Alveolar Bone ResorptionPhase 2NCT04433117
Bone Material Comparison in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
A Phase 2 study testing Shefabone and Bio-Oss in people with Alveolar Bone Resorption and Sequela, run by Mohanad Al-Sabbagh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Hard and soft tissue deficiencies of an alveolar ridge arise as sequelae of tooth extraction when socket preservation is not applied. In addition, extraction of posterior maxillary teeth causes pneumatization of the maxillary sinus in relation to other fixed landmarks such as the teeth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alveolar Bone Resorption, Sequela, Tooth Extrusion
- What is being tested?
- Shefabone and Bio-Oss
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Jun 2020to 1 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 20 to 75 years of age
- at least one maxillary edentulous posterior site requiring maxillary sinus grafting and replacement with a dental implant.
Who cannot join
- current smokers/tobacco users
- are pregnant
- have active periodontal disease
- have uncontrolled diabetes
- have any autoimmune disease
- have kidney disease
Show all 9Show fewer
- have liver disease
- are receiving radiation or chemotherapy
- have any type of radiographic periapical pathology such as a periapical abscess.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Bone Quality and Quantity in the Maxillary Sinus Grafted With Xenograft or Synthetic Bone Substitute: A Radiographic and Histomorphometric Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Hard and soft tissue deficiencies of an alveolar ridge arise as sequelae of tooth extraction when socket preservation is not applied. In addition, extraction of posterior maxillary teeth causes pneumatization of the maxillary sinus in relation to other fixed landmarks such as the teeth. These anatomic sinus limitations and alveolar bone deficiencies are the main challenges for dental implant placement. Different bone substitutes have been used to augment bone in pneumatized maxillary sinuses.
Scaffolding materials such as xenografts or synthetics substitutes have been proven to be a viable alternative.
Xenografts are obtained from nonhuman species and serve as a scaffold for the formation of new bone (osteoconduction). Histologic evaluation of maxillary sinuses grafted with xenografts revealed newly formed bone to be mostly woven bone with some remodeling to lamellar bone. These histologic findings reaffirm the osteoconductive ability of xenografts when used as the sole grafting material in maxillary sinus augmentation. Xenografts appear to be an effective method for maxillary sinus grafting and demonstrate limited resorption over time. Sinuses augmented with synthetic bone substitute (SBS) also appear to successfully integrate based on recent histomorphometric studies. Vascularization and trabecular bone formation in sinuses grafted with SBS has been previously demonstrated. One type of SBS includes porous granules of bioactive and resorbable silica-calcium phosphate nanocomposite (ShefaBone). ShefaBone grafts offer a novel alternative that can potentially unite the 3 salient bone-forming properties (osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis). ShefaBone has unique properties including: 1) bioactivity 2) bioresorbablility, and 3) allowing for the uptake of calcium ions from the physiological solution and releasing phosphate and silicate ions which aid in bone formation. A material with such properties will substitute bone in a more controlled and effective combination that can be obtained in many clinical situations, without the disadvantages found with autograft. ShefaBone has demonstrated successful regenerative properties for bony defects. To our knowledge, there is no reported clinical studies on the use of SCPC material to graft a pneumatized maxillary sinus. This aim of this current study is to compare SCPC to commonly used xenograft material in an augmented maxillary sinus.
Read the detailed description
- To assess the quality and quantity of the maxillary sinus bone prior to the placement of dental implants and subsequent restorations, approximately 20 patients will be randomly assigned to receive an augmentation of the maxillary sinus region using either Shefabone (synthetic bone) or Bio-Oss (xenograft).
- With the use of pre-operative and post-operative limited view CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) radiography, the maxillary sinus bone density will be assessed and compared between the individuals receiving Shefabone and the individuals receiving xenograft material.
- Histomorphometric analysis will be used to assess, compare and contrast the quality and the quantity of the new vital bone cells generated when using these different graft materials.
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Resorption, Sequela, Tooth Extrusion
- Being tested
- Shefabone, Bio-Oss
- Keywords
- Sinus pneumatization, Socket preservation, Sinus augmentation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ShefaboneBiological
Silica-calcium phosphate composite.
Bio-OssBiological
Also called Bio-Oss by Geistlich
Xenograft Bone substitute. Bone from animals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Other | Control group in this study will comprise of 10 subjects and will receive Bio-Oss xenograft bone material. Receives: Biological: Bio-Oss |
| Test Group | Experimental | The test group in this study will comprise of 10 subjects and will receive Shefabone synthetic bone substitute. Receives: Biological: Shefabone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bone Density - Limited View CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) Measurements
Bone density will be measured by limited view CBCT radiography pre- and post-operatively.
Measured: 5 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Bone Quality
Bone quality will be measured using histomorphometric analysis.
