Acute Coronary SyndromePhase 4WOEST-3NCT04436978
What is the Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI?
A Phase 4 study testing 30-day DAPT and Guideline-directed therapy in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, run by St. Antonius Hospital at 20 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. AF patients are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- 30-day DAPT and Guideline-directed therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Jan 2023to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years
- Undergoing successful PCI (either ACS or elective PCI)
- History of or newly diagnosed (<72 hours after PCI/ACS) atrial fibrillation or flutter with a long-term (≥ 1 year) indication for OAC
Who cannot join
- Contra indication to edoxaban, aspirin or all P2Y12 inhibitors
- Current indication for OAC besides atrial fibrillation/flutter (e.g. venous thromboembolism)
- <12 months after any stroke
- CHADSVASc score ≥7
- Moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis (AVA ≤1.5 cm2)
- Mechanical heart valve prosthesis
Show all 20Show fewer
- Intracardiac thrombus or apical aneurysm requiring OAC
- Poor LV function (LVEF <30%) with proven slow-flow
- History of intracranial haemorrhage
- Active bleeding on randomization
- History of intraocular, spinal, retroperitoneal, or traumatic intra-articular bleeding, unless the causative factor has been permanently resolved
- Recent (<1 month) gastrointestinal haemorrhage, unless the causative factor has been permanently resolved.
- Known coagulopathy
- Severe anaemia requiring blood transfusion or thrombocytopenia <50 × 109/L
- BMI >40 or bariatric surgery
- Kidney failure (eGFR <15)
- Active liver disease (ALT, ASP, AP >3x ULN or active hepatitis A, B or C)
- Active malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
- Life expectancy <1 year
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding women
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
20 sites in 2 countries
Belgium10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
ASZ Aalst
Aalst
Rosseel
- Recruiting
UZ Antwerpen
Antwerp
Vandendriessche
- Recruiting
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden
Dewilde
- Recruiting
UZ Brussel
Brussels
Vandeloo
- Recruiting
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk
Ferdinande
- Recruiting
AZ Maria Middelares Gent
Ghent
Cornelis
- Not yet recruiting
Jan Yperman
Ieper
De Keyser
- Recruiting
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk
van mieghem, MD PhD
- Recruiting
UZ Leuven
Leuven
Adriaenssens
- Recruiting
AZ Delta
Roeselare
Dujardin
Netherlands10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
Alkmaar
Heestermans
- Recruiting
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam
Simao Henriques, MD PhD
- Recruiting
OLVG
Amsterdam
Vink
- Recruiting
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven
Vlaar
- Recruiting
Treant Zorggroep
Emmen
Ruifrok
- Not yet recruiting
Zuyderland Ziekenhuis
Heerlen
Van 't hof
- Recruiting
Tergooi MC
Hilversum
Plomp
- Recruiting
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein
Jurrien ten berg, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Hagaziekenhuis
The Hague
Schotborgh
- Recruiting
Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
Tilburg
Magro
About this study
Official title: What is the Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Having Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?
The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. AF patients are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e. aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor, to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF undergoing PCI were traditionally treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT, i.e. OAC plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) to prevent ischemic complications. However, TAT doubles or even triples the risk of major bleeding complications. More recently, several clinical studies demonstrated that omitting aspirin, a strategy known as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is safer compared to TAT with comparable efficacy.
However, pooled evidence from recent meta-analyses suggests that patients treated with DAT are at increased risk of MI and ST. Insights from the AUGUSTUS trial showed that aspirin added to OAC and clopidogrel for 30 days, but not thereafter, resulted in fewer severe ischemic events. This finding emphasizes the relevance of early aspirin administration on ischemic benefit, also reflected in the current ESC guideline. However, because we consider the bleeding risk of TAT unacceptably high, we propose to use a short course of DAPT (omitting OAC for 1 month). There is evidence from the BRIDGE study that a short period of omitting OAC is safe in patients with AF. In this study, these patients are treated with DAPT, which also prevents stroke, albeit not as effective as OAC. This temporary interruption of OAC will allow aspirin treatment in the first month post-PCI where the risk of both bleeding and stent thrombosis is greatest.
The WOEST 3 trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of one month DAPT compared to guideline-directed therapy consisting of OAC and P2Y12 inhibitor combined with aspirin up to 30 days. We hypothesise that the use of short course DAPT is superior in bleeding and non-inferior in preventing ischemic events. The primary safety endpoint is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the ISTH at 6 weeks after PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis at 6 weeks after PCI.
