Healthcare-Associated PneumoniaTARPPNCT04438187
Trial of Antimicrobial Restraint in Presumed Pneumonia
A study testing antimicrobial initiation in people with Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia and Sepsis, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this cluster-randomized crossover study is to determine the effect of delaying antimicrobial initiation until objective microbiologic data is obtained in patients with presumed ICU-acquired pneumonia without septic shock. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- antimicrobial initiation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 186 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Intubated patients admitted to a surgical or trauma intensive care unit that have had an appropriate quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial sputum culture sent ≥48 hours into their ICU admission
- Primary pathology managed by surgical specialty
- Age ≥18 years.
Who cannot join
- Non-intubated patients.
- Intubated patients with concern for active infection that is not suspected to be pneumonia (i.e. intra-abdominal infection, skin and soft tissue infection, urinary tract infection, etc.)
- Primary disease not surgical or traumatic in nature
- Primary diagnosis of burns
- Incarcerated status
- Pregnant status or delivery during this hospitalization.
- On active immunosuppressive medications (or taking as a home medication prior to arrival)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The objective of this cluster-randomized crossover study is to determine the effect of delaying antimicrobial initiation until objective microbiologic data is obtained in patients with presumed ICU-acquired pneumonia without septic shock.
Read the detailed description
This study will involve 8 centers is to determine the effect of delaying antimicrobial initiation until objective microbiologic data is obtained in patients with presumed ICU-acquired pneumonia without septic shock. The study team will compare two sequential 4-month periods in each unit, one 'aggressive' antimicrobial initiation period and one 'conservative' antimicrobial initiation period.
This study will serve the following specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine feasibility of a larger multicenter study of the same design as well as assess protocol adherence across multiple centers.
Specific Aim 2: Prospectively determine the all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all patients with suspected pneumonia who were treated under either an aggressive or conservative antimicrobial initiation protocol.
Specific Aim 3: Prospectively determine antimicrobial initiation rates, total days of antimicrobial administration, hospital and ICU length of stay, and ventilator-free alive days for patients treated under each protocol.
Specific Aim 4: To survey physicians that participated in the study to assess their feelings about the study including level of comfort starting antimicrobials aggressively, level of comfort withholding antimicrobials until definitive evidence of infection, perceived protocol adherence, perceived importance of the study, and willingness to participate in other studies of its kind (to be performed after closure of the clinical portion of the study).
- Conditions
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis
- Being tested
- antimicrobial initiation
- Medical subject headings
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
antimicrobial initiationOther
antimicrobial initiation based on protocol assignment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive Arm | Other | If an intubated patient is suspected of having an ICU-acquired HAP/VAP during the aggressive period, antimicrobials should be initiated immediately after quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial cultures are sent regardless of clinical status. This will include patients who, as determined by the attending intensivist, are in sepsis or septic shock. If, after 72 hours, cultures and other clinical data do not point to a pneumonia, the antimicrobials should be stopped in the absence of another source of infection. Receives: Other: antimicrobial initiation |
| Conservative Arm | Other | If a patient is suspected of having an ICU-acquired HAP/VAP during the conservative period, quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial cultures should be sent. If the patient is in septic shock persistent hypotension requiring vasoactive medications to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm HG or persistent lactic acidosis (>2 mmol/L) despite adequate resuscitation) antimicrobials will be initiated immediately. If the patient has new onset organ dysfunction that is presumed to be due to infection (sepsis) then antimicrobials will be initiated at the discretion of the attending intensivist. In the absence of septic shock or sepsis (intensivist discretion), antimicrobials will not be initiated unless objective evidence of pneumonia is present or another documented source of infection is identified mandating treatment with antimicrobials. Receives: Other: antimicrobial initiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
protocol adherence
as a pilot study the primary outcome will be protocol adherence as defined by using the criteria below:
Aggressive Protocol:
- Failure to send appropriate culture before initiation of antimicrobials in the absence of septic shock
- Failure to stop antimicrobials in the absence of pneumonia or other documented infection after 72 hours.
Conservative Protocol:
- Failure to send appropriate culture
- Initiation of antimicrobials (in the absence of septic shock, new onset or worsening organ dysfunction, or other indicated source of infection) without any objective evidence of pneumonia.
- Failure to initiate antimicrobials in the setting of objective evidence of pneumonia.
- Failure to stop antimicrobials in the absence of other documented infection if final cultures return as negative.
