Coronary Heart DiseaseNCT04433052
Clinical Value and Cost-effectiveness of a Personalized Prevention Program (PPP) in Patients With High Risk Stable CHD
A study testing personalised prevention program (PPP) in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Tampere University at 26 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective clinical study with two parts: PART A: a prospective biomarker-based risk screening study in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects PART B: a nested randomized clinical trial (RCT) in an enriched subpopulation of high-risk stable CHD subjects PART A: 12 000 subjects with stable CHD PART B: 2000 subjects… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Heart Disease
- What is being tested?
- personalised prevention program (PPP)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12,000 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Eligible study subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Informed consent form signed by the study subjects.
- Male or female aged 30 to 80 years on the day of enrolment.
- > 50% stenosis in one or more major coronary arteries on angiography or computerised tomography (CT) performed within the preceding one year (from enrolment visit). or Myocardial infarction (type I, II) during the preceding year.
Eligible study subjects must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
- Hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation or acute heart failure within the preceding one month (30 days). These subjects can be enrolled after a one-month stabilisation period, which begins from the time of the event.
- Subjects with NYHA class III-IV heart failure i.e. marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, comfortable only at rest.
- Uncontrolled arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardias.
- Subjects undergoing dialysis due to severe renal disease.
- Diseases that severely disable exercising (per investigator's judgement), such as rheumatoid arthritis, neurological or orthopaedic diseases.
- Known aplastic or haemolytic anaemia.
- Concomitant non-coronary disease, such as malignancy that limits life expectancy to less than three years.
- Concurrent participation in another interventional study.
- Subjects not able and/or willing to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all study procedures and use a smartphone application.
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 6 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
26 sites in 6 countries
Poland6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University of Bialystok
Bialystok
Karol Kaminski, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Medical University of Silesia
Katowice
Zbigniew Gasior, MD, PhD, zgasior@ptkardio.pl
- Not yet recruiting
Jagellonian University Medical College
Krakow
Piotor Jankowski, MD, PhD, piotrjankowski@interia.pl
- Not yet recruiting
University of Lublin
Lublin
Andrzej Wysokinski, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Nicolaus Copernicus University
Toruniak
Aldona Kubica, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
National Institute of Cardiology
Warsaw
Rafal Dabrowski, MD, PhD
Germany5 sites, 4 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Klinik am See
Berlin
Heinz Völler, MD, PhD
- Withdrawn
CCV-MVZ
Frankfurt
- Not yet recruiting
Heidelberg University
Mannheim
Winfried März, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Technise Universität Munchen
München
Martin Halle, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Herzklinik Ulm
Ulm
Ralf Birkemeyer, MD, PhD
Finland4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki
Juha Sinisalo, MD, PhD, juha.sinisalo@hus.fi
- Recruiting
Mehiläinen
Helsinki
Kristiina Hotakainen, MD, PhD, Kristina.Hotakainen@mehilainen.fi
- Not yet recruiting
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio
Juha Hartikainen, MD, PhD, juha.hartikainen@kuh.fi
- Recruiting
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu
Janne Hukkanen, MD, PhD, janne.hukkanen@ppshp.fi
Greece4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hellenic Red Cross Hospital
Athens
Nikolaos Bourmpoulis, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Konstantopoulio Hospital
Athens
Patsilinakos Sotirios, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Sismanoglion Hospital
Athens
Dimitrios Sionis, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
The Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy Athens
Athens
Constantinos Davos, MD, PhD, cdavos@bioacademy.gr
Italy4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Genova
Genova
Itolo Porto, MD, PhD, italo.porto@unige.it
- Not yet recruiting
Multi Medica, Care and Research Institute
Milan
Roberto FE Pedretti, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Casilino Hospital Rome
Rome
Leonardo Calo, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
University Hospital Turin
Turin
Gaetano de Ferrari, MD, PhD, gaetanomaria.deferrari@unito.it
Portugal3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital de Santa Cruz-CHLO
Carnaxide
Miguel Mendes, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital do Espirito Santo
Lisbon
Lino Patricio, MD, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital Santa Maria-CHULN/FMUL
Lisbon
Ana Abreu, MD, PhD, ananabreu@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Value and Cost-effectiveness of a Personalized Prevention Program in Patients With High Risk Stable Coronary Heart Disease
Prospective clinical study with two parts:
PART A: a prospective biomarker-based risk screening study in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects PART B: a nested randomized clinical trial (RCT) in an enriched subpopulation of high-risk stable CHD subjects
PART A: 12 000 subjects with stable CHD
PART B: 2000 subjects with high risk of CV events will be randomized to usual care (UC) or personalised prevention program (PPP) i.e. 1000 subjects per arm.