Measured: 5.5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2020
- Study start17 Jun 2020
- Primary completion14 Feb 2023
- Study completion1 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Alveolar Bone ResorptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled clinical trial. Entails 2 groups of subjects which will be randomly assigned. Group 1 will be the control group, and group 2 is test group.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mohanad Al-Sabbagh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, DDS, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04433117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 58349
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Beneficial information for further research around the topic and/or information that may aid/benefit subjects or dentists in treatment may be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bone Quality and Quantity in the Maxillary Sinus Grafted With Xenograft or Synthetic Bone Substitute: A Radiographic and Histomorphometric Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04433117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 58349
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Resorption, Sequela, Tooth Extrusion
- Keywords
- Sinus pneumatization, Socket preservation, Sinus augmentation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mohanad Al-SabbaghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hard and soft tissue deficiencies of an alveolar ridge arise as sequelae of tooth extraction when socket preservation is not applied. In addition, extraction of posterior maxillary teeth causes pneumatization of the maxillary sinus in relation to other fixed landmarks such as the teeth. These anatomic sinus limitations and alveolar bone deficiencies are the main challenges for dental implant placement. Different bone substitutes have been used to augment bone in pneumatized maxillary sinuses.
Scaffolding materials such as xenografts or synthetics substitutes have been proven to be a viable alternative.
Xenografts are obtained from nonhuman species and serve as a scaffold for the formation of new bone (osteoconduction). Histologic evaluation of maxillary sinuses grafted with xenografts revealed newly formed bone to be mostly woven bone with some remodeling to lamellar bone. These histologic findings reaffirm the osteoconductive ability of xenografts when used as the sole grafting material in maxillary sinus augmentation. Xenografts appear to be an effective method for maxillary sinus grafting and demonstrate limited resorption over time. Sinuses augmented with synthetic bone substitute (SBS) also appear to successfully integrate based on recent histomorphometric studies. Vascularization and trabecular bone formation in sinuses grafted with SBS has been previously demonstrated. One type of SBS includes porous granules of bioactive and resorbable silica-calcium phosphate nanocomposite (ShefaBone). ShefaBone grafts offer a novel alternative that can potentially unite the 3 salient bone-forming properties (osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis). ShefaBone has unique properties including: 1) bioactivity 2) bioresorbablility, and 3) allowing for the uptake of calcium ions from the physiological solution and releasing phosphate and silicate ions which aid in bone formation. A material with such properties will substitute bone in a more controlled and effective combination that can be obtained in many clinical situations, without the disadvantages found with autograft. ShefaBone has demonstrated successful regenerative properties for bony defects. To our knowledge, there is no reported clinical studies on the use of SCPC material to graft a pneumatized maxillary sinus. This aim of this current study is to compare SCPC to commonly used xenograft material in an augmented maxillary sinus.
Detailed description
- To assess the quality and quantity of the maxillary sinus bone prior to the placement of dental implants and subsequent restorations, approximately 20 patients will be randomly assigned to receive an augmentation of the maxillary sinus region using either Shefabone (synthetic bone) or Bio-Oss (xenograft).
- With the use of pre-operative and post-operative limited view CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) radiography, the maxillary sinus bone density will be assessed and compared between the individuals receiving Shefabone and the individuals receiving xenograft material.
- Histomorphometric analysis will be used to assess, compare and contrast the quality and the quantity of the new vital bone cells generated when using these different graft materials.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled clinical trial. Entails 2 groups of subjects which will be randomly assigned. Group 1 will be the control group, and group 2 is test group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Other | Biological: Bio-OssControl group in this study will comprise of 10 subjects and will receive Bio-Oss xenograft bone material. |
| Test Group | Experimental | Biological: ShefaboneThe test group in this study will comprise of 10 subjects and will receive Shefabone synthetic bone substitute. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 20 to 75 years of age
- at least one maxillary edentulous posterior site requiring maxillary sinus grafting and replacement with a dental implant.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- current smokers/tobacco users
- are pregnant
- have active periodontal disease
- have uncontrolled diabetes
- have any autoimmune disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ShefaboneSilica-calcium phosphate composite. | Biological | Test Group |
| Bio-OssAlso: Bio-Oss by GeistlichXenograft Bone substitute. Bone from animals. | Biological | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Bone Density - Limited View CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) Measurements
Time frame: 5 months
Bone density will be measured by limited view CBCT radiography pre- and post-operatively.
1 secondary outcome
Bone Quality
Time frame: 5.5 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Beneficial information for further research around the topic and/or information that may aid/benefit subjects or dentists in treatment may be shared.
Related trials for Alveolar Bone Resorption
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant Failed
Recruiting
Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation
Dehiscence, Tooth Extraction
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) Study Using Alloplastic Biomaterial and a Resorbable Synthetic Membrane. A Digital Workflow (CBCT/Scanner) Evaluates Hard and Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes at 4 Months, Validating Support for the Gingival Phenotype and Buccal Bone Plate.
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Substitutes
Recruiting
Melatonin Effect on Immediate Dental Implants in the Posterior Mandible
Dental Implant, Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Not yet recruiting
Bone and Soft Tissue Healing After Socket Preservation With NOVAMag or Permamem Membranes
Alveolar Bone Loss, Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, DDS principal investigator
University of Kentucky
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Shefabone and Bio-Oss in people with Alveolar Bone Resorption and Sequela, run by Mohanad Al-Sabbagh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bone Density - Limited View CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) Measurements (time frame: 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2024.