PsoriasisGULLIVERNCT04439526
A Study of Guselkumab in Naive or Bio-experienced Participants With Regional (Facial and Genital) Psoriasis
An observational study of Psoriasis, run by Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. at 38 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness profile of guselkumab used in a real-life setting in participants with moderate facial and/or genital psoriasis. Effectiveness will be evaluated using the static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) for the facial region and the sPGA for the genital region. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 10 Jun 2020to 21 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Outpatients with facial and/or genital psoriasis, receiving guselkumab treatment as standard of care (SOC) in clinical practice, will be observed. The primary data source for the study will be the medical records of each participating participant.
Who may be able to join
- Participants included in the study:
- must have a first or confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis, requiring systemic treatment with significant involvement (defined as a Static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] score greater than or equal to [>=] 3) involving the facial and/or genital regions
- must have started treatment according to the approved indication as described in the current version of summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of the product approved in Italy. Enrollment may occur at any time after the first injection of guselkumab but before completion of the next visit at week 4 or 12 as scheduled according to common clinical practice
- must sign an informed consent form (ICF) allowing data collection and source data verification in accordance with local requirements
Who cannot join
- Participants will be excluded from the study if they:
- have any contraindication to the use of guselkumab, as stated in the current SmPC of the product approved in Italy
- received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days before the start of guselkumab treatment
- are currently enrolled in another clinical trial or investigational study
- are currently enrolled in an observational study sponsored or managed by a Janssen company
- participant unable to read, to write, to understand and sign the informed consent form (ICF)
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 1 country.
38 sites in 1 country
Italy38 sites
Policlinico di Bari Ospedale Giovanni XXIII
Bari, 70124
Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio
Cagliari, 09124
PO G.Rodolico, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Catania
Catania, 95123
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona
Cava de' Tirreni, 84013
Università D'Annunzio
Chieti, 66100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara
Cona, 44124
Ospedale Sant'Antonio Abate
Erice, 91016
Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze-Ospedale Piero Palagi
Florence, 50125
IRCCS Aor San Martino IST
Genova, 16132
Ospedale San Salvatore
L’Aquila, 67100
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino
Messina, 98125
AO Papardo
Messina, 98158
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
Az. Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Modena
Modena, 41124
Azienda Ospedaliera Univ.- Università Degli studi della Campania - Luigi Vanvitelli
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II
Naples, 80131
Università del Piemonte Orientale - Ospedale Maggiore della Carità di Novara
Novara, 28100
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Padova
Padova, 35128
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone
Palermo, 90127
Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
Parma, 43126
Ospedale S. Maria Della Misericordia
Perugia, 06129
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56126
Grande Ospedale Metropolitano 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Reggio Calabria
Reggio Calabria, 89124
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS
Reggio Emilia, 42123
ISG San Gallicano
Roma, 00144
AOU Policlinico Umberto I
Roma, 00161
Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata
Roma, 00167
Policinico A Gemelli
Roma, 00168
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma, 00183
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, 20089
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria
Terni, 05100
Ospedale Alfredo Fiorini
Terracina, 04019
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino, 10126
A.O. Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
Torrette Di Ancona, 60030
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S.Maria Della Misericordia
Udine, 33100
Ospedale S.S. Giovanni e Paolo
Venezia, 30122
About this study
Official title: Observational Study on GUselkumab: Effectiveness and Impact on quaLity of LIfe in naïVE or Bio Experienced Patients With Regional (Facial and Genital) Psoriasis (GULLIVER Study)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness profile of guselkumab used in a real-life setting in participants with moderate facial and/or genital psoriasis. Effectiveness will be evaluated using the static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) for the facial region and the sPGA for the genital region.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Guselkumab
- Keywords
- Facial, Genital
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis, Facies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuselkumabDrug
Also called Tremfya
Participants with moderate facial and/or genital psoriasis treated with guselkumab (as prescribed by their physician) in real world practice will be observed in this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants with Facial Psoriasis | Participants with moderate facial psoriasis who are being treated with guselkumab in real world practice will be observed in this study. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab | |
| Participants with Genital Psoriasis | Participants with moderate genital psoriasis who are being treated with guselkumab in real world practice will be observed in this study. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at Least a 2-grade Improvement for the Facial Region
The sPGA for the facial region is a physician global rating of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at Least a 2-grade Improvement for the Genital Region
The sPGA for the genital region is a physician global ratings of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (23)
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement for the Facial Region
The sPGA for the facial region is a physician global rating of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Measured: Week 12, Week 28
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement for the Genital Region
The sPGA for the genital region is a physician global rating of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Measured: Week 12, Week 28
Change from Baseline in the Dermatology Quality of life Index (DLQI) Total Score for the Facial Region
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participants' quality of life. Each question is evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life. The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 30 where 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the DLQI Total Score for the Genital Region