Study purpose is to assess the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of a personalised prevention program (PPP) in high-risk, stable coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects and to prospectively validate risk screening biomarkers
Read the detailed description
Primary Objectives:
PART A:
- To prospectively validate biomarkers in risk stratification among stable CHD subjects, i.e. evaluation of the biomarker performance in accurately predicting CV events including CV death, nonfatal MI, HF events
- To identify high-risk CHD subjects for the subsequent RCT, i.e. 15-20% of the screened patient population at the highest risk
PART B
- To demonstrate whether a personalised prevention (PPP) strategy in high-risk CHD subjects results in a decreased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF) events) as compared to the local usual care (UC)
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the difference between the PPP arm to the UC arm as listed in section outcomes.
- To evaluate the health economic value of the PPP
- To prospectively study associations (in all enrolled subjects) between separate biomarkers (CERT2, hs-troponin, proBNP, Cystatin C) or their score (CoroPredict)
In addition to the above-listed primary and secondary objectives of the study, the following analysis will be carried out based on the data to be collected during the trial:
- Effect of personalised prevention on behavioural change.
- Effect of behavioural change on CV outcomes and blood pressure.
- Identification of key components and risk factors affecting effectiveness of the PPP.
- Inter-relationship between nutrition and exercise will be evaluated. Nutrition parameters will be based on questionnaires and biomarkers (Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), Trimethyllysine (TML), carnitines and their metabolites).
- Effect of the use of the CoroPrevention Tool Suite (EXPERT tool) on the agreement between exercise prescriptions generated by cardiovascular nurses to subjects with CVD, and the ESC guideline-directed exercise prescriptions
- Effect of greater adherence to EXPERT tool-driven exercise prescriptions by clinicians and subjects, on CVD risk, physical fitness, and prognosis (hospitalisations, adverse events, mortality) in subjects with CVD.
- Effect of the use of the EXPERT tool-driven medication decision support system on the agreement between medication prescriptions generated by cardiovascular nurses to subjects with CVD, and the ESC guideline-directed medication prescriptions
- Effect of better adherence by both clinicians and subjects to ESC guideline prescriptions, driven by the medication decision support system within the EXPERT tool, on CVD risk and prognosis (hospitalisations, adverse events, mortality) in subjects with CVD.
- Investigation of the user experience and user acceptance of the CoroPrevention Tool Suite.
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease
- Being tested
- personalised prevention program (PPP)
- Keywords
- Prevention, Coronary Heart Disease, Biomarkers, Lifestyle
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
personalised prevention program (PPP)Behavioural
Study subjects in the PPP arm will be invited to return to the study site six times over a three-year period (at V2/start of the study, V3/mo2, V4/mo6, V5/mo12, V6/mo18 and V7/mo36) to receive lifestyle coaching and exercise prescriptions led by a delegated member of the site staff and supervised by the investigator. Information on drug treatment will also be given by the investigator. These activities will be assisted by digital tools specifically designed for this study, the CoroPrevention Tool Suite.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Personalised prevention program (PPP) | Experimental | Participants will be invited to return to the study site six times over a three year period to receive lifestyle coaching and exercise prescriptions. Eupropean Society of Cardiology/European Association of Preventive Cardiology (ESC/EAPC) -designed lifestyle counselling will be partially delivered by novel smartphone applications. Participants will also receive pharmaceutical treatment according to the ESC guideline for chronic coronary syndromes. Receives: Behavioral: personalised prevention program (PPP) |
| Usual care (UC) | No intervention | Participants will be referred back to usual care provided by their treating physicians. It is anticipated that physicians will treat these participants according to local usual medical practices. Patients randomized to UC group will not receive any treatment recommendations nor restrictions by the study investigators or nurses. Randomized UC patients are invited to site visits twice over a three year period. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To demonstrate whether a PPP strategy in high-risk CHD subjects results in a decreased risk of CV events (CV death, nonfatal MI or HF events) compared to the UC
- The time from randomisation to the occurrence of the first CV event included in the composite endpoint of the study (CV death, nonfatal MI, HF events) over 3 years follow-up.