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
- Being tested
- 30-day DAPT, Guideline-directed therapy
- Keywords
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Oral Anticoagulant, NOAC - Novel Oral Anticoagulant, DOAC - Direct Oral Anticoagulant, DAPT - Dual Antiplatelet Therapy, Antithrombotic Therapy, Dual Therapy, Triple Therapy, Bleeding, Thrombosis, Stroke, Stent Thrombosis, Systemic Embolism, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery disease
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Hemorrhage, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
30-day DAPTDrug
DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) during the first 30 days following PCI. After 30 days, all patients will be treated with edoxaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor.
Guideline-directed therapyDrug
Guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| First month DAPT | Active comparator | 30-day DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor.
Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines.
NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily. Receives: Drug: 30-day DAPT |
| Guideline-directed therapy | Active comparator | Standard guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor.
Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines.
NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily. Receives: Drug: Guideline-directed therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary safety endpoint
Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Measured: 6 weeks
Primary efficacy endpoint
Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Bleeding complications
Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Measured: 6 months
Thrombotic complications
Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis
Measured: 6 months
Net clinical benefit
Composite of major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism all-cause death and stent thrombosis
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Clinical symptom severity
CCS grade
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
All-cause death
All-cause death as defined by ARC-2 and SCTI
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction as defined by the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Stroke
Stroke as defined by VARC-2 definitions
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Systemic embolism
Systemic embolism according to ENTRUST-AF PCI definition
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Stent thrombosis
Stent thrombosis as defined by ARC-2
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Major bleeding
Major bleeding as defined by BARC 3 or 5
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding
CRNM as defined by BARC 2
Measured: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2020
- Study start11 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Coronary SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study is designed as a multicentre open label randomized controlled superiority trial with regards to safety and non-inferiority trial with regards to efficacy. Participating study centres will enrol patients undergoing PCI who have previously or newly diagnosed AF and indication for NOAC. As soon as possible, but within 72 hours after PCI, patients will be randomized 1:1 to either * 30 days DAPT (asprin + P2Y12 inhibitor), followed by guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor) * Standard guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Antonius Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jurriën M. ten Berg, MD, PhD, St. Antonius Hospital
- Investigators
- Jurriën M ten Berg, Prof, MD, Principal investigator, St. Antonius Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04436978
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL81102.100.22
- Other IDs
- 2022-001298-30
- Acronym
- WOEST-3
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Will individual participant data be available? Yes What data in particular will be shared? Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). What other documents will be available? Study Protocol, informed consent form, clinical study report When will data be available (start and end dates)? Within 1 year following article publication. End date to be determined. With whom? Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. For what types of analyses? To achieve aims in the approved proposal. By what mechanism will data be made available? Proposals should be directed to as.verburg@antoniusziekenhuis.nl. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Publications
Verburg A, Bor WL, Kucuk IT, Henriques JPS, Vink MA, Ruifrok WT, Plomp J, Heestermans TACM, Schotborgh CE, Vlaar PJ, Magro M, Rikken SAOF, van den Broek WWA, van Mieghem CAG, Cornelis K, Rosseel L, Dujardin KS, Vandeloo B, Vandendriessche T, Ferdinande B, van 't Hof AWJ, Tijssen JGP, Limbruno U, De Caterina R, Rubboli A, Angiolillo DJ, Adriaenssens T, Dewilde W, Ten Berg JM. Temporary omission of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the WOEST-3 randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2024 Jul 15;20(14):e898-e904. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00100.
PubMed 39007830
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- What is the Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Having Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04436978
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WOEST-3 / NL81102.100.22
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
- Keywords
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Oral Anticoagulant, NOAC - Novel Oral Anticoagulant
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Antonius HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Study start
- 11 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. AF patients are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e. aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor, to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF undergoing PCI were traditionally treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT, i.e. OAC plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) to prevent ischemic complications. However, TAT doubles or even triples the risk of major bleeding complications. More recently, several clinical studies demonstrated that omitting aspirin, a strategy known as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is safer compared to TAT with comparable efficacy.