Measured: by time of culture finalization or 1 week
Secondary outcomes (5)
In-hospital mortality
All-cause, by treatment protocol assignment (intent-to-treat), ICU mortality, pneumonia-related
Measured: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Days of antimicrobials administered
includes empiric, therapeutic, prophylactic, and perioperative antimicrobials
Measured: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Ventilator-free alive days
Measured: until hospital discharge or 1 year
ICU length of stay
Measured: Until discharge from ICU or 1 year
Hospital length of stay
Measured: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2021
- Primary completion6 Jan 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthcare-Associated PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Kansas Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This will be a pragmatic, before-and-after, cluster-randomized, protocol crossover study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Michigan University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christopher Guidry, Principal investigator, KU Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04438187
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 145059
- Acronym
- TARPP
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: aggregated study results
Publications
Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, Swenson B, Metzger R, Flohr TR, Politano AD, Riccio LM, Popovsky KA, Sawyer RG. Aggressive versus conservative initiation of antimicrobial treatment in critically ill surgical patients with suspected intensive-care-unit-acquired infection: a quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;12(10):774-80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70151-2. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
PubMed 22951600Barbier F, Andremont A, Wolff M, Bouadma L. Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013 May;19(3):216-28. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f27be.
PubMed 23524477Torres A, Niederman MS, Chastre J, Ewig S, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Hanberger H, Kollef M, Li Bassi G, Luna CM, Martin-Loeches I, Paiva JA, Read RC, Rigau D, Timsit JF, Welte T, Wunderink R. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax (ALAT). Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 10;50(3):1700582. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00582-2017. Print 2017 Sep.
PubMed 28890434Leonard KL, Borst GM, Davies SW, Coogan M, Waibel BH, Poulin NR, Bard MR, Goettler CE, Rinehart SM, Toschlog EA. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Trauma Patients: Different Criteria, Different Rates. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):363-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.076. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PubMed 26938612Krebs ED, Hassinger TE, Guidry CA, Berry PS, Elwood NR, Sawyer RG. Non-utility of sepsis scores for identifying infection in surgical intensive care unit patients. Am J Surg. 2019 Aug;218(2):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.044. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
PubMed 30553458Eguia E, Cobb AN, Baker MS, Joyce C, Gilbert E, Gonzalez R, Afshar M, Churpek MM. Risk factors for infection and evaluation of Sepsis-3 in patients with trauma. Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):851-857. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PubMed 30885453Anand V, Zhang Z, Kadri SS, Klompas M, Rhee C; CDC Prevention Epicenters Program. Epidemiology of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria in Undifferentiated Patients and Association With Suspected Infection and Sepsis. Chest. 2019 Aug;156(2):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
PubMed 30978329Piriyapatsom A, Lin H, Pirrone M, De Pascale G, Corona De Lapuerta J, Bittner EA, Schmidt UH, De Moya M, Berra L. Evaluation of the Infection-Related Ventilator-Associated Events Algorithm for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Surveillance in a Trauma Population. Respir Care. 2016 Mar;61(3):269-76. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04280. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
PubMed 26556896Pieracci FM, Rodil M, Haenel J, Stovall RT, Johnson JL, Burlew CC, Jurkovich GJ, Moore EE. Screening for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Institution Analysis of 1,013 Lower Respiratory Tract Cultures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Aug;16(4):368-74. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.086. Epub 2015 May 28.
PubMed 26207397Carraro E, Cook C, Evans D, Stawicki S, Postoev A, Olcese V, Phillips G, Eiferman D. Lack of added predictive value of portable chest radiography in diagnosing ventilator-associated pulmonary infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Dec;15(6):739-44. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.239.
PubMed 25314257Croce MA, Swanson JM, Magnotti LJ, Claridge JA, Weinberg JA, Wood GC, Boucher BA, Fabian TC. The futility of the clinical pulmonary infection score in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):523-7; discussion 527-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000204033.78125.1b.
PubMed 16531849Quick JA, Breite MD, Barnes SL. Inadequacy of Algorithmic Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Diagnosis in Acute Care Surgery. Am Surg. 2018 Feb 1;84(2):300-304.
