risk for ablation due to major comorbid medical conditions
  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Ablation of Lung Lesions Using Microwave Energy (ALLUME)

This study compares the outcomes and safety of two standard treatment options called microwave ablation and surgical wedge resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, sarcoma and colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Microwave ablation is designed to kill tumor cells by heating the tumor until the tumor cells die. A wedge resection is a procedure that involves the surgical removal of a small, wedge-shaped piece of lung tissue to remove a small tumor or to diagnose lung cancer. Comparing these two treatment options may help researchers learn which method works better for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic sarcoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. Estimate the 2-year local recurrence rate for microwave ablation within a basket.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for safety when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

II. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for efficacy when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

III. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for changes in patient reported outcomes when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.

Being tested
Computed Tomography with Contrast, Microwave Ablation, Questionnaire Administration, Wedge Excision
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Colorectal Neoplasms, Sarcoma, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Computed Tomography with ContrastProcedure or surgery

    Also called Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography, CONTRAST ENHANCED CT SCAN, Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography, CT Scan With Contrast

    Undergo contrast-enhanced CT

  • Microwave AblationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Ablation, Microwave

    Undergo microwave ablation

  • Questionnaire AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

  • Wedge ExcisionProcedure or surgery

    Also called Wedge Resection

    Undergo wedge resection

Study groups in NCT04430725
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Observational (microwave ablation, wedge excision, CT)Patients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced CT imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.
Receives: Procedure: Computed Tomography with Contrast; Procedure: Microwave Ablation; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Procedure: Wedge Excision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to local recurrence per treated nodule

    Will be measured from the first date of treatment and characterized according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and/or biopsy. The local recurrence of each subtype will be adjusted according to the method proposed by Fine and Gray. Will evaluate each basket individually and allow patients to contribute multiple nodules. Therefore, the Bayesian piecewise constant frailty model will be used to account for interdependence in the failure duration of nodules arising from the same patient. Additional posterior summaries will be reported, such as median failure duration. Additionally, will report plots of the full time-to-failure distribution with pointwise 95% Bayesian credible intervals.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-ablation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Incidence of clinically significant adverse events

    The occurrence of significant adverse events will be recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) published by the National Institutes of Health. Grade III or above adverse events within the following categories: cardiac disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. 30-day mortality will also be recorded. Patient adverse events will be tabulated by symptom grade and categories.

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  2. Time to local recurrence per patient

    Contrast-enhanced CT imaging will be used to monitor for local recurrence. Local recurrence will be defined either by a positive biopsy or by radiographic RECIST criteria. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-ablation

  3. Regional and distance recurrence

    Regional and distant recurrence will be defined either by a positive biopsy or by radiographic RECIST criteria. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-ablation

  4. Overall survival per patient

    Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-ablation

  5. Changes in patient reported outcomes per patient

    Will be reported as time to symptom recovering using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer (MDASI-LC) questionnaires. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to 9 months after enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2020
  2. Study start7 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04430725
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-0301
Other IDs
NCI-2020-03474, 2018-0301
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
10 Jun 2020
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in