Normal Pressure HydrocephalusNCT04434053
Adjustable Gravitational vs. Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves in iNPH
A study testing MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) in people with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, run by Military University Hospital, Prague at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The goal of the study is to verify theoretical benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting with MIETHKE M.blue® valve in patients with iNPH. The study is designed to assess walking and balance, urinary function, cognitive performance and quality of life before and after shunting and compare the results between the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- What is being tested?
- MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to 1 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of patients (between 60 and 85 years old)
- Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait and one other symptom from Hakim-Adams triad (incontinence or dementia)
- maximal initial pressure of 20 cmH2O during lumbar infusion test
- Rout during LIT >9mmHg/ml*min
- at least 15% improvement in Gait scale score after ELD
- Conclusion of neuropsychological examination suggestive of iNPH (based on MoCA, Test of phonemic and verbal fluency, RAVLT, ROCFT, TMT A and B, Subtest of WAIS III, GDS)
Who cannot join
- Aetiology of hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus - history of meningitis or subarachnoid haemorrhage, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst)
- Intracranial tumor
- Other neurodegenerative diseases may be present (AD, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, Progressive supranuclear palsy and cerebrovascular diseases), however have to be mild and evaluated in neurological, neuropsychological examinations and on MRI
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Neurosurgical department of the Central Military Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University
Prague, 16902
Petra Zajíčková, +420973202963, nchr@uvn.cz
Petr Skalický, MD
About this study
Official title: Adjustable Gravitational vs. Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Prospective Randomized Study.
The goal of the study is to verify theoretical benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting with MIETHKE M.blue® valve in patients with iNPH. The study is designed to assess walking and balance, urinary function, cognitive performance and quality of life before and after shunting and compare the results between the patients with MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valves.
Read the detailed description
Patients who will be referred to Military University Hospital Prague with suspicion of normal pressure hydrocephalus will be tested by conventional methods to consider implantation of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. This testing is performed during hospitalization and includes clinical examination of the patient by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist including neuropsychological questionnaires or tests - MoCA, AVLT, ROCFT, TMT A + B, Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (N, K, P), Semantic Fluence Test (animals, vegetables), subtest of battery WAIS III and GDS. Clinical examinations are followed by magnetic resonance imaging. Functional testing of cerebrospinal fluid circulation is initiated on the second day unless another cause of the patient's symptoms (AD, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, tumor, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst etc.) is present. The functional testing will involve lumbar infusion test and subsequent external lumbar drainage (ELD) for 120h, including biochemical analysis of CSF during the ELD. After this time, the objective improvement of the patient's gait with the aid of the Dutch Gait Scale will be evaluated with respect to the subjective evaluation by the patient or family (changes in urinary incontinence / urgency, headaches, etc.). If the diagnosis of normotensive hydrocephalus is confirmed, the patient will be indicated for a VP shunt implantation, which is used for permanent derivation of cerebrospinal fluid into the peritoneal cavity. As a result of cerebrospinal fluid derivation, the clinical condition of most of the patients improves. The operation process described by Michael J. Fritsch (Fritsch et al. 2014) will be modified for various valve types in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and assumed conditions for proper valve adjustment. Patients will be randomly implanted with a M.blue® or proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve (Christoph Miethke GmbH \& Co. KG) in a randomized manner to form two study groups. The efficacy and safety of the proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve has already been confirmed in a randomized prospective study in patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus (Lemcke et al. 2013). The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve lies in the targeted modification of the cerebrospinal fluid diversion during the active time of a day, when the opening pressure of the valve's gravitational unit is controlled according to the angle between the valve and the horizontal line. The basal opening pressure of the valve that has to be overcome in the supine position is controlled with a fixed differential pressure unit. ProGAV 2.0® is an adjustable differential pressure valve implanted with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®. The shunt-assistant represents a fixed gravity unit that increases the pressure in the standing position, which must be overcome for the cerebrospinal fluid flow through th shunt. The opening pressure of the valve could be selected according to the patient's height and sex. The basal opening pressure of the valve that must be overcome in the supine position is controlled with an adjustable differential pressure unit that can be adjusted before and after the shunt implantation. In both valves, the opening pressure is the sum of the opening pressures of the gravitational and differential pressure units. The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve is the possibility of changing the opening pressure of the gravitational unit regulated according to the position of the head in the space and thus aiming more at the pressure conditions when the valve is not parallel to the horizontal line.