However, pooled evidence from recent meta-analyses suggests that patients treated with DAT are at increased risk of MI and ST. Insights from the AUGUSTUS trial showed that aspirin added to OAC and clopidogrel for 30 days, but not thereafter, resulted in fewer severe ischemic events. This finding emphasizes the relevance of early aspirin administration on ischemic benefit, also reflected in the current ESC guideline. However, because we consider the bleeding risk of TAT unacceptably high, we propose to use a short course of DAPT (omitting OAC for 1 month). There is evidence from the BRIDGE study that a short period of omitting OAC is safe in patients with AF. In this study, these patients are treated with DAPT, which also prevents stroke, albeit not as effective as OAC. This temporary interruption of OAC will allow aspirin treatment in the first month post-PCI where the risk of both bleeding and stent thrombosis is greatest.
The WOEST 3 trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of one month DAPT compared to guideline-directed therapy consisting of OAC and P2Y12 inhibitor combined with aspirin up to 30 days. We hypothesise that the use of short course DAPT is superior in bleeding and non-inferior in preventing ischemic events. The primary safety endpoint is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the ISTH at 6 weeks after PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis at 6 weeks after PCI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study is designed as a multicentre open label randomized controlled superiority trial with regards to safety and non-inferiority trial with regards to efficacy. Participating study centres will enrol patients undergoing PCI who have previously or newly diagnosed AF and indication for NOAC. As soon as possible, but within 72 hours after PCI, patients will be randomized 1:1 to either * 30 days DAPT (asprin + P2Y12 inhibitor), followed by guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor) * Standard guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| First month DAPT | Active comparator | Drug: 30-day DAPT30-day DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor. Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines. NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily. |
| Guideline-directed therapy | Active comparator | Drug: Guideline-directed therapyStandard guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor. Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines. NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years
- Undergoing successful PCI (either ACS or elective PCI)
- History of or newly diagnosed (<72 hours after PCI/ACS) atrial fibrillation or flutter with a long-term (≥ 1 year) indication for OAC
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Contra indication to edoxaban, aspirin or all P2Y12 inhibitors
- Current indication for OAC besides atrial fibrillation/flutter (e.g. venous thromboembolism)
- <12 months after any stroke
- CHADSVASc score ≥7
- Moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis (AVA ≤1.5 cm2)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 30-day DAPTDAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) during the first 30 days following PCI. After 30 days, all patients will be treated with edoxaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor. | Drug | First month DAPT |
| Guideline-directed therapyGuideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients) | Drug | Guideline-directed therapy |
Primary outcome
Primary safety endpoint
Time frame: 6 weeks
Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Primary efficacy endpoint
Time frame: 6 weeks
Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis
11 secondary outcomes
Bleeding complications
Time frame: 6 months
Thrombotic complications
Time frame: 6 months
Net clinical benefit
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Clinical symptom severity
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
All-cause death
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Stroke
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Systemic embolism
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Major bleeding
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39007830Verburg A, Bor WL, Kucuk IT, Henriques JPS, Vink MA, Ruifrok WT, Plomp J, Heestermans TACM, Schotborgh CE, Vlaar PJ, Magro M, Rikken SAOF, van den Broek WWA, van Mieghem CAG, Cornelis K, Rosseel L, Dujardin KS, Vandeloo B, Vandendriessche T, Ferdinande B, van 't Hof AWJ, Tijssen JGP, Limbruno U, De Caterina R, Rubboli A, Angiolillo DJ, Adriaenssens T, Dewilde W, Ten Berg JM. Temporary omission of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the WOEST-3 randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2024 Jul 15;20(14):e898-e904. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00100.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Will individual participant data be available? Yes What data in particular will be shared? Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). What other documents will be available? Study Protocol, informed consent form, clinical study report When will data be available (start and end dates)? Within 1 year following article publication. End date to be determined. With whom? Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. For what types of analyses? To achieve aims in the approved proposal. By what mechanism will data be made available? Proposals should be directed to as.verburg@antoniusziekenhuis.nl. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Related trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
AI-Assisted Interpretation of Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department
Chest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jurriën M ten Berg, Prof, MD principal investigator
St. Antonius Hospital
20 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 30-day DAPT and Guideline-directed therapy in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, run by St. Antonius Hospital at 20 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in Belgium, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ashley Verburg, MD (+31 (0)88 320 0925, as.verburg@antoniusziekenhuis.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary safety endpoint (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04436978, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2023.