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participants' quality of life. Each question is evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life. The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the questions and ranges from 0 to 30 where 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score for the Facial Region
The SF-36 is a survey that measures 8 domains of health including: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional) and general mental health. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 100. Worst value is 0 and best value is 100.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 PCS Score for the Genital Region
The SF-36 is a survey that measures 8 domains of health including: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional) and general mental health. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 100. Worst value is 0 and best value is 100.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score for the Facial Region
The SF-36 is a survey that measures 8 domains of health including: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional) and general mental health. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 100. Worst value is 0 and best value is 100.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 MCS Score for the Genital Region
The SF-36 is a survey that measures 8 domains of health including: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (role-physical), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional) and general mental health. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 100. Worst value is 0 and best value is 100.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Pain/Itch/Discomfort Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores for the Facial Region
Each VAS is a patient-rated assessment designed to evaluate the intensity of pain, itch or discomfort on a linear scale of 0-100. Operationally, each VAS is represented by a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by extreme descriptors at each end, where 0 = "No Symptom" and 100 = "Worst Symptom Imaginable".
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Pain/Itch/Discomfort VAS Scores for the Genital Region
Each VAS is a patient-rated assessment designed to evaluate the intensity of pain, itch or discomfort on a linear scale of 0-100. Operationally, each VAS is represented by a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by extreme descriptors at each end, where 0 = "No Symptom" and 100 = "Worst Symptom Imaginable".
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Redness/Scaling/Thickness VAS Scores for the Facial Region
Each VAS is a patient-rated assessment designed to evaluate the intensity of redness, scaling, and thickness on a linear scale of 0-100. Operationally, each VAS is represented by a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by extreme descriptors at each end, where 0 = "No Sign" and 100 = "Worst Sign Imaginable".
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Redness/Scaling/Thickness VAS Scores for the Genital Region
Each VAS is a patient-rated assessment designed to evaluate the intensity of redness, scaling, and thickness on a linear scale of 0-100. Operationally, each VAS is represented by a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by extreme descriptors at each end, where 0 = "No Sign" and 100 = "Worst Sign Imaginable".
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement Among Participants with an Overall sPGA Score greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at baseline
The overall sPGA is defined as physician global rating of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
The PASI is a tool to assess and grade the severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In the PASI, the body is divided into four areas: the head, trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for degree of erythema, scaling and induration/thickness, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72, with higher score indicating more severe disease status. A PASI 100 response is defined as 100 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI 90 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
The PASI is a tool to assess and grade the severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In the PASI, the body is divided into four areas: the head, trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for degree of erythema, scaling and induration/thickness, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72, with higher score indicating more severe disease status. A PASI 90 response is defined as >=90% improvement in PASI score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI 75 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
The PASI is a tool to assess and grade the severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In the PASI, the body is divided into four areas: the head, trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for degree of erythema, scaling and induration/thickness, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72, with higher score indicating more severe disease status. A PASI 75 response is defined as >=75% improvement in PASI score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Mean Percent Change in PASI Score from Baseline
The PASI is a tool to assess and grade the severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In the PASI, the body is divided into four areas: the head, trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for degree of erythema, scaling and induration/thickness, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72, with higher score indicating more severe disease status. Mean percent change from baseline in PASI score will be assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Mean Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) from Baseline in Participants with BSA >10% at Baseline
BSA affected by psoriasis of <5% is considered mild psoriasis, 5-10% moderate psoriasis, and >10% severe psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute PASI Score of Less Than (<) 3 Among Participants with a PASI Score of >10 at Baseline
The PASI is a tool to assess and grade the severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In the PASI, the body is divided into four areas: the head, trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of surface area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for degree of erythema, scaling and induration/thickness, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72, with higher score indicating more severe disease status. Percentage of participants who achieve an absolute PASI score <3 will be assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)
The TSQM-9 is a 9-item generic participant-reported outcome instrument to assess participants' satisfaction with medication and covers domains of effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The instrument is scored by domain with scores ranging from 0-100, where a lower score indicates lower satisfaction.