Patients will not be familiar with the type of valve implanted with respect to subjective evaluation of patients during the follow-up. Initial valve settings will be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Follow-up of the patients will be guided in the usual regime according to the natural history of the disease: at one month of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, including brain CT scan; at three-months of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber for the biochemical analysis; at six-months an outpatient examination by a neurosurgeon; at one year of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber valve for biochemical analysis; at two-years of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by neurosurgeon and neuropsychologist including brain CT scan including collection of the following questionnaires and collection of the cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber of the valve for biochemical analysis.
For the purpose of the study, the Dutch Gait scale (gait), UI-SF (incontinence) and MoCA (dementia) will be used to assess the outcome of the shunt operation to monitor the severity and nature of the main symptoms during the follow-up in pre-implant, three months, one year and after two years. The SF-12V2 will be used in a similar mode to monitor the quality of life of the patients. Severity of the symptoms will also be assessed by the Kiefer Scale, which was developed directly to monitor patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus. Charlson comorbidity index will be used to monitor covariates. All clinical examinations by a neurosurgeon will monitor early and late complications of the short-circuit operation (infection, hemorrhage, overdrainage, underdrainage, shunt malfunction), the number of valve setting changes and their range, unscheduled checks and shunt revisions and other unexpected events.
The expected number of patients who will undergo all examinations after an annual check is 40 (20 and 20).
The expected benefit of the study is in particular to confirm the theoretical assumptions of an adjustable gravitational valve in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and thus in improvement of the quality and life expectancy of these patients.
- Conditions
- Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- Being tested
- MIETHKE M.blue®, MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
- Keywords
- iNPH
- Medical subject headings
- Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MIETHKE M.blue®Device
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE M.blue® valve.
MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)Device
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® valve that will be implanted together with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MIETHKE M.blue® | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: MIETHKE M.blue® |
| MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Dutch Gait scale in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Gait Scale, a useful quantitative measure of gait impairment in NPH patients, is a component of a larger measure developed as part of the Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study (Boon et al., 1997). The Gait Scale evaluates various aspects of gait, including walking speed, number of steps, stride length, stance, foot-floor clearance, balance, tandem walking ability, turning ability, and start hesitation in 10m of walking. (Ravdin et al., 2008) The score consists of 3 subcategories and ranges 2-40 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Measured: Month 3/Year 1
Change in MoCA in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It was created in 1996 by Ziad Nasreddine in Montreal, Quebec. The MoCA assesses several cognitive domains. Score ranges 0-30 points with lower scores indicating more severely impaired cognitive skills.
Measured: Month 3/Year 1
Change in ICIQ UI-SF in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity, impact on quality of life (QoL) and simple estimation of a cause of urinary incontinence in men and women. The score ranges 0-21 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Measured: Month 3/Year 1
Change in Kiefer Score in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment
Measured: Month 3/Year 1
Change in SF12 v 2.0 Health Survey in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The SF-12® V2 Health Survey (SF-12 v2.0) (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. Generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures like the SF-12 assess general health and well-being [or health-related quality of life (HRQOL)], including the impact of any and all illnesses on a broad range of functional domains. The SF-12 v2 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware \& Sherbourne, 1992; Ware, Snow, Kosinski, \& Gandek, 1993) covering the same eight domains of health outcomes, including physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH).
Measured: Month 3/Year 1
Secondary outcomes (4)
Postoperative changes in valve settings in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Any change in the valve settings postoperatively will be recorded together with a degree of individual changes.
Measured: 1 Year
Overdrainage in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Headaches, dizziness, subdural effusions on imaging methods (MRI, CT) and any unplanned visits will be recorded. Chronic subdural haematomas will be divided to symptomatic/asymptomatic and number of drainages will be recorded.