PubMed 29580362Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, Napolitano LM, O'Grady NP, Bartlett JG, Carratala J, El Solh AA, Ewig S, Fey PD, File TM Jr, Restrepo MI, Roberts JA, Waterer GW, Cruse P, Knight SL, Brozek JL. Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
PubMed 27418577Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J, Gea-Banacloche J, Keh D, Marshall JC, Parker MM, Ramsay G, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, Levy MM; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):858-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000117317.18092.e4.
PubMed 15090974Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
PubMed 28098591
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Trial of Antimicrobial Restraint in Presumed Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04438187
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TARPP / 145059
- Conditions
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Michigan University
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this cluster-randomized crossover study is to determine the effect of delaying antimicrobial initiation until objective microbiologic data is obtained in patients with presumed ICU-acquired pneumonia without septic shock.
Detailed description
This study will involve 8 centers is to determine the effect of delaying antimicrobial initiation until objective microbiologic data is obtained in patients with presumed ICU-acquired pneumonia without septic shock. The study team will compare two sequential 4-month periods in each unit, one 'aggressive' antimicrobial initiation period and one 'conservative' antimicrobial initiation period.
This study will serve the following specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine feasibility of a larger multicenter study of the same design as well as assess protocol adherence across multiple centers.
Specific Aim 2: Prospectively determine the all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all patients with suspected pneumonia who were treated under either an aggressive or conservative antimicrobial initiation protocol.
Specific Aim 3: Prospectively determine antimicrobial initiation rates, total days of antimicrobial administration, hospital and ICU length of stay, and ventilator-free alive days for patients treated under each protocol.
Specific Aim 4: To survey physicians that participated in the study to assess their feelings about the study including level of comfort starting antimicrobials aggressively, level of comfort withholding antimicrobials until definitive evidence of infection, perceived protocol adherence, perceived importance of the study, and willingness to participate in other studies of its kind (to be performed after closure of the clinical portion of the study).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This will be a pragmatic, before-and-after, cluster-randomized, protocol crossover study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive Arm | Other | Other: antimicrobial initiationIf an intubated patient is suspected of having an ICU-acquired HAP/VAP during the aggressive period, antimicrobials should be initiated immediately after quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial cultures are sent regardless of clinical status. This will include patients who, as determined by the attending intensivist, are in sepsis or septic shock. If, after 72 hours, cultures and other clinical data do not point to a pneumonia, the antimicrobials should be stopped in the absence of another source of infection. |
| Conservative Arm | Other | Other: antimicrobial initiationIf a patient is suspected of having an ICU-acquired HAP/VAP during the conservative period, quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial cultures should be sent. If the patient is in septic shock persistent hypotension requiring vasoactive medications to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm HG or persistent lactic acidosis (>2 mmol/L) despite adequate resuscitation) antimicrobials will be initiated immediately. If the patient has new onset organ dysfunction that is presumed to be due to infection (sepsis) then antimicrobials will be initiated at the discretion of the attending intensivist. In the absence of septic shock or sepsis (intensivist discretion), antimicrobials will not be initiated unless objective evidence of pneumonia is present or another documented source of infection is identified mandating treatment with antimicrobials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Intubated patients admitted to a surgical or trauma intensive care unit that have had an appropriate quantitative or semi-quantitative endobronchial sputum culture sent ≥48 hours into their ICU admission
- Primary pathology managed by surgical specialty
- Age ≥18 years.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Non-intubated patients.
- Intubated patients with concern for active infection that is not suspected to be pneumonia (i.e. intra-abdominal infection, skin and soft tissue infection, urinary tract infection, etc.)
- Primary disease not surgical or traumatic in nature
- Primary diagnosis of burns
- Incarcerated status
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| antimicrobial initiationantimicrobial initiation based on protocol assignment. | Other | Aggressive Arm, Conservative Arm |
Primary outcome
protocol adherence
Time frame: by time of culture finalization or 1 week
as a pilot study the primary outcome will be protocol adherence as defined by using the criteria below: Aggressive Protocol: * Failure to send appropriate culture before initiation of antimicrobials in the absence of septic shock * Failure to stop antimicrobials in the absence of pneumonia or other documented infection after 72 hours. Conservative Protocol: * Failure to send appropriate culture * Initiation of antimicrobials (in the absence of septic shock, new onset or worsening organ dysfunction, or other indicated source of infection) without any objective evidence of pneumonia. * Failure to initiate antimicrobials in the setting of objective evidence of pneumonia. * Failure to stop antimicrobials in the absence of other documented infection if final cultures return as negative.