Measured: Week 52
Persistency with Guselkumab
Persistency with treatment is defined as duration of time from initiation to last dose of therapy, as well as the percentage of participants still on treatment at the end of the observation period.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Narrative Plots at Enrollment and Week 52
Participants will be invited to fill in two narrative plots; one at the enrollment visit and one at the week 52 visit.
Measured: Baseline (at enrollment) and Week 52
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2020
- Study start10 Jun 2020
- Primary completion21 Nov 2023
- Study completion21 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen-Cilag S.p.A., Italy Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04439526
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108761
- Other IDs
- CNTO1959PSO4013
- Acronym
- GULLIVER
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observational Study on GUselkumab: Effectiveness and Impact on quaLity of LIfe in naïVE or Bio Experienced Patients With Regional (Facial and Genital) Psoriasis (GULLIVER Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04439526
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GULLIVER / CR108761
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Facial, Genital
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness profile of guselkumab used in a real-life setting in participants with moderate facial and/or genital psoriasis. Effectiveness will be evaluated using the static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) for the facial region and the sPGA for the genital region.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants with Facial Psoriasis | – | Drug: GuselkumabParticipants with moderate facial psoriasis who are being treated with guselkumab in real world practice will be observed in this study. |
| Participants with Genital Psoriasis | – | Drug: GuselkumabParticipants with moderate genital psoriasis who are being treated with guselkumab in real world practice will be observed in this study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Outpatients with facial and/or genital psoriasis, receiving guselkumab treatment as standard of care (SOC) in clinical practice, will be observed. The primary data source for the study will be the medical records of each participating participant.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- must have a first or confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis, requiring systemic treatment with significant involvement (defined as a Static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] score greater than or equal to [>=] 3) involving the facial and/or genital regions
- must have started treatment according to the approved indication as described in the current version of summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of the product approved in Italy. Enrollment may occur at any time after the first injection of guselkumab but before completion of the next visit at week 4 or 12 as scheduled according to common clinical practice
- must sign an informed consent form (ICF) allowing data collection and source data verification in accordance with local requirements
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- have any contraindication to the use of guselkumab, as stated in the current SmPC of the product approved in Italy
- received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days before the start of guselkumab treatment
- are currently enrolled in another clinical trial or investigational study
- are currently enrolled in an observational study sponsored or managed by a Janssen company
- participant unable to read, to write, to understand and sign the informed consent form (ICF)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuselkumabAlso: TremfyaParticipants with moderate facial and/or genital psoriasis treated with guselkumab (as prescribed by their physician) in real world practice will be observed in this study. | Drug | Participants with Facial Psoriasis, Participants with Genital Psoriasis |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at Least a 2-grade Improvement for the Facial Region
Time frame: Week 52
The sPGA for the facial region is a physician global rating of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at Least a 2-grade Improvement for the Genital Region
Time frame: Week 52
The sPGA for the genital region is a physician global ratings of psoriasis severity, which evaluates plaque thickness, scaling and erythema, at a given point in time. The sPGA comprises a 6-point rating scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = clear, 1 = minimal/ almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.
23 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement for the Facial Region
Time frame: Week 12, Week 28
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement for the Genital Region
Time frame: Week 12, Week 28
Change from Baseline in the Dermatology Quality of life Index (DLQI) Total Score for the Facial Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the DLQI Total Score for the Genital Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score for the Facial Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 PCS Score for the Genital Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score for the Facial Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in the SF-36 MCS Score for the Genital Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Pain/Itch/Discomfort Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores for the Facial Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Pain/Itch/Discomfort VAS Scores for the Genital Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Redness/Scaling/Thickness VAS Scores for the Facial Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Change from Baseline in Redness/Scaling/Thickness VAS Scores for the Genital Region
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at least a 2-grade Improvement Among Participants with an Overall sPGA Score greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI 90 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI 75 Response Among Participants with a PASI Score >10 at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Mean Percent Change in PASI Score from Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Mean Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) from Baseline in Participants with BSA >10% at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute PASI Score of Less Than (<) 3 Among Participants with a PASI Score of >10 at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 28, Week 52
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)
Time frame: Week 52
Persistency with Guselkumab
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Narrative Plots at Enrollment and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and Week 52
Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen-Cilag S.p.A., Italy Clinical Trial study director
Janssen-Cilag S.p.A.
38 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Psoriasis, run by Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. at 38 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and at Least a 2-grade Improvement for the Facial Region (time frame: Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2024.