Measured: 3 years follow-up
Secondary outcomes (7)
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
- The times from randomisation to the occurrence of the specific items included in the composite endpoint (CV death, nonfatal MI, HF event) over 3 years follow-up
Measured: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
- The times from randomisation to the occurrence of secondary CV events (unstable angina, stroke and coronary revascularisations excluding those elective revascularisations that have been planned prior to randomisation)
Measured: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
- Treatment adherence; measured by compliance laboratory assessments and in the PPP group, also with activity reports
Measured: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
All-cause mortality
Measured: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Incidence of additional clinical endpoints: diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), chronic kidney disease (CKD), peripheral artery disease (PAD) and hypertension
Measured: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the health economic value of the PPP
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of PPP versus UC will be undertaken, based on evidence from the randomised clinical trial (RCT) portion of the study, using within-trial analysis and long-term cost-effectiveness modelling for the six countries participating in the CoroPrevention trial: Finland, Poland, Greece, Portugal, Italy, and Germany.
Measured: 3 years follow-up
• To prospectively study associations (in all enrolled subjects) between separate risk biomarkers (CERT2, hs-troponin , proBNP, Cystatin C) or their score (CoroPredict) and
- Primary composite CV event (CV death, MI, HF events)
- Specific CV events (CV death, nonfatal MI, HF events) separately
- Specific secondary CV events (unstable angina, stroke, coronary revascularisations)
- Incidence of DM2, CKD, PAD and hypertension
Measured: 3 years follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tampere University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Reijo Laaksonen, Tampere University
- Investigators
- Reijo Laaksonen, MD, PhD, Study director, Tampere University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04433052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CPP-2020-1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: EU open access policy
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Value and Cost-effectiveness of a Personalized Prevention Program in Patients With High Risk Stable Coronary Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04433052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CPP-2020-1
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease
- Keywords
- Prevention, Coronary Heart Disease, Biomarkers, Lifestyle
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tampere UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective clinical study with two parts:
PART A: a prospective biomarker-based risk screening study in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects PART B: a nested randomized clinical trial (RCT) in an enriched subpopulation of high-risk stable CHD subjects
PART A: 12 000 subjects with stable CHD
PART B: 2000 subjects with high risk of CV events will be randomized to usual care (UC) or personalised prevention program (PPP) i.e. 1000 subjects per arm.
Study purpose is to assess the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of a personalised prevention program (PPP) in high-risk, stable coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects and to prospectively validate risk screening biomarkers
Detailed description
Primary Objectives:
PART A:
- To prospectively validate biomarkers in risk stratification among stable CHD subjects, i.e. evaluation of the biomarker performance in accurately predicting CV events including CV death, nonfatal MI, HF events
- To identify high-risk CHD subjects for the subsequent RCT, i.e. 15-20% of the screened patient population at the highest risk
PART B
- To demonstrate whether a personalised prevention (PPP) strategy in high-risk CHD subjects results in a decreased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF) events) as compared to the local usual care (UC)
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the difference between the PPP arm to the UC arm as listed in section outcomes.
- To evaluate the health economic value of the PPP
- To prospectively study associations (in all enrolled subjects) between separate biomarkers (CERT2, hs-troponin, proBNP, Cystatin C) or their score (CoroPredict)
In addition to the above-listed primary and secondary objectives of the study, the following analysis will be carried out based on the data to be collected during the trial:
- Effect of personalised prevention on behavioural change.
