AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine DiseasesNCT04436354

The Effect of Trendelenburg Lithotomy Position on Pain and Procedural Time During Vaginoscopic Office Hysteroscopy

A study testing vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study revealed that the TL position is supposed to be more efficient not only for lowering pain score but also reducing the procedural time. Also, performing hysteroscopy in this position may be easier for doctors than in the lithotomy position. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Diseases
What is being tested?
vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
157 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 16 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • uterine disorders
  • abnormal uterine bleeding
  • infertility

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy
  • cervical disorders
  • pelvic infections

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Saglik Bilimleri University Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, 34255

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The present study revealed that the TL position is supposed to be more efficient not only for lowering pain score but also reducing the procedural time. Also, performing hysteroscopy in this position may be easier for doctors than in the lithotomy position.

Read the detailed description

VOH is a widely used diagnostic method and seems to be getting more into outpatient clinics. Despite its huge contribution to clinical practice, pain during the procedure is an important limiting factor. We aimed to investigate the effect of the trendelenburg lithotomy position to the pain and procedural time.However, there is a scarcity of research on this subject. Therefore, the rationale of the study was to enlighten the gap in the literature regarding the pain score and procedural time during VOH for diagnostic purposes in TL position. In order to gain scientific evidence, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare pain score and duration of procedure between the standard lithotomy position and TL position. Also, the convenience for the physician performing the procedure was assessed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature investigating the effect of the position of the patient during the procedure on both time, pain, and the convenience for the physician simultaneously.

Being tested
vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy
Keywords
vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy, lithotomy position, trendelenburg lithotomy position, visual pain score, procedural time, Likert scale
Medical subject headings
Uterine Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vaginoscopic office hysteroscopyProcedure or surgery

    Also called positions

    comparison of procedural time and pain scores of patients in different gynecologycal positions

Study groups in NCT04436354
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy in the trendelenburg positionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy
vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy in lithotomy positionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analog Score for pain

    The Visual Pain Scale (VPS) was used to evaluate pain levels with 0 represented pain-free, while 10 described the most severe pain (Ekin et al. 2009; Price et al. 1983). Patients were asked to mark the pain expressing point on the VPS immediately after VOH. The severity of pain is determined by the value of the point (cm) marked by the participant

    Measured: 12 months

  2. procedural times

    minutes

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. attitudinal Likert type survey

    with a 5-point attitudinal Likert type survey; a psychometric scale commonly used to score responses in a questionnaire. The ease or difficulty of the procedure was categorized as 1-very easy, 2-easy, 3-ineffective, 4-difficult, 5-very difficult, and the physician performing the procedure marked

    the appropriate section for each VOH procedure in the scale.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2020
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
157 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04436354
Sponsor's protocol ID
GaziosmanpasaTREHa
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
11 Jun 2020
Last updated
24 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analog Score for pain (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in