Measured: 1 Year
Shunt revisions in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Any shunt revisions will be recorded together with a cause (malfunction etc.)
Measured: 1 Year
Shunt related infections in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Any shunt related infection will be recorded.
Measured: 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Normal Pressure HydrocephalusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Military University Hospital, Prague
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ondřej Bradáč, Military University Hospital, Prague
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04434053
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MilitaryUHP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adjustable Gravitational vs. Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Prospective Randomized Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04434053
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MilitaryUHP
- Conditions
- Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- Keywords
- iNPH
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Military University Hospital, PragueUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the study is to verify theoretical benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting with MIETHKE M.blue® valve in patients with iNPH. The study is designed to assess walking and balance, urinary function, cognitive performance and quality of life before and after shunting and compare the results between the patients with MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valves.
Detailed description
Patients who will be referred to Military University Hospital Prague with suspicion of normal pressure hydrocephalus will be tested by conventional methods to consider implantation of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. This testing is performed during hospitalization and includes clinical examination of the patient by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist including neuropsychological questionnaires or tests - MoCA, AVLT, ROCFT, TMT A + B, Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (N, K, P), Semantic Fluence Test (animals, vegetables), subtest of battery WAIS III and GDS. Clinical examinations are followed by magnetic resonance imaging. Functional testing of cerebrospinal fluid circulation is initiated on the second day unless another cause of the patient's symptoms (AD, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, tumor, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst etc.) is present. The functional testing will involve lumbar infusion test and subsequent external lumbar drainage (ELD) for 120h, including biochemical analysis of CSF during the ELD. After this time, the objective improvement of the patient's gait with the aid of the Dutch Gait Scale will be evaluated with respect to the subjective evaluation by the patient or family (changes in urinary incontinence / urgency, headaches, etc.). If the diagnosis of normotensive hydrocephalus is confirmed, the patient will be indicated for a VP shunt implantation, which is used for permanent derivation of cerebrospinal fluid into the peritoneal cavity. As a result of cerebrospinal fluid derivation, the clinical condition of most of the patients improves. The operation process described by Michael J. Fritsch (Fritsch et al. 2014) will be modified for various valve types in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and assumed conditions for proper valve adjustment. Patients will be randomly implanted with a M.blue® or proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve (Christoph Miethke GmbH \& Co. KG) in a randomized manner to form two study groups. The efficacy and safety of the proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve has already been confirmed in a randomized prospective study in patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus (Lemcke et al. 2013). The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve lies in the targeted modification of the cerebrospinal fluid diversion during the active time of a day, when the opening pressure of the valve's gravitational unit is controlled according to the angle between the valve and the horizontal line. The basal opening pressure of the valve that has to be overcome in the supine position is controlled with a fixed differential pressure unit. ProGAV 2.0® is an adjustable differential pressure valve implanted with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®. The shunt-assistant represents a fixed gravity unit that increases the pressure in the standing position, which must be overcome for the cerebrospinal fluid flow through th shunt. The opening pressure of the valve could be selected according to the patient's height and sex. The basal opening pressure of the valve that must be overcome in the supine position is controlled with an adjustable differential pressure unit that can be adjusted before and after the shunt implantation. In both valves, the opening pressure is the sum of the opening pressures of the gravitational and differential pressure units. The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve is the possibility of changing the opening pressure of the gravitational unit regulated according to the position of the head in the space and thus aiming more at the pressure conditions when the valve is not parallel to the horizontal line.
Patients will not be familiar with the type of valve implanted with respect to subjective evaluation of patients during the follow-up. Initial valve settings will be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Follow-up of the patients will be guided in the usual regime according to the natural history of the disease: at one month of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, including brain CT scan; at three-months of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber for the biochemical analysis; at six-months an outpatient examination by a neurosurgeon; at one year of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber valve for biochemical analysis; at two-years of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by neurosurgeon and neuropsychologist including brain CT scan including collection of the following questionnaires and collection of the cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber of the valve for biochemical analysis.