- Effect of behavioural change on CV outcomes and blood pressure.
- Identification of key components and risk factors affecting effectiveness of the PPP.
- Inter-relationship between nutrition and exercise will be evaluated. Nutrition parameters will be based on questionnaires and biomarkers (Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), Trimethyllysine (TML), carnitines and their metabolites).
- Effect of the use of the CoroPrevention Tool Suite (EXPERT tool) on the agreement between exercise prescriptions generated by cardiovascular nurses to subjects with CVD, and the ESC guideline-directed exercise prescriptions
- Effect of greater adherence to EXPERT tool-driven exercise prescriptions by clinicians and subjects, on CVD risk, physical fitness, and prognosis (hospitalisations, adverse events, mortality) in subjects with CVD.
- Effect of the use of the EXPERT tool-driven medication decision support system on the agreement between medication prescriptions generated by cardiovascular nurses to subjects with CVD, and the ESC guideline-directed medication prescriptions
- Effect of better adherence by both clinicians and subjects to ESC guideline prescriptions, driven by the medication decision support system within the EXPERT tool, on CVD risk and prognosis (hospitalisations, adverse events, mortality) in subjects with CVD.
- Investigation of the user experience and user acceptance of the CoroPrevention Tool Suite.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Personalised prevention program (PPP) | Experimental | Behavioral: personalised prevention program (PPP)Participants will be invited to return to the study site six times over a three year period to receive lifestyle coaching and exercise prescriptions. Eupropean Society of Cardiology/European Association of Preventive Cardiology (ESC/EAPC) -designed lifestyle counselling will be partially delivered by novel smartphone applications. Participants will also receive pharmaceutical treatment according to the ESC guideline for chronic coronary syndromes. |
| Usual care (UC) | No intervention | –Participants will be referred back to usual care provided by their treating physicians. It is anticipated that physicians will treat these participants according to local usual medical practices. Patients randomized to UC group will not receive any treatment recommendations nor restrictions by the study investigators or nurses. Randomized UC patients are invited to site visits twice over a three year period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| personalised prevention program (PPP)Study subjects in the PPP arm will be invited to return to the study site six times over a three-year period (at V2/start of the study, V3/mo2, V4/mo6, V5/mo12, V6/mo18 and V7/mo36) to receive lifestyle coaching and exercise prescriptions led by a delegated member of the site staff and supervised by the investigator. Information on drug treatment will also be given by the investigator. These activities will be assisted by digital tools specifically designed for this study, the CoroPrevention Tool Suite. | Behavioural | Personalised prevention program (PPP) |
Primary outcome
To demonstrate whether a PPP strategy in high-risk CHD subjects results in a decreased risk of CV events (CV death, nonfatal MI or HF events) compared to the UC
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
• The time from randomisation to the occurrence of the first CV event included in the composite endpoint of the study (CV death, nonfatal MI, HF events) over 3 years follow-up.
7 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the difference between PPP arm to the UC arm in
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
To evaluate the health economic value of the PPP
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
• To prospectively study associations (in all enrolled subjects) between separate risk biomarkers (CERT2, hs-troponin , proBNP, Cystatin C) or their score (CoroPredict) and
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. EU open access policy
Related trials for Coronary Heart Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
SYMmetric Valve fraME Expansion To Reduce hYpoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Balloon-expandable TAVI: the SYMMETRY Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis and/or Insufficiency, Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Reijo Laaksonen, MD, PhD study director
Tampere University
26 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing personalised prevention program (PPP) in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Tampere University at 26 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in Poland, Germany, Finland, Greece, Italy and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hanna Marttila, MSc (+358407240771, hanna.marttila@tuni.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To demonstrate whether a PPP strategy in high-risk CHD subjects results in a decreased risk of CV events (CV death, nonfatal MI or HF events) compared to the UC (time frame: 3 years follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2023.