5 secondary outcomes
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Days of antimicrobials administered
Time frame: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Ventilator-free alive days
Time frame: until hospital discharge or 1 year
ICU length of stay
Time frame: Until discharge from ICU or 1 year
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: until hospital discharge or 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 22951600Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, Swenson B, Metzger R, Flohr TR, Politano AD, Riccio LM, Popovsky KA, Sawyer RG. Aggressive versus conservative initiation of antimicrobial treatment in critically ill surgical patients with suspected intensive-care-unit-acquired infection: a quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;12(10):774-80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70151-2. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 23524477Barbier F, Andremont A, Wolff M, Bouadma L. Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013 May;19(3):216-28. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f27be.
- Background: PubMed 28890434Torres A, Niederman MS, Chastre J, Ewig S, Fernandez-Vandellos P, Hanberger H, Kollef M, Li Bassi G, Luna CM, Martin-Loeches I, Paiva JA, Read RC, Rigau D, Timsit JF, Welte T, Wunderink R. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax (ALAT). Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 10;50(3):1700582. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00582-2017. Print 2017 Sep.
- Background: PubMed 26938612Leonard KL, Borst GM, Davies SW, Coogan M, Waibel BH, Poulin NR, Bard MR, Goettler CE, Rinehart SM, Toschlog EA. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Trauma Patients: Different Criteria, Different Rates. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):363-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.076. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 30553458Krebs ED, Hassinger TE, Guidry CA, Berry PS, Elwood NR, Sawyer RG. Non-utility of sepsis scores for identifying infection in surgical intensive care unit patients. Am J Surg. 2019 Aug;218(2):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.044. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 30885453Eguia E, Cobb AN, Baker MS, Joyce C, Gilbert E, Gonzalez R, Afshar M, Churpek MM. Risk factors for infection and evaluation of Sepsis-3 in patients with trauma. Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):851-857. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 30978329Anand V, Zhang Z, Kadri SS, Klompas M, Rhee C; CDC Prevention Epicenters Program. Epidemiology of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria in Undifferentiated Patients and Association With Suspected Infection and Sepsis. Chest. 2019 Aug;156(2):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 26556896Piriyapatsom A, Lin H, Pirrone M, De Pascale G, Corona De Lapuerta J, Bittner EA, Schmidt UH, De Moya M, Berra L. Evaluation of the Infection-Related Ventilator-Associated Events Algorithm for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Surveillance in a Trauma Population. Respir Care. 2016 Mar;61(3):269-76. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04280. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 26207397Pieracci FM, Rodil M, Haenel J, Stovall RT, Johnson JL, Burlew CC, Jurkovich GJ, Moore EE. Screening for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Institution Analysis of 1,013 Lower Respiratory Tract Cultures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Aug;16(4):368-74. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.086. Epub 2015 May 28.
- Background: PubMed 25314257Carraro E, Cook C, Evans D, Stawicki S, Postoev A, Olcese V, Phillips G, Eiferman D. Lack of added predictive value of portable chest radiography in diagnosing ventilator-associated pulmonary infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Dec;15(6):739-44. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.239.
- Background: PubMed 16531849Croce MA, Swanson JM, Magnotti LJ, Claridge JA, Weinberg JA, Wood GC, Boucher BA, Fabian TC. The futility of the clinical pulmonary infection score in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):523-7; discussion 527-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000204033.78125.1b.
- Background: PubMed 29580362Quick JA, Breite MD, Barnes SL. Inadequacy of Algorithmic Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Diagnosis in Acute Care Surgery. Am Surg. 2018 Feb 1;84(2):300-304.
- Trial of antibiotic restraint in presumed pneumonia: A Surgical Infection Society multicenter pilotLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. aggregated study results
Related trials for Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia
Multi Drug Resistant Infections, Pneumnia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Pathogens in Children With Respiratory Tract Infection by Mechanical Ventilation Using mNGS
VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 4
EaRly impAct theraPy With Ceftazidime-avibactam Via rapID Diagnostics
Blood Stream Infections, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruiting
Mobile-Based Microlearning for Improving ICU Nurses' Adherence to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Protocols
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Recruiting
Immediate Versus Substantiated Antibiotic Therapy in Suspected Non-Severe Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christopher Guidry principal investigator
KU Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing antimicrobial initiation in people with Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia and Sepsis, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
protocol adherence (time frame: by time of culture finalization or 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04438187, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2024.