For the purpose of the study, the Dutch Gait scale (gait), UI-SF (incontinence) and MoCA (dementia) will be used to assess the outcome of the shunt operation to monitor the severity and nature of the main symptoms during the follow-up in pre-implant, three months, one year and after two years. The SF-12V2 will be used in a similar mode to monitor the quality of life of the patients. Severity of the symptoms will also be assessed by the Kiefer Scale, which was developed directly to monitor patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus. Charlson comorbidity index will be used to monitor covariates. All clinical examinations by a neurosurgeon will monitor early and late complications of the short-circuit operation (infection, hemorrhage, overdrainage, underdrainage, shunt malfunction), the number of valve setting changes and their range, unscheduled checks and shunt revisions and other unexpected events.
The expected number of patients who will undergo all examinations after an annual check is 40 (20 and 20).
The expected benefit of the study is in particular to confirm the theoretical assumptions of an adjustable gravitational valve in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and thus in improvement of the quality and life expectancy of these patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MIETHKE M.blue® | Experimental | Device: MIETHKE M.blue® |
| MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) | Active comparator | Device: MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age of patients (between 60 and 85 years old)
- Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait and one other symptom from Hakim-Adams triad (incontinence or dementia)
- maximal initial pressure of 20 cmH2O during lumbar infusion test
- Rout during LIT >9mmHg/ml*min
- at least 15% improvement in Gait scale score after ELD
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aetiology of hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus - history of meningitis or subarachnoid haemorrhage, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst)
- Intracranial tumor
- Other neurodegenerative diseases may be present (AD, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, Progressive supranuclear palsy and cerebrovascular diseases), however have to be mild and evaluated in neurological, neuropsychological examinations and on MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MIETHKE M.blue®The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE M.blue® valve. | Device | MIETHKE M.blue® |
| MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® valve that will be implanted together with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®. | Device | MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) |
Primary outcome
Change in the Dutch Gait scale in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: Month 3/Year 1
The Gait Scale, a useful quantitative measure of gait impairment in NPH patients, is a component of a larger measure developed as part of the Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study (Boon et al., 1997). The Gait Scale evaluates various aspects of gait, including walking speed, number of steps, stride length, stance, foot-floor clearance, balance, tandem walking ability, turning ability, and start hesitation in 10m of walking. (Ravdin et al., 2008) The score consists of 3 subcategories and ranges 2-40 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Change in MoCA in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: Month 3/Year 1
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It was created in 1996 by Ziad Nasreddine in Montreal, Quebec. The MoCA assesses several cognitive domains. Score ranges 0-30 points with lower scores indicating more severely impaired cognitive skills.
Change in ICIQ UI-SF in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: Month 3/Year 1
The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity, impact on quality of life (QoL) and simple estimation of a cause of urinary incontinence in men and women. The score ranges 0-21 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Change in Kiefer Score in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: Month 3/Year 1
The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment
Change in SF12 v 2.0 Health Survey in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: Month 3/Year 1
The SF-12® V2 Health Survey (SF-12 v2.0) (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. Generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures like the SF-12 assess general health and well-being [or health-related quality of life (HRQOL)], including the impact of any and all illnesses on a broad range of functional domains. The SF-12 v2 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware \& Sherbourne, 1992; Ware, Snow, Kosinski, \& Gandek, 1993) covering the same eight domains of health outcomes, including physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH).
4 secondary outcomes
Postoperative changes in valve settings in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: 1 Year
Overdrainage in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: 1 Year
Shunt revisions in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: 1 Year
Shunt related infections in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
Time frame: 1 Year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2020.
Related trials for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prediction of Response to Shunt Surgery in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using Radscale and Lumbar Puncture
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Recruiting
Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CereVasc® eShunt® System in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Recruiting
Examining the Feasibility of Using Pressure Gradient Regulated Automated Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage During External Lumbar Drain Trials
NPH (Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus)
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of ShuntCheck Performance Characteristics in Asymptomatic Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) in people with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, run by Military University Hospital, Prague at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ondřej Bradáč, M.D, M.Sc., Ph.D (+420777600923, ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Dutch Gait scale in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) (time frame: Month 3/Year 1